An Assessment Scale for Patients with Postoperative Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infection: a Cross-Sectional Study

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Surgical Site Infections: An Evidence-Based Literature Review

Background

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a frequent postoperative complication that nurses commonly need to provide asepsis-specific meticulous care for. The application of a closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) device is regarded as a novel technique that aims to lower the risk of external wound contamination.

Aim

The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of iNPWT on high-risk closed laparotomy incisions with the aim to inform nursing practitioners and physicians engaged in multieffort wound care practices. Nursing professionals play a crucial role in mitigating the incidence of SSIs, from the time of application, through ongoing assessment tissue condition, and ensuring asepsis, thereby enhancing patient care and safety.

The Research Question

Is prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy effective in reducing the incidence of (closed) surgical site wound infections postlaparotomy?

PICO Elements

The population studied included patients undergoing laparotomy surgery. The intervention under review included the application of iNPWT, compared to the use of standard gauze dressing. The expected outcome was SSI reduction.

Methods and Results

A systematized literature search was conducted using various databases to identify published studies that address the PICO question. The PRISMA checklist and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools allowed to exclude irrelevant articles and to critically appraise the evidence, respectively. Eleven key articles were retrieved including four RCTs and seven systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The results indicated an overall positive association between iNPWT and a reduction in SSI in laparotomy surgeries when compared to standard dressings.

Linking Evidence to Action

Data across most studies reviewed support the benefits with the use of iNPWT as a preventive strategy to lower the rates of SSI, with some claiming no difference. Although heterogeneity in the studies precludes a definite conclusion, nurses may make a more informed decision when navigating the demands of SSI prevention targeted nursing care.

Predicting Superficial Surgical Site Infections: A Study of the Risk Factors and an Assessment Scale From Western India

Introduction Superficial surgical site infections (SSSIs) are very common nosocomial infections that can complicate a range of surgeries, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality, and an overall decreased benefit of surgical interventions, along with exorbitant expenditure of healthcare resources. An assessment scale could help in the segregation of the high-risk patient population, and appropriate resources could be directed toward them. Methods A prospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Western India with 200 participants. Certain probable preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors for SSSIs were assessed for significance of association, and each patient was given a score according to the assessment scale. The predictive power of the scale was calculated. Results Body mass index (BMI), preoperative laboratory investigations, and preoperative hospital stay showed a significant association with the complication. Clean-contaminated wounds had a higher incidence of postoperative SSSIs as compared to clean wounds. Postoperatively, fever and the presence of open drains predisposed the patient to complications. The assessment scale was found to have a positive predictive value of 40.94% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.30%. Conclusion The factors that could significantly prevent the development of SSSIs are normal preoperative laboratory investigations, less than three days of preoperative hospital stay, and avoiding the use of open drains. The high NPV of the assessment scale means that it can be used as a screening tool to segregate high-risk patients.

Surgical site infections in Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common and costly type of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) worldwide. Despite individual studies, there is also no clear statistics on the SSI prevalence rate in the East Mediterranean region. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of SSI in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching three international databases (Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus) from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2018. The keywords used included 'Prevalence' OR 'incidence' OR 'surgical site infection' OR 'wound infection' OR 'Postoperative Wound Infections' and 'Middle east'. The Hoy et al.'s tool was used to evaluate the quality of the articles. Result: Out of 889 initial studies, 40 studies from 12 countries of the Eastern Mediterranean region were included in the final stage of the study. Based on the results of random effect method, the overall prevalence of SSI in 137,452 patients was 7.9% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 7.1, 8.8; I²=96.7%). The prevalence of SSI in cardiac surgery and general surgery wards was 10 and 9.2%, respectively. The prevalence of SSI was lower in women than in males, although this difference was related to caesarean section. Conclusions: Considering the high prevalence of SSI in the Eastern Mediterranean region, timely diagnosis, proper prevention and postoperative control are necessary in the region using the same international guides in all countries.