Idiopathic colonic perforation in adult-a rare case

Stercoral perforation of the cecum: A case report

BACKGROUND

With less than 90 reported cases to date, stercoral perforation of the colon is a rare occurrence. Stercoral ulceration is thought to occur due to ischemic pressure necrosis of the bowel wall, which is caused by the presence of a stercoraceous mass. To underscore this urgent surgical situation concerning clinical presentation, surgical treatment, and results, we present the case of a 66-year-old man with a stercoral perforation.

CASE SUMMARY

A 66-year-old man with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and gout presented at the emergency department with lower abdominal pain and a low-grade fever lasting for a few hours. Abdominal computed tomography indicated a suspected bezoar (approximately 7.6 cm) in the dilated cecum, accompanied by pericolic fat stranding, mild proximal dilatation of the ileum, pneumoperitoneum, and minimal ascites. Intraoperatively, feculent peritonitis with isolated cecal perforation were observed. Consequently, a right hemicolectomy with peritoneal lavage was performed. A histopathological examination supported the intraoperative findings.

CONCLUSION

In stercoral perforations, a diagnosis should be diligently pursued, especially in older adults, and prompt surgical intervention should be implemented.

Prevalence and Clinicopathologic Features of Intestinal Perforation Caused by Segmental Absence of the Intestinal Musculature in Adults

Segmental absence of the intestinal musculature (SAIM) can cause intestinal perforation in adults. However, its prevalence and clinicopathologic features have not been well-described. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of SAIM-associated perforation and characterize its clinicopathologic features. We retrospectively examined 109 cases of intestinal perforation that underwent surgical resection from January 2009 to December 2019. SAIM was defined as the complete absence of the muscularis propria without extensive inflammation and fibrinous exudation around the perforation. SAIM was the second most frequent cause of perforation (26 cases: 24%), the most frequent cause being related to diverticulitis (39 cases: 36%). The most common site was the sigmoid colon (12 cases: 46.2%). The younger group (aged below 65 y) exhibited more frequent perforation of the upper segments of the gastrointestinal tract (from the duodenum to the descending colon) than the older group (65 y and above) (P=0.0018). No patients developed recurrence. The most common gross features were well-defined circular or small punched-out lesions, and the histologic features were complete absence of the muscularis propria and absence of hemorrhage and necrosis around the area of perforation. The characteristic features of SAIM were unique and their prevalence was higher than previously reported. The precise recognition of SAIM can aid in understanding the cause of perforation and avoiding further unnecessary examinations.

Transverse Colonic Perforation in Renal Transplant Recipients During the Early Postoperative Period: A Case Series

There are very few cases of nondiverticulitis episodes of colonic perforation in the acute postoperative period following kidney transplantation described in the literature. Various nondiverticular causes of colonic perforations include ischemia, malignancy, cytomegalovirus (CMV) enterocolitis, and nonobstructive colonic dilatation. Immunosuppressive medication can contribute to colonic perforation, placing kidney recipients at risk for these complications. Since 2011, there have been 2 cases of transverse colonic perforation in the early postoperative period following renal transplantation at our institution. Both patients underwent urgent exploratory laparotomy with resection of perforated transverse colon and creation of a proximal colostomy. The aim of this study is to review the cases of colonic perforation following renal transplantation to gain a greater understanding of this rare occurrence. Despite the lack of a clear cause of perforation, it is imperative to have a high index of suspicion for colonic perforations in these immunocompromised patients to provide prompt surgical management and improved outcomes.

Spontaneous colonic perforation in adults: Evaluation of a pooled case series

Spontaneous colonic perforation in adults (SCPA) is rare but important. Its clinicopathological features and outcomes remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to explore and investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, clinical outcomes and potential risk factors for patients with SCPA. Data of seven patients with SCPA treated in our hospitals from January 2008 to December 2017, and 221 cases from research databases before 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The description of SCPA included stercoral perforation of the colon (SPC), idiopathic perforation of the colon (IPC) and spontaneous colonic perforation (SCP) in the study. All SCPA patients presented with unexplained abdominal pain and peritonitis. The median age was 62.5 years. The definite diagnosis preoperatively was 20.6%. The commonest lesion location was sigmoid colon and Hartmann's operation accounted for 59.3%. Histopathology of stercoral perforation (HSP) and histopathology of idiopathic perforation (HIP) were two histopathological findings. Postoperative complication was 67.7% and mortality was 31.1%. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that chronic constipation was an independent risk factor for histopathological features (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.005). Age of patients was associated with both postoperative complication (p = 0.012, p = 0.044) and mortality (p = 0.013, p = 0.034). Univariate analysis showed that HSP was associated with postoperative complication (p = 0.015). Our findings from the analysis pertaining to SCPA confirm those from previous studies, supporting the SCPA, as a uniform description, is an infrequent and life-threatening disease requiring early surgical intervention. We found that the elderly with chronic constipation was a high-risk category and those with HIP had a more favorable outcome than that of patients with HSP.

Systemic schistosomiasis and large bowel perforation: An unexpected surgical urgency. Report of a case and literature review

In the presence of suggestive clinical picture (high eosinophil count and multiple CT scan granuloma-like lesions), schistosomiasis should be taken into account in case of suspected bowel perforation even if common risk factors are not identified through anamnesis.

Intestinal perforation after surgical treatment for incisional hernia: iatrogenic or idiopathic?

Intestinal perforation (IP) is a life-threatening gastroenterological condition requiring urgent surgical care, which may present itself as an uncommon complication following incisional hernia repair surgery, most often because of iatrogenic traumatism occurring during the procedure. However, we report a case where a spontaneous onset can be hypothesised. A 60-years-old patient underwent repair of an abdominal laparocele, through rectus abdominis muscle plasty, 5 years after development of an incisional hernia due to exploratory laparotomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Xipho-pubic scar was excised and umbilicus and supra-umbilical hernia sac dissected, a linear median incision was performed along the sub-umbilical linea alba, reaching preperitoneal plane to assess any intestinal loop adherence to the abdominal wall. After limited viscerolysis, abdominal wall defect was corrected by ‘rectus abdominis muscle plasty’ and umbilicus reconstruction by Santanelli technique. Postoperative course was uneventful until Day 29, with sudden onset of epigastric pain, fever and bulge. Sixty cubic centimeter pus was drained percutaneously and cavity was rinsed with a 50% H2O2 and H2O V-V solution until draining clear fluid. Symptoms recurred two days later, while during rinsing presented dyspnoea. X-Ray and CT scan diagnosed IP, and she underwent under emergency an exploratory laparotomy, leading to right hemicolectomy extended to last ileal loops and middle third of the transverse, right monolateral salpingo-ovariectomy and a temporary ileostomy by general surgeon. Twenty-three days later an ileostomy reversal surgery was performed and 8 days after she was discharged. At latest follow-up patient showed fair conditions, complaining abdominal pain and diarrhoea, attributable to the extensive intestinal resection. IP following incisional hernia repair, is reported as uncommon and early postoperative complication. In our case, the previous regular postoperative course with late onset lead us to hypothesise a possible idiopathic etiopathogenesis, because of a strangulation followed by gangrene and abscess formation, which might begin before the incisional hernia repair and unnoticed at the time surgery was performed.