Complex proximal humerus fractures: Hertel's criteria reliability to predict head necrosis

Prosthetic treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly

The Section for Skeletal Trauma and Sports Injuries of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) has reached a consensus among European countries in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in a working group. As a result the ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly were published in 2021. The various treatment options and algorithms for this are now described in more detail and the procedures were explained in several related specialist articles. The recommendations include conservative and four possible surgical treatment options (ORIF, nailing, hemi- and total inverse arthroplasty). This article deals with hemi- and total inverse arthroplasty. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has emerged as a key treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. It offers significant advantages in restoring function, alleviating pain, and providing durable outcomes compared to alternative approaches. Despite challenges related to implant complications and surgical expertise, ongoing advancements in technology and techniques continue to improve its effectiveness. With the rising incidence of complex fractures, RTSA is expected to play an increasingly vital role in maintaining the quality of life in aging populations.

Open reduction and internal fixation versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of unstable proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plate and intramedullary allograft: A retrospective study

Background

This retrospective clinical study aims to compare the functional and radiological outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of unstable proximal humerus fractures treated with both locking plate and intramedullary graft.

Methods

Forty-seven patients with proximal humerus fractures were treated with either open reduction and internal fixation (25 cases) or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (22 cases) and evaluated retrospectively with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Thirty-one fresh-frozen fibulae and 16 lyophilized tibia allografts were used for augmentation. Change of both neck-shaft angle and humeral head height were evaluated radiologically. Functional outcomes were assessed using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH), Absolute Constant-Murley Score (CSabs), Relative Constant-Murley Score (CSrel), and Individual Relative Constant-Murley Score (CSindiv).

Results

Follow-up period and age for open reduction and internal fixation/minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis were 27.4 ± 16.2/29.6 ± 17.6 months and 60.5 ± 13.7/66.3 ± 11.7 years. CSabs, CSrel, and CSindiv were 57.3 ± 21.2/52.4 ± 18.9, 73 ± 24.1/73.9 ± 23.4, and 69.6 ± 24.8/64 ± 25.5 for open reduction and internal fixation/minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, p ≥ 0.409. DASH was 14.8 ± 12.5/18.7 ± 14.5 for open reduction and internal fixation/minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, p = 0.324. Decrease of neck-shaft angle and humeral head height was 7.8 ± 9.4/8.2 ± 15.6° and 0.6 ± 5.5/1.4 ± 2.6 mm for open reduction and internal fixation/minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, p ≥ 0.380. Surgical time was 165.8 ± 77.6/84.7 ± 38.1 min for open reduction and internal fixation/minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, p < 0.001.

Conclusions

Locked plating with intramedullary graft augmentation of unstable proximal humerus fractures demonstrates similar functional and radiological outcomes when comparing open reduction and internal fixation with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. However, minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis is related to significantly shorter surgical time versus open reduction and internal fixation.

The VIDIA BONE score as a patient- and fracture-related risk score for the occurrence of fracture sequelae in proximal humerus fractures

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to determine preoperative patient- and fracture-related risk factors for estimating the risk of fracture sequelae after surgically treated proximal humerus fractures (PHF) using locking plate osteosynthesis. The purpose was to develop a fracture sequelae risk score as an additional tool to facilitate the treatment strategy for PHF.

METHODS

All patients with PHF who underwent surgery with locking plate osteosynthesis were included. Inclusion criteria were complete preoperative parameters including general patient-specific information, preoperative radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the occurrence of fracture sequelae (Group I: no fracture sequelae, Group II: fracture sequelae). Following risk factors for fracture sequelae were defined: Vascular supply interruption risk [V], Individual (female gender) [I], Diabetes [D], ISAR (Identification of Seniors at risk) [I], ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score [A], Body mass index [B], Osteopenia [O], Nicotine abuse [N], Elderly > 65 [E]. The VIDIA BONE score contains 9 items. For each parameter of the VIDIA BONE score, a value between 1 and 3 was assigned based on the odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

This comparative case series study included 112 patients, with 82 (73.2%) in Group I and 30 (26.8%) in Group II. All defined preoperative risk factors were associated with an increased risk of fracture sequelae (FS), with odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.3 to 3.9, although not all parameters reached statistical significance. The maximum score was 24 points, categorized as follows: scores of 1 to 8 indicating low risk, 9 to 16 indicating moderate risk, and 17 to 24 indicating high risk of fracture sequelae following PHF. Patients with a VIDIA BONE score of 1 to 8 points demonstrated favorable postoperative outcomes, with FS observed in only 6% of cases. In contrast, 84% of patients with a score of 17 to 24 developed a FS. Additionally, 90% of all patients who developed FS had a VIDIA BONE score more than 9 points.

CONCLUSION

The VIDIA BONE score appears to be a simple, reproducible, and valuable tool for supporting reliable treatment decisions. Locking plate osteosynthesis is an effective treatment option for patients with a low risk VIDIA BONE score. However, patients with a high risk VIDIA BONE score are more likely to experience FS and osteosynthesis failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A prognostic classification of proximal humerus fractures: the cephalic extension staging

PURPOSE

Recent publications emphasized the role of dorsomedial metaphyseal extension of humeral head as predictor of ischemia after complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). We evaluated on preoperative 3D CT scan of PHFs the surface of this metaphyseal extension and its prognostic value on the occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN).

METHODS

We followed a series of 25 fixations of complex PHF which had a preoperative 3D CT scan and measured the surface area of the posterior metaphyseal extension (PME) of the head. Using approximations, we calculated the ratio between the PME surface area (PMS) and the articular surface area of the head (HS). The PMS/HS ratio was analyzed against the risk of AVN.

RESULTS

The measurement of the PMS/HS ratio emphasizes the significance of PME. The incidence of AVN is correlated with the magnitude of PME. Therefore, we include the PME as a fifth element in the characterization of complex PHFs and we propose a 4-stage prognostic classification based on the number of extensions of the humeral head. The head may have 3 extensions: posteromedial (PME), lesser tuberosity (LTE) and greater tuberosity (GTE). The risk of AVN decreases with the number of extensions of the head.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates a correlation between the occurrence of AVN and the size of PME in complex PHF cases. We propose a four-stage classification system to facilitate treatment decision-making between fixation and prosthesis.

