Efficacy of Agomelatine 25-50 mg for the Treatment of Anxious Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Three Placebo-Controlled Studies

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of agomelatine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in adult patients

This systematic literature review aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine versus approved medications for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in adult patients. We selected randomized controlled trials on various medications used to treat GAD in adult patients. An existing systematic literature review (Kong et al., 2020) was used to identify relevant studies published before 2020. Outcomes of remission and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed, following a random-effects network meta-analysis approach. Of 25 identified studies, 20 and 22 studies were included in the network meta-analysis for studying the remission and discontinuation (due to AEs) outcomes, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the remission rate was observed between agomelatine and pregabalin [odds ratio (OR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-4.21]. For the other comparators, the results were nonsignificant; however, all the point estimates were in favor of agomelatine. Similarly, for discontinuation because of AEs, the point estimates leaned consistently toward agomelatine suggesting its higher tolerability. The probabilities of agomelatine having the highest remission rate and lowest discontinuation (due to AEs) rate were 67% and 68%, respectively. Based on its demonstrated effectiveness and tolerability, agomelatine can be considered as a drug of choice for the treatment of GAD.

Equipercentile linking of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 scales in people with mental disorders

BACKGROUND

The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS 2.0) have been widely used to measure functional impairment and disability. To ensure that the scores from these two scales are practically exchangeable across diseases, therapies, and care programmes, the current study aimed to examine the linkage of the WHODAS 2.0 with the SDS and develop a simple and reliable conversion table for the two scales in people with mental disorders.

METHODS

A total of 798 patients (mean age = 36.1, SD = 12.7) were recruited from outpatient clinics of the Institute of Mental Health, and the Community Wellness Clinic in Singapore. Using a single-group design, an equipercentile equating method with log-linear smoothing was used to establish a conversion table from the SDS to the WHODAS 2.0 and vice versa.

RESULTS

The conversion table showed that the scores were consistent for the entire range of scores when the scores were converted either from the SDS to the WHODAS 2.0 or from the WHODAS 2.0 to the SDS. The agreement between the WHODAS 2.0's raw and converted scores and SDS's raw and converted scores were interpreted as good with intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.711 and 0.725, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a simple and reliable method for converting the SDS scores to the WHODAS 2.0 scores and vice versa, enabling interchangeable use of data across these two disability measures.

Agomelatine: A Potential Multitarget Compound for Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Agomelatine (AGM) is one of the latest atypical antidepressants, prescribed exclusively for the treatment of depression in adults. AGM belongs to the pharmaceutical class of melatonin agonist and selective serotonin antagonist ("MASS"), as it acts both as a selective agonist of melatonin receptors MT1 and MT2, and as a selective antagonist of 5-HT2C/5-HT2B receptors. AGM is involved in the resynchronization of interrupted circadian rhythms, with beneficial effects on sleep patterns, while antagonism on serotonin receptors increases the availability of norepinephrine and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex, with an antidepressant and nootropic effect. The use of AGM in the pediatric population is limited by the scarcity of data. In addition, few studies and case reports have been published on the use of AGM in patients with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Considering this evidence, the purpose of this review is to report the potential role of AGM in neurological developmental disorders. AGM would increase the expression of the cytoskeleton-associated protein (ARC) in the prefrontal cortex, with optimization of learning, long-term memory consolidation, and improved survival of neurons. Another important feature of AGM is the ability to modulate glutamatergic neurotransmission in regions associated with mood and cognition. With its synergistic activity a melatoninergic agonist and an antagonist of 5-HT2C, AGM acts as an antidepressant, psychostimulant, and promoter of neuronal plasticity, regulating cognitive symptoms, resynchronizing circadian rhythms in patients with autism, ADHD, anxiety, and depression. Given its good tolerability and good compliance, it could potentially be administered to adolescents and children.

Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy of Anxiety Symptoms in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Focus on Agomelatine

Patients with depression require thorough clinical assessment, which should include symptom profile, severity and staging, personality factors, antecedent and concurrent psychiatric comorbidity, physical comorbidity, neurocognitive function, exposure to stressors in early life (e.g. trauma) or recently (e.g. bereavement), and protective factors. The presence of anxiety symptoms in a depressed patient is associated with more severe depression, increased suicidality and worse outcomes compared with non-anxious depression. A network meta-analysis of antidepressant treatments found that agomelatine, citalopram, amitriptyline, escitalopram, mirtazapine, paroxetine, venlafaxine and vortioxetine were all significantly more effective than other antidepressants for the treatment of depression, and that agomelatine, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline and vortioxetine were better tolerated than other antidepressants. Agomelatine has been shown to have two major effects-relieving depressive symptoms, and supporting symptomatic and functional recovery-and these benefits have been demonstrated in patients with depression as well as in patients with generalised anxiety disorder, including those with more severe symptoms. Agomelatine has also been shown to be efficacious and well tolerated in patients with depression plus concomitant anxiety symptoms. A pooled analysis of data from six agomelatine studies of depression (three placebo-controlled and three with active comparators-fluoxetine, sertraline and venlafaxine) found that agomelatine was significantly more effective than placebo at relieving the anxiety subscore on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and that the difference between agomelatine and placebo was even more marked in the subgroup of patients with severe anxiety symptoms at baseline. Irrespective of the pharmacotherapy used in patients with depression, the likelihoods of response and remission are increased when pharmacotherapy is combined with psychotherapy, with this approach being more effective than either pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy alone. Persistence with treatment is important, and clinicians should therefore encourage patients to keep trying to obtain relief.

Update on treatments for anxiety-related disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines recent evidence that informs the treatment of anxiety-related disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and benzodiazepines, agomelatine has demonstrated efficacy in treating generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Other novel products, such as ketamine, psilocybin and cannabidiol, are in the process of gathering evidence in support of the treatment of anxiety disorders. In psychological therapy, various psychological treatments for anxiety disorders, such as mindfulness-based intervention, acceptance and commitment therapy, psychodynamic therapy, emotion-focused therapy and dialectical behavioural therapy, have been tried. Still, most therapies have not proven superior to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). In very preliminary findings: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was effective in GAD; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was effective for social anxiety disorder (SAD) and GAD and augmented exposure therapy for specific fears. Internet and mobile-based interventions have comparable efficacy to face-to-face therapy.

SUMMARY

Pharmacotherapy of anxiety disorders is expanding to novel products. Despite trying other psychological therapies for anxiety disorders, most therapies were comparable to but not superior to CBT. rTMS and tDCS were also used and show early promise for GAD, but further studies are needed. Most internet or mobile app based psychological therapies were based on CBT, and some can be considered as alternatives to in-person face-to-face therapy.

Interventions for generalized anxiety disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of recently published work on anxiety, focusing on generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and its treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Self-reported anxiety symptoms were highly prevalent during the COVID-19 global pandemic in both the general population and in selected groups. There remains divided opinion about whether internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is noninferior to face-to-face CBT for GAD. A systematic review of drug treatment for GAD showed efficacy for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), agomelatine, and quetiapine. There may be a place for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of GAD. There was some evidence of efficacy for complementary therapies, including physical exercise, yoga, acupuncture, and Withania somnifera (ashwagandha). However, a systematic review of cannabidiol and tetrahydrocannabinol found insufficient evidence of efficacy in anxiety disorders.

SUMMARY

Antidepressants and quetiapine show efficacy in the treatment of GAD. Internet-based psychological interventions have a place in the treatment of GAD when face-to-face treatment is inaccessible. There is increasing evidence for the use of physical exercise in the management of GAD. Some other complementary therapies, including cannabinoids, require further, methodologically sound, research.

