Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Elderly Patients: Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre in Northern India

The Impact of Human Microbiotas in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Organ Transplantation

The human microbiota heavily influences most vital aspects of human physiology including organ transplantation outcomes and transplant rejection risk. A variety of organ transplantation scenarios such as lung and heart transplantation as well as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is heavily influenced by the human microbiotas. The human microbiota refers to a rich, diverse, and complex ecosystem of bacteria, fungi, archaea, helminths, protozoans, parasites, and viruses. Research accumulating over the past decade has established the existence of complex cross-species, cross-kingdom interactions between the residents of the various human microbiotas and the human body. Since the gut microbiota is the densest, most popular, and most studied human microbiota, the impact of other human microbiotas such as the oral, lung, urinary, and genital microbiotas is often overshadowed. However, these microbiotas also provide critical and unique insights pertaining to transplantation success, rejection risk, and overall host health, across multiple different transplantation scenarios. Organ transplantation as well as the pre-, peri-, and post-transplant pharmacological regimens patients undergo is known to adversely impact the microbiotas, thereby increasing the risk of adverse patient outcomes. Over the past decade, holistic approaches to post-transplant patient care such as the administration of clinical and dietary interventions aiming at restoring deranged microbiota community structures have been gaining momentum. Examples of these include prebiotic and probiotic administration, fecal microbial transplantation, and bacteriophage-mediated multidrug-resistant bacterial decolonization. This review will discuss these perspectives and explore the role of different human microbiotas in the context of various transplantation scenarios.

Young haploidentical donor versus fully matched elderly donor: An observational study on patients aged 50 years or older underwent hematopoietic progenitor cells transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Stem cell transplantation has been a therapeutic option for increasingly older patients but the search for the donor is an additional question in this context. Currently the ideal donor is a sibiling with fully compatible human leukocyte antigens, but when it is an elderly patient there is a high probability that this donor is also elderly, and the donor age has been related to worse outcomes and the possible comorbidities may render the donor ineligible.

OBJECTIVE

To compare, in patients aged 50 years or older, the overall survival of patients whose donor had haploidentical HLA compatibility and under 50 years of age ("young" donor) versus patients whose donor had a total HLA compatibility and 50 years of age or older ("elderly" donor).

METHODS

This is a consecutive retrospective descriptive observational epidemiological study. All patients were treated during the period from January, 2010 to April, 2019. Overall survival of patients 50 years of age and older was the primary outcome of the study.

RESULT

We included 53 patients. In the multivariate analysis we found no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients whose donor had fully HLA compatible aged 50 years and older and patients whose donor had haploidentical HLA compatible and aged up to 50 years (p = 0.135).

CONCLUSION

The results obtained in the study show that for patients aged 50 years or older, a donor with haploidentical human leukocyte antigen compatibility and age below 50 years can be chosen without impairing overall survival.

Myeloablative Versus Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis

The conditioning regimens used for the allo-HSCT include either myeloablative conditioning (MAC) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens based on the age, performance status and co-morbidities. Studies comparing the survival outcomes of RIC and MAC allo-HSCT in AML and MDS patients have reported contradictory results. We therefore retrospectively analyzed our data of AML and MDS patients who received MAC and RIC allo-HSCT at our center and compared the long term outcome of the two conditioning regimens. One hundred twenty six consecutive patients were evaluated, 32 (25.4%) underwent MAC allo-HSCT and 94 (74.6%) underwent RIC allo-HSCT. The most common MAC regimen used was busulfan plus cyclophosphamide and the most common RIC regimen used was fludarabine plus melphalan. The median age was higher in RIC group (44 years, range 4-75 years) compared to MAC group (31 yrs, range 6-51 yrs, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of overall survival (p = 0.498), relapse-free survival (p = 0.791) and non-relapse mortality (p = 0.366) between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, only chronic graft-versus-host disease resulted in decreased risk of relapse and improved overall survival irrespective of the conditioning regimens used.