Entire-volume serial histological examination for detection of micrometastases in lymph nodes of colorectal cancers

Clinical Significance of Lymph Node Micrometastasis in pN0 Gastric Cancer Patients

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between lymph node micrometastasis (LNMM) and clinicopathological factors and to evaluate the prognostic effects of LNMM in pN0 gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Methods

One hundred and seventy-two GC patients who received radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled in the present study. 1371 negative lymph nodes from level 2 station confirmed by pathology were examined. The LNMM was diagnosed by telomeric repeat amplification protocol/enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TRAP-ELISA). The relationship between clinicopathological factors and LNMM was investigated by multivariate analysis. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of LNMM on prognosis.

Results

LNMM was detected in 423 lymph nodes from 72 patients. The results showed that invasion depth (OR = 3.755, P = 0.004), TNM staging (OR = 3.152, P = 0.002), lymphatic invasion (OR = 2.178, P = 0.009), and tumor differentiation (OR = 1.266, P = 0.013) were independent risk factors associated with LNMM. Survival analysis showed that patients with LNMM had significantly worse 5-year survival compared with those without LNMM (42% vs. 76.4%, P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LNMM, tumor size, Lauren type, invasion depth, and lymphatic invasion (P < 0.05) were independently factors associated with 5-year survival.

Conclusions

The findings showed that tumor invasion depth, TNM staging, lymphatic invasion, and tumor differentiation were independent risk factors associated with LNMM occurrence. Moreover, LNMM is a clinically negative prognostic factor in pN0 GC patients.

Intraoperative Detection of Micrometastases in Whole Excised Lymph Nodes Using Fluorescent Paired-Agent Imaging Principles: Identification of a Suitable Staining and Rinsing Protocol

PURPOSE

Correctly identifying nodal status is recognized as a critical prognostic factor in many cancer types and is essential to guide adjuvant treatment. Currently, surgical removal of lymph nodes followed by pathological examination is commonly performed as a standard-of-care to detect node metastases. However, conventional pathology protocols are time-consuming, yet less than 1 % of lymph node volumes are examined, resulting in a 30-60 % rate of missed micrometastases (0.2-2 mm in size).

PROCEDURES

This study presents a method to fluorescently stain excised lymph nodes using paired-agent molecular imaging principles, which entail co-administration of a molecular-targeted imaging agent with a suitable control (untargeted) agent, whereby any nonspecific retention of the targeted agent is accounted for by the signal from the control agent. Specifically, it was demonstrated that by dual-needle continuous infusion of either an antibody-based imaging agent pair (epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted agent: IRDye-800CW labeled Cetuximab; control agent: IRDye-700DX-IgG) or an Affibody-based pair (EGFR targeted Affibody® agent: ABY-029; control agent IRDYe-700DX carboxylate) at 0.3 ml/min.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated the possibility to achieve >99 % sensitivity and > 95 % specificity for detection of a single micrometastasis (~0.2 mm diameter) in a whole lymph node within 22 min of tissue processing time.

CONCLUSION

The detection capabilities offer substantial improvements over existing intraoperative lymph node biopsy methods (e.g., frozen pathology has a micrometastasis sensitivity <20 %).

Impact of multisection and immunohistochemistry in lymph node staging of Gastric Carcinoma - Case series

Gastric carcinoma (GC) locoregional recurrence may occur even in cases where the tumor has been completely resected, possibly due to lymph node (LN) micrometastases. It is estimated that in 10% to 30% of cases, LN micrometastases are not detected by a conventional method for histological assessment of LN metastases with hematoxylin-eosin (HE). A cross-sectional study assessed 51 patients with GC by histological evaluation of the LN micrometastases through LN multi sectioning associated with immunohistochemistry analysis with monoclonal antibodies AE1 and AE3. Total gastrectomy was performed in 51% of patients. The total number of resected LN nodes was 1698, with a mean number of resected LN of 33.3 ± 13.2 per surgical specimen, of which 187 had metastasis. After the application of LN multisection and immunohistochemistry, LN micrometastases were found in 45.1% of the cases. LN staging changed in 29.4%, and tumor staging changed in 23.5% of the cases. In patients initially staged as pN0, LN staging and tumor staging changed, both in 19.2% of the cases. In patients initially staged as pN1 or more, LN staging changed in 40.0% of them, and tumor staging changed in 28.0% of the cases. The accuracy of HE for the histological staging of LN tumoral involvement was 76%, which was considered insufficient for CG patients staging. Investigation of LN micrometastasis through LN multisection and immunohistochemistry should be performed, particularly in cases where the presence of blood and lymphatic vessel invasion has been identified after conventional histological analysis, as well as in patients with advanced GC.

