In Vitro Study of the Effects of Denosumab on Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Comparison with Zoledronic Acid

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

Denosumab Induces Neoplastic Stromal Cell Apoptosis Via p62 Downregulation Dependent on Autophagy Pathway in Giant Cell Tumour of Bone

BACKGROUND

As the only humanized monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) therapy, denosumab has limited antitumour effect on neoplastic stromal cells. Nevertheless, its mechanism of action has not yet been clarified. A previous study has revealed that p62 may play an important role in the antitumour activity of denosumab.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to investigate if the mechanism by which denosumab inhibits GCTB neoplastic stromal cells growth is via p62 modulation and other related mechanisms.

METHODS

p62 expression before and after denosumab therapy was analysed by RT‒qPCR, western blot, ELISA, and immunohistochemical assays. Two primary neoplastic stromal cells were isolated from fresh GCTB tumour tissue (L cell) and metastatic tissue (M cell). Cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and autophagy were investigated in p62 knockdown neoplastic stromal cells transfected by short hairpin RNA lentivirus in vitro. Tumor growth was evaluated in the chick chorioallantoic membrane model in vivo.

RESULTS

p62 expression was found to be downregulated following denosumab therapy. The patients with a decrease in p62 expression had lower recurrence-free survival rates. The proliferation of M cells was not inhibited by denosumab therapy, but it was restored by p62 knockdown. Moreover, p62 knockdown inhibited tumour growth in vivo. Denosumab induced M cell apoptosis and arrested the cell cycle at the G1/G0 transition and these effects were also enhanced by p62 knockdown. Autophagic flux assays revealed p62 modulation to be dependent on autophagy following denosumab incubation.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab induced neoplastic stromal cells apoptosis via p62 downregulation dependent on autophagy pathway. The combination of p62 and RANKL knockdown might be a better strategy than RANKL knockdown alone for GCTB targeted therapy.

Denosumab for giant cell tumors of bone from 2010 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis

Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are considered moderately malignant bone tumors. Denosumab, as a neoadjuvant therapy, provides new possibilities for treating GCTB. However, even after multiple studies and long-term clinical trials, there are limitations in the treatment process. Research data and Medical Subject Headings terms related to denosumab and GCTB were collected from January 2010 to October 2022 using the Web of Science and MeSH ( https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov ) browsers. These data were imported into CiteSpace and VOSviewer softwares for bibliometric analysis. Overall, 445 publications on denosumab and GCTB were identified. Over the last 12 years, the growth rate of the total number of publications has remained relatively stable. The USA published the highest number of articles (83) and had the highest centrality (0.42). Amgen Inc. and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) First Ortoped Rizzoli were identified as the most influential institutions. Many authors have made outstanding contributions to this field. Lancet Oncology had the highest journal impact factor (54.433). Local recurrence and drug dosage are current research hotspots, and future development trends will mainly focus on prognostic markers of GCTB and the development of new therapies. Further research is required to analyze denosumab's safety and efficacy and understand its local recurrence of GCTB, to identify the optimal dose. Future progress in this field will likely focus on exploring new diagnostic and recurrence markers to monitor disease progression and examine new therapeutic targets and treatment strategies.

Investigation of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Tissue Engineering Approaches for the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Primary bone tumors such as Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, and chondrosarcoma, secondary bone tumors developed from progressive malignancies, and metastasized bone tumors are more prevalent and studied descriptively through biology and medical research. Less than 0.2% of cancer diagnoses are caused by rare bone-originating tumors, which despite being rare are particularly difficult due to their high death rates and substantial disease burden. A giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an intramurally invasive but rare and benign type of bone tumor, which seldom metastasizes. The most often prescribed medication for GCTB is Denosumab, a RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand) inhibitor. Because pharmaceutical drug companies rely on two-dimensional and animal models, current approaches for investigating the diverse nature of tumors are insufficient. Cell line based medication effectiveness and toxicity studies cannot predict tumor response to antitumor medicines. It has already been investigated in detail why molecular pathways do not reproduce in vitro, a phenomenon known as flat biology. Due to physiological differences between human beings and animals, animal models do not succeed in identifying side effects of the treatment, emulating metastatic growth, and establishing the link between cancer and the immune system. This review summarizes and discusses GCTB, the disease, its cellular composition, various bone tumor models, and their properties and utilization in research. As a result, this study delves deep into in vitro testing, which is vital for scientists and physicians in various fields, including pharmacology, preclinical investigations, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine.

