Fertility Outcomes After Laparoscopic Cystectomy in Infertile Patients with Stage III-IV Endometriosis: a Cohort with 6-10 years of Follow-up

Influencing factors and prediction model construction for recurrence in patients with ovarian endometriosis after laparoscopic conservative surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors influencing recurrence following laparoscopic conservative surgery in patients with ovarian endometriosis (OEM) and to develop a predictive model.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the clinical data from 212 OEM patients who underwent laparoscopic conservative surgery at Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital from May 2013 to December 2021 were meticulously reviewed. According to disease recurrence over a 2-year follow-up period, the patients were divided into a recurrence group and a non-recurrence group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with postoperative recurrence in OEM patients. A nomogram prediction model for postoperative recurrence in OEM patients was constructed using R 3.4.3 software. The discriminative power of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), with goodness of fit evaluated using the H-L goodness-of-fit test and Bootstrap method (self-sampling method). Clinical net benefit was analyzed through decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Over a two-year follow-up, 36 cases of recurrence were observed, yielding a recurrence rate of 16.98%. Bilateral cysts (OR = 2.257, P = 0.005), high r-ASRM stage (OR = 2.651, P = 0.001), and elevated postoperative TNF-α levels (OR = 3.607, P = 0.004) were identified as risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic conservative surgery in patients with OEM, while older age (OR = 0.566, P = 0.018) and postoperative adjuvant medication (OR = 0.509, P = 0.016) were protective factors. The nomogram prediction model, based on the above indicators, had an AUC of 0.895 for postoperative recurrence risk in OEM patients, with no overfitting phenomenon indicated by the goodness-of-fit test (χ2 = 1.786, P = 0.987). The Bootstrap validation (1000 samples) showed an average absolute error of 0.018 between predicted and actual probabilities. Decision curve analysis showed that the model effectively predicted a clinically relevant net benefit for postoperative recurrence risk.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram prediction model incorporating age, cyst distribution, r-ASRM staging, postoperative TNF-α levels, and postoperative adjuvant drugs effectively assesses the recurrence risk in OEM patients.

Surgical Technique and Fertility Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review of Open and Laparoscopic Cystectomy in Women of Reproductive Age

Cystectomy, the surgical removal of ovarian tissue, is commonly performed in women of reproductive age to address conditions such as ovarian cysts, endometriosis, and tumors. The choice of surgical technique, open versus laparoscopic, has significant implications for postoperative recovery and long-term fertility outcomes. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the current literature on the effects of these two surgical approaches on fertility in women of reproductive age. Open cystectomy, while effective, is associated with larger incisions, increased trauma to surrounding reproductive structures, and a higher incidence of postoperative complications, which may negatively impact future fertility. In contrast, laparoscopic cystectomy offers a minimally invasive option that generally results in less postoperative pain, quicker recovery, and potentially improved fertility outcomes due to reduced damage to surrounding tissues. However, the literature reveals a complex interplay between surgical technique, underlying medical conditions, and individual patient factors that can influence reproductive potential. This review synthesizes key studies comparing the fertility outcomes of both surgical methods, highlighting the need for individualized surgical planning based on each patient's unique circumstances and reproductive goals. Additionally, it discusses the importance of preoperative counseling and multidisciplinary approaches to optimize patient outcomes. Future research is essential to further clarify the long-term fertility implications of open and laparoscopic cystectomy and to refine surgical techniques to enhance reproductive health. This review contributes to the growing body of evidence guiding clinicians in making informed decisions that prioritize the effective treatment of ovarian pathology and fertility preservation.

Guideline No. 435: Minimally Invasive Surgery in Fertility Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefits and risks of minimally invasive procedures in the management of patients with infertility and provide guidance to gynaecologists who manage common conditions in these patients.

TARGET POPULATION

Patients with infertility (inability to conceive after 12 months of unprotected intercourse) undergoing investigation and treatment.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Minimally invasive reproductive surgery can be used to treat infertility, improve fertility treatment outcomes, or preserve fertility. All surgery has risks and associated complications. Reproductive surgery may not improve fertility outcomes and may, in some instances, damage ovarian reserve. All procedures have costs, which are borne either by the patient or their health insurance provider.