Significant function and research progress of biomarkers in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common gastrointestinal tumor types, and the incidence and mortality rates are higher in men compared with women. Various studies have revealed that gastric cancer is a spectrum of tumor types, which have biological and genetic diversity. It has proven to be difficult to improve the overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with gastric cancer through the use of traditional surgery and chemoradiation, as gastric cancer is usually identified at an advanced stage. In consequence, the outcome is frequently poor. Thus, novel biomarkers and anticancer targets are required to improve the outcome. As the identification of biomarkers has increased due to advances in research and the greater availability of bioinformatics and functional genomics, the potential therapeutic regimens available have also increased concurrently. These advances have also improved the ability to predict responses to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, whilst other biomarkers predict post-treatment survival and recurrence based on their expression. This review focuses closely on the important functions of biomarkers in the timely diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, in addition to the advances in the study of certain novel markers in gastric cancer.

Current status of lymph node micrometastasis in gastric cancer

Lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer. An inadequate number of dissected lymph nodes is an independent risk factor affecting recurrence, even in patients who are node negative. Oddly, certain early-stage patients still experience recurrence or metastasis within a short time, even if they have undergone standard radical mastectomy. Many researchers have attributed these adverse events to lymph node micrometastasis (LNM), which is defined as a microscopic deposit of malignant cells of less than 2 mm in diameter. With the development of diagnostic tools such as immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, the rate of detection of LNM has been constantly increasing. Although there is no clear consensus about risk factors for or the definitive clinical significance of LNM, the clinical impact of LNM is remarkable in gastric cancer. For minimally invasive treatment in particular, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic surgery, accurate diagnosis of LNM is regarded as the potential key to maintaining the balance between curability and safety. This review provides an overview of the definition, detection and significance of LNM in gastric cancer. We also summarize several attention-drawing controversies regarding the treatment of patients who may have LNM.

Sentinel Node Mapping Using a Fluorescent Dye and Visible Light During Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: Result of a Prospective Study From a Single Institute

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of sentinel node mapping using a fluorescent dye and visible light in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND

Recently, fluorescent imaging technology offers improved visibility with the possibility of better sensitivity or accuracy in sentinel node mapping.

METHODS

Twenty patients with early gastric cancer, for whom laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with standard lymphadenectomy had been planned, were enrolled in this study. Before lymphadenectomy, the patients received a gastrofiberoscopic peritumoral injection of fluorescein solution. The sentinel basin was investigated via laparoscopic fluorescent imaging under blue light (wavelength of 440-490 nm) emitted from an LED curing light. The detection rate and lymph node status were analyzed in the enrolled patients. In addition, short-term clinical outcomes were also investigated.

RESULTS

No hypersensitivity to the dye was identified in any enrolled patients. Sentinel nodes were detected in 19 of 20 enrolled patients (95.0%), and metastatic lymph nodes were found in 2 patients. The latter lymph nodes belonged to the sentinel basin of each patient. Meanwhile, 1 patient (5.0%) experienced a postoperative complication that was unrelated to sentinel node mapping. No mortality was recorded among enrolled cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel node mapping with visible light fluorescence was a feasible method for visualizing sentinel nodes in patients with early gastric cancer. In addition, this method is advantageous in terms of visualizing the concrete relationship between the sentinel nodes and surrounding structures.

