Outcomes of salvage haploidentical transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide for graft failure following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Salvage HLA-haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Using Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide for Recurrent Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis-associated Graft Failure after Cord Blood Transplantations: A Case Report

We describe a case of immunological rejection occurring twice after cord blood transplantation (CBT) for mixed phenotype blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia that was successfully salvaged by haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Pre-engraftment immune reaction (PIR) and subsequent hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), likely due to HLA mismatch in the graft-versus-host (GVH) direction, lead to poor graft function (PGF) and graft failure (GF). This case highlights the pathophysiology of PIR, HLH, PGF, and GF, collectively termed "post-transplant cytokine syndrome." PT-Cy haplo-PBSCT, with wide donor availability and reduced infection risk leading to HLH via rapid engraftment, may be a suitable salvage option for post-CBT cytokine syndrome-related GF.

CD34-selected stem cell boost was an effective treatment for refractory poor hematopoietic reconstitution after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Poor hematopoietic reconstitution (PHR), especially poor graft function (PGF) and prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PT), is a life-threatening complication after allo- hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Currently, almost no studies have analyzed CD34+-selected stem cells "boost" (SCB) after haplo-HSCT. Hence, in this study, we focused specifically on refractory PHR after haplo-HSCT.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of donor- CD34+ SCB for the treatment of refractory PHR after haplo-HSCT.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-seven patients with refractory PHR who received a donor-CD34+ selected SCB at Peking University People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients' hematopoietic response, incidence of graft-versus-host disease, and survival after CD34+ cell boost were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among the 27 patients with refractory PHR who received a CD34+ SCB, five patients (18.5%) were diagnosed with primary PGF, 17 patients (63%) were diagnosed with secondary PGF, and five patients (18.5%) were diagnosed with PT. The median time to PHR diagnosis was 63 days (range: 42-330 days), and the median time to the donor CD34+ boost was 456 days (range: 58-853 days). The median number of infused CD34+ cells was 2.589 × 106/kg (range: 0.738-16.8 × 106/kg). Among the 27 patients, 15 achieved hematologic response (55.56%). Among the responders, the median time of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) response was 15 days (range: 10-158 days), and the median time of erythroid reconstitution was 18 days (range: 7-158 days). The platelet reconstitution time was 22 days (range: 7-171 days). Patients with acute infection during CD34+ SCB were noted to have a worse hematologic response (1/15 vs. 5/12, P = 0.03). The mortality rate significantly differed between patients who achieved complete hematologic response and those who did not (100% vs. 33.3%, respectively; P < 00.001). Infections were the leading cause of death (n = 5/8, 62.5%).

CONCLUSION

CD34+-selected SCB is a potentially effective treatment for refractory PHR after haploidentical HSCT.

Salvage haploidentical transplantation for graft failure after first haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation: an updated experience

Graft failure is a fatal complication following allogeneic stem cell transplantation where a second transplantation is usually required for salvage. However, there are no recommended regimens for second transplantations for graft failure, especially in the haploidentical transplant setting. We recently reported encouraging outcomes using a novel method (haploidentical transplantation from a different donor after conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide). Herein, we report updated outcomes in 30 patients using this method. The median time of the second transplantation was 96.5 (33-215) days after the first transplantation. Except for one patient who died at +19d and before engraftment, neutrophil engraftments were achieved in all patients at 11 (8-24) days, while platelet engraftments were achieved in 22 (75.8%) patients at 17.5 (9-140) days. The 1-year OS and DFS were 60% and 53.3%, and CIR and TRM was 6.7% and 33.3%, respectively. Compared with the historical group, neutrophil engraftment (100% versus 58.5%, p < 0.001) and platelet engraftment (75.8% versus 32.3%, p < 0.001) were better in the novel regimen group, and OS was also improved (60.0% versus 26.4%, p = 0.011). In conclusion, salvage haploidentical transplantation from a different donor using the novel regimen represents a promising option to rescue patients with graft failure after the first haploidentical transplantation.

Prospects and Potential for Chimerism Analysis after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Chimerism analysis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation serves to confirm engraftment, indicate relapse of hematologic malignancy, and attribute graft failure to either immune rejection or poor graft function. Short tandem repeat PCR (STR-PCR) is the prevailing method, followed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), with detection limits of 1-5% and 0.1%, respectively. Chimerism assays using digital PCR or next-generation sequencing, both of which are more sensitive than STR-PCR, are increasingly used. Stable mixed chimerism is usually not associated with poor outcomes in non-malignant diseases, but recipient chimerism may foretell relapse of hematologic malignancies, so higher detection sensitivity may be beneficial in such cases. Thus, the need for and the type of intervention, e.g., immunosuppression regimen, donor lymphocyte infusion, and/or salvage second transplantation, should be guided by donor chimerism in the context of the feature and/or residual malignant cells of the disease to be treated.

Impacts of Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide Dose on Graft-versus-Leukemia Effects via HLA-B Leader in HLA-Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The graft-versus-leukemia effect of HLA-B leader dimorphism, i.e., methionine (M) or threonine (T) at position -21 of the leader sequence, has been observed in HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo). However, the biological mechanism has been unclear, and the contributions of HLA-B leader genotype to risk reduction of relapse might be dependent on posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) doses.

METHODS

To investigate whether the effect of HLA-B leader dimorphism was modified by the PTCy dose, we retrospectively analyzed 99 patients who received PTCy-haplo.