EVIDENCE

We searched English-language articles from January 2010 to May 2021 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, and Cochrane Library (see Appendix A for MeSH search terms).

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix B (Tables B1 for definitions and B2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Gynaecologists who manage common conditions in patients with infertility.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Directive clinique no 435 : Chirurgie minimalement invasive dans les traitements de fertilité

OBJECTIF

Évaluer les risques et bénéfices de la chirurgie minimalement invasive dans la prise en charge des patientes atteintes d'infertilité et fournir des conseils aux gynécologues qui prennent en charge les problèmes les plus fréquents chez ces patientes.

POPULATION CIBLE

Patientes atteintes d'infertilité (incapacité à concevoir après 12 mois de rapports sexuels non protégés) en processus diagnostique ou sous traitement. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: On peut recourir à la chirurgie de la reproduction minimalement invasive pour traiter l'infertilité, améliorer les résultats des traitements de fertilité ou préserver la fertilité. Toutes les interventions chirurgicales comportent des risques et des complications associées. La chirurgie de la reproduction n'améliore pas toujours la fertilité et peut, dans certains cas, compromettre la réserve ovarienne. Toutes les interventions entraînent des coûts, lesquels sont assumés par la patiente ou son assureur. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été faites dans les bases de données PubMed-Medline, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus et Cochrane Library pour répertorier les articles publiés en anglais dans la période de janvier 2010 à mai 2021 (voir les termes de recherche MeSH à l'annexe A). MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe B en ligne (tableau B1 pour les définitions et tableau B2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Gynécologues qui prennent en charge les affections courantes chez les patientes atteintes d'infertilité. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Extrinsic Adenomyosis Is Associated With Postoperative Recurrence of Ovarian Endometrioma

Objective: To determine whether endometrioma recurrence is closely related to the presence of extrinsic adenomyosis, which was demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Design: Observational crosssectional study involving patients with the recurrence of ovarian endometrioma (OMA). Correlations of endometrioma recurrence and adenomyosis subtypes shown by MRI were analyzed. Method: Between January 2018 and December 2020, a total of 233 patients with recurrence of OMA after ovarian cystectomy were administered for surgery at our institution. All patients were divided into subtype II (Group A), subtype I+IV (Group B), and nonadenomyosis (Group C) groups at preoperative MRI imaging. The correlations of endometrioma recurrence with clinical features, imaging appearance, and surgical findings were retrospectively analyzed. Results: We found 112 (48.07%) patients of endometrioma recurrence combined with subtype II adenomyosis, 8 (3.43%) subtype I adenomyosis, 47 (20.17%) subtype IV adenomyosis, 66 (28.32%) nonadenomyosis. The mean time of OMA recurrence (44.28 ± 8.37, vs. 63.96 ± 10.28, vs. 69.36 ± 9.34 mon), rate of pain symptoms (85.71, vs. 69.10, vs. 18.18%), and primary infertility (31.25, vs. 14.55, vs. 10.77%) were higher in Group A. Uterine volume (257.37± 42.61, vs. 203.14 ± 33.52, vs. 100.85 ± 26.67 cm³), and mean OMA size (4.97 ± 2.25, vs. 4.36 ± 2.38, vs. 4.46 ± 2.70 cm) were significantly larger in Group A. The rate of DIE (83.93, vs. 45.45, vs. 40.91%), the number of DIE (3.6 ± 1.8 vs. 2.3 ± 1.5 vs. 2.2 ± 1.3), the mean total revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine score (rASRM, 103.14 ± 23.89 vs. 74.23 ± 16.72 vs. 36.51 ± 14.23) were significantly higher in Group A. After a multiple logistic regression analysis, extrinsic adenomyosis (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-3.4), DIE lesions (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-2.8), and primary infertility (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-4.3) were significantly associated with early recurrence (in 3-year) of OMA. Conclusions: Extrinsic adenomyosis was associated with postoperative recurrence of OMA. In addition, a pathogenic link between extrinsic adenomyosis and pelvic endometriosis needs to be clarified.

Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients Co-existing With Endometriosis and Adenomyosis

Objective: To investigate the difference of clinical features and outcomes between EM patients with and without AM after following up for at least 6 years after surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 358 EM patients who had a minimum of 6 years follow-up after laparoscopic cystectomy, which was performed by one single doctor at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2009 to April 2013. All women were divided into AM group and non-AM group and analysis was performed in preoperative characteristics, surgical findings and postoperative outcomes during follow-up.

Results: A total of 358 EM patients were recruited, of which 142 (39.7%) were in the AM group and the rest 216 (60.3%) in the non-AM group. Between the two group, the mean age was 34.6 vs. 32.2 years (P < 0.001). The mean operating time in the AM and non-AM group was 73.2 vs. 61.9 min (P < 0.001). According to the revised AFS classification, the mean score of the two group were 60.3 vs. 45.5 (P < 0.001). At the end of the follow-up, though the AM group was with higher rate of disease relapse, yet no significant difference was found between the two groups in statistical comparison (34/142 [23.9%] vs. 34/216 [15.7%], P = 0.053). With a minimum follow-up of 6 years after laparoscopic cystectomy, failed and successful pregnancy were seen in 107/142(75.4%) and 35/142 (24.6%) patients in the AM group vs. 114/216(52.8%) and 102/216 (47.2%) patients in the non-AM group (P < 0.05). As for the successfully pregnant patients, live births, including spontaneous pregnancy and IVF-ET, were seen in 34/35 (97.1) vs. 99/102 (97.1) patients between AM and non-AM groups, while others ended in spontaneous abortion. No significant associations were found between the two groups in infertility, leiomyoma presence, the size of ovarian endometrioma, type of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) or type of recurrence (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with non-AM group, EM patients with concurrent AM may have higher age, longer mean operating time and higher mean AFS score. In terms of fertility outcomes, patients in the AM group were with lower likelihood of pregnancy after surgery during the long-time follow-up.

Recurrence Rate and Risk Factors for the Recurrence of Ovarian Endometriosis after Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy

The aim of this study was to identify the recurrence rate and risk factors for the recurrence of ovarian endometriosis (OE) after laparoscopic cystectomy. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Subjects were OE cases who underwent laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital (BAH). The period of this study was from January 2008 to December 2017. Ovarian histopathology and at least one-year follow-up after surgery were the prerequisite requirements. A total of 106 OE cases were included in the study. Subjects were classified into recurrence and nonrecurrence groups. It comprised of 24 and 82 cases, respectively. The mean age of the participant was 32.4 years old. The demographic characters of both groups were comparable. The recurrence rate after laparoscopic OE surgery in the present study was 22.6% (24/106). The average largest diameter of OE in the present study was 54.5 mm. Postoperative medical treatment (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.14-8.74, p = 0.02) and postoperative pregnancy (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.03-7.93, p = 0.04) were associated factors for recurrence decrement. The recurrence rate of OE after laparoscopic cystectomy was 22.6%. Postoperative medical treatment and postoperative pregnancy were a significant factor that lowered OE recurrence.

Preventive therapeutic options for postoperative recurrence of ovarian endometrioma: gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with or without levonorgestrel intrauterine system insertion

PURPOSE

Here, we compared endometrioma recurrence rates in patients who have undergone a laparoscopic cystectomy and treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) alone or a GnRHa combined with a levonogestrel intrauterine system (LND-IUS).

