Comparison of maximal Rubidium-82 activities for myocardial blood flow quantification between digital and conventional PET systems

Ejection fraction and ventricular volumes on rubidium positron emission tomography: Validation against cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the non-invasive gold standard for non-invasively determining left ventricular volumes (LVVs) and ejection fraction (EF). We aimed to assess the accuracy of LVV and left ventricular ejection fraction measured by positron emission tomography (PET) as compared to CMR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent both PET and CMR within 1 year were identified from prospective institutional registries. Analysis was performed to evaluate the agreement between the raw and body-surface-area-normalized left ventricular volume (LVV) and EF derived from PET vs. those derived from CMR.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 669 patients (mean age 62 ± 13 years, 65% male). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration between CMR and PET imaging was 36 (7-118) days. The median (IQR) EF values were 52% (38-63%) on CMR and 53% (37-65%) on PET (mean difference: 0.53% ± 9.1, P = 0.129) with a strong correlation (Spearman rho = 0.84, P < 0.001; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.86, P < 0.001; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.844, 95% CI: 0.822 to 0.865). Results were similar with LVV, normalized LVV/EF, and in subgroups of patients with reduced EF, coronary artery disease scar, and LV hypertrophy as well as in patients with defibrillators. However, PET tended to underestimate LVV compared to CMR.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed a strong correlation of EF and LVV by PET against a reference standard of CMR, whereas PET significantly underestimated LVV, but not EF, compared to CMR.

Advances in Digital PET Technology and Its Potential Impact on Myocardial Perfusion and Blood Flow Quantification

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we explore the development of digital PET scanners and describe the mechanism by which they work. We dive into some technical details on what differentiates a digital PET from a conventional PET scanner and how such differences lead to better imaging characteristics. Additionally, we summarize the available evidence on the improvements in the images acquired by digital PET as well as the remaining pitfalls. Finally, we report the comparative studies available on how digital PET compares to conventional PET, particularly in the quantification of coronary blood flow.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of digital PET offers high sensitivity and time-of-flight (TOF), which allow lower activity and scan times, with much less risk of detector saturation. This allows faster patient throughput, scanning more patients per generator, and acquiring more consistent image quality across patients. The higher sensitivity captures more of the potential artifacts, particularly motion-related ones, which presents a current challenge that still needs to be tackled. The digital silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) positron emission tomography (PET) machine has been an important development in the technological advancements of non-invasive nuclear cardiovascular imaging. It has enhanced the utility for PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification.

Effect of temporal sampling protocols on myocardial blood flow measurements using Rubidium-82 PET

BACKGROUND

A variety of temporal sampling protocols is used worldwide to measure myocardial blood flow (MBF). Both the length and number of time frames in these protocols may alter MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurements. We aimed to assess the effect of different clinically used temporal sampling protocols on MBF and MFR quantification in Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET imaging.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 20 patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging using Rb-82 PET. A literature search was performed to identify appropriate sampling protocols. PET data were reconstructed using 14 selected temporal sampling protocols with time frames of 5-10 seconds in the first-pass phase and 30-120 seconds in the tissue phase. Rest and stress MBF and MFR were calculated for all protocols and compared to the reference protocol with 26 time frames.

RESULTS

MBF measurements differed (P ≤ 0.003) in six (43%) protocols in comparison to the reference protocol, with mean absolute relative differences up to 16% (range 5%-31%). Statistically significant differences were most frequently found for protocols with tissue phase time frames < 90 seconds. MFR did not differ (P ≥ 0.11) for any of the protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Various temporal sampling protocols result in different MBF values using Rb-82 PET. MFR measurements were more robust to different temporal sampling protocols.

Assessment of a digital and an analog PET/CT system for accurate myocardial perfusion imaging with a flow phantom

In Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) with Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) systems, accurate quantification is essential. We assessed flow quantification accuracy over various injected activities using a flow phantom.

