Associations of the BRAF V600E Mutation and PAQR3 Protein Expression with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Clinicopathological Features

The Association between Lymphocytic Thyroiditis and Papillary Thyroid Cancer Harboring Mutant BRAF: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and lymphocytic thyroiditis (LT) co-occur with a prevalence of about 30%. PTC harboring BRAFV600E (PTC-BRAF) confers a worse prognosis, but it is unclear if LT alters prognostic features and recurrence of PTC. Objective: We compared the prevalence of PTC-BRAF with and without LT. The risk of adverse pathological features in (i) PTC in the presence and absence of BRAF mutation, irrespective of LT status, was compared to (ii) PTC in the presence and absence of LT, irrespective of BRAF status. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection for observational studies published from 2010 to June 2023 on adult patients with PTC. The search strategy yielded 47 studies with relevant data. Data of baseline characteristics, clinicopathological features, and the quality assessment tool were extracted by two reviewers. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023437492). Results: Of the 47 studies, 39 studies with a total cohort of 28 143, demonstrated that the odds of PTC-BRAF were significantly lower in the presence of LT compared to its absence (odds ratio [OR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.58, p < 0.00001). In PTC-BRAF patients, there was a positive association of central neck nodal disease (CNND), PTC > 1 cm, extra-thyroidal extension, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage 3-4, and multifocality with pooled ORs of 1.54 (95% CI: 1.16-2.04), 1.14 (95% CI: 0.82-1.58), 1.66 (95% CI: 1.40-1.97), 1.53 (95% CI: 1.35-1.75), and 1.24 (95% CI: 1.11-1.40) respectively, compared to wild-type PTC, irrespective of LT status. In the same studies, PTC with LT patients had lower pooled ORs of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.81) for CNND, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95) for PTC > 1 cm, 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58-0.86) for ETE, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75-0.94) for AJCC Stage 3-4 compared to PTC without LT, irrespective of BRAF status. PTC recurrence was not affected by BRAF or LT, with pooled ORs of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.66-1.90, p = 0.67) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.28-1.30, p = 0.20) respectively. Similar results were seen with recurrence expressed as hazard ratio in this limited data-set. Conclusion: The odds of PTC-BRAF are significantly lower in the presence of LT than without. PTC with LT, irrespective of BRAF status, was significantly associated with better prognostic factors. Further studies are required to evaluate if LT inhibits PTC-BRAF, and whether this is relevant to the role of immunotherapy in advanced thyroid cancer.

Thyroglobulin Antibody (TgAb) Positive is an Independent Risk Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma

Objective

To investigate the relationship between lymph node metastasis and the clinicopathologic features of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) patients with thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) positive and negative.

Methods

A total of 443 patients with DTC were included in this study. Clinicopathological data of the patients were collected, including tumor size, clinical stage, calcification, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, extra-membrane infiltration, BRAF V600E mutation status, and thyroid-related hormone and antibody levels. The relationship between of lymph node metastasis and clinicopathologic features was analyzed.

Results

There were 227(51.2%) TgAb negative and 216(48.8%) TgAb positive DTC patients. Compared with patients without lymph node metastasis, DTC patients with lymph node metastasis had a higher proportion of patients with <55 years of age, maximum tumor diameter >1cm, calcification, BRAF V600E mutation, and TgAb positive. Multivariate regression logistic analysis showed that <55 years old (odds ratio (OR): 2.744, 95% CI: 1.665-4.522, P<0.001), maximum tumor diameter >1cm (OR: 2.163, 95% CI: 1.431-3.271, P<0.001), BRAF V600E mutation (OR: 2.489, 95% CI: 1.397-4.434, P=0.002), and TgAb positive (OR: 1.540, 95% CI: 1.020-2.326, P=0.040) were risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Maximum tumor diameter >1cm and BRAF V600E increased the risk by more than one fold for lymph node metastasis in TgAb-negative and TgAb-positive DTC patients.

