Safety and Effectiveness Analyses of Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in Patients with HIV: 2-Year Report of Post-Marketing Surveillance in Japan

Characteristics and real-world medication persistence of people living with HIV treated with DTG/3TC or BIC/FTC/TAF: a hospital claims database study in Japan

Background

As the life expectancy of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) has improved, chronic disease burden and polypharmacy have increased in PLWH. Simplification of the antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen for PLWH has become crucial. The real-world treatment patterns and medication persistence of the 2-drug single-tablet regimen (STR), dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC), compared to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) prescribed were investigated.

Methods

This retrospective, database study extracted data from a hospital-based medical claims database in Japan. The changes in ART distributions by year during the identification period between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2021 were observed. Patients with disease record of HIV-1 infection and prescribed DTG/3TC or BIC/FTC/TAF as the first prescription of STR during the identification period were divided into two cohorts; DTG/3TC cohort and BIC/FTC/TAF cohort, respectively. Patient without medication records more than 3 months and no future data more than 6 months were excluded. Patients' characteristics were compared between the DTG/3TC cohort and the BIC/FTC/TAF cohort by Mantel-Haenszel test to adjust for age. Medication persistence was compared between the two cohorts by evaluating the continuation rates using Kaplan-Meier methods, using the log-rank test to assess the difference between the Kaplan-Meier curves. The median time-to-first prescription was compared between the two cohorts by Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results

Prescriptions of DTG/3TC and BIC/FTC/TAF increased steadily from 2019 to 2021 after the release year of each STR. There was no significant difference in the time-to-first prescription (p = 0.3). A total of 959 patients were included, with 120 patients and 839 patients on DTG/3TC and BIC/FTC/TAF, respectively. The proportion of dyslipidemia at baseline was significantly higher in the DTG/3TC cohort than in the BIC/FTC/TAF cohort after adjusting for mean age (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in medication persistence between the two cohorts (p = 0.91).

Conclusion

This study showed that DTG/3TC was likely to be selected for elderly patients and those with chronic disease in real-world clinical practice, which seems in accordance with the treatment strategy recommended by guidelines. Comparable medication persistence was observed with both regimens, aligning with findings from other countries. The 2-drug single-tablet regimen DTG/3TC may be an important ART regimen for PLWH with multiple morbidities and polypharmacy in an aging society. Due to the limitations of the database, further research to assess viral loads, emergence of resistance and adverse events will be encouraged.

Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Is Noninferior to Continuing Dolutegravir- and Non-Dolutegravir-Based Triple-Drug Antiretroviral Therapy in Virologically Suppressed People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: DUALING Prospective Nationwide Matched Cohort Study

Background

Confirming the efficacy of dolutegravir/lamivudine in clinical practice solidifies recommendations on its use.

Methods

Prospective cohort study (DUALING) in 24 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment centers in the Netherlands. HIV RNA-suppressed cases were on triple-drug antiretroviral regimens without prior virological failure or resistance and started dolutegravir/lamivudine. Cases were 1:2 matched to controls on triple-drug antiretroviral regimens by the use of dolutegravir-based regimens, age, sex, transmission route, CD4+ T-cell nadir, and HIV RNA zenith. The primary endpoint was the treatment failure rate in cases versus controls at 1 year by intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses with 5% noninferiority margin.

Results

The 2040 participants were 680 cases and 1380 controls. Treatment failure in the 390 dolutegravir-based cases versus controls occurred in 8.72% and 12.50% (difference: -3.78% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -7.49% to .08%]) by intention-to-treat and 1.39% and 0.80% (difference: 0.59% [95% CI, -.80% to 1.98%]) by on-treatment analyses. The treatment failure risk in 290 non-dolutegravir-based cases was also noninferior to controls. Antiretroviral regimen modifications unrelated to virological failure explained the higher treatment failure rate by intention-to-treat. A shorter time on triple-drug antiretroviral therapy and being of non-Western origin was associated with treatment failure. Treatment failure, defined as 2 consecutive HIV RNA >50 copies/mL, occurred in 4 cases and 5 controls but without genotypic resistance detected. Viral blips occured comparable in cases and controls but cases gained more weight, especially when tenofovir-based regimens were discontinued.

Conclusions

In routine care, dolutegravir/lamivudine was noninferior to continuing triple-drug antiretroviral regimens after 1 year, supporting the use of dolutegravir/lamivudine in clinical practice.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT04707326.