Greater tuberosity medial malposition: does it affect shoulder abductor moment?

PURPOSE

The detrimental effect of greater tuberosity malposition on functional scores is well known. Superior or posterior malpositions exceeding five mm lead to excessive loading on the deltoid strength. However, the significance of situations where greater tuberosity becomes medialized due to the compressive effect of the locking plate fixation, especially in fractures with metaphyseal dead space, has not been emphasized. It is hypothesized that this condition may cause shortening of the rotator cuff moment arm and consequently impact functional scores.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018, 52 patients, aged 65,28 (ranging 40-85) proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plate fixation were included in the study. Cephalodiaphyseal angle, greater tuberosity displacement , patients reported outcome and Constant-Murley scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean Constant Murley score was determined to be 78.76 (ranging from 38 to 100). According to the patients reported outcome 39 excellent , five good , two fair, six poor results were observed. Avascular necrosis with screw migration was detected in five cases, while one patient experienced implant insufficiency along with varus deformity. Greater tuberosity was found to be positioned between 6 mm posterior-superior and -13 mm medial. Significant medial malposition was observed in three patients, with -9, -12, and -13 mm of medialization, respectively. Cephalodiaphysial angle was determined as 139.30 degrees (ranging from 120 to 150 degrees) and showed weak correlation with the functional score. Greater tuberosity medialization also showed weak correlation with the Constant-Murley score. The values exhibiting deviation were associated with low patient-reported outcome results and functional scores. In the examination of greater tuberosity displacement values, it was observed that Neer type 3 and 4 fractures differed significantly from Neer type 2 fractures regarding to Kruskal-Wallis test.

CONCLUSIONS

Medial impaction of greater tuberosity may be the reason of decreased functional scores, similar to superior or posterior malposition. The medialization of greater tuberosity should be considered as a potential factor leading to the shortening of the rotator cuff's abductor moment.

Fibula allograft in complex three-part and four-part proximal humeral fractures in active patients, a matched case-control study

Background

About 20% of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are unstable and/or markedly displaced and therefore require surgery. Locking plate fixation after anatomical reduction has become the current treatment of choice for these fractures in the active population. However, studies have shown complication rates up to 36%, such as loss of reduction and avascular necrosis. To date, data from literature are inconclusive on outcomes following the use of an intramedullary fibula allograft in PHFs, possibly due to the case mix. It is hypothesized that the use of a fibula allograft is beneficial to prevent secondary displacement of the fracture in cases where the medial hinge is markedly displaced and unstable, resulting in better clinical and patient reported outcomes.

Methods

In this multicenter matched cohort study, patients with an unstable, displaced PHF, including anatomic neck fractures and significantly displaced surgical neck fractures, were included. Patients that were treated with a locking plate augmented with a fibula allograft were matched to patients who had undergone locking plate reconstruction without the allograft. The matches were made based on fracture characteristics, age, and performance status. Functional outcomes, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, complications, and radiographic results were compared.

Results

Twelve patients with fibula allograft augmented osteosyntheses were included and matched to 12 control patients. The mean age was 58 years in the fibula allograft group compared to 62 years in the control group. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score, Constant Shoulder score, abduction, and external rotation were significantly better in the fibula allograft group (17.4 ± 8.6 vs. 26.1 ± 19.2, P = .048; 16.5 ± 11.5 vs. 19.8 ± 16.5 P = .040; mean 127° ± 38° vs. mean 92° ± 49° P = -.045; 50° ± 21° vs. mean 26° ± 23°, P = .004). There was no statistically significant difference in the Oxford Shoulder score between groups (P = .105). The Visual Analog Scale was not significantly different between groups (3.1 ± 1.8 vs. 1.6 ± 1.9, P = .439). Radiographic union was reached in 11 patients of the fibula allograft group compared to 8 in the control group (P = .317). The complication rate was twice as high in the control group (3 vs. 7).

Conclusion

Additional support of the medial hinge in unstable PHFs with a locking plate in combination with a fibula allograft appears to create a more stable construct without compromising the viability of the articular surface of the head. The use of a fibula allograft in selected complex cases could therefore result in better clinical outcomes with lower complication rates.

Single-Stage Bilateral Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for a Bilateral Four-Part Fracture Dislocation of the Proximal Humerus in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are a common type of fracture in adults. Although PHFs are common, bilateral presentation is extremely rare. Most PHFs are treated conservatively. In this report, we describe a 69-year-old right-hand-dominant male patient who was involved in a high-impact motor vehicle accident (MVA). The patient's upper limbs were in a fully extended position while he was holding the driving wheel, where he sustained a side impaction to the car by a hard object that caused bilateral four-part PHF with dislocation, which was confirmed on radiological investigations. The orthopedic surgery team believed that surgical treatment was necessary and ideal for these bilateral fracture dislocations, specifically bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). This is due to multiple factors, including the risk of humeral head avascular necrosis (AVN), the patient's advanced age, low demand, poor bone stock, osteoporosis, and a non-fixable fracture pattern. The patient underwent a single-stage bilateral RTSA procedure, which was well tolerated. He was optimized postoperatively. The post-operative X-ray showed good and satisfactory implant positions and orientation. Functional assessment using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were calculated at three-months follow-up (right-left: 50-60 and 41-14, respectively), at five-months follow-up (right-left: 34-66 and 38-14, respectively), and at eight-months follow-up (right-left: 40-68 and 24-7.5, respectively). Follow-up X-rays revealed good tuberosities healing, and no loosening or scapular notching. In addition, pain was assessed on a numerical rating scale (NRS), which demonstrated fast pain relief. Short-term follow-up with the patient demonstrated that he was satisfied with the surgery, especially the left side with a pain score on the NRS of one. We selected to share our experience of this complex case with our peers in the field of orthopedic surgery worldwide so that such a procedure could be implemented in similar cases to ensure satisfactory outcomes following bilateral four-part PHF with dislocation.

