1
|
Harandi H, Fallahtafti P, Karimi A, Hashemi SM, Mahalleh M, Ashouri M, Salehi MA, Hoveidaei A. Examining the immunological responses to COVID-19 vaccination in multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:411. [PMID: 38720296 PMCID: PMC11080142 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05006-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impaired immune response in multiple myeloma renders the patients vulnerable to infections, such as COVID-19, and may cause worse response to vaccines. Researchers should analyze this issue to enable the planning for special preventive measures, such as increased booster doses. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the response and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS This meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, conducting a comprehensive database search using specified keywords. Study selection involved a two-phase title/abstract and full-text screening process. Data extraction was performed by two researchers, and statistical analysis involved meta-analysis, subgroup analysis based on vaccine dosage and study time, random effects meta-regression, and heterogeneity testing using the Q test. RESULTS The meta-analysis revealed that patients with multiple myeloma (MM) had a lower likelihood of developing detectable antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination compared to healthy controls (Log odds ratio with 95% CI: -3.34 [-4.08, -2.60]). The analysis of antibody response after different doses showed consistent lower seropositivity in MM patients (after first dose: -2.09, [-3.49, -0.69], second: -3.80, 95%CI [-4.71, -3.01], a booster dose: -3.03, [-5.91, -0.15]). However, there was no significant difference in the mean level of anti-S antibodies between MM patients and controls (Cohen's d -0.72, [-1.86, 0.43]). Evaluation of T-cell responses indicated diminished T-cell-mediated immunity in MM patients compared to controls. Seven studies reported clinical response, with breakthrough infections observed in vaccinated MM patients. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the impaired humoral and cellular immune responses in MM patients after COVID-19 vaccination, suggesting the need for further investigation and potential interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Harandi
- Research Center for Antibiotic Stewardship and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parisa Fallahtafti
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Tehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirali Karimi
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | | | - Mehrdad Mahalleh
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Rheumatology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Moein Ashouri
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Armin Hoveidaei
- Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Takagi E, Terakura S, Fujigaki H, Okamoto A, Miyao K, Sawa M, Morishita T, Goto T, Ozawa Y, Nishida T, Fukushima N, Ozeki K, Hanajiri R, Saito K, Murata M, Tomita A, Kiyoi H. Antibody response after third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients is comparable to that in healthy counterparts. Int J Hematol 2023; 118:462-471. [PMID: 37561340 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-023-03648-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
To determine the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients, we measured antibody titer serially in 92 allo-HSCT patients. Among the evaluable 87 patients, median age at vaccination was 53 years (range, 18-75). The average time between allo-HSCT and vaccination was 3.3 years (range, 0.5-15.7). One month after the second dose, 70 patients (80.5%) had a positive response, whereas 17 patients (19.5%) had a negative response (< 20 U/mL). Only patients older than 44 years had a negative response. Low IgM level was the only significant predictor of vaccine failure in elderly patients. When antibody response before and after the third vaccination was examined in 47 patients, antibodies increased significantly from a median of 18.3 U/mL to 312.6 U/mL (P < 0.01). The median antibody titer after the third vaccination of healthy individuals (n = 203) was 426.4 U/mL, which was comparable to that of patients (P = 0.2). The antibody titer after the third mRNA vaccination increased even in patients whose first two mRNA vaccinations failed. These findings suggest that allo-HSCT recipients should receive the mRNA vaccine regularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erina Takagi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan
| | - Seitaro Terakura
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
| | - Hidetsugu Fujigaki
- Department of Advanced Diagnostic System Development, Fujita Health University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Akinao Okamoto
- Department of Hematology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Kotaro Miyao
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - Masashi Sawa
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - Takanobu Morishita
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Goto
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukiyasu Ozawa
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Nishida
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Fukushima
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, JA Aichi Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Ozeki
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, JA Aichi Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan
| | - Ryo Hanajiri
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Saito
- Department of Advanced Diagnostic System Development, Fujita Health University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Makoto Murata
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan
| | - Akihiro Tomita