Conclusion

Younger age (<55 years old), maximum tumor diameter >1cm, BRAF V600E mutation, and TgAb positive were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in DTC. And maximum tumor diameter >1cm and BRAF V600E mutation were risk factors for lymph node metastasis both in TgAb positive and negative DTC patients.

Younger Than 55 Years Old and BRAF V600E Mutation are Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas ≤1.0 cm but Not in >1.0 cm

Background

Studies on the relationship between BRAF V600E mutation and the clinicopathologic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), risk of lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) have shown inconsistent results.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, clinicopathological data of the patients were collected, and molecular testing was done for BRAF V600E mutation. PTC patients are divided into PTC≤1.0cm (PTMC) and PTC>1.0cm, and the relationship between BRAF V600E mutation and clinicopathologic features was analyzed respectively.

Results

Of the 520 PTC patients, 432 (83.1%) were female and 416 (80.0%) were <55 years old. BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 422 (81.2%) tumour samples of PTC. There was no significant difference in the frequency of BRAF V600E mutation between different age groups. There were 250 (48.1%) patients with PTMC and 270 (51.9%) patients with PTC>1.0cm. BRAF V600E mutation was significantly associated with bilateral cancer (23.0% vs 4.9%, P=0.005) and lymph node metastasis (61.7% vs 39.0%, P=0.009) in PTMC patients, while BRAF V600E mutation was significantly associated with bilateral cancer (24.9% vs 12.3%, P=0.048) in PTC>1.0cm patients. Logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for gender, Hashimoto's thyroiditis and calcification, we found that younger age (<55 years old) (OR: 2.384, 95% CI: 1.241-4.579, P=0.009) and BRAF V600E mutation (OR: 2.213, 95% CI: 1.085-4.512, P=0.029) were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in PTMC, similar results were not obtained in PTC>1.0cm.

Conclusion

Younger age (<55 years old) and BRAF V600E mutation was independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis in PTMC.

Risk and Prognostic Factors for BRAFV600E Mutations in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Over the past ten years, the incidence rate of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) worldwide has been increasing rapidly year by year, with the incidence rate increasing 6% annually. PTC has become the malignant tumor with the highest growth rate in the world that fourteen PTC-related mutant genes have been identified. Whether the BRAFV600E mutation related to more aggressive clinicopathologic features and worse outcome in PTC remains variable and controversial. We aim to investigate the risk factors that may predict the BRAFV600E mutation potential of these lesions and new prevention strategies in PTC patients.

METHODS

A total of 9,908 papillary thyroid carcinoma patients with average 74.6% BRAFV600E mutations were analyzed (RevMan 5.3 software) in this study. The PubMed, Embase, and ISI Web of Science databases were systematically searched for works published through December 15, 2021.

RESULTS

The following variables were associated with an increased risk of BRAFV600E mutation in PTC patients: age ≥ 45 years (OR = 1.39, 95%CI = 1.21-1.60, p < 0.00001), male gender (OR = 1.13, 95%CI = 0.99-1.28, p = 0.06), multifocality (OR = 1.22, 95%CI = 1.07-1.40, p = 0.004), lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 0.79-2.23, p = 0.28), extrathyroidal extension + (OR = 1.61, 95%CI = 1.06-2.44, p = 0.03), vascular invasion + (OR = 2.04, 95%CI = 1.32-3.15, p = 0.001), and tumor node metastasis stage (OR = 1.61, 95%CI = 1.38-1.88, p < 0.00001). In addition, tumor size (>1 cm) (OR = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.32-0.81, p = 0.005) and distant metastasis (OR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.22-2.21, p = 0.54) had no association or risk with BRAFV600E mutation in PTC patients.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review identified the following significant risk factors of BRAFV600E mutation in PTC patients: age (≥45 years), gender (male), multifocality, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, and advanced tumor node metastasis stage (stages III and IV). Tumor size (>1 cm) and distant metastasis do not appear to be correlated with BRAFV600E mutation in PTC patients.