Treatment of Metaphyseal Defects in Plated Proximal Humerus Fractures with a New Augmentation Technique-A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

Background and Objectives: Unstable proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with metaphyseal defects-weakening the osteosynthesis construct-are challenging to treat. A new augmentation technique of plated complex PHFs with metaphyseal defects was recently introduced in the clinical practice. This biomechanical study aimed to analyze the stability of plated unstable PHFs augmented via implementation of this technique versus no augmentation. Materials and Methods: Three-part AO/OTA 11-B1.1 unstable PHFs with metaphyseal defects were created in sixteen paired human cadaveric humeri (average donor age 76 years, range 66-92 years), pairwise assigned to two groups for locked plate fixation with identical implant configuration. In one of the groups, six-milliliter polymethylmethacrylate bone cement with medium viscosity (seven minutes after mixing) was placed manually through the lateral window in the defect of the humerus head after its anatomical reduction to the shaft and prior to the anatomical reduction of the greater tuberosity fragment. All specimens were tested biomechanically in a 25° adduction, applying progressively increasing cyclic loading at 2 Hz until failure. Interfragmentary movements were monitored by motion tracking and X-ray imaging. Results: Initial stiffness was not significantly different between the groups, p = 0.467. Varus deformation of the humerus head fragment, fracture displacement at the medial humerus head aspect, and proximal screw migration and cut-out were significantly smaller in the augmented group after 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000 and 10,000 cycles, p ≤ 0.019. Cycles to 5° varus deformation of the humerus head fragment-set as a clinically relevant failure criterion-and failure load were significantly higher in the augmented group, p = 0.018. Conclusions: From a biomechanical standpoint, augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement placed in the metaphyseal humerus head defect of plated unstable PHFs considerably enhances fixation stability and can reduce the risk of postoperative complications.

Biomechanical Analysis of Combined Medial Calcar and Lateral Locked Plating Versus Isolated Lateral Locked Plating of Proximal Humerus Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Medial calcar buttress plating combined with lateral locked plating is biomechanically tested against isolated lateral locked plating in synthetic humeri models for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

METHODS

Proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11-A2.1) were manufactured in 10 pairs of Sawbones humeri models (Sawbones, Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon Island, WA). Specimen were randomly assigned and instrumented with either medial calcar buttress plating combined with lateral locked plating (CP) or isolated lateral locked plating (LP). Nondestructive torsional and axial load tests were performed to evaluate construct stiffness. Large-cycle axial tests were conducted followed by destructive ramp-to-failure tests. Cyclic stiffness was compared in both nondestructive and ultimate failure loads. Failure displacement was recorded and compared between groups.

RESULTS

The addition of medial calcar buttress plating to lateral locked plating constructs significantly increased the axial ( P < 0.01) and torsional ( P < 0.01) stiffness of the construct compared with isolated lateral locked plating by 95.56% and 37.46%, respectively. All models demonstrated greater axial stiffness ( P < 0.01) after 5000 cycles of axial compression, not dependent on the fixation method. During destructive testing, the CP construct withstood 45.35% larger load ( P < 0.01) and congruently exhibited 58% less humeral head displacement ( P = 0.02) before failure when compared with the LP construct.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the biomechanical superiority of medial calcar buttress plating when combined with lateral locked plating as compared with isolated lateral locked plating of OTA/AO type 11-A2.1 proximal humerus in synthetic humeri models.

Humeral Head Avascular Necrosis: Pathophysiology, Work-up, and Treatment Options

» Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is the result of ischemic injury to the epiphyseal bone leading to humeral head collapse and arthritis.» Common causes include trauma, chronic corticosteroid use, or systemic disease processes, such as sickle cell disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, or alcohol abuse.» Nonoperative treatment consists of risk factor management, physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and activity modification.» Surgical treatment options include arthroscopic debridement, core decompression, vascularized bone grafts, and shoulder arthroplasty.

Early Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adults Treated With Locked Plate Fixation Compared with Nonoperative Treatment: An Age-, Comorbidity-, and Fracture Morphology-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs), range of motion (ROM), and complication rates for proximal humerus fractures managed nonoperatively or with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Academic level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred thirty-one patients older than 55 years were identified retrospectively. 122 patients were excluded. 309 patients with proximal humerus fractures met inclusion criteria (234 nonoperative and 75 ORIF). After matching, 192 patients (121 nonoperative and 71 ORIF) were included in the analysis.

INTERVENTION

Nonoperative versus ORIF (locked plate) treatment of proximal humerus fracture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Early Visual Analog Score (VAS), ROM, PROs, complications, and reoperation rates between groups.

RESULTS

At 2 weeks, ORIF showed lower VAS scores, better passive ROM, and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) scores ( P < 0.05) compared with nonoperative treatment. At 6 weeks, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) had lower VAS scores, better passive ROM, and PROMIS scores ( P < 0.05) compared with nonoperative treatment. At 3 months, ORIF showed similar PROMIS scores ( P > 0.05) but lower VAS scores and better passive ROM ( P < 0.05) compared with nonoperative treatment. At 6 months, ORIF showed similar VAS scores, ROM, and PROMIS scores ( P > 0.05) compared with nonoperative treatment. There was no difference in secondary operation rates between groups ( P > 0.05). ORIF patients trended toward a higher secondary reoperation rate (15.5% vs. 5.0%) than nonoperative patients ( P = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

In an age-, comorbidity-, and fracture morphology-matched analysis of proximal humerus fractures, ORIF led to decreased pain and improved passive ROM early in recovery curve compared with nonoperative treatment that normalized after 6 months between groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Should valgus-impacted proximal humerus fractures necessarily be operated on? Radiological versus functional results

Background/aim

Impacted valgus proximal humerus fracture has been known to be challenging in terms of treatment and outcomes since it was defined. Moreover, it is a type of fracture that is difficult to treat. In addition, exact limits have not yet been determined regarding which parameters affect patients' functional and reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiological results of patients with impacted valgus proximal humerus fractures treated conservatively and surgically and to evaluate the effect of these radiological parameters on functional outcomes.

