A case of gastric pseudoaneurysm following endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer

Propensity score matching analysis to evaluate efficacy of polyethylene oxide adhesive on preventing delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Regardless of technical advancements, delayed bleeding is still a common adverse event after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), often occurring in the early postoperative phase. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a newly designed polyethylene oxide (PEO) adhesive for preventing delayed gastric bleeding. Patients who underwent gastric ESD between December 2017 and December 2020 at three Chinese institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Patients receiving PEO application on gastric post-ESD ulcers were included in the PEO group, and patients without this procedure were included in the control group. To minimize potential bias, propensity score matching was performed, and sex, age, lesion size, lesion morphology, ulceration, localization, procedure time, frequency of major intraoperative bleeding, resected specimen size, lesion histopathology, submucosal invasion and the taking of antithrombotic drugs were included as matching factors. The incidence of delayed bleeding and time to bleeding were compared between both groups. After propensity score matching, 270 patients (135 per group) were included in the analysis. The delayed bleeding rate in the PEO group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.5%, 2/135 vs. 8.9%, 12/135, P = 0.006). The median time (range) to bleeding was 4.5 (4–5) days in the PEO group and 2 (1–15) days in the control group, with no significant difference (P = 0. 198). PEO demonstrated a significant effect in reducing the rate of delayed bleeding. Further study is warranted to confirm the efficacy of PEO for bleeding that occurs in the early phase after gastric ESD.

Transarterial embolisation for gastroduodenal bleeding following endoscopic resection

OBJECTIVES

Transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) is widely used to treat gastrointestinal bleeding. This paper reports the safety and efficacy of TAE for bleeding following endoscopic resection, including endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.

METHODS

Fifteen consecutive patients (13 males, two females; mean age 62.2 years) from two tertiary medical centres who underwent TAE for gastroduodenal bleeding after endoscopic resection from November 2001 to December 2020 were included. Patient demographics, clinical presentations, angiographic findings, and TAE details were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Immediate bleeding during endoscopic resection was noted in four patients. Delayed bleeding 1-30 days after endoscopic resection in nine patients presented with haematochezia (n = 4), haematemesis (n = 6) and melaena (n = 1). Endoscopic haemostasis was attempted in 11 patients (73.3%) but failed due to continued bleeding despite haemostasis (n = 6), failure to secure endoscopic field (n = 3) and unstable vital signs (n = 2). Eleven patients had positive angiographic findings for bleeding, and all bleeding arteries were embolised except one owing to failed superselection of the bleeder. In the other four patients with negative angiographic findings, the left gastric artery with/without the right gastric artery or the accessory left gastric artery was empirically embolised using gelatin sponge particles. Both technical and clinical success rates were 93.3% (14/15). No procedure-related complications occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

TAE is safe and effective in the treatment of immediate and delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection procedures.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first and largest 20-year bicentric study published in English on this topic. Empirical TAE for angiographically negative bleeding sites was also effective without significant complications.