Effects of anti-RANKL antibodies administered to pregnant mice on bone and tooth development in neonates

OBJECTIVES

This study examined how the anti-bone resorptive agent denosumab, which comprises anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (anti-RANKL) monoclonal antibodies, administered during pregnancy affected neonatal development. Anti-RANKL antibodies, which are known to bind to mouse RANKL and inhibit osteoclast formation, were administered to pregnant mice. Following this, the survival, growth, bone mineralization, and tooth development of their neonates were analyzed.

METHODS

Anti-RANKL antibodies (5 mg/kg) were injected into pregnant mice on day 17 of gestation. After parturition, their neonatal offspring underwent microcomputed tomography at 24 h and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after birth. Three-dimensional bone and teeth images were subjected to histological analysis.

RESULTS

Approximately 70% of the neonatal mice born to mice who received anti-RANKL antibodies died within 6 weeks after birth. These mice had a significantly lower body weight and significantly higher bone mass compared with the control group. Furthermore, delayed tooth eruption and abnormal tooth morphology (eruption length, enamel surface, and cusps) were observed. Conversely, while the tooth germ shape and mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 1/5/8 expression remained unchanged at 24 h after birth in the neonatal mice born to mice that received anti-RANKL antibodies, osteoclasts were not formed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that anti-RANKL antibodies administered to mice in the late stage of pregnancy results in adverse events in their neonatal offspring. Thus, it is speculated that administering denosumab to pregnant humans will affect fetal development and growth after birth.

Outcome of re-operation for local recurrence following pre-operative denosumab administration and curettage for giant cell tumour of bone with difficult joint preservation

PURPOSE

Denosumab enables joint-sparing surgery (curettage) and surgical downstaging in patients with giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), where joint preservation is not possible. However, denosumab treatment causes osteosclerosis of the lesion, making it difficult to curet the lesion, leaving the tumour behind, and increasing the local recurrence rate. We performed a three-centre retrospective study to investigate the postoperative local re-recurrence rate, joint preservation status, and functional outcomes of locally recurrent lesions after preoperative denosumab treatment and curettage in patients with difficult joint preservation.

METHODS

We included 38 of 142 patients with primary GCTB of the extremities who underwent preoperative denosumab and curettage between 2009 and 2021 with local recurrence. Preoperative denosumab was indicated in patients with minimal residual periarticular and subchondral bones, large extraosseous lesions (Campanacci stage 3), and pathological fractures that made joint preservation difficult.

RESULTS

Local re-recurrence occurred in 6 (15.8%) of the 38 patients. In 29 patients who underwent re-curettage, local re-recurrence occurred in six patients (20.7%); however, in nine patients who underwent en bloc resection, no local re-recurrence was observed. The joint preservation rate was 63.2% (24 of 38 patients), with a median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 28 (interquartile range: 26.8-29.0). The median follow-up period after surgery for local recurrence was 63.5 months (interquartile range: 42.5-82.4).

CONCLUSION

Since the local re-recurrence rate after re-curettage for local recurrence was low, and the joint preservation rate and affected limb function were good, preoperative denosumab administration may be considered in patients who require downstaging to maintain good limb function (joint preservation).

RANKL neutralisation prevents osteoclast activation in a human in vitro ameloblastoma-bone model

Ameloblastoma is a benign, locally invasive epithelial odontogenic neoplasm of the jaw. Treatment of choice is jaw resection, often resulting in significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to recapitulate ameloblastoma in a completely humanised 3D disease model containing ameloblastoma cells, osteoblasts and activated osteoclasts to investigate the RANKL pathway within the ameloblastoma stromal environment and its response to the RANKL antibody denosumab. In vitro bone was engineered by culturing human osteoblasts (hOB) in a biomimetic, dense collagen type I matrix, resulting in extensive mineral deposits by day 21 forming alizarin red positive bone like nodules throughout the 3D model. Activated TRAP + human osteoclasts were confirmed through the differentiation of human CD14+ monocytes after 10 days within the model. Lastly, the ameloblastoma cell lines AM-1 and AM-3 were incorporated into the 3D model. RANKL release was validated through TACE/ADAM17 activation chemically or through hOB co-culture. Denosumab treatment resulted in decreased osteoclast activation in the presence of hOB and ameloblastoma cells. These findings stress the importance of accurately modelling tumour and stromal populations as a preclinical testing platform.