METHODS

The study was performed on the digital 4-ring Discovery MI (DMI-20) and analog Discovery 690 (D690) PET/CT systems, using 325-1257 MBq of [15O]H2O. PET performance and flow quantification accuracy were assessed in terms of count-rates, dead-time factors (DTF), scatter fractions (SF), time-activity curves (TACs), areas-under-the-curves (AUCs) and flow values.

RESULTS

On DMI-20, prompts of 12.8 Mcps, DTF of 2.06 and SF of 46.1% were measured with 1257 MBq of activity. On the D690, prompts of 6.85 Mcps, DTF of 1.57 and SF of 32.5% were measured with 1230 MBq of activity. AUC values were linear over all activities. Mean wash-in flow error was - 9% for both systems whereas wash-out flow error was - 5% and - 6% for DMI-20 and D690. With the highest activity, wash-out flow error was - 12% and - 7% for the DMI-20 and D690.

CONCLUSION

DMI-20 and D690 preserved accurate flow quantification over all injected activities, with maximum error of - 12%. In the future, flow quantification accuracy over the activities and count-rates evaluated in this study should be assessed.

Activity regimes for 82Rb cardiac PET: Effects on absolute MBF and MPI

BACKGROUND

Selection of optimal tracer activity for 82Rb PET is based on a trade-off between necessary count-statistics in the late static phase and detector saturation in the early blood-pool phase. Administered tracer activity recommended in prescribing information differs substantially from recommendations in current literature. The present study examines the effect on both absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and relative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) of reducing dose.

METHODS

Forty patients were scanned twice on a PMT-based PET/CT (GE D690): At recommended activity (1110 MBq) and at either 740 or 370 MBq. MBF, MFR, total perfusion deficit (TPD) and ejection fractions (EF) were quantified. Results were compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Linear correlation between MBF at 1110 MBq at either reduced activity had an R2 > 0.98. A small bias (± 5%-9%) was observed with opposite signs for 1110/740 and 1110/370. Limits of agreement for MBF were larger for 1110/370. MFR had a lower linear correlation (R2 = 0.96), but wide limits of agreement especially for 1110/370. TPD and EF correlated well at 1110/740 (R2 = 0.96 and 0.99, respectively), but large scatter was observed for 1110/370.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of the tracer activity to 740 MBq, significantly reduced dead-time correction factors, while still producing reliable static and gated images. However, despite large dead-time at 1110 MBq, no systematic bias on absolute MBF was observed compared to reduced activities.

Value of SiPM PET in myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82

BACKGROUND

PET scanners using silicon photomultipliers with digital readout (SiPM PET) have an improved temporal and spatial resolution compared to PET scanners using conventional photomultiplier tubes (PMT PET). However, the effect on image quality and visibility of perfusion defects in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is unknown. Our aim was to determine the value of a SiPM PET scanner in MPI.

METHODS

We prospectively included 30 patients who underwent rest and regadenoson-induced stress Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) MPI on the D690 PMT PET (GE Healthcare) and within three weeks on the Vereos SiPM PET (Philips Healthcare). Two expert readers scored the image quality and assessed the existence of possible defects. In addition, interpreter's confidence, myocardial blood flow (MBF), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) values were compared.

RESULTS

Image quality improved (P = 0.03) using the Vereos as compared to the D690. Image quality of the Vereos and the D690 was graded fair in 20% and 10%, good in 60% and 50%, and excellent in 20% and 40%, respectively. Defect interpretation and interpreter's confidence did not differ between the D690 and the Vereos (P > 0.50). There were no significant differences in rest MBF (P ≥ 0.29), stress MBF (P ≥ 0.11), and MFR (P ≥ 0.51).

CONCLUSION

SiPM PET provides an improved image quality in comparison with PMT PET. Defect interpretation, interpreter's confidence, and absolute blood flow measurements were comparable between both systems. SiPM PET is therefore a reliable technique for MPI using Rb-82.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ToetsingOnline NL63853.075.17. Registered 13 November, 2017.

Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve by CZT-SPECT: A head to head comparison with 82Rubidium PET imaging

BACKGROUND

We measured myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR) by dynamic CZT-SPECT and 82Rb-PET in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) and compared the accuracy of the two methods in predicting obstructive CAD.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with available coronary angiography data underwent 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT and 82Rb-PET cardiac imaging. Stress and rest MBF and MPR were calculated by both methods and compared. Diagnostic accuracies of CZT-SPECT and PET were also assessed using a receiver-operator-characteristic curve.

RESULTS

CZT-SPECT yielded similar baseline MBF, but higher hyperemic MBF and MPR values compared to PET. There was a modest correlation between the two methods for MPR (r = 0.56, P < .01). MPR by CZT-SPECT showed a good ability in identify a reduced MPR by PET, with an area under the curve of 0.85. A MPR cut-off of 2.5 was identified by CZT-SPECT for detection of abnormal MPR by PET, with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 86%, 73% and 80%. The area under the curve for the identification of obstructive CAD by regional MPR were 0.83 for CZT-SPECT and 0.84 for PET (P = .90). At CZT-SPECT, a regional MPR of 2.1 provided the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for identifying obstructive CAD. Diagnostic accuracy of CZT-SPECT and PET using respective cut-off values was comparable (P = .62).

CONCLUSION

Hyperemic MBF and MPR values obtained by CZT-SPECT are higher than those measured by 82Rb-PET imaging, with a moderate correlation between the two methods. CZT-SPECT shows good diagnostic accuracy for the identification of obstructive CAD. These findings may encourage the use of this new technique to a better risk stratification and patient management.

Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique introduced in 1970s. Over the years, PET was used alone but is in 2000 when the first hybrid PET/CT device was clinically introduced. Since then, PET has continuously been marked by technological developments, being the most recent one the introduction of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) as an alternative to standard photomultiplier tubes used in analog PET/CT systems. SiPMs, the basis for the so called digital PET/CT systems, are smaller than standard photomultiplier tubes (enabling higher spatial resolution) and provide up to 100% coverage of the crystal area, as well as high sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution. SiPMs in combination with optimized acquisition and reconstruction parameters improve the localization of the annihilation events, provide high definition PET images, and offer higher sensitivity and higher diagnostic performance. This article summarizes the evidence about the superior performance of the state of the art digital PET and highlights its potential clinical implications. Digital PET opens new perspectives in the quantification and characterization of small lesions, which are mostly undetectable using analog PET systems, potentially changing patient management and improving outcomes in oncological and non-oncological diseases. Moreover, digital PET offers the possibility to reduce radiation dose and scan times which may facilitate the implementation of PET to address unmet clinical needs.

Body weight-dependent Rubidium-82 activity results in constant image quality in myocardial perfusion imaging with PET

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice shows degrading image quality in heavier patients who undergo myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET when using a fixed tracer activity. Our aim was to derive and validate a patient-specific activity protocol resulting in a constant image quality in PET MPI.

METHODS

We included 251 patients who underwent rest MPI with Rb-82 PET (Discovery 670, GE Healthcare). 132 patients were included retrospectively and were scanned using a fixed activity of 740 MBq. The total number of measured prompts was normalized to activity and correlated to body weight, mass per body length and body mass index to find the best predicting parameter. Next, a patient-specific activity was derived and subsequently validated in 119 additional patients. Image quality was scored by three experts on a four-point scale.

RESULTS

Both image quality and prompts decreased in heavier patients when using a fixed activity (p < .005). Body weight was used to derive a new activity formula: Activity = 8.3 MBq/kg. When applying this formula, both measured prompts and scored image quality became independent of body weight (p > .60).

CONCLUSION

Administrating a Rb-82 activity that linearly depends on body weight resulted in a constant image quality across all patients and is recommended.

