Combined procedures with laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Effectiveness of simultaneous umbilical hernia primary repair with laparoscopic cholecystectomy

OBJECTIVE

Umbilical hernia repair can be easily performed simultaneously with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The use of mesh is recommended for hernias larger than 1 cm. In this study, patients with primary repair of umbilical hernia simultaneously with laparoscopic cholecystectomy were evaluated. It aimed to present the effectiveness of this method and the effect of body mass index (BMI) on treatment results.

METHODS

The records of patients who underwent primary repair of umbilical hernia simultaneously with laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients' age, gender, BMI, length of hospital stay, recurrence and reoperation information, and follow-up times were analyzed. The patients were examined in three groups according to their BMI, and the effect of BMI on treatment was investigated.

RESULTS

patients were included in the study. Median values of the patients for age, BMI, hospitalization, and follow-up were 63 (28-94), 31 (20-51) kg/m2, 1 (1-25) days, and 23 (0.6-76) months, respectively. Recurrence was detected in 8 patients. BMI was <25 in one patient with recurrence and >30 in 5 patients. There was no significant correlation between length of stay, number of relapse and reoperation, and BMI (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our study, the recurrence rate was found to be higher than the studies reported with the use of mesh, and most of the patients with recurrence are obese, although it is not statistically significant. If the recurrence rate is acceptable, we believe that repair with primary suture is feasible in umbilical hernia.

Laparoscopic Surgery with Concomitant Hernia Repair and Cholecystectomy: An Alternative Approach to Everyday Practice

Introduction: Concomitant surgeries have been performed previously in several centers with experience in laparoscopic surgeries. These surgeries are performed in one patient under one operation with anesthesia. Methods: We performed a retrospective unicenter study from October 2021 to December 2021 analyzing patients who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with cholecystectomy. We extracted data from 20 patients who underwent hiatal hernia repair together with cholecystectomy. Grouping of data by hiatal hernia type showed 6 type IV hernias (complex hernia), 13 type III hernias (mixed type) and 1 type I hernia (sliding hernia). Out of the 20 cases analyzed, 19 were patients suffering from chronic cholecystitis and 1 patient presented with acute cholecystitis. The average operating time was 179 min. Minimum blood loss was achieved. Cruroraphy was performed in all cases, mesh reinforcement was added in five cases, and fundoplication was performed in all cases, with 3 Toupet, 2 Dor and 15 floppy Nissen fundoplication procedures performed. Fundopexy was routinely performed in cases of Toupet fundoplication. A total of 1 bipolar and 19 retrograde cholecystectomies were performed. Results: All patients had favorable postoperative hospitalization. Patient follow-up took place at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, with no sign of recurrence of hiatal hernia (anatomical or symptomatic) and no symptoms of postcholecystectomy syndrome. In two patients, we had to perform colostomy. Conclusion: Concomitant laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and cholecystectomy is safe and feasible.

Evaluation of 30-day morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter prospective observational Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (IAGES) Study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for benign gallstone disease. There are no robust Indian data on the 30-day morbidity and mortality of this procedure. A prospective multicentre observational study was conducted by the Indian Association of Gastro-Intestinal Endo Surgeons (IAGES) to assess the 30-day morbidity and mortality of LC in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participating surgeons were invited to submit data on all consecutive LCs for benign diseases performed between 09/12/2020 and 08/03/2021 in adults. Primary outcome measures were 30-day morbidity and mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables significantly associated with primary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 293 surgeons from 125 centres submitted data on 6666 patients. Of these, 71.7% (n = 4780) were elective. A total LC was carried out in 95% (n = 6331). Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy was performed in 1.9% (n = 126) and the procedure were converted to open in 1.4% of patients. Bile duct injury was seen in 0.3% (n = 20). Overall, 30-day morbidity and mortality were 11.1% (n = 743) and 0.2% (n = 14), respectively. Nature of practice, ischemic heart disease, emergency surgery, postoperative intensive care, and postoperative hospital stay were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Age, weight, body mass index, duration of symptoms, nature of the practice, history of Coronavirus Disease-2019, previous major abdominal surgery, acute cholecystitis, use of electrosurgical or ultrasonic or bipolar energy for cystic artery control; use of polymer clips for cystic duct control; conversion to open surgery, subtotal cholecystectomy, simultaneous common bile duct exploration, mucocele, gangrenous gall bladder, dense adhesions, intraoperative cholangiogram, and use of drain were independently associated with 30-day morbidity.

CONCLUSION

LC has 30-day morbidity of 11.1%, 30-day mortality of 0.2%, conversion to open rate of 1.4%, and bile duct injury rate of 0.3% in India.

Laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy in children: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernias (IHs) are sometimes encountered incidentally in children during laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy in children.

METHODS

A multicentric study was performed in patients with AA and concurrent IH who received laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy (study group), compared with patients who underwent two-stage laparoscopic procedures (control group) between September 2012 and January 2020. Intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

189 patients with AA and concurrent IH (117 children in the study group, and 72 children in the control group) were enrolled. No significant differences in preoperative characteristics were identified between the two groups. Patients in the study group had a shorter total operative time and hospital stay than those in the control group (43.2 ± 8.1 vs 53.9 ± 7.3 min, p < 0.001; 1.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.9 days, p = 0.023). The study group incurred lower costs than the control group (9198.7 ± 587.6 vs 14,392.5 ± 628.6 RMB, p < 0.001). During follow-up (range 1.5-6.0 years), three children in the study group and two children in the control group experienced wound infection. One child in the study group had recurrent IH.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic simultaneous procedures do not increase the incidence of wound infection or recurrent IH. Moreover, they avoid repeat anesthesia and hospitalization. Therefore, this approach is safe, feasible and cost-effective for children with AA and concurrent IH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

SIMULTANEOUS LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR AND CHOLECYSTECTOMY: DOES IT CAUSE MESH INFECTION?