Microwave in situ inactivation in the treatment of bone giant cell tumor: a mid-term descriptive study

AIM

To evaluate the mid-term clinical efficacy of microwave in situ inactivation combined with bone grafting or polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) filling in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study. A total of 30 GCTB patients received microwave in situ inactivation from January 2012 to January 2020, whose clinical recurrence rate was evaluated at the last follow-up after microwave in situ inactivation surgery. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) function score was used to evaluate the postoperative clinical panoramic results.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 21 to 110 months, with an average of 63.79 months. Distal femur (40%) and proximal tibia (28%) had a higher rate of GCTB incidence. Seventeen percent of tumor patients suffered from associated pathologic fracture. The rate of Campanacci classification stage III was 60%. The average MSTS score was evaluated as 27.53 points overall at the last follow-up. In terms of complications, three, two, two and one cases developed fat liquefaction, controllable tissue rejection reaction, incision infection and degenerative changes around lesion joint, respectively, without in situ recurrences and reoperation as well as distant lung metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of microwave in situ inactivation combined with bone grafting or PMMA filling is prudently recommended as one of the options for the limb salvage treatment of giant cell tumor of long and periarticular bone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV: case series.

A bibliometric research based on hotspots and frontier trends of denosumab

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets and inhibits the osteoclast activating factor receptor activator for nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL). It has been widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis, giant cell tumors of bone, and in the prevention of malignant skeletal-related events (SREs). We collected the research results and related MeSH terms of denosumab from 2011 to 2021 through the Web of Science and PubMed, respectively. The literature was visualized and analyzed by CiteSpace and bibliometric online analysis platforms. The MeSH terms were biclustered using the Bibliographic Co-Occurrence Analysis System (BICOMB) and graph clustering toolkit (gCLUTO). The results show that the number of denosumab-related annual publications had increased from 51 to 215, with the United States leading and Amgen Inc. being the most influential in the past 10 years. Articles published in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research had the highest total citations. Three scholars from Shinshu University in Matsumoto, Yukio Nakamura, Takako Suzuki, and Hiroyuki Kato, joined the field relatively late but produced the most. The clinical comparison and combination of denosumab with other drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis was the most significant focus of research. Drug withdrawal rebound and management strategies have gained more attention and controversy recently. MeSH analysis revealed eight major categories of research hotspots. Among them, exploring the multiple roles of the RANK-RANKL-OPG system in tumor progression, metastasis, and other diseases is the potential direction of future mechanism research. It is a valuable surgical topic to optimize the perioperative drug administration strategy for internal spinal fixation and orthopedic prosthesis implantation. Taken together, the advantages of denosumab were broad and cost-effective. However, there were still problems such as osteonecrosis of the jaw, severe hypocalcemia, a high recurrence rate of giant cells in the treatment of bone and individual sarcoidosis, and atypical femoral fractures, which need to be adequately solved.

How zoledronic acid improves osteoporosis by acting on osteoclasts

Osteoporosis is called a silent disease, because it is difficult to detect until comprehensive examinations for osteoporosis are performed or osteoporotic fractures occur. Zoledronic acid is currently the first-line anti-osteoporotic drug, with good efficacy and treatment compliance. A major advantage of zoledronic acid is that intravenous zoledronic acid often guarantees a therapeutic effect for up to 1 year after infusion. The reasons why zoledronic acid is effective in improving osteoporosis are that it can inhibit osteoclast differentiation and induce osteoclast apoptosis, thus suppressing bone resorption and increasing bone density. The story between zoledronic acid and osteoclasts has been written long time ago. Both the canonical receptor activator of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) pathway and the non-canonical Wnt pathway are the main pathways by which zoledronic acid inhibits osteoclast differentiation. Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and ferroptosis that was first proposed in 2012, are all considered to be closely associated with zoledronic acid-induced osteoclast apoptosis. Here, we provide a brief review of the recent progress on the study of zoledronic acid and osteoclasts, and hope to elaborate how zoledronic acid improves osteoporosis by acting on osteoclasts.

Updated concepts in treatment of giant cell tumor of bone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) are intermediate, locally aggressive primary bone tumors. For conventional GCTB, surgery remains treatment of choice. For advanced GCTB, a more important role came into play for systemic therapy including denosumab and bisphosphonates over the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

In diagnostics, focus has been on H3F3A (G34) driver mutations present in GCTB. The most frequent mutation (G34W) can be detected using immunohistochemistry and is highly specific in differentiating GCTB from other giant cell containing tumors. PD-L1 expression can be used as biological marker to predict higher recurrence risks in GCTB patients.The use of bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement is under investigation in a randomized controlled trial. A new technique consisting of percutaneous microwave ablation and bisphosphonate-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cementoplasty was proposed for unresectable (pelvic) GCTB.Increased experience with use of denosumab raised concern on elevated recurrence rates. However, conclusions of meta-analyses should be interpreted with risk of indication bias in mind. Several small studies are published with short-course denosumab (varying from 3 to 6 doses). One small trial directly compared denosumab and zoledronic acid, with no statistical differences in radiological and clinical outcome, and nonsignificantly higher recurrence rate after denosumab. As bisphosphonates directly target neoplastic stromal cells in GCTB, larger directly comparative trials are still warranted.