RESULTS

In the low-dose PTCy group, the patient M+ HLA-B leader genotype did not significantly affect the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) but negatively impacted the overall survival (OS) compared to the M- genotype. In contrast, in the high-dose PTCy group, patients with the M+ genotype had a decreased CIR, but no significant difference in the OS was observed between patients with the M+ and M- genotypes. Regardless of PTCy doses, the patient M+ genotype had detrimental effects on nonrelapse mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the effect of the patient HLA-B leader genotype is modified by the PTCy dose, providing immunological insight into the PTCy dosage and supporting further studies to investigate the underlying mechanisms.

Long-term outcome of second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT2) for primary graft failure in patients with acute leukemia in remission: A study on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Second transplantation (HSCT2) is a potential treatment for primary graft failure (pGF). We assessed the outcome of HSCT2, performed between 2000 and 2021, for pGF in 243 patients with acute leukemia. Median age was 44.8 years. Conditioning at first HSCT (HSCT1) was myeloablative (MAC) in 58.4%. Median time from HSCT1 to HSCT2 was 48 days. Donors for HSCT2 were the same as for HSCT1 in 49%. Engraftment post HSCT2 was achieved by 73.7% of patients. The incidence of acute (a) graft versus host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV and III-IV was 23.2 and 8.1%. 5-year total and extensive chronic (c) GVHD was 22.3 and 10.1%. 5-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and GVHD free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 51.6, 18.8, 29.6, 30.7 and 22.4%, respectively. Infections were the main cause of death. In multivariable analysis, being transplanted at second vs. first remission, lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS; <90) and receiving MAC at HSCT1 were adverse prognostic factors for NRM, LFS, OS, and GRFS, as was increased age for NRM, LFS, OS. We conclude that HSCT2 can rescue about a third of the patients who experienced pGF, but NRM is as high as 50%.

Outcomes of graft failure after umbilical cord blood transplantation in acute leukemia: a study from Eurocord and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Graft failure has remained a limitation of umbilical cord blood transplantation (CBT). Here, we assessed the outcomes of patients who experienced graft failure after CBT. Inclusion criteria were patients (age ≥ 18 years) experiencing graft failure after unrelated CBT (single or double) between 2005 and 2016, for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), no prior allogeneic or autologous transplantation, no other stem cell product. The study included 87 patients. At 1-year, cumulative incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 35% and 37%, respectively. One-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 40% and 29%, respectively. Forty-six patients underwent a salvage second transplantation with 1-year and 2-year OS and PFS from second transplantation 41% and 34% for OS, and 37% and 34% for PFS, respectively. In multivariate analysis, complete remission (CR) at CBT (HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.83, P = 0.01) and reduced-intensity conditioning (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.91, P = 0.023) were associated with better OS. In conclusion, in this retrospective study, we observed that approximately one-quarter of patients experiencing graft failure after CBT remained alive without relapse 2 years later.

CD3+TCRαβ/CD19+ depleted mismatched family or unrelated donor salvage stem cell transplantation for graft dysfunction in inborn errors of immunity

BACKGROUND

A minority of children experience significant graft dysfunction after an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for inborn errors of immunity (IEI). The optimal approach to salvage HSCT is unclear with respect to conditioning regimen and stem cell source. This single-centre retrospective case series reports the outcomes of salvage CD3+TCRαβ/CD19 depleted mismatched family or unrelated donor stem cell transplantation (TCRαβ-SCT) between 2013 - 2022 for graft dysfunction in 12 children with IEI.

OBJECTIVES

Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-free and event-free survival (GEFS), toxicities, GvHD, viremia and long-term graft function.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective audit of patients who underwent second CD3+TCRαβ/CD19 depleted mismatched donor graft using Treosulfan-based reduced toxicity myeloablative conditioning.

RESULTS

Median age at first HSCT was 8.76 months (range, 2.5 months - 6 years) and at second TCRαβ-SCT was 3.6 years (1.2 - 11 years). Median interval between first and second HSCT was 1.7 years (3 months - 9 years). The primary diagnoses were: severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) (n=5) and non-SCID IEI (n=7). The indications for second HSCT were: primary aplasia (n=1), secondary autologous reconstitution (n=6), refractory aGVHD (n=3) and secondary leukemia (n=1). Donors were either haploidentical parental donors (n=10) or mismatched unrelated donors (n=2). All received TCRαβ/CD19-depleted-PBSC with a median CD34+ cell dose of 9.3 × 10⁶/kg (2.8-32.3 × 10⁶/kg) and a median TCRαβ+ cell dose of 4 × 10⁴/kg (1.3-19.2 × 10⁴/kg). All engrafted with median days to neutrophil and platelet recovery of 15 (12-24) and 12 (9-19). One developed secondary aplasia and one had secondary autologous reconstitution, but both underwent a successful third HSCT. Four (33%) had grade II aGvHD and none had grade III-IV aGvHD. None had cGvHD but one developed extensive cutaneous cGVHD after third HSCT using PBSC and ATG. Nine (75%) were noted to have at least one episode of blood viremia with HHV6 (n=6, 50%), adenovirus (n=6, 50%), EBV (n=3, 25%) or CMV (n=3; 25%). Median duration of follow-up was 2.3 years (range: 0.5 - 10 years) and the 2-year OS, EFS and GEFS were 100% (95% confidence interval, 0-100%), 73% (37-90%) and 73% (37%-90%) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TCRαβ-SCT from mismatched family or unrelated donors, using a chemotherapy only regimen, is a safe alternative donor salvage transplant strategy for second HSCT in patients without a suitably matched donor.