Agomelatine decreases cocaine-induced locomotor sensitisation and dopamine release in rats

BACKGROUND

Agomelatine is a melatoninergic antidepressant approved to treat the major depressive disorder. Agomelatine exerts its behavioural, pharmacological, and physiological effects through the activation of MT₁ and MT₂ melatonin receptors and the blockade of 5-HT_2B and 5-HT_2C serotonin receptors. Some studies have reported that the activation of the MT₁ and MT₂ melatonin receptors decreased cocaine-induced locomotor activity and cocaine self-administration. These findings from another study showed that agomelatine decreased alcohol consumption. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of agomelatine administration on cocaine-induced behavioural (cocaine-induced locomotor activity and cocaine-induced locomotor sensitisation) and neurochemical (dopamine levels) effects.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats (250-280 g) received cocaine (10 mg/kg) during the induction and expression of locomotor sensitisation. Agomelatine (10 mg/kg) was administered 30 minutes before cocaine. After each treatment, locomotor activity was recorded for 30 minutes. Dopamine levels were determined in the ventral striatum, the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and the ventral tegmental area (VTA) by high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) in animals treated with agomelatine and cocaine. Luzindole (30 mg/kg) was administered to block the agomelatine effect.

RESULTS

In this study, we found that agomelatine decreased cocaine-induced locomotor activity and the induction and expression of locomotor sensitisation. In addition, agomelatine decreased cocaine-induced dopamine levels. Luzindole blocked the agomelatine-induced decrease in the expression of locomotor sensitisation in rats.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest (1) that agomelatine showed efficacy in decreasing cocaine psychostimulant effects and (2) that agomelatine can be a useful therapeutic agent to reduce cocaine abuse.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Cannabis Use Cessation in First-Episode Psychosis Patients: A 1-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

Despite the negative influence of cannabis use on the development and prognosis of first-episode psychosis (FEP), there is little evidence on effective specific interventions for cannabis use cessation in FEP. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a specific cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for cannabis cessation (CBT-CC) with treatment as usual (TAU) in FEP cannabis users. In this single-blind, 1-year randomized controlled trial, 65 participants were randomly assigned to CBT-CC or TAU. The primary outcome was the reduction in cannabis use severity. The CBT-CC group had a greater decrease in cannabis use severity and positive psychotic symptoms over time, and a greater improvement in functioning at post-treatment than TAU. The treatment response was also faster in the CBT-CC group, reducing cannabis use, anxiety, positive and general psychotic symptoms, and improving functioning earlier than TAU in the follow-up. Moreover, patients who stopped and/or reduced cannabis use during the follow-up, decreased psychotic symptoms and increased awareness of disease compared to those who continued using cannabis. Early intervention based on a specific CBT for cannabis cessation, may be effective in reducing cannabis use severity, in addition to improving clinical and functional outcomes of FEP cannabis users.

Agomelatine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: focus on its distinctive mechanism of action

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), the most frequently diagnosed form of anxiety, is usually treated by cognitive-behavioural approaches or medication; in particular, benzodiazepines (acutely) and serotonin or serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (long term). Efficacy, compliance, and acceptability are, however, far from ideal, reinforcing interest in alternative options. Agomelatine, clinically employed in the treatment of major depression, expresses anxiolytic properties in rodents and was effective in the treatment of GAD (including severely ill patients) in several double-blind, short-term (12 weeks) and relapse-prevention (6 months) studies. At active doses, the incidence of adverse effects was no higher than for placebo. Agomelatine possesses a unique binding profile, behaving as a melatonin (MT₁/MT₂) receptor agonist and 5-HT_2C receptor antagonist, yet recognizing neither monoamine transporters nor GABA_A receptors. Extensive evidence supports a role for 5-HT_2C receptors in the induction of anxious states, and their blockade likely plays a primary role in mediating the anxiolytic actions of agomelatine, including populations in the amygdala and bed nucleus of stria terminalis, as well as the hippocampus. Recruitment of MT receptors in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, thalamic reticular nucleus, and hippocampus appears to fulfil a complimentary role. Downstream of 5-HT_2C and MT receptors, modulation of stress-sensitive glutamatergic circuits and altered release of the anxiogenic neuropeptides, corticotrophin-releasing factor, and vasopressin, may be implicated in the actions of agomelatine. To summarize, agomelatine exerts its anxiolytic actions by mechanisms clearly distinct from those of other agents currently employed for the management of GAD.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

How agomelatine helps in the treatment of anxiety disorders.