SUMMARY

Neoadjuvant denosumab is highly effective for advanced GCTB, and a short-course is advised to facilitate surgery, whereas increased recurrence rates remain of concern. Randomized controlled trials are conducted on bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement and on optimal dose and duration of neoadjuvant denosumab. PD-L1 could be a potential new therapy target in GCTB.

Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in Cases of Surgically Unsalvageable Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Randomized Clinical Trial

•

Denosumab and zoledronic acid had similar tumor responses and clinical benefits.

•

Disease progression was observed in patients in the DB group (12.5%) than ZA group (15.0%).

•

Denosumab treatment was markedly more expensive than zoledronic acid treatment (p < 0.0001).

•

The recurrence-free survival rate at 4-year follow-up is higher in DB group (p = 0.035).

Background

Giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a relatively benign, but locally aggressive osteoclastogenic stromal tumour of the bone. Although denosumab has been approved as an monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand for the treatment of GCTB, few clinical trials of the benefit in tumor response have been conducted to prove the efficiency in Chinese population.

Objectives

In this multicentric, random controlled, clinical trial, 160 patients were enrolled to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid treatment in patients with surgically unsalvageable GCTB.

Methods

Between 2nd Jan 2015 and 1st Jan 2018, 160 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ①surgically unsalvageable GCTB, ②surgically salvageable GCTB with planned surgery expected to result in severe morbidity were included in this randomized clinical trial. Patients received either subcutaneous denosumab (DB group; 120 mg once every 4 weeks with loading doses of 120 mg subcutaneously admininstered on days 8 and 15; n = 80) or intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA group; 4 mg once every 4 weeks; n = 80) for six cycles. Disease status, clinical benefits, treatment-emergent adverse effects, overall survival, and cost of treatment were evaluated during the follow-up period. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Denosumab and zoledronic acid had similar tumor responses (p = 0.118) and clinical benefits (p = 0.574). Disease progression was observed in fewer patients in the DB group (12.5%) than ZA group (15.0%). Denosumab caused fatigue (p = 0.001) and back pain (p < 0.0001), while zoledronic acid caused hypocalcemia (p < 0.0001), flu-like symptoms (p = 0.059) and hypotension (p = 0.059). Denosumab treatment was markedly more expensive than zoledronic acid treatment (p < 0.0001). The cost to manage treatment-emergent adverse effects was the same for the ZA group and the DB group (p = 0.425). The accumulate recurrence-free survival rate at 4-year follow-up is higher in DB group (p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Denosumab is a safe but costly alternative to zoledronic acid for treatment of surgically unsalvageable GCTB.

Study of imaging changes following preoperative denosumab for giant cell tumor of bone

•

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply.

•

The decrease of blood supply was the most significant in the initial stage of treatment.

•

It is not recommended to apply denosumab long before surgical treatment.

Background

The changes in the characteristics of the tumor blood supply of giant cell tumor of bone over time after treatment with denosumab remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in the blood supply imaging characteristics of giant cell tumor of bone after preoperative denosumab treatment and to provide evidence for evaluating the reasonable time for preoperative treatment.

Methods

A total of 59 patients with giant cell tumor of bone who were treated in our hospital from 2014 to 2019 were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent enhanced CT examination of the tumor site before denosumab treatment and every month after treatment. The plain CT value and enhanced CT value of the tumor were measured, and the CT enhancement rate of the tumor was calculated. The change in the CT enhancement rate of the tumor over time after denosumab treatment was analyzed.

Results

The average tumor enhancement rates were 2.14 (1.22–4.05), 1.60 (1.12–2.53), 1.38 (1.02–2.24), and 1.25 (1–2.11) before denosumab treatment and one month, three months, and six months after treatment, respectively. After denosumab treatment, the average monthly CT enhancement rate decreased as follows: 0.54 (25.2%) in the first month, 0.11 (5.15%) in the second to third months, and 0.04 (1.87%) in the fourth to sixth months. The tumor enhancement rate was no longer significantly reduced three months post-treatment. There was a significant correlation between the reduction in the CT enhancement rate and the initial CT enhancement rate (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply. The decrease in the blood supply is the most significant in the initial stage of treatment. Following treatment, the decrease in the blood supply gradually reduces over time. Therefore, for the purpose of reducing intra-operative bleeding and facilitating surgery, application of denosumab treatment is not recommended more than three months before surgery.

