Decreased imaging time of amyloid PET using [18F]florbetapir can maintain quantitative accuracy

Ultra-fast [18F]florbetapir PET imaging using the uMI Panorama PET/CT system

BACKGROUND

There is a need for faster amyloid PET scans to reduce patients' discomfort, minimize movement artifacts, and increase throughput. The recently introduced uMI Panorama PET/CT system featuring enhanced spatial resolution and sub-200ps TOF offers the potential for shorter scan duration without sacrificing image quality or efficacy to detect Aβ deposition. The study aims to establish a faster acquisition protocol for [18F]florbetapir PET imaging using digital PET/CT scanner uMI Panorama, while ensuring adequate image quality and amyloid-β (Aβ) detectability comparable to the standard 10-minute scan.

METHODS

Thirty-eight participants (29 Aβ positive and 9 Aβ negative) from a prospective dementia cohort at Peking Union Medical University Hospital underwent routine [18F]florbetapir PET scans using the uMI Panorama PET/CT scanner and a T1-weighted brain MRI scan. List-mode PET data were reconstructed into durations of 10 min, 2 min, 1 min, 45 s, and 30 s (G10min, G2min, G1min, G45s, G30s). Two trained nuclear medicine physicians independently evaluated the image quality using a 5-point scale and provided binary diagnosis. Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) of the composite cortex (frontal, lateral parietal, lateral temporal, and cingulate cortices) were calculated to discriminate Aβ status and coefficient of variation assessed objective image quality. Comparisons of image quality and Aβ detectability between various fast scan groups and G10min group were conducted.

RESULTS

The subjective image quality evaluation and Aβ detectability results from the two physicians showed both good intra-reader and inter-reader agreements (Cohen's kappa coefficient: 0.759-1.000). The subjective and objective image qualities of the G2min scans were comparable to the G10min scans, whereas adequate image quality was achieved with the G1min and G45s scans (5-point score ≥ 3). Subjective visual diagnosis by two physicians yielded consistent accuracy for G10min, G2min, and G1min groups, but lower specificity for G45s and G30s groups. The objective detection of Aβ status by cortex SUVr across all scan durations maintained perfect discriminatory efficiency and relatively high effect size (Hedge's G: 2.48-2.54).

CONCLUSIONS

A 1-min ultra-fast scan is feasible for [18F]florbetapir PET imaging using uMI Panorama PET/CT, while maintaining adequate image quality and Aβ diagnostic efficiency.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05023564. Registered September 2022 https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT05023564 .

What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Protection against occupational radiation exposure in clinical settings is important. This paper clarifies the present status of medical occupational exposure protection and possible additional safety measures. Radiation injuries, such as cataracts, have been reported in physicians and staff who perform interventional radiology (IVR), thus, it is important that they use shielding devices (e.g., lead glasses and ceiling-suspended shields). Currently, there is no single perfect radiation shield; combinations of radiation shields are required. Radiological medical workers must be appropriately educated in terms of reducing radiation exposure among both patients and staff. They also need to be aware of the various methods available for estimating/reducing patient dose and occupational exposure. When the optimizing the dose to the patient, such as eliminating a patient dose that is higher than necessary, is applied, exposure of radiological medical workers also decreases without any loss of diagnostic benefit. Thus, decreasing the patient dose also reduces occupational exposure. We propose a novel four-point policy for protecting medical staff from radiation: patient dose Optimization, Distance, Shielding, and Time (pdO-DST). Patient dose optimization means that the patient never receives a higher dose than is necessary, which also reduces the dose received by the staff. The patient dose must be optimized: shielding is critical, but it is only one component of protection from radiation used in medical procedures. Here, we review the radiation protection/reduction basics for radiological medical workers, especially for IVR staff.