Materials and methods

A total of 79 patients who were treated between 2015 and 2021 with a diagnosis of impacted valgus fracture were evaluated retrospectively. Patients treated conservatively (Group 1) and surgically (Group 2) were evaluated in terms of radiological measurements (tubercle displacement (TD), cephalodiaphyseal angle (CDA), medial hinge (MH), cephaloglenoid angle (CGA), medial hinge impaction (MHI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant Shoulder Score, and functional outcomes (range of motion). The effect of radiological parameters on clinical outcomes was analyzed by a correlation test.

Results

In the postoperative period, the ASES and Constant scores of the patients in Group 2 were significantly higher than those of the patients in Group 1. Additionally, Group 2 had better results in terms of passive extension, active internal rotation, and active/passive external rotation. Patients in both groups exhibited improvements in radiological parameters, and the correlation test showed that MH and MHI were mostly related to ASES and Constant scores.

Conclusion

The monitoring and treatment of impacted valgus proximal humerus fractures remain controversial. Although radiological parameters are a guide for orthopedic surgeons, the limits have not been clearly defined. In this study, in addition to all parameters, the effect of MH and MHI on functional results was emphasized.

The Hertel classification can't predict the risk of humeral head osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis using an anterolateral approach

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures can progress to osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Hertel developed a binary classification system (12 subtypes) and demonstrated that some patterns have more risk to develop osteonecrosis. Hertel described the prevalence and the risk factors for Humeral head osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis using a Deltopectoral approach. Few studies have evaluated the prevalence and the capacity of Hertel's classification to predict Humeral Head osteonecrosis following osteosynthesis of proximal Humeral fractures through the anterolateral approach. The objectives of this study were to correlate osteonecrosis predictors established by the Hertel classification with the risk of developing osteonecrosis and its prevalence after osteosynthesis using the anterolateral approach.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures using an anterolateral approach. Patients were divided into two groups: high risk for necrosis (group 1) and low risk for necrosis (group 2) according to Hertel's criteria. The overall prevalence of osteonecrosis and the prevalence in each group were calculated. A radiological examination was performed in the true anteroposterior (Grashey), scapular, and axillary views, before and after the operation (minimum 1 year after surgery). A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess the pattern of the temporal evolution of osteonecrosis. The groups were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The unpaired t-test (parametric variables - age) and the Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric time between trauma and surgery) were used.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients were evaluated. The postoperative follow-up time was 14.5 ± 3.3 months. The time to onset of necrosis was 14.1 ± 3.9 months. Sex, age, and time between trauma and surgery did not influence the risk of necrosis. Type 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12, or fractures with posteromedial head extension less than or equal to 8 mm, or diaphysis deviation greater than 2 mm, as well as grouping did not influence the risk for osteonecrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Hertel's criteria were not able to predict the development of osteonecrosis after osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures performed through the anterolateral approach. The total prevalence of osteonecrosis was 17.9% with a tendency toward an increased incidence after 1 year of surgical treatment.

Computed Tomography Does Not Improve Intra- and Interobserver Agreement of Hertel Radiographic Prognostic Criteria

Background and Objectives: Proximal humerus fractures are the second most frequent site of avascular necrosis (AVN), occurring in up to 16% of cases. The Hertel criteria have been used as a reference for the prediction of humerus head ischemia. However, these are based solely on the use of radiographs, which can make interpretation extremely difficult due to several reasons, such as the overlapping fragments, severity of the injury, and noncompliant acute pain patients. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the role of computed tomography (CT) in the interpretation of the Hertel criteria and to evaluate the intra- and interobserver agreement of orthopedic surgeons, comparing their area of expertise. Materials and Methods: The radiographs and CT scans of 20 skeletally mature patients who had fractures of the proximal humerus were converted to jpeg and mov, respectively. All images were evaluated by eight orthopedic surgeons (four trauma surgeons and four shoulder surgeons) in two different occasions. The intra- and interobserver agreement was assessed by using the Kappa coefficient. The level of significance was 5%. Results: There was a weak-to-moderate intraobserver agreement (κ < 0.59) for all examiners. Only the medial metaphyseal hinge greater than 2 mm was identified by 87.5% of evaluators both in the radiographic and CT examinations in the two rounds of the study (p < 0.05). There was no significant interobserver agreement (κ < 0.19), as it occurred only in some moments of the second round of evaluation. Conclusions: The prognostic criteria for humeral head ischemia evaluated in this study showed weak intra- and interobserver agreement in both the radiographic and tomographic evaluation. CT did not help surgeons in the primary interpretation of Hertel prognostic criteria used in this study when compared to the radiographic examination.

Does mechanism of injury impact the outcome of operative fixation of geriatric proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of energy mechanism on outcomes following repair of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in the middle aged and geriatric population.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-nine patients who presented to our academic medical center between 2006 and 2020, and underwent operative treatment of a proximal humerus fracture were prospectively enrolled in an IRB-approved database. Patients above 55 were divided into high energy (motor vehicle accident, pedestrian struck, or fall > 2 stairs) or low energy mechanisms (fall from standing or < 2 stairs). Of 97 patients with complete documentation and follow-up, 72 were included in the low velocity (LV) group and 25 were included in the high velocity (HV) group. Demographic information, primary injury details, healing and time to union, range of motion (ROM), complications, and need for reoperation were assessed at initial presentation and subsequent follow-up appointments.

RESULTS

Mean age, BMI, and gender were significantly different between the LV and HV cohorts (p = 0.01, 0.04, 0.01). OTA/AO fracture patterns were similar between the groups. (p = 0.14). Bony healing and complications occurred with similar frequency between groups (p = 1.00, 0.062). The most common complications in the LV and HV groups included avascular necrosis (9.7%, 16.0%), and screw penetration (4.2%, 12.0%), while the HV group also had rotator cuff issues including weakness and tendonitis (12.0%). There was no significant difference in need for reoperation between cohorts (p = 0.45). Time to healing, shoulder ROM, and DASH scores did not differ between each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Energy and mechanism demonstrates similar outcomes in operatively treated proximal humerus fractures. These factors should not play a role in decisions for surgery in these patients and can help guide patient expectations.

Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Background

This study compares patient-reported outcomes and range of motion (ROM) between adults with an AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type C proximal humerus fracture managed nonoperatively, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients >60 years of age treated with nonoperative management, ORIF, or RSA for AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures from 2015 to 2018. Visual analog scale pain scores, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, ROM values, and complication and reoperation rates were compared using analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi square analysis for categorical variables.