Comparison of Denosumab and Zoledronic acid as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with giant cell tumor of bone

OBJECTIVES

Both Zoledronic acid and denosumab have been utilized in neo-adjuvant setting for facilitating surgery and downsizing the lesion in Giant cell tumor (GCT). This study is aimed at comparing Zoledronic acid and Denosumab, when used in neo-adjuvant setting, in terms of radiological and clinical outcomes in GCT undergoing surgical intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical intervention for GCT who received either denosumab or Zoledronic acid as neoadjuvant agents were retrospectively analyzed for reduction in tumor load radiologically, change in surgical plan after therapy, facilitation of surgery, therapy related complications, cost of treatment, rate of local recurrence and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty patients received denosumab and 19 patients received Zoledronic acid as neoadjuvant agent. There was no significant difference in radiological outcomes, facilitation of surgery and clinical outcomes at end of follow-up. Zoledronic acid group had lower number of recurrences, however, not statistically significant. Therapy with Zoledronic acid was significantly cheaper (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid is a cheaper alternative to denosumab in terms of solidification of lesion, reducing recurrence rates and improving clinical outcomes. Larger prospective studies required to further delineate this outcome with Zoledronic acid.

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals the Migration of Osteoclasts in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is benign tumor that can cause significant osteolysis and bone destruction at the epiphysis of long bones. Osteoclasts are thought to be highly associated with osteolysis in GCTB. However, the migration of osteoclasts in GCTB remains unclear. A deeper understanding of the complex tumor microenvironment is required in order to delineate the migration of osteoclasts in GCTB. In this study, samples were isolated from one patient diagnosed with GCTB. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was used to detect the heterogeneity of GCTB. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining was used to evaluate the cell subtypes identified by scRNA-seq. A total of 8,033 cells were obtained from one patient diagnosed with GCTB, which were divided into eight major cell types as depicted by a single-cell transcriptional map. The osteoclasts were divided into three subsets, and their differentiation trajectory and migration status were further analyzed. Osteoclast migration may be regulated via a series of genes associated with cell migration. Furthermore, four signaling pathways (RANKL, PARs, CD137 and SMEA3 signaling pathway) were found to be highly associated with osteoclast migration. This comprehensive single-cell transcriptome analysis of GCTB identified a series of genes associated with cell migration as well as four major signaling pathways that were highly related to the migration of osteoclasts in GCTB. Our findings broaden the understanding of GCTB bionetworks and provides a theoretical basis for anti-osteolysis therapy against GCTB in the future.

Combination of Melatonin and Zoledronic Acid Suppressed the Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in vitro and in vivo

Melatonin (Mlt) confers potential antitumor effects in various types of cancer. However, to the best of our knowledge, the role of Mlt in the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) remains unknown. Moreover, further research is required to assess whether Mlt can enhance the therapeutic effect of zoledronic acid (Zol), a commonly used anti-GCTB drug. In this research, we investigated the effects of Mlt, Zol, and the combination of these two drugs on GCTB cells’ characteristics, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, osteogenic differentiation, migration, and invasion. The cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, colony formation assay, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay (TUNEL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, alizarin red staining (ARS), scratch wound healing assay, and transwell experiment were performed, respectively. Our results showed that Mlt could effectively inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GCTB cells, as well as promote the apoptosis and osteogenic differentiation of tumor cells. Of note, a stronger antitumor effect was observed when Mlt was combined with Zol treatment. This therapeutic effect might be achieved by inhibiting the activation of both the Hippo and NF-κB pathways. In conclusion, our study suggests that Mlt can be a new treatment for GCTB, which could further enhance the antitumor effect of Zol.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone

Simple Summary

According to the 2020 World Health Organization classification, a giant cell tumor of bone is an intermediate malignant bone tumor. Denosumab treatment before curettage should be avoided due to the increased risk of local recurrence. Administration of denosumab before en bloc resection of the giant cell tumors of the pelvis and spine facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for giant cell tumors of the sacrum. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable giant cell tumors of the pelvis, spine, and sacrum. A wait-and-see approach is recommended for lung metastases at first, then denosumab should be administered to the growing lesions. Radiotherapy is not recommended owing to the risk of malignant transformation. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant giant cell tumors of bone.

Abstract

The 2020 World Health Organization classification defined giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) as intermediate malignant tumors. Since the mutated H3F3A was found to be a specific marker for GCTB, it has become very useful in diagnosing GCTB. Curettage is the most common treatment for GCTBs. Preoperative administration of denosumab makes curettage difficult and increases the risk of local recurrence. Curettage is recommended to achieve good functional outcomes, even for local recurrence. For pathological fractures, joints should be preserved as much as possible and curettage should be attempted. Preoperative administration of denosumab for pelvic and spinal GCTBs reduces extraosseous lesions, hardens the tumor, and facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for sacral GCTBS. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable pelvic, spinal, and sacral GCTBs. It is recommended to first observe lung metastases, then administer denosumab for growing lesions. Radiotherapy is associated with a risk of malignant transformation and should be limited to cases where surgery is impossible and denosumab, zoledronic acid, or embolization is not available. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant GCTBs.