Effects of two patient-specific dosing protocols on measurement of myocardial blood flow with 3D 82Rb cardiac PET

PURPOSE

Clinical measurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) has emerged as an important component of routine PET-CT assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Although multiple society guidelines recommend patient-specific dosing, there is a lack of studies evaluating the efficacy of patient-specific dosing for quantitative MBF accuracy.

METHODS

Two patient-specific dosing protocols (weight- and BMI-adjusted) were retrospectively evaluated in 435 consecutive clinical patients referred for PET myocardial perfusion assessment. MBF was estimated at rest and after regadenoson-induced hyperemia. The effect of dosing protocol on dose reduction, PET scanner saturation, relative perfusion, and image quality was compared. The effect of PET saturation on the accuracy of MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in remote myocardium was assessed with multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

BMI-adjusted dosing was associated with lower administered ⁸²Rb activities (1036.0 ± 274 vs. 1147 ± 274 MBq, p = 0.003) and lower PET scanner saturation incidence (28 vs. 38%, p = 0.006) and severity (median saturation severity index 0.219 ± 0.33 vs. 0.397 ± 0.59%, p = 0.018) compared to weight-adjusted dosing. PET saturation that occurred with either dosing protocol was moderate and resulted in modest remote MBF and MFR biases ranging from 2 to 9% after adjusting for patient age, sex, BMI, rate-pressure product, and LV ejection fraction. No adverse effects of BMI dose adjustment were observed in relative perfusion assessment or image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific dosing according to BMI is an effective method for guideline-directed dose reduction while maintaining image quality and accuracy for routine MBF and MFR quantification.

3D PET/CT 82Rb PET myocardial blood flow quantification: comparison of half-dose and full-dose protocols

PURPOSE

Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) has become central in the clinical application of Rubidium-82 (⁸²Rb) PET myocardial perfusion scans. Current recommendations suggest injections of 1100-1500 MBq of ⁸²Rb in bolus form, which poses a potential risk of PET system saturation on most 3D PET/CT systems currently being used. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and impact of PET system saturation and to test the potential use of a half-dose acquisition protocol.

METHODS

This study comprised 20 patients who underwent repeated rest scans in a single imaging session, one employing a full-dose (FD), and the other scan a half-dose (HfD) protocol. Datasets were evaluated for saturation based on visual assessments of input functions and sinograms. We compared FD and HfD MBF measurements using Bland-Altman plots, coefficients of variation (CV), and paired t tests. A correction factor permitting serial analyses using FD/HfD imaging protocols was obtained using only the datasets without saturation.

RESULTS

A dose reduction of 47% was reported for the HfD protocol (FD, 1247 ± 196 MBq; HfD, 662 ± 115 MBq). Saturation effects were observed in 4/20 (20%) FD scans, with none observed in the 20 HfD scans. Assessment of MBFs for FD and HfD protocols revealed bias in the MBF assessments of 0.09 ml/g/min (global MBF, FD = 1.03 ± 0.29 vs HfD = 0.94 ± 0.22 ml/g/min (p = 0.001)). Exclusion of patients with visually identified saturation effects (N = 4) reduced the bias to 0.05 ml/g/min (global MBF, FD = 0.97 ± 0.28 vs HfD = 0.92 ± 0.23 ml/g/min (p = 0.02)). From the datasets without saturation effect, it was possible to generate a bias-correction: Corrected MBF_HfD = 1.09*MBF_HfD-0.03 ml/g/min. MBF_FD and MBF_HfD did not differ following the bias correction (MBF_FD = 0.97 ± 0.28, MBF_{HfD,corrected} = 0.98 ± 0.25 ml/g/min, p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

Saturation effects can be problematic in ⁸²Rb MBF studies using the recommended FD protocols for 3D PET/CT scanners. The use of HfD protocol eliminates the risks of saturation and should be used instead of clinical protocols to avoid erroneous results.