- Department of Hematology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Kiyoi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Faizan U, Nair LG, Bou Zerdan M, Jaberi-Douraki M, Anwer F, Raza S. COVID-19 vaccine immune response in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia: a systematic review. Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother 2023; 11:25151355231190497. [PMID: 37645011 PMCID: PMC10461737 DOI: 10.1177/25151355231190497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with plasma cell dyscrasia are at a higher risk of developing a severe Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) infection. Here we present a systematic review of clinical studies focusing on the immune response to the COVID-19 vaccination in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia and to utilize the results to improve day-to-day practice. Design Systematic Review. Methods Online databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid, and Cochrane) were searched following the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Only articles published in the English language were included. Out of 59 studies, nine articles (seven prospective and two retrospective studies) were included in this systematic review. Abstracts, case reports, and case series were excluded. Results In all nine studies (N = 1429), seroconversion post-vaccination was the primary endpoint. Patients with plasma cell disorders had a lower seroconversion rate compared to healthy vaccinated individuals and the overall percentage of seroconversion ranged between 23% and 95.5%. Among patients on active therapy, lower seroconversion rates were seen on an anti-CD38 agent, ranging from 6.5 up to 100%. In addition, a significantly lower percentage was recorded in older patients, especially in those aged equal to or greater than 65 years and those who have been treated with multiple therapies previously. Only one study reported a statistically significant better humoral response rate with the mRNA vaccine compared to ADZ1222/Ad26.Cov.S. Conclusion Variable seropositive rates are seen in patients with plasma cell dyscrasia. Lower rates are reported in patients on active therapy, anti-CD38 therapy, and elderly patients. Hence, we propose patients with plasma cell dyscrasias should receive periodic boosters to maintain clinically significant levels of antibodies against COVID-19. Registration PROSPERO ID: CRD42023404989.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Unaiza Faizan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, 65 Onondaga Road, Apt B, Rochester, NY 14621, USA
| | - Lakshmi G. Nair
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Maroun Bou Zerdan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Suny Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Faiz Anwer
- Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shahzad Raza
- Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Terpos E, Musto P, Engelhardt M, Delforge M, Cook G, Gay F, van de Donk NWCJ, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Vangsted AJ, Driessen C, Schjesvold F, Cerchione C, Zweegman S, Hajek R, Moreau P, Einsele H, San-Miguel J, Boccadoro M, Dimopoulos MA, Sonneveld P, Ludwig H. Management of patients with multiple myeloma and COVID-19 in the post pandemic era: a consensus paper from the European Myeloma Network (EMN). Leukemia 2023:10.1038/s41375-023-01920-1. [PMID: 37142661 PMCID: PMC10157596 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-01920-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
In the post-pandemic COVID-19 period, human activities have returned to normal and COVID-19 cases are usually mild. However, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) present an increased risk for breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalization and death. The European Myeloma Network has provided an expert consensus to guide patient management in this era. Vaccination with variant-specific booster vaccines, such as the bivalent vaccine for the ancestral Wuhan strain and the Omicron BA.4/5 strains, is essential as novel strains emerge and become dominant in the community. Boosters should be administered every 6-12 months after the last vaccine shot or documented COVID-19 infection (hybrid immunity). Booster shots seem to overcome the negative effect of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies on humoral responses; however, anti-BCMA treatment remains an adverse predictive factor for humoral immune response. Evaluation of the immune response after vaccination may identify a particularly vulnerable subset of patients who may need additional boosters, prophylactic therapies and prevention measures. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab is not effective against the new dominant variants and thus is no longer recommended. Oral antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir) and remdesivir are effective against Omicron subvariants BA.2.12.1, BA.4, BA.5, BQ.1.1 and/or XBB.1.5 and should be administered in MM patients at the time of a positive COVID-19 test or within 5 days post symptoms onset. Convalescent plasma seems to have low value in the post-pandemic era. Prevention measures during SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, including mask wearing and avoiding crowded places, seem prudent to continue for MM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Pellegrino Musto
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, "Aldo Moro" University School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
- Unit of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, AOUC Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - Monika Engelhardt
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Interdisciplinary Cancer Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michel Delforge
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gordon Cook
- CRUK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trial Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Francesca Gay
- Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Niels W C J van de Donk
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Annette Juul Vangsted
- Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoph Driessen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Fredrik Schjesvold
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B-Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claudio Cerchione
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Hajek
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Philippe Moreau
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jesus San-Miguel
- Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mario Boccadoro
- Division of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heinz Ludwig
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, First Department of Medicine, Center for Oncology, Hematology, and Palliative Care, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Uaprasert N, Pitakkitnukun P, Tangcheewinsirikul N, Chiasakul T, Rojnuckarin P. Immunogenicity and risks associated with impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and booster in hematologic malignancy patients: an updated meta-analysis. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:173. [PMID: 36550105 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00776-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) have demonstrated impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Factors associated with poor immunogenicity remain largely undetermined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and medRxiv databases to identify studies that reported humoral or cellular immune responses (CIR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The primary aim was to estimate the seroconversion rate (SR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination across various subtypes of HM diseases and treatments. The secondary aims were to determine the rates of development of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and CIR following complete vaccination and SR following booster doses. A total of 170 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis of primary and secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis of 150 studies including 20,922 HM patients revealed a pooled SR following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8-70.4%; I2 = 94%). Meta-regression analysis showed that patients with lymphoid malignancies, but not myeloid malignancies, had lower seroconversion rates than those with solid cancers (R2 = 0.52, P < 0.0001). Patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART), B-cell targeted therapies or JAK inhibitors were associated with poor seroconversion (R2 = 0.39, P < 0.0001). The pooled NAb and CIR rates were 52.8% (95% CI; 45.8-59.7%, I2 = 87%) and 66.6% (95% CI, 57.1-74.9%; I2 = 86%), respectively. Approximately 20.9% (95% CI, 11.4-35.1%, I2 = 90%) of HM patients failed to elicit humoral and cellular immunity. Among non-seroconverted patients after primary vaccination, only 40.5% (95% CI, 33.0-48.4%; I2 = 87%) mounted seroconversion after the booster. In conclusion, HM patients, especially those with lymphoid malignancies and/or receiving CART, B-cell targeted therapies, or JAK inhibitors, showed poor SR after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A minority of patients attained seroconversion after booster vaccination. Strategies to improve immune response in these severely immunosuppressed patients are needed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chung A, Banbury B, Vignali M, Huang CY, Asoori S, Johnson R, Kurtz T, Arora S, Wong SW, Shah N, Martin TG, Wolf JL. Antibody and T-cell responses by ultra-deep T-cell receptor immunosequencing after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. Br J Haematol 2022; 199:520-528. [PMID: 36041779 PMCID: PMC9538250 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We investigated antibody and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19)‐specific T‐cell mediated responses via ultra‐deep immunosequencing of the T‐cell receptor (TCR) repertoire in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD). We identified 364 patients with PCD who underwent spike antibody testing using commercially available spike‐receptor binding domain immunoglobulin G antibodies ≥2 weeks after completion of the initial two doses of mRNA vaccines or one dose of JNJ‐78436735. A total of 56 patients underwent TCR immunosequencing after vaccination. Overall, 86% tested within 6 months of vaccination had detectable spike antibodies. Increasing age, use of anti‐CD38 or anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen therapy, and receipt of BNT162b2 (vs. mRNA‐1273) were associated with lower antibody titres. We observed an increased proportion of TCRs associated with surface glycoprotein regions of the COVID‐19 genome after vaccination, consistent with spike‐specific T‐cell responses. The median spike‐specific T‐cell breadth was 3.11 × 10−5, comparable to those in healthy populations after vaccination. Although spike‐specific T‐cell breadth correlated with antibody titres, patients without antibody responses also demonstrated spike‐specific T‐cell responses. Patients receiving mRNA‐1273 had higher median spike‐specific T‐cell breadth than those receiving BNT162b2 (p = 0.01). Although patients with PCD are often immunocompromised due to underlying disease and treatments, COVID‐19 vaccination can still elicit humoral and T‐cell responses and remain an important intervention in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfred Chung
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - Chiung-Yu Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sireesha Asoori
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rachel Johnson
- American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, St. Maarten
| | - Theodore Kurtz
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shagun Arora
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sandy W Wong
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nina Shah
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Thomas G Martin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Wolf
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|