The current standing on the use of denosumab in giant cell tumour of the bone

Giant cell tumour of the bone (GCTB) has been classically treated surgically. With the advent of denosumab, there is potential to use it as a targeted therapy to downstage the tumour and control its progression. Like all new therapies, the dosage, duration, and long-term effects of treatment can only be determined over the time through numerous trials and errors. The current recommendation of use of the monoclonal antibody is 3-4 months of neoadjuvant denosumab in patients with advanced GCTB for cases who were not candidates for primary curettage initially, and prolonged use for surgically unsalvageable GCTB. The use of Denosumab in the adjuvant setting to prevent recurrence is not established.

Immunohistochemical Characterization of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Treated With Denosumab: Support for Osteoblastic Differentiation

Giant cell tumor of bone is a locally aggressive, rarely metastasizing neoplasm. Evidence suggests that the neoplastic cells may be osteoblastic in differentiation. Standard treatment is surgical removal, but medical therapy with denosumab, an inhibitor of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κβ ligand, has become a component of patient management in select cases. Denosumab-treated giant cell tumor of bone (DT-GCTB) shows drastic morphologic changes including the presence of abundant bone. To further determine the relationship of the neoplastic cells to osteoblast phenotype, we performed a morphologic and immunohistochemical study on a series of DT-GCTB. Cases of DT-GCTB were retrieved from surgical pathology files, available slides were reviewed, and immunohistochemistry for H3.3 G34W, SATB2, and p63 was performed. The cohort included 31 tumors from 30 patients (2:3 male:female), ages 15 to 73 years (median=36 y). The morphology of post-denosumab-treated tumors ranged from tumors composed of an abundant bone matrix with few spindle cells to spindle cell-predominant tumors. Five had focal residual classic CGTB, and 2 manifested mild nuclear atypia. The majority expressed all markers: 86.2% for H3.3 G34W, 96.7% for SATB2, and 100% for p63. All markers stained the various tumor components including spindle cells and the cells on the surface of and within the treated tumor bone matrix. Most markers were also positive in reactive-appearing woven bone adjacent to tumor: 84.6% for H3.3 G34W, 100% for SATB2, and 68% for p63. These findings suggest that denosumab treatment of giant cell tumor of bone results in osteoblastic differentiation with bone production.

The role of Denosumab in joint preservation for patients with giant cell tumour of bone

AIMS

Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We previously reported a 15% local recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 30 months in 20 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab. The aim of this study was to determine if this initial favourable outcome following the use of Denosumab was maintained with longer follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with GCTB of the limb considered high-risk for unsuccessful joint salvage, due to minimal periarticular and subchondral bone, large soft tissue mass, or pathological fracture, were treated with Denosumab followed by extended intralesional curettage with the goal of preserving the joint surface. Patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, and secondary sarcoma.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 33.8 years (18 to 67) with high-risk GCTB received median six cycles of Denosumab before surgery. Tumours occurred most commonly around the knee (17/25, 68%). The median follow-up was 57 months (interquartile range (IQR) 13 to 88). The joint was salvaged in 23 patients (92%). Two required knee arthroplasty due to intra-articular fracture and arthritis. Local recurrence developed in 11 patients (44%) at a mean of 32.5 months (3 to 75) following surgery, of whom four underwent repeat curettage and joint salvage. One patient developed secondary osteosarcoma and another benign GCT lung metastases.

CONCLUSION

The use of Denosumab for joint salvage was associated with a higher than expected rate of local recurrence at 44%. Neoadjuvant Denosumab for joint-sparing procedures should be considered with caution in light of these results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):184-191.

Various pathways of zoledronic acid against osteoclasts and bone cancer metastasis: a brief review

Zoledronic acid (ZA) is one of the most important and effective class of anti-resorptive drug available among bisphosphonate (BP), which could effectively reduce the risk of skeletal-related events, and lead to a treatment paradigm for patients with skeletal involvement from advanced cancers. However, the exact molecular mechanisms of its anticancer effects have only recently been identified. In this review, we elaborate the detail mechanisms of ZA through inhibiting osteoclasts and cancer cells, which include the inhibition of differentiation of osteoclasts via suppressing receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL)/receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK) pathway, non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+/calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) pathway, and preventing of macrophage differentiation into osteoclasts, in addition, induction of apoptosis of osteoclasts through inhibiting farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS)-mediated mevalonate pathway, and activation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced pathway. Furthermore, ZA also inhibits cancer cells proliferation, viability, motility, invasion and angiogenesis; induces cancer cell apoptosis; reverts chemoresistance and stimulates immune response; and acts in synergy with other anti-cancer drugs. In addition, some new ways for delivering ZA against cancer is introduced. We hope this review will provide more information in support of future studies of ZA in the treatment of cancers and bone cancer metastasis.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Current Status and Pitfalls