INTRODUCTION

• Anxiety disorders have a significant negative impact on quality of life.• The most common type of anxiety disorder, called generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), is associated with nervousness and excessive worry.• These symptoms can lead to additional symptoms like tiredness, sleeplessness, irritability, and poor attention.• GAD is generally treated through either cognitive-behavioural therapy or medication. However, widely used drugs like benzodiazepines and serotonin reuptake inhibitors have adverse effects.• Agomelatine, a well-established antidepressant drug, has shown anxiety-lowering ('anxiolytic') properties in rats and has been shown to effectively treat GAD with minimal side effects.• However, exactly how it acts on the brain to manage GAD is not yet clear.• Thus, this review aims to shed light on agomelatine's mechanism of action in treating GAD.

METHODS

• The authors reviewed studies on how agomelatine treats anxiety in animals.• They also looked at clinical studies on the effects of agomelatine in people with GAD.

RESULTS

• The study showed that agomelatine 'blocks' a receptor in nerve cells, which plays a role in causing anxiety, called the 5-HT_2C receptor.• Blocking this receptor, especially in specific brain regions such as nerve cells of the amygdala, bed nucleus of stria terminalis, and hippocampus, produced the anxiety reduction seen during agomelatine treatment.• Agomelatine also activates the melatonin (MT) receptor, which is known to keep anxiety in check, promote sleep, and maintain the sleep cycle.• Agomelatine should thus tackle sleep disturbances commonly seen in patients with GAD.• Beyond 5-HT_2C and MT receptors, signalling molecules in nerve cells that are known to be involved in anxiety disorders (called 'neurotransmitters' and 'neuropeptides') are also affected by agomelatine.

CONCLUSION

• Agomelatine's anxiolytic effects are caused by mechanisms that are distinct from those of other medications currently used to treat GAD.• This explains its therapeutic success and minimal adverse side effects.

The clinical characterization of the adult patient with an anxiety or related disorder aimed at personalization of management

The clinical construct of "anxiety neurosis" was broad and poorly defined, so that the delineation of specific anxiety disorders in the DSM-III was an important advance. However, anxiety and related disorders are not only frequently comorbid, but each is also quite heterogeneous; thus diagnostic manuals provide only a first step towards formulating a management plan, and the development of additional decision support tools for the treatment of anxiety conditions is needed. This paper aims to describe systematically important domains that are relevant to the personalization of management of anxiety and related disorders in adults. For each domain, we summarize the available research evidence and review the relevant assessment instruments, paying special attention to their suitability for use in routine clinical practice. We emphasize areas where the available evidence allows the clinician to personalize the management of anxiety conditions, and we point out key unmet needs. Overall, the evidence suggests that we are becoming able to move from simply recommending that anxiety and related disorders be treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or their combination, to a more complex approach which emphasizes that the clinician has a broadening array of management modalities available, and that the treatment of anxiety and related disorders can already be personalized in a number of important respects.

Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy of Generalised Anxiety Disorder: Focus on Agomelatine

Recent network meta-analyses support the use of pharmacotherapy in patients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). Compared with placebo, drug treatment can improve symptoms and quality of life, and is more effective in preventing relapse. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors are generally considered the first-line agents of choice in GAD, but in some patients, an alternative evidence-based treatment with a different mechanism of action may also be considered (e.g. those with severe GAD, inadequate response, adverse effects and/or contraindications). One example is agomelatine, a melatonin receptor agonist and serotonin 2C (5-HT_2C) receptor antagonist, which has been shown to have efficacy that is greater than placebo in patients with GAD, and to have a tolerability profile that compares favourably with that of escitalopram. Both agomelatine and escitalopram are efficacious in treating patients with GAD, including those with severe symptoms.