Results

A total of 88 patients were included: 41 nonoperative, 23 ORIF, and 24 RSA. At the 2-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale scores and lower PROMIS pain interference scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale, PROMIS pain interference, and PF scores and better ROM (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 3-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS pain interference and PF scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS PF scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. There was a significantly higher complication rate in the ORIF group than in the non-operative and RSA groups (P < .05).

Conclusion

The management of AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures in older adults with RSA or ORIF led to early decreased pain and improved physical function and ROM compared to nonoperative management at the expense of a higher complication rate in the ORIF group.

Proximal humerus fractures: anatomy, diagnosis and management

Proximal humeral fractures are common with a bimodal distribution and sex discrepancy, affecting younger men and older women. The presentation of a proximal humeral fracture can vary greatly because of this bimodal distribution and the associated differences in mechanism of injury.

Initial management should involve assessment of life- and limb-threatening injuries as outlined by the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma, with particular attention paid to axillary nerve function and vascular status. Initial imaging should involve orthogonal X-rays in three planes to determine fracture characteristics and exclude glenohumeral dislocation. Computed tomography imaging improves interobserver agreement and is the gold standard in determining fracture management.

Management depends on fracture pattern, patient functionality and bone stock. Most patients with proximal humeral fractures achieve good functional outcomes via conservative methods (sling support and early, graded mobilisation), although there is a lack of evidence in certain populations, including younger patients. Surgery is required for open fractures and more complex fracture patterns where there is a risk of avascular necrosis of the humeral head, unacceptable impairment of functionality or neurovascular compromise. Surgical techniques can be head-sparing or involve replacement of the humeral head. There are several head-sparing techniques, each with different cost–benefit and complication profiles with no one technique superior to any other. However, improvements in plate technology may render open reduction internal fixation a more suitable technique, particularly in younger patients. Head replacement techniques (hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty) are indicated when the risk of avascular necrosis is too high or in older patients with osteoporotic bone. In these patients, reverse shoulder arthroplasty is preferred as it achieves better functional results than hemiarthroplasty. Complication rates vary depending on the fracture configuration and the course of management undertaken.

Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH+ of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population

Background: Operative management of proximal humeral fractures is still challenging. While antegrade nailing has become a valid option in fracture fixation, risk factors for adverse events, and failure have not been sufficiently clarified. Methods: All patients of a single trauma center undergoing surgery for proximal humeral fractures with the Targon PH+ nail between 2014 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. This included complications, revisions, and failures. Pre- and postoperative radiographic imaging were assessed regarding fracture’s complexity, anatomic reduction, reconstruction of the medial hinge, metaphyseal head extension, and fixation of the implant in the calcar region. Follow-up was at a minimum of 12 months. Results: A total number of 130 patients with a mean age of 74.5 years (range 63−94, SD ± 8.2) are included in this study. Two- and three-part fractures were found in 58 patients, while 14 patients showed four-part fractures. Overall, a complication rate of 34.2% and an implant failure rate of 15.4% was found. Four-part fractures showed a significantly higher complication rate than two- and three-part fractures. Four-part fractures also showed significantly higher revisions (p = 0.005) and implant failures (p = 0.008). The nonsufficient anatomical reduction was found to be a risk factor for complications (p < 0.0001), implant failures (p < 0.0001), and later humeral head osteonecrosis (p < 0.0001). Insufficiently reconstructed medial hinges (p = 0.002) and a metaphyseal head extension of under 8 mm (p = 0.005) were also demonstrated as risk factors for osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Conclusions: Four-part fractures in an elderly population show high complication, revision, and implant-failure rates. Therefore, demonstrated radiologic risk factors should be evaluated for improvements. Anatomical reduction and fixation near the calcar proved to be vital for successful antegrade nailing of complex fractures. To prevent osteonecrosis of the humeral head, reconstruction of the medial hinge and metaphyseal head extension should be evaluated.

Reduction and fixation of proximal humeral fracture with severe medial instability using a small locking plate

BACKGROUND

Currently, the reduction and support of comminuted medial cortex of humeral fracture remains a challenge, Therefore, a novel reduction and fixation technique that employs an anteromedial small locking plate was explored in this study, and its viability and the associated complications were assessed.

METHODS

Fifteen cases of proximal humeral fractures with medial instability (five cases were classified as three-part and ten as four-part by Neer classification) were treated by the proposed reduction technique using an anteromedial small locking plate. Subsequently, the radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated over an average follow-up period of 18.53 months.

RESULTS

The average operation time was 108 min (range, 70-130 min), and the mean fracture union time in all patients was 12.13 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). Complications such as infection and neurovascular injury were not observed. Postoperative X-ray showed avascular necrosis and screw penetration in one patient, while screw penetration, varus malunion, or significant reduction loss was not found in the other cases. The mean Constant score was 79.8 (range, 68-92) during the final visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an anteromedial small locking plate improved the reduction efficiency, reconstructed the medial support, and alleviated the occurrence of complications in proximal humeral fractures with medial instability.

Protective and Risk Factors for Humerus Head Necrosis After Proximal Humerus Fracture Treated with Internal Locking Plate

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common and lead to post-traumatic humerus head necrosis (HHN) in 3-35% after ORIF with an internal locking plate. Few studies focus on this condition and risk factors remain a discussion topic. Hertel's criteria for initial head ischemia right after fracture (fracture complexity, medial hinge displacement and short metaphyseal head extension) have recently been correlated to HHN, but there is still a clear lack of evidence on the topic. Due to its anatomical similarities to the proximal femur, some authors argue that PHF may as well benefit from early surgery to avoid head necrosis.

METHODS

In this 10-year retrospective study, we assessed 305 patients from a single center. All cases were treated with a PHILOS plate through a deltopectoral approach. The mean follow-up time was 467 days. The primary endpoint was HHN.