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). Clinical trials and case series have demonstrated that denosumab is relevant to beneficial tumor response and surgical down-staging in patients of GCTB. However, these trials or case series have limitations with a short follow-up. Recent increasing studies revealed that denosumab probably increased the local recurrence risk in patients treated with curettage. This may be caused by the thicken bone margin of tumor that trapped tumor cells from curettage. The direct bone formation by tumor cells in the margin after denosumab treatment also contributed to the local recurrence. in vitro studies showed denosumab resulted in a cytostatic instead of a true cytotoxic response on neoplastic stromal cells. More importantly, denosumab-treated GCTB exhibited morphologic overlap with malignancy, and a growing number of patients of malignant transformation of GCTB during denosumab treatment have been reported. The optimal duration, long term safety, maintenance dose, and optimum indications remain to be elucidated. With these concerns in mind, this review warns that the denosumab therapy of GCTB should be applied with caution.

Can Denosumab be used in combination with Doxorubicin in Osteosarcoma?

Osteosarcoma is an aggressive bone tumor of the pediatric age. It is therefore important to improve conventional therapies (chemotherapy and surgery). Anticancer drugs often cause osteoporosis due to a misbalance of RANK/RANK-L/OPG pathway.

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody with high affinity and specificity to RANK-L, the ligand released by osteoblasts that enhances osteoclasts differentiation and bone resorption. It is used in osteoporosis and in other conditions characterized by bone mass loss. Doxorubicin is a chemotherapic drug used in several kinds of tumors, and also patients treated with it often develop osteoporosis.

We investigated the effects of Denosumab alone and in combination with Doxorubicin, in two human osteosarcoma cell lines (MG63 and U-2 OS). We evaluated the effect of these treatments on apoptosis, cell cycle progression, invasion capacity and bone metabolism.

We observed for the first time an anti-invasive effect of Denosumab in OS cells and confirmed its anti-osteoporotic activity also in Osteosarcoma. On the other hand, we demonstrate that Denosumab not only does not affect apoptosis and cell cycle progression, but when used in combination with Doxorubicin, it causes an unexpected reduction of its activity. These results indicate that the presence of Denosumab might inhibit the efficacy of the chemotherapic drug.

In conclusion, while our results certainly support and confirm the efficacy of Denosumab in Osteoporosis, we discourage the use of Denosumab in addition to conventional chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma, even though, certainly further investigations are necessary to better clarify the clinical role of this monoclonal antibody in cancer.

Role of cancer stem cells in the development of giant cell tumor of bone

The primary bone tumor is usually observed in adolescence age group which has been shown to be part of nearly 20% of the sarcomas known today. Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) can be benign as well as malignant tumor which exhibits localized dynamism and is usually associated with the end point of a long bone. Giant cell tumor (GCT) involves mononuclear stromal cells which proliferate at a high rate, multinucleated giant cells and stromal cells are equally present in this type of tumor. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been confirmed to play a potential role in the development of GCT. Cancer stem cell-based microRNAs have been shown to contribute to a greater extent in giant cell tumor of bone. CSCs and microRNAs present in the tumors specifically are a great concern today which need in-depth knowledge as well as advanced techniques to treat the bone cancer effectively. In this review, we attempted to summarize the role played by cancer stem cells involving certain important molecules/factors such as; Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs), miRNAs and signaling mechanism such as; mTOR/PI3K-AKT, towards the formation of giant cell tumor of bone, in order to get an insight regarding various effective strategies and research advancements to obtain adequate knowledge related to CSCs which may help to focus on highly effective treatment procedures for bone tumors.

Challenges of denosumab in giant cell tumor of bone, and other giant cell-rich tumors of bone

Purpose of review

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an uncommon benign primary bone tumor, consisting of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK) expressing reactive osteoclast-like giant cells and neoplastic spindle-shaped cells. Denosumab was approved by FDA in 2013 and by EMA in 2014 to treat adults and skeletally mature adolescents with unresectable GCTB or when resection is likely to result in severe morbidity. However, there is much discussion regarding the optimal applied treatment strategy.