Current status and scope of lymph node micrometastasis in gastric cancer

Recently, lymph node micrometastasis has been evaluated for its prognostic value in gastric cancer. Lymph node micrometastasis cannot be detected via a usual pathologic examination, but it can be detected by using some other techniques including immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. With the development of such diagnostic techniques, the detection rate of lymph node micrometastasis is constantly increasing. Although the prognostic value of lymph node micrometastasis remains debatable, its clinical impact is apparently remarkable in both early and advanced gastric cancer. At present, studies on the prognostic value of lymph node micrometastasis are evolving to overcome its current limitations and extend the scope of its application.

Gastric carcinoma: stage migration by immunohistochemically detected lymph node micrometastases

BACKGROUND

Immunohistochemically detected micrometastases of the regional lymph nodes in previously pN0-classified gastric cancer have been incorporated in the TNM staging system. This study aims to determine the incidence of such micrometastases in gastric carcinoma and to investigate their impact on stage grouping and prognosis.

METHODS

Ninety-five patients with gastric carcinoma classified as pN0 by conventional histological examination were enrolled. All patients underwent gastric resection with regional lymphadenectomy between 2006 and 2010. A total of 2018 lymph nodes was obtained (median, 20 Lymph nodes) and immunohistostained with anti-pan cytokeratin antibody (KL1).

RESULTS

Micrometastases were detected in regional lymph nodes by immunohistostaining in 16 out of all 95 patients. Fourteen patients were upstaged by micrometastasis-positive regional lymph nodes. Three patients demonstrated lymph nodes with isolated tumor cells alone. A significantly higher incidence of micrometastases was observed in patients with diffuse histologic type (p = 0.007) and total gastrectomy (p = 0.007). When isolated tumor cells were also regarded as lymph node involvement, the recurrence rate was significantly higher for node-positive than for node-negative patients and for those younger than 70 years (33.3 and 6.7 %, respectively; p = 0.026; n = 39). Overall survival analysis revealed no significant difference between micrometastasis-positive and micrometastasis-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistostaining of regional lymph nodes in node-negative gastric carcinoma patients leads to an increased detection of micrometastases with significant implications for the staging system. Although no impact on survival time was shown, the higher recurrence rate for node-positive patients younger than 70 years indicates a prognostic value of immunohistochemically detectable micrometastases.

Should lymph node micrometastasis be considered in node staging for gastric cancer?: the significance of lymph node micrometastasis in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

In TNM staging system, lymph node staging is based on the number of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer and micrometastasis is not considered. Several reports proposed the importance of lymph node micrometastasis as the causative factor for recurrence and poor survival, but it remains controversial among researchers.

METHODS

A total of 482 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection from 2004 to 2010 at Korea University Medical Center Ansan Hospital, South Korea were prospectively enrolled. For detecting lymph node micrometastasis, immunohistochemical staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody (CAM 5.2) was performed on negative lymph nodes by hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) staining. Survival differences were compared between conventional node staging and new node staging that took micrometastasis into consideration. Also, the prognostic value of lymph node micrometastasis was investigated in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (32.4%) showed lymph node micrometastasis. Overall, the micrometastatic group had more advanced tumor and lymph node stage, lymphovascular cancer cell invasion, a higher rate of recurrence, and poor survival. Furthermore, when the cumulative numbers of macro- and micrometastatic lymph nodes were calculated together, the discriminative power of survival difference between each node stage became more stratified. Also, multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model demonstrated perineural invasion, pathologic T stage, dissected lymph nodes, macro- and micrometastatic lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node micrometastasis was clinically significant as a risk factor for recurrent gastric cancer. Lymph node micrometastasis should be considered when estimating TNM stage for determining prognosis and the best treatment strategy.

Prognostic significance of histologically detected lymph node micrometastases of sizes between 0.2 and 2 mm in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Minimal lymph node involvement is a potential prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. The International Union Against Cancer defined tumour deposits between 0.2 and 2 mm as micrometastases and clusters and single-cell infiltrations below this cutoff as isolated tumour cells. Nevertheless, only a minority of studies discriminated metastatic involvements according to this definition.

METHODS

In order to investigate the prognostic significance of micrometastases (0.2-2 mm), we performed a retrospective study enrolling 44 routinely diagnosed micrometastatic cases within 15 years which represent about 1% of our cases. These cases have been re-evaluated.

RESULTS

Seven of the micrometastatic cases turned out to be macrometastases after step sectioning. Complete follow-up was available in 33 remaining cases. Collections of node-negative and macrometastatic cases served as control groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves of macro- and micrometastatic cases showed a similar adverse course (p = 0.830) especially during the first 40 months. The 5-year-survival rates were 51, 60 and 64 months for macro-, micrometastatic and node-negative cases, respectively. The difference in overall survival, however, reached only a statistical trend and was not significant (p = 0.137). After re-evaluation with step sections and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry out of an initial 91 node-negative cases, 11 (12%) cases were identified with isolated tumour cells and one (1%) case with a micrometastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that micro- and macrometastatic colorectal cancers show very similar survival rates. Therefore, efforts to improve the detection of lymph node micrometastases seem to be justified.

Myofibroblast activation in colorectal cancer lymph node metastases

BACKGROUND

Myofibroblasts have an important role in regulating the normal colorectal stem cell niche. While the activation of myofibroblasts in primary colorectal cancers has been previously described, myofibroblast activation in lymph node metastases has not been described before.

METHODS

Paraffin-embedded lymph node sections from patients with macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumour cells were stained to identify myofibroblasts and to characterise the distribution of different cell types in tumour-containing lymph nodes. The extent of myofibroblast presence was quantified and compared with the size of the metastasis and degree of proliferation and differentiation of the cancer cells.

RESULTS

We show substantial activation of myofibroblasts in the presence of colorectal metastases in lymph nodes, which is intimately associated with glandular structures, both in micro- and macrometastases. The degree of activation is positively associated with the size of the metastases and the proportion of Ki67+ve cancer cells, and negatively associated with the degree of enterocyte differentiation as measured by CK20 expression.

CONCLUSION

The substantial activation of myofibroblasts in tumour-containing lymph nodes strongly suggests that these metastatic cancer cells are still significantly dependent on their microenvironment. Further understanding of these epithelial-mesenchymal interactions could lead to the development of new therapies in metastatic disease.

Three-dimensional quantitative ultrasound for detecting lymph node metastases

PURPOSE

Detection of metastases in lymph nodes (LNs) is critical for cancer management. Conventional histological methods may miss metastatic foci. To date, no practical means of evaluating the entire LN volume exists. The aim of this study was to develop fast, reliable, operator-independent, high-frequency, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods for evaluating LNs over their entire volume to effectively detect LN metastases.

METHODS

We scanned freshly excised LNs at 26 MHz and digitally acquired echo-signal data over the entire three-dimensional (3D) volume. A total of 146 LNs of colorectal, 26 LNs of gastric, and 118 LNs of breast cancer patients were enrolled. We step-sectioned LNs at 50-μm intervals and later compared them with 13 QUS estimates associated with tissue microstructure. Linear-discriminant analysis classified LNs as metastatic or nonmetastatic, and we computed areas (Az) under receiver-operator characteristic curves to assess classification performance. The QUS estimates and cancer probability values derived from discriminant analysis were depicted in 3D images for comparison with 3D histology.

RESULTS

Of 146 LNs of colorectal cancer patients, 23 were metastatic; Az = 0.952 ± 0.021 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.911-0.993); sensitivity = 91.3% (specificity = 87.0%); and sensitivity = 100% (specificity = 67.5%). Of 26 LNs of gastric cancer patients, five were metastatic; Az = 0.962 ± 0.039 (95% CI: 0.807-1.000); sensitivity = 100% (specificity = 95.3%). A total of 17 of 118 LNs of breast cancer patients were metastatic; Az = 0.833 ± 0.047 (95% CI: 0.741-0.926); sensitivity = 88.2% (specificity = 62.5%); sensitivity = 100% (specificity = 50.5%). 3D cancer probability images showed good correlation with 3D histology.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that operator- and system-independent QUS methods allow reliable entire-volume LN evaluation for detecting metastases. 3D cancer probability images can help pathologists identify metastatic foci that could be missed using conventional methods.