BACKGROUND

Repair of inguinal hernia concomitant with cholecystectomy was rarely performed until more recently when laparoscopic herniorrhaphy gained more adepts. Although it is generally an attractive option for patients, simultaneous performance of both procedures has been questioned by the potential risk of complications related to mesh, mainly infection.

AIM

To evaluate a series of patients who underwent simultaneous laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and cholecystectomy, with emphasis on the risk of complications related to the mesh, especially infection.

METHODS

Fifty patients underwent simultaneous inguinal repair and cholecystectomy, both by laparoscopy, of which 46 met the inclusion criteria of this study.

RESULTS

In all, hernia repair was the first procedure performed. Forty-five (97,9%) were discharged within 24 h after surgery. Total mean cost of the two procedures performed separately ($2,562.45) was 43% higher than the mean cost of both operations done simultaneously ($1,785.11). Up to 30-day postoperative follow-up, seven (15.2%) presented minor complications. No patient required hospital re-admission, percutaneous drainage, antibiotic therapy or presented any other signs of mesh infection after three months. In long-term follow-up, mean of 47,1 months, 38 patients (82,6%) were revaluated. Three (7,8%) reported complications: hernia recurrence; chronic discomfort; reoperation due a non-reabsorbed seroma, one in each. However, none showed any mesh-related complication. Satisfaction questionnaire revealed that 36 (94,7%) were satisfied with the results of surgery. All of them stated that they would opt for simultaneous surgery again if necessary.

CONCLUSION

Combined laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and cholecystectomy is a safe procedure, with no increase in mesh infection. In addition, it has important advantage of reducing hospital costs and increase patient' satisfaction.

Combined Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Procedures by a Single Surgeon: Boon to Economically and Medically Backward Areas

Introduction This study was done to evaluate our experience of combining a retroperitoneal laparoscopic urological operation with other transperitoneal laparoscopic operations. Materials and methods We present a retrospective study of a series of 20 cases of retroperitoneal laparoscopic urological surgeries combined with at least one transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures, performed by a senior minimally invasive surgeon, between March 2013 and August 2020. We have excluded three patients where either of the procedures required conversion to open surgery. We retrospectively reviewed all the data regarding the patient's demographics, combined surgical procedures done, operative time taken, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and days of hospital stay. Results Total of 20 patients had undergone simultaneous retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures. A total of nine (45%) cases comprised a combination of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Two patients had undergone a combination of three laparoscopic procedures in the same operation. The mean hospital stay was 3.6 days. Blood loss was minimal to moderate in all the patients, none needed any perioperative blood transfusion. No major complications were noted in any patients. Conclusion Combining a retroperitoneal laparoscopic urological procedure with another transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery is very much feasible. It becomes even easier and relevant provided both the procedures are performed by a single, experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

Simultaneous TAPP inguinal repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a case series

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy and inguinal hernioplasty are the most frequent surgeries in Chile and the world. Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty, being a clean surgery, reports mesh infection rates of less than 2% and adding a simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy is controversial due to an increase in the risk of mesh infection. The aim of this paper is to report the results of simultaneous TAPP hernioplasty with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of the digestive surgery database. We identified cases in which laparoscopic inguinal TAPP repair and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy were performed. Demographic, clinical information, hernia type and size, data from the surgery and its complications were also retrieved and analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 21 patients, 86% male and with an average age of 61 years range 46-84. 72% of the hernias were unilateral, predominating indirect 50%, direct 28% and the remaining were femoral and mixed. The average hernia size was 2.2 cm. The meshes used were 56% polypropylene, 37% polyester and 5% PVDF. We report one gallblader perforation. At a median time of 40 months of follow-up (range 4-89 months), one hernia recurrence was found (3.7%), there were no reoperations at the time of the interview and there were no cases of mesh infection. Complications of surgery includes one ipsilateral testicular atrophy 4.8% and 1 ipsilateral inguinal seroma 4.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of cases, adding clean contaminated surgery to the inguinal TAPP hernioplasty was not associated with an increase in the infection of the mesh.

Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ventral hernia repair compared to that of laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone

BACKGROUND

Although incidental hernias frequently are found and repaired during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the outcomes of simultaneous LC and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) have not been scrutinized. In this study we evaluated short-term outcome data comparing simultaneous LC and LVHR against LC alone.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database (2005-2009) was queried using primary procedure and secondary current procedural terminology (CPT(®)) codes for LC and LVHR. Outcomes analyzed included separate LC and LVHR and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ventral hernia repair (LC/LVHR). The 30 day clinical outcomes along with postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS) were assessed using the χ(2) test and analysis-of-variance test with p values < 0.01 set as significant. We also performed forward stepwise multivariable regression taking in to consideration over 50 ACS NSQIP risk factors to adjust for patient risk.

RESULTS

A total of 82,837 patients underwent LC and/or LVHR of which 357 (0.4%) underwent simultaneous LC/LVHR. Patients who underwent LC/LVHR were more likely to have surgical site infections, suffer sepsis or septic shock, and have pulmonary complications, including pneumonia, reintubation or prolonged ventilator requirements, than LC-alone patients. No difference was noted in 30 day mortality, rates of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE), renal insufficiency, or stroke. After multivariable adjustment for over 50 ACS NSQIP risk factors, concurrent LC/LVHR continued to pose a higher risk for these outcomes relative to LC only.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous LC/LVHR results in greater postoperative morbidity in terms of surgical site infections, sepsis, and pulmonary complications when compared to LC alone. In light of this increased short-term morbidity, consideration should be given toward performing LC and LVHR independently in patients requiring both procedures. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to better understand the implications of simultaneous LC/LVHR.