METHODS

We enrolled endometrioma patients who underwent laparoscopic cyst enucleation and divided them into two groups according to postoperative management: GnRHa alone and GnRHa in combination with LND-IUS. We compared preoperative history, perioperative parameters, postoperative endometrioma recurrence, and symptoms between these two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patients were included in the final analysis. With a median 84.6 months of follow-up, we detected significant differences between the two groups with respect to age at surgery (31.6 ± 4.8 vs. 37.6 ± 4.2 years, χ² = 1.978, p < 0.001), gravida (0 vs. 2, χ² = 4.391, p < 0.001), parity (0 vs. 1, χ² = 0.035, p < 0.001), body mass index (21.0 ± 2.5 vs. 21.9 ± 2.4, χ² = 0.0096, p = 0.009), r-AFS score (48 vs. 64, χ² = 4.888, p = 0.001), and operation time (60 vs. 75 min, χ² = 9.119, p = 0.003). Patients treated with both GnRHa and LND-IUS achieved significantly less endometrioma recurrence (23.6 vs. 11.5%, χ² = 5.202, p = 0.023) and higher rates of pain remission (92.1 vs. 100%, χ² = 6.511, p = 0.011), while those with GnRHa alone suffered more recurrent and painful symptoms (χ² = 9.280, p = 0.026). Multivariate analysis using a Cox regression demonstrated that combined GnRHa and LNG-IUS treatment correlated with a decreased endometrioma recurrence rate after laparoscopic cystectomy (RR 0.369, 95% CI 0.182-0.749, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment of GnRHa and LNG-IUS exhibited superior pain relief and recurrence prevention among endometrioma patients after fertility-sparing surgery. Thus, combination treatment is a preferable long-term option for patients without intent for pregnancy in the near future.

Reproductive capacity and recurrence of disease after surgery for moderate and severe endometriosis - a retrospective single center analysis

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis can be associated with considerable pain and sterility. After surgical excision of moderate or severe endometriosis lesions, the rate of recurrence reaches up to 67%. The objective of this retrospective study was to establish the recurrence and pregnancy rates following surgical resection of stage III/IV endometriosis lesions. Indications for operation were endometriosis symptoms, sonographic findings and/or infertility.

METHODS

A total of 456 patients who underwent stage III/IV endometriosis surgery between 2004 and 2014 were sent a questionnaire relating to their postoperative medical treatment, pregnancies, relief of symptoms and recurrence. Responses of 206 patients (45.2%) and their clinical data were analysed for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 66.5% (N = 137) of patients had stage III disease, and 33.5% (N = 69) had stage IV disease. The average age was 37 years (17-59). A total of 63.1% (N = 130) of surgeries were performed by laparoscopy, 21.8% (N = 45) were performed by laparotomy and 15% (N = 31) were performed by conversion. Complete resection of endometriosis lesions was achieved in 90.8% of patients (N = 187). After surgery, 48.5% (N = 100) of the women did not receive hormonal treatment; the main reason was the desire for children in 53%. Complete or partial relief in complaints was achieved in 93.2% (N = 192). The rate of recurrence was 21.8% (N = 45). The statistically significant factors that was associated with a higher risk to develop recurrence was an age < 35 (p < 0.005). After surgery, 65.8% (79/120) of patients who wished to have children became pregnant. There was a statistically significant association among a higher postoperative pregnancy rate and age < 35 (p < 0.003) in multivariate logistic regression analysis and laparoscopic surgical access in univariate logistic regression analysis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

We assessed the high percentage of complete or partial relief of symptoms of 93.2%, the high postoperative pregnancy rate of 65.8% and the low rate of recurrence of 21.8% compared to international literature to be very encouraging for women suffering from moderate and severe endometriosis. Though laparoscopy is considered the 'gold standard'of endometriosis surgery, laparotomy still may be indicated in patients with extensive endometriosis especially to preserve reproductive function.

REASONS FOR ENDOMETRIOSIS-ASSOCIATED INFERTILITY

This article discusses the causes and mechanisms of the occurrence of infertility in endometriosis within the framework of versions and contraversions. The magnitude of the described problem is noted not only from a medical, but also from a socio-economic perspective. Four main factors of endometriosis-associated infertility were identified: tubal-peritoneal, ovarian, embryonic and endometrial. Given the inconsistency of scientific data, the need for further research is noted.