Body weight-dependent Rubidium-82 activity results in constant image quality in myocardial perfusion imaging with PET

Exponential dosing to standardize myocardial perfusion image quality with rubidium-82 PET

BACKGROUND

82Rb PET is commonly performed using the same injected activity in all patients, resulting in lower image quality in larger patients. This study compared 82Rb dosing with exponential vs proportional functions of body weight on the standardization of myocardial perfusion image (MPI) quality.

METHODS

Two sequential cohorts of N = 60 patients were matched by patient weight. Rest and dipyridamole stress 82Rb PET was performed using 0.1 MBq·kg-2 exponential and 9 MBq·kg-1 proportional dosing. MPI scans were compared qualitatively with visual image quality scoring (IQS) and quantitatively using the myocardium-to-blood contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and blood background signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as a function of body weight.

RESULTS

Average (min-max) patient body weight was 81 ± 18 kg (46-137 kg). Proportional dosing resulted in decreasing CNR, SNR, and visual IQS with increasing body weight (P < 0.05). Exponential dosing eliminated the weight-dependent decreases in these image quality metrics that were observed in the proportional dosing group.

CONCLUSION

82Rb PET dosing as an exponential (squared) function of body weight produced consistent stress perfusion image quality over a wide range of patient weights. Dramatically lower doses can be used in lighter patients, with the equivalent population dose shifted toward the heavier patients to standardize diagnostic image quality.

The prevalence of image degradation due to motion in rest-stress rubidium-82 imaging on a SiPM PET-CT system

BACKGROUND

Motion of the heart is known to affect image quality in cardiac PET. The prevalence of motion blurring in routine cardiac PET is not fully appreciated due to challenges identifying subtle motion artefacts. This study utilizes a recent prototype Data-Driