Exploring the Histogenesis and Diagnostic Strategy Using Immunoassay and RT-PCR in Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma

Alveolar soft part sarcoma: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 26 cases emphasizing risk factors and prognosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features and prognostic indicators of alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS).

METHODS

The characteristics of 26 ASPS patients diagnosed at our hospital between January 2011 and January 2019 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The data for 12 male and 14 female patients, with a median age of 27.5 years, were assessed. The clinical symptoms mainly included painless enlarged masses in deep soft tissues. ASPS had a characteristic pathological morphology. Twenty-four patients were positive for TFE3, and TFE3 gene rearrangement was detected in 12 patients. Among the 26 patients who completed follow-up, 14 had metastasis, 1 had local recurrence, and 7 died. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that prognosis was significantly correlated with sex, tumour size and metastasis (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that sex and metastasis were independent prognostic risk factors for patients with ASPS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ASPS is a rare soft tissue sarcoma of unknown origin that occurs in young people, has a slow but metastatic course, and is associated with a poor 5-year survival rate among patients with metastasis. ASPS has character TFE3 protein and gene expression, and the diagnosis is relatively specific. The diagnosis requires comprehensive analysis of clinical history, histological morphology, and immunohistochemistry.

Detection of various fusion genes by one-step RT-PCR and the association with clinicopathological features in 242 cases of soft tissue tumor

Introduction: Over the past decades, an increasing number of chromosomal translocations have been found in different STSs, which not only has value for clinical diagnosis but also suggests the pathogenesis of STS. Fusion genes can be detected by FISH, RT-PCR, and next-generation sequencing. One-step RT-PCR is a convenient method to detect fusion genes with higher sensitivity and lower cost. Method: In this study, 242 cases of soft tissue tumors were included, which were detected by one-step RT-PCR in multicenter with seven types of tumors: rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (pPNET), synovial sarcoma (SS), myxoid liposarcomas (MLPS), alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), and soft tissue angiofibroma (AFST). 18 cases detected by one-step RT-PCR were further tested by FISH. One case with novel fusion gene detected by RNA-sequencing was further validated by one-step RT-PCR. Results: The total positive rate of fusion genes was 60% (133/213) in the 242 samples detected by one-step RT-PCR, in which 29 samples could not be evaluated because of poor RNA quality. The positive rate of PAX3-FOXO1 was 88.6% (31/35) in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, EWSR1-FLI1 was 63% (17/27) in pPNET, SYT-SSX was 95.4% in SS (62/65), ASPSCR1-TFE3 was 100% in ASPS (10/10), FUS-DDIT3 was 80% in MLPS (4/5), and COL1A1-PDGFB was 66.7% in DFSP (8/12). For clinicopathological parameters, fusion gene status was correlated with age and location in 213 cases. The PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene status was correlated with lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis in RMS. Furthermore, RMS patients with positive PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene had a significantly shorter overall survival time than those patients with the negative fusion gene. Among them, the FISH result of 18 cases was concordant with one-step RT-PCR. As detected as the most common fusion types of AHRR-NCOA2 in one case of AFST were detected as negative by one-step RT-PCR. RNA-sequencing was used to determine the fusion genes, and a novel fusion gene PTCH1-PLAG1 was found. Moreover, the fusion gene was confirmed by one-step RT-PCR. Conclusion: Our study indicates that one-step RT-PCR displays a reliable tool to detect fusion genes with the advantage of high accuracy and low cost. Moreover, it is a great tool to identify novel fusion genes. Overall, it provides useful information for molecular pathological diagnosis and improves the diagnosis rate of STSs.

Primary alveolar soft part sarcoma of the rectum resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a very rare soft tissue sarcoma. Primary ASPS of the gastrointestinal tract is especially rare. Due to the scarcity of cases, neither its clinicopathologic features nor its mutational background has been clarified. Here, we report a case of ASPS arising from the rectum, which was completely resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. The lesion was a 17 × 16 × 15 mm semi-pedunculated mass in the upper portion of the rectum in a 46-year-old female. In terms of histology, tumor cells exhibited confluent eosinophilic cytoplasm, forming a sheet-like architecture. Periodic acid Schiff-positive diastase-resistant intracytoplasmic crystals were observed in the tumor cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed TFE3 rearrangement, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed an ASPSCR1-TFE3 type 1 fusion. Negative PAX8 immunostaining and the absence of other massive lesions in postoperative imaging studies led to a diagnosis of primary ASPS of the rectum. The potential oncogenic role of the canonical ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion transcript in gastrointestinal ASPS was indicated. Primary gastrointestinal ASPS remains a diagnostic pitfall in routine surgical pathology.

Genetic diversity in alveolar soft part sarcoma: A subset contain variant fusion genes, highlighting broader molecular kinship with other MiT family tumors

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare malignancy that, since its initial description, remains a neoplasm of uncertain histogenesis. The disease-defining molecular event characterizing the diagnosis of ASPS is the ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion gene. Following identification of an index case of ASPS with a novel TFE3 fusion partner, we performed a retrospective review to determine whether this represents an isolated event. We identified two additional cases, for a total of three cases lacking ASPSCR1 partners. The average patient age was 46 years (range, 17-65); two patients were female. The sites of origin included the transverse colon, foot, and dura. Each case exhibited a histomorphology typical of ASPS, and immunohistochemistry was positive for TFE3 in all cases. Routine molecular testing of the index patient demonstrated a HNRNPH3-TFE3 gene fusion; the remaining cases were found to have DVL2-TFE3 or PRCC-TFE3 fusion products. The latter two fusions have previously been identified in renal cell carcinoma; to our knowledge, this is the first report of a HNRNPH3-TFE3 gene fusion. These findings highlight a heretofore underrecognized genetic diversity in ASPS, which appears to more broadly molecularly overlap with that of translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma and PEComa. These results have immediate implications in the diagnosis of ASPS since assays reliant upon ASPSCR1 may yield a false negative result. While these findings further understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of ASPS, issues related to the histogenesis of this unusual neoplasm remain unresolved.