Comparison of diagnostic value of SWE, FNA and BRAF gene detection in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE), fine needle aspiration (FNA) and BRAF gene detection (BRAFV600E gene mutation detection) in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules. METHODS: SWE images, FNA cytological results and BRAF detection results of ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules confirmed by pathology were analyzed retrospectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to determine the best cutoff value of SWE Emax. In the combined diagnosis of SWE, FNA and BRAF, firstly, the nodules with BRAF gene mutation were included in the positive ones, secondly, the nodules with benign and malignant FNA were included in the FNA + SWE or FNA + SWE + BRAF negative and positive ones respectively, finally, for FNA uncertain nodules: those whose SWE Emax were less than or equal to the cutoff value were included in FNA + SWE or FNA + SWE + BRAF negative ones, and those whose SWE Emax were greater than the cutoff value were included in positive ones. The diagnostic efficacy of SWE, FNA, SWE + FNA, FNA + BRAF and their combination in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules were compared. RESULTS: The ROC curve showed that the best cutoff value of SWE Emax was 40.9 kpa, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.842 (0.800∼0.885). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE were 76.3% (270/354), 75.5% (80/106) and 76.1% (350/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA were 58.2% (206/354), 88.7% (94/106) and 65.2(300/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA + BRAF were 95.5% (338/354), 88.7% (94/106) and 93.9% (432/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE + FNA were 85.9% (304/354), 98.1% (104/106) and 88.7% (408/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE + FNA + BRAF were 98.3% (348/354), 98.1% (104/106) and 98.3% (452/460), respectively. For the diagnostic accuracy, SWE + FNA + BRAF >  FNA + BRAF >  FNA + SWE >  SWE >  FNA, the difference was statistically significant (all P >  0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules, SWE and FNA have high diagnostic efficiency. For the diagnostic accuracy, FNA + BRAF is better than FNA + SWE. FNA combination with BRAF gene detection further improves the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of FNA. The combined application of the three is the best.

Prevalence of BRAFV600E mutation in Asian series of papillary thyroid carcinoma-a contemporary systematic review

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), the most common malignancy of the endocrine system, is frequently driven by BRAFV600E mutation, which was reported in 35-60% cases in Western series. Numerous studies have recently emerged from Asian countries and regions; however sufficient summary is lacking to date. BRAF mutation serves as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in thyroid cancer, therefore establishing a rate of BRAF on the national scale could be of practical significance. We performed systematic reviews of available literature to investigate the prevalence of BRAF mutation in series of PTC from various Asian countries and regions. Out of the total 3,966 reports identified via initial screening, 138 studies encompassing over 40,000 PTCs were included for the final analysis. A vast majority (90.2%) of PTCs with known BRAF status were from East Asia, including China, South Korea, and Japan, with BRAF mutation rates of 71.2%, 75.5%, and 70.6%, respectively. Less abundant Indian and Saudi Arabian series found 45.6% and 46.3% prevalence of BRAFV600E in PTC, respectively. Much limited evidence was available from Thailand, Iran, Kazakhstan, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, Hong Kong, Philippines, Vietnam, Iraq, and Myanmar. No relevant publications were found from other highly populated countries, such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Malaysia. After grouping by geographic region, we found that the highest rate of BRAFV600E was reported in the PTC series from East Asia (76.4%). Much lower rate (45-48%) was seen in PTC cohorts from South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East while the Southeast Asian series were in between (57%). Further subgroup analysis revealed that studies employing fresh frozen tissue and fine-needle aspirates showed higher rates of BRAF compared to those used formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. We found that the PTC series enrolled patients' cohorts after 2010 demonstrated a higher rate of BRAF compared to the earlier series. Finally, pediatric PTCs had lower BRAF prevalence compared to the baseline rate for the country. In conclusion, despite considerable among and within countries heterogeneity, the Asian PTC series showed a higher prevalence of BRAFV600E mutation than that in Western series. Causes of geographic heterogeneity, whether genuine (etiology, genetics) or methodology-related should be further investigated.