Enucleation is Better for a Giant Hemangioma Proximal to the Hepatic Portal Vascular Structures

Clinical impact and role of major vessels involvement in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma

BACKGROUND

Severe bleeding remains a significant concern in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma. It is rarely reported that how the degree of major vessels involvement impacts on severe bleeding. The present study primarily aimed to analyze the impacts of the number of involved major vessels (NIMV) during laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma and evaluate the risk factors associated with increased bleeding.

METHODS

A database search was carried out for consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for liver hemangiomas at our department from January 2018 to December 2023. The collected data included demographics, characteristics of the hemangiomas, laboratory data, operation method, surgical and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study. 42 patients were categorized into the group with NIMV < 2, while 30 patients were divided into the group with NIMV ≥ 2. The group with NIMV ≥ 2 demonstrated a significant correlation with special segments, involved multiple segments and diameter of the hemangiomas (P < 0.01). And the perioperative variables including the extent of resection, operative time, blood loss, Pringle maneuver times, postoperative stay, drainage tube duration, and postoperative liver function (ALT, AST) also showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). Notably, NIMV ≥ 2 was identified as the most important independent risk factor for intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 ml in laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma (P = 0.011). For NIMV ≥ 2, the independent risk factor was special segments in multivariate analysis (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The involvement of multiple major vessels (NIMV ≥ 2) was significantly associated with special segments, resulting in increased intraoperative blood loss, operation difficulty, and delayed postoperative recovery. Moreover, it was identified as the single independent risk factor with a considerable risk for increased blood loss during laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma.

Enucleation versus hepatectomy for hepatic hemangiomas: A meta-analysis

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of enucleation and hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatic hemangioma (HH).

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating enucleation versus hepatectomy for HH starting from the time of database creation to February 2022. Extraction of the data used in this study was done from the literature. The differences between the two surgical approaches were evaluated by comparing and analyzing the relevant data by means of meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 1,384 patients (726 underwent enucleation, and 658 with hepatectomy) were included in our meta-analysis from 12 studies. Enucleations were associated with favorable outcomes in terms of operation time [mean difference (MD): −39.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): −46.23, −33.30], blood loss (MD: −300.42, 95% CI: −385.64, −215.19), length of hospital stay (MD: −2.33, 95% CI: −3.22, −1.44), and postoperative complications (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44–0.74). There were no differences between the groups in terms of patients needing transfusion (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.50, 1.42), inflow occlusion time (MD: 1.72, 95% CI: −0.27, 3.71), and 30-day postoperative mortality (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.02–2.17).

Conclusion

Compared with hepatectomy, enucleation is found to be effective at reducing postoperative complications, blood loss, and operation time and shortening the length of hospital stay. Enucleation is similar to hepatectomy in terms of inflow occlusion time, 30-day postoperative mortality, and patients needing transfusing to hepatectomy.

Efficacy and factors affecting the choice of enucleation and liver resection for giant hemangioma: a retrospective propensity score-matched study

Background

Liver resection (LR) and enucleation (EN) are the main surgical treatment for giant hepatic hemangioma (HH), but how to choose the type of surgery is still controversial. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and the factors affecting the choice of open procedure for HH.

Methods

The data for patients with pathologically confirmed HH who underwent open surgery from April 2014 to August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression were performed to disclose the factors associated with the choice of EN or LR. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare the efficacy of the two procedures.

Results

A total of 163 and 110 patients were enrolled in the EN and LR groups. Following 1:1 matching by PSM analysis, 66 patients were selected from each group. Centrally located lesions (OR: 0.131, 95% CI 0.070–0.244), tumors size > 12.1 cm (OR: 0.226, 95% CI 0.116–0.439) and multiple tumors (OR: 1.860, 95% CI 1.003–3.449) were independent factors affecting the choice of EN. There was no significant difference in the median operation time (156 vs. 195 min, P = 0.156), median blood loss (200 vs. 220 ml, P = 0.423), blood transfusion rate (33.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 1.000), mean postoperative feeding (3.1 vs. 3.3 d, P = 0.460), mean postoperative hospital stay (9.5 vs. 9.0 d, P = 0.206), or the major complication rates between the two groups.

Conclusions

Peripherally located lesions, tumors size ≤ 12.1 cm and multiple tumors were more inclined to receive EN. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of EN or LR.

Invasive management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma

Hepatic hemangioma is common among benign liver tumors and usually grows slowly. About 50-70% of hepatic hemangiomas are asymptomatic, and management is not necessary; however, management should be considered in symptomatic patients. The optimal management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma depends on multiple factors. Invasive management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma mainly consists of surgery and interventional radiology, including transarterial embolization, ablation, percutaneous sclerotherapy, and percutaneous argon-helium cryotherapy. Although both surgery and interventional radiology are promising in the management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma, multiple and/or giant hemangiomas represent a clinical dilemma because the complication rate and recurrence rate are relatively high, and symptom relief is not always achieved. However, a review of recent advances in treatment is lacking. We therefore summarized the current invasive management techniques for symptomatic hepatic hemangioma to potentially facilitate clinical decision-making.

Surgical Management of Giant Hepatic Hemangioma: Single Center's Experience with 144 Patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatic hemangioma (HH) is the most common benign solid tumor of the liver. The aim of this study is to review our experiences of surgical treatment for giant HH and to show the impact of HH size and type of surgical resection on surgical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of the cases who underwent surgery for giant HH during the period from January 2000 to April 2017.

RESULTS

Elective surgery was performed for 144 patients who had giant HH. The median diameter of resected HH was 10 cm (5-31 cm). Enucleation was performed for 92 (63.9%) patients and anatomical resection was required in 52 (36.1%) patients. No statistical difference between enucleation and resection as regards intraoperative and postoperative findings. The amount of intraoperative blood loss is significantly more in HH > 10 cm (300 vs. 575 ml, P = 0.007), the need of blood transfusion was significantly more in HH > 10 cm (P = 0.000), and the operation time was significantly longer in HH > 10 cm (120 vs. 180 min, P = 0.000). The size of HH had no significant effect as regards the development of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Giant hemangioma can be treated surgically with low incidence of morbidity and mortality. No statistical difference between enucleation and resection as regards surgical outcomes. In left lobe HH, HH located deeper in posterior hepatic segments and in multiple HH, hepatic resection is preferred. The size of the HH had significant impact intraoperative blood loss and operative time.