Recent findings

Neoadjuvant treatment of GCTB with denosumab can effectively downstage tumors to facilitate less morbid surgery or completely avoid the need for resection, but there is concern about local recurrence postsurgery. Definitive treatment of unresectable GTCB improves symptoms and halts tumor progression. The optimal treatment duration is unclear and long-term treatment is associated with adverse events like osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures. Denosumab maintenance dose interval is currently being investigated.

Summary

For the related but heterogenous group of giant cell rich tumors of bone, like aneurysmal bone cysts (ABC) and central giant cell granuloma (CGCG), denosumab is a new treatment modality under investigation. Given the effectiveness in GCTB, this could be a promising treatment option for selected patients with advanced disease.

Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid in High-Risk Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial

Lessons Learned.

Adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid did not decrease the recurrence rate of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in this study. The efficacy could not be determined because of the small sample size.

GCTB recurrences, even in the denosumab era, are still an issue; therefore, a randomized study exploring the efficacy of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant setting in GCTB is still valid.

Background.

Bisphosphonates are assumed to inhibit giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB)‐associated osteoclast activity and have an apoptotic effect on the neoplastic mononuclear cell population. The primary objective of this study was to determine the 2‐year recurrence rate of high‐risk GCTB after adjuvant zoledronic acid versus standard care.

Methods.

In this multicenter randomized open‐label phase II trial, patients with high‐risk GCTB were included (December 2008 to October 2013). Recruitment was stopped because of low accrual after the introduction of denosumab. In the intervention group, patients received adjuvant zoledronic acid (4 mg) intravenously at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.

Results.

Fourteen patients were included (intervention n = 8, controls n = 6). Median follow‐up was long: 93.5 months (range, 48–111). Overall 2‐year recurrence rate was 38% (3/8) in the intervention versus 17% (1/6) in the control group (p = .58). All recurrences were seen within the first 15 months after surgery.

Conclusion.

Adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid did not decrease the recurrence rate of GCTB in this study. The efficacy could not be determined because of the small sample size. Because recurrences, even in the denosumab era, are still an issue, a randomized study exploring the efficacy of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant setting in GCTB is still valid.

Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in cases of surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Although denosumab has been approved as an antiresorptive agent for giant cell tumor of bone, its efficacy has not been proven.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid treatment in patients with surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients with surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone were included in this randomized clinical trial. Patients received either subcutaneous denosumab (DB group; 120 mg per 4 weeks plus an additional 120 mg on days 8 and 15; n = 125) or intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA group; 4 mg per 4 weeks; n = 125) for six cycles. Disease status, clinical benefits, treatment-emergent adverse effects, overall survival, and cost of treatment were evaluated during the follow-up period. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Denosumab and zoledronic acid had similar tumor responses (p = 0.18) and clinical benefits (p = 0.476). Disease progression was observed in fewer patients in the DB group (1%) than ZA group (2%). Denosumab caused fatigue (p = 0.0004) and back pain (p < 0.0001), while zoledronic acid caused hypocalcemia (p < 0.0001), flu-like symptoms (p = 0.021), hypotension (p = 0.021), and hypokalemia (p = 0.021). Denosumab treatment was markedly more expensive than zoledronic acid treatment (p < 0.0001). The cost to manage treatment-emergent adverse effects was higher for the ZA group than the DB group (p = 0.0425). Overall survival was the same for both treatments (p = 0.066).

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab is a safe but costly alternative to zoledronic acid for treatment of surgically unsalvageable giant cell tumor of bone.

Effect of bisphosphonates on local recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone: a meta-analysis

Background

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive tumor, and its postoperative recurrence remains a problem. The present meta-analysis aimed to analyze the effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) on local recurrence of GCTB.

Methods

Seven case-control studies were included by computerized searches of bibliographic databases (PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, ISI Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure). The pooled adjusted ORs were calculated to evaluate the local recurrence of GCTB.

Results

The BP group presented significantly lower total local recurrence rate than the control group in GCTB (P<0.01). Subgroup analysis shows BP group presented significantly lower local recurrence than the control group in GCTB with different tumor grades (P<0.05). In patients who underwent intralesional curettage, a significantly lower local recurrence rate was found in the BP group compared with the control group (P<0.01), but no significance was found for patients who underwent wide resection (P=0.16). None of the included studies described severe adverse effects related to BPs.

Conclusion

The results confirmed the effect of BPs on reducing the local recurrence of GCTB, and the effect is not influenced by the tumor grades. BPs are benefit for the patients who underwent intralesional curettage but not recommended for those who underwent wide resection.

A simple and robust reporter gene assay for measuring the bioactivity of anti-RANKL therapeutic antibodies

The mechanism sketch of the reporter gene assay for the bioactivity determination of anti-RANKL mAbs.