RESULTS

HHN was diagnosed in 12 patients (4%), 10 of which were diagnosed within the first year and one case 4 years after surgery. A positive correlation (p < 0.04) was found between HHN and fracture type (both in AO and Neer's classification), initial neck-shaft-angle (NSA) and metaphyseal head extension (MHE). Medial hinge displacement (MHD) occurred in all HHN cases. Achieving perfect reduction (< 2 mm dislocation) was relevant to avoiding HHN (p = 0.035). Although HHN developed in 32% of the high risk cases (four-part fractures with a short MHE), it was completely avoided (0%) when perfect reduction was achieved. Time until surgery after admission was neither a protective nor a risk factor for HHN.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that fracture complexity (four-part and C-fractures) as well as disruption of the medial hinge with a metaphyseal head extension smaller than 8 mm are relevant risk factors for humerus head necrosis. A combination of these criteria generated an high risk pattern with a 32% rate of HHN. Though often difficult to achieve, perfect reduction was a clear protective factor and reduced HHN to 0%. Perfect reduction may be key to inosculation and, therefore, salvage of the humerus head, especially in high risk cases. Surgery timing did not correlate with HHN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

Implant Selection for Proximal Humerus Fractures

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are a common orthopedic injury; however, their treatment remains largely controversial with evidence supporting a wide array of treatments. Although many injuries can be treated nonoperatively, there has been much debate about surgical management of PHF. A detailed review of the literature was performed relative to operative management options specifically related to implant choices. Although no definitive answers are available regarding best practice, there is literature to guide operative decision-making and implant selection based on both patient- and surgeon-specific factors.

Solely sutures is a reliable fixation for valgus-impacted proximal humeral fractures

PURPOSE

Valgus impacted proximal humeral fractures with substantial displacement may severely compromise shoulder function and open reduction can therefore be considered. Internal fixation hardware may eventually however constitute problems. In a small subset of these fractures, in which there is no medial comminution and intact blood supply it is possible to use a least possible fixation method with solely sutures through the tendons of the rotator cuff and the shaft as described by Bigliani 1990. The aim of the present study was to investigate the outcome of this fixation method in a retrospective series of patients.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients, 23 women and 4 men, with a mean age of 66 years (53-83) and minimum follow-up time of 2 years (2-11 years) accepted follow-up with standard shoulder radiographs and 22 were examined with Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant-Murley (CM) shoulder score and Numeric Rating Scale for pain (NRS). Reoperations or adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The median OSS was 45 (range 5-48) and CM 63 (range 21-98). The relative CM score was 81% of the uninjured side and median NRS 0 (range 0-5). No reoperations were undertaken. One patient had a complete avascular necrosis (AVN), 3 patients had a partial AVN of the humeral head and two a partial resorption of the greater tuberosity.

CONCLUSION

The use of sutures only for fixation of displaced valgus-impacted proximal humeral fractures provided a relatively reliable outcome with good functional scores and no reoperations. There appears to be no need for the use of hardware for fixation of this rare subset of fractures.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to examine trends, outcomes, and principles in treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly with a critical focus on reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a developing treatment option.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature shows an increase in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and a decrease in hemiarthroplasty performed for proximal humerus fractures. More predictable outcomes and lower revision rates are seen in older individuals treated primarily or secondarily with reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to those treated with hemiarthroplasty. We report current and historical treatments, outcomes, and principles in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of complex, displaced proximal humerus fractures in older individuals (≥ 65 years old).

[Primary fracture protheses and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in complex humeral head fractures : An alternative to joint-preserving osteosynthesis?]

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of complex humeral head fractures has adapted dynamically over the course of the last decade. The primary use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients has gained in relevance due to promising short and middle-term results. Long-term results, however, are still pending. The appliance of anatomical hemiarthroplasty, on the other hand, has lost in significance in favour of osteosynthesis and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

INDICATIONS

This review article follows the question as to under which circumstances primary fracture arthroplasty reflects an alternative or even a preference to joint-preserving osteosynthesis in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. It also specifies spectrums of indications for anatomical hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Anatomic locking plates for complex proximal humeral fractures: anatomic neck fractures versus surgical neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Continued debate exists on the management of displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures. Only a few studies have compared the efficacy of proximal humeral locking plates (PHLPs) for treating anatomic neck fractures (ANFs) and surgical neck fractures (SNFs).

METHODS

The medical data of 31 consecutive patients with displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures treated with PHLPs between May 2013 and April 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. We divided the patients into the ANF and SNF groups and assessed the neck-shaft angle (NSA), sum of the screw tip-articular surface distance, and other parameters postoperatively at 3 days and at 12 months using shoulder radiographs. The Constant-Murley scores were assessed at 3 days, 12 months, and last follow-up.

RESULTS

The ANF group had a significantly lower mean age and significantly greater mean operative duration, estimated blood loss, and rate of bone grafting. Full or partial osteonecrosis of the humeral head developed in 7 patients and 1 patient in the ANF and SNF groups, respectively. Screw cutout and/or pullout complications occurred in 8 cases in the ANF group but not in the SNF group. In the ANF group, the values for NSA and the sum of the screw tip-articular surface distance changed significantly from 3 days to 12 months postoperatively. There were no significant correlations among the tested parameters.

CONCLUSION

ANFs resulted in more complications at a younger age than SNFs. ANF treatment using PHLPs is more prone to a decreased NSA and humeral head osteonecrosis and has poorer clinical outcomes than SNF treatment using PHLPs.

Ischaemia, healing and outcomes in proximal humeral fractures

Interfragmental ischaemia is a prerequisite for the initiation of the inflammatory and immunological response to fracturing of bone.Intrafragmental ischaemia is inevitable: the extent of the initial ischaemic insult does not, however, directly relate to the outcome for healing of the fracture zones and avascular necrosis of the humeral head. The survival of distal regions of fragments with critical perfusion may be the result of a type of inosculation (blood vessel contact), which establishes reperfusion before either revascularization or neo-angiogenesis has occurred.Periosteum has a poorly defined role in fracture healing in the proximal humerus. The metaphyseal periosteal perfusion may have a profound effect, as yet undefined, on the healing of most metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, and may be disturbed further by inadvertent surgical manipulation.The metaphysis can be considered as a 'torus' or ring of bone, its surface covered by periosteum antero- and posterolaterally, through which the tuberosity segments gain perfusion and capsular reflections antero- and posteromedially, through which the humeral head (articular) fragment gains perfusion.The torus is broken in relatively simple primary patterns: a fracture line at the upper surface of the torus is an anatomical 'neck' fracture; a fracture line at the lower surface of the torus is the surgical 'neck' fracture. Secondary fragmentation (through compression and/or distraction) of the torus itself creates complexity for analysis (classification), alters the capacity and outcome for healing (by variable interruption of the fragmental blood supply) and influences interfragmental stability. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180005.

Retrospective analysis of proximal humeral fracture-dislocations managed with locked plates

BACKGROUND

Fracture-dislocation is the extreme variant of injury to the proximal humerus that occurs more commonly in young adults as a result of high-velocity trauma. We evaluated the functional and radiologic outcome of fixation of proximal humeral fracture-dislocations with locked plates.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 33 proximal humeral fracture-dislocations in 29 patients with a mean age of 35 years (range, 19-60 years) treated by open reduction and internal fixation with locked plates between January 2009 and December 2013. The fracture-dislocation in 85% was the result of high-energy trauma resulting in 3- or 4-part fracture-dislocation. The fracture-dislocation was anterior in 27 and posterior in 6.

RESULTS

The average delay from injury to surgery was 7 days (range, 1-35 days), with a mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 24-66 months). All of the fractures united at an average of 15 weeks after surgery. At the final follow-up, the mean forward flexion was 129° (range, 100°-160°), and mean abduction was 128° (range, 100°-150°). The mean Constant score at the final follow-up was 78 points (range, 68-88 points). One case of complete osteonecrosis of the humeral head and 1 case of partial osteonecrosis of the humeral head were noted. Two cases of screw perforation of the humeral head were seen, with subsequent restricted range of motion improving after removal of the offending screws.

CONCLUSIONS

Most young patients with 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fracture-dislocations can achieve good functional outcome after fixation with locked plates.

How bone quality may influence intraoperative and early postoperative problems after angular stable open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

With the introduction of the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI), a simple radiographic tool has become available to measure bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of local bone mineral density on the early failure rate after angular stable open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs).

METHODS

We retrospectively followed up all patients treated with angular stable implants for PHFs from 2007 to 2014. The fractures were classified according to Neer, and the DTI, metaphyseal head extension (MHE), medial hinge displacement, and quality of reduction were assessed. Failures were defined as head screw cutouts.

RESULTS

The study included 146 patients (mean age, 66 years; range, 20-94 years). The mean follow-up period was 11 months (range, 3-94 months). Of the fractures, 91% were classified as 2- or 3-part fractures and 9% as 4-part fractures. The mean DTI was 1.44 (range, 1.19-2.11), and the mean MHE was 12 mm (range, 0-48 mm). The reduction result was at least acceptable in 80% of fractures. Screw cutouts were found in 23%. The DTI and MHE were the most significant preoperative predictors for the reduction result. The DTI (P = .036) and age (P = .02) were independent preoperative factors, and a good reduction (P = .001) was the only intraoperative factor influencing cutout.

DISCUSSION

This study proves that good bone quality and a long MHE are helpful for the reduction. Furthermore, good bone quality, a younger age, and a good reduction prevent later cutout. We conclude that local bone quality is a relevant factor in the treatment plan for PHFs.

Early-stage radiological critical analysis of unsuccessful cases following a four-part fracture osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus: focus on the "P" sign

Radiological evaluation of complex intra-articular fractures of the proximal humerus is still challenging. Here, we describe the post-operative "P" sign as a reproducible radiographical mark of a varus reduction, performed by assembling a head-shaft angulation of less than 130 degrees. Our retrospective study was conducted in a group of subjects who previously suffered from proximal humerus four-part fractures. We evaluated the post-operative evolution of specific radiographical parameters that are of crucial prognostic significance: Cervix-diaphysis angle (HHSA), quality level of the orthopaedic reduction (insufficient, sufficient and good) based on a radiological generalized subjective overview, presence of calcar screws through the Philos plate. The final cohort included a group of 39 patients of 70.76 ± 8.3 years of age and an average follow-up of 7.2 months. The post-operative mean HHSA was 131.5 ± 9.4. Interestingly, a positive correlation was detected between presence of the radiographical "P" sign in the post-operative period and the number of surgical complications coming up in the post-operative period (OR:  3.68 - I.C. 95%: 0.7984255-19.2532430), although not statistically significant. In our study, the high number of complications corresponds to literature database. Presence of the "P" sign could be a useful tool for assessing the quality of reduction during intra and post-operative radiological evaluation. We  underline the importance of the "P" sign as a "quality of reduction" factor and strongly recommend its intra-operative monitoring as an additional tool together with a standard subjective evaluation of the reduction.

Multifragmentary dislocated humeral head fracture-A case report of a successful head preserving treatment strategy despite delayed presentation

•

Case report of multifragmentary and luxated humeral head fracture treated headpreserving despite delayed surgery (120 h).

•

“Avoiding arthroplasty inspite of extrmely high risk of avascular necrosis due to compromised blood supply in luxation oft he humeral head.

•

The headpreserving treatment showed excellent functional and radiologic results keeping a high “quality of life level”.

•

Divergent from the recommended standard−treatment (trauma arthroplasty) of luxated humeral headsplit fractures in a “delayed situation” a head preserving option should be taken into consideration.

Introduction

Head preserving, delayed osteosynthesis five days after a luxated, multifragmentary humeral head fracture is rarely seen and a challenge for the surgeon.

Presentation of case

This case history describes the case of a 69-year-old female with delayed head preserving treatment of a dislocated multifragmentary humeral head fracture using intramedullary nailing, avoiding a primary trauma arthroplasty after strict refusal of the patient despite poor prognosis and high risk of avascular humeral head necrosis.

Discussion

The treatment of the humeral head fracture is still a matter of debate, the “golden standard” does not exist, especially in the deferred luxated situation. With the use of modern implants head preserving treatment is reasonable and possible. It should therefore always be taken into account as an alternative for arthroplasty.

Conclusion

Excellent postoperative outcome can be achieved by joint reconstruction eliminating the possible side effects of shoulder endoprosthesis.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: research models

PURPOSE

the past decade has seen a considerable increase in the use of research models to study reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Nevertheless, none of these models has been shown to completely reflect real in vivo conditions.

METHODS

we performed a systematic review of the literature matching the following key words: "reverse total shoulder arthroplasty" or "reverse total shoulder replacement" or "reverse total shoulder prosthesis" and "research models" or "biomechanical models" or "physical simulators" or "virtual simulators". The following databases were screened: Medline, Google Scholar, EMBASE, CINAHIL and Ovid. We identified and included all articles reporting research models of any kind, such as physical or virtual simulators, in which RTSA and the glenohumeral joint were reproduced.

RESULTS

computer models and cadaveric models are the most commonly used, and they were shown to be reliable in simulating in vivo conditions. Bone substitute models have been used in a few studies. Mechanical testing machines provided useful information on stability factors in RTSA.

CONCLUSION

because of the limitations of each individual model, additional research is required to develop a research model of RTSA that may reduce the limitations of those presently available, and increase the reproducibility of this technique in the clinical setting.

Hertel 7 fracture of the humeral head. Can two different fixation systems (Diphos/PHP) lead to different outcomes? A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcomes and complication rates in the medium-to-long-term follow-up of Hertel 7 humeral head fractures treated with two different locking plates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 52 patients with type 7 humeral head fracture (in accordance with Hertel classification) were enrolled retrospectively: 24 patients [4 male, 20 female; mean age (standard deviation [SD]): 68.9 (5.8) years] were treated with Diphos H plate (Group A) and 28 patients [6 male, 22 female; mean age (SD): 61.0 (7.5) years] with Proximal Humeral Plate (PHP; Group B). The mean follow-up periods were 25.6 and 18.9 months, respectively. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; X-ray evaluation was also performed and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean Constant score in the Diphos and PHP groups at follow-up were 75.6 (SD 13.4) and 78.9 (SD 12.8), respectively (p>0.05). The DASH score was similar in both groups (Diphos: 18.6, range 0-51.5; PHP: 16.8, range 0-47.8) (p>0.05). In our series, 9.6% of patients had complications; these included a case of aseptic non-union and a case of avascular necrosis of the humeral head in each group, and a secondary screw perforation in a patient treated with Diphos.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with Hertel 7 proximal humeral fractures, Diphos and PHP lead to similar satisfactory functional outcomes and are associated with low complication rates; this confirms that both are useful implants for the treatment of this pattern of fracture.

The treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures: analysis of the results of 55 cases treated with PHILOS plate

Complex proximal humerus fractures are often difficult to treat. Their frequency is high, especially in the elderly, and their treatment is still controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological results achieved by patients with complex proximal humerus fractures, treated with PHILOS plate only. A cohort of 55 patients was selected. The mean age was 63.4 (range 33-89), while the mean follow-up time was 21.5 months (range 6-75). Clinical outcome was evaluated with the "Constant-Murley shoulder score." All the informations about the presence of complications were gathered, and radiological images were used to calculate the head-shaft angle. The overall mean Constant score was 61.93 ± 18.59, the Individual CS was 70 ± 20 % and the Relative CS was 83 ± 23 %. No significant differences were found between fractures Neer 3 and Neer 4 and between the surgical approaches (delta-split vs. delto-pectoral). Six patients had a fracture with dislocation, seven patients (12.7 %) had complications while in four patients a head-shaft angle beyond the normal range was found. Osteosynthesis with PHILOS plate is stable in the greater part of the cases, and it allows an earlier rehabilitation and so a good functional result, which could be compromised by a prolonged immobilization. Therefore, PHILOS plate is a good option for the treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures.

Timing of surgery for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and internal fixation is one established method for treatment of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. However, the timing of surgery and its effect on complications have not yet been investigated in the literature. Hence, aim of this study was to analyze the occurrence of complication following locked plating of proximal humeral fractures when surgery was delayed in comparison to early intervention.

METHODS

Between February 2002 and November 2010, 497 patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated by open reduction and locked plating. 329 patients were available for follow-up with a minimum of 12 months after surgery. Outcome analysis included radiographic evidence of loss of fixation (> 10° of secondary displacement), screw-cutout and avascular head necrosis. Outcomes were analyzed with regards to age, gender and fracture pattern and were compared between time intervals in which the primary surgery had been conducted; early intervention (< 48 h), timely scheduled for surgery (3-5 days) and delayed intervention (>5 days).

RESULTS

Of 329 patients (68.4% women; median age at time of surgery: 69.9 years, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 68.2, 71.2) the median time between fracture incident and surgical intervention was 3.2 days (95%CI: 3.1, 3.3). Surgery was performed in a 2-part fracture at a median of 3.3 days (95%CI: 3.2, 3.4) after trauma, in a 3-part fracture after 3.3 days (95%CI: 3.1, 3.4), in a 4-part fracture 2.9 days (95%CI: 2.8, 3.0), in head split type fracture 2.2 days (95%CI: 2.0, 2.4) and in dislocation type fracture 0.8 days after trauma (95%CI: 0.7, 0.9, p = 0.40). Loss of fixation was observed in 12.8% (n = 42 patients), of which in 4.9% (n = 16) screw cutout was evident and in 6.8% of cases (n = 20) avascular head necrosis was diagnosed. Patients in which complication was observed were treated at median 2.5 days after trauma (95% CI, 1.8, 3.2), in comparison, patients without evidence of complications were treated at a median of 3.2 days (95% CI, 2.8-3.8, p = 0.35). The odds ratio regarding occurrence of complications for patients treated <48 hours was 0,924, for patients in which surgery was performed 3-5 days after the incident the odds ratio was 0,836 and in patients treated > 5 days the odds ratio was 1,637.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of fixation following open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures was not more frequently observed when surgery was performed 3-5 days after the incident in comparison to early intervention (< 48 h). However, a delay of intervention > 5 days is related to significant increase of complications. Thus, if open reduction and internal fixation is indicated, reconstruction of the proximal humerus should be performed within 5 days of the fracture event. In head split and dislocated fracture types anatomic reconstruction completed within 48 h from the incident may be beneficial with regards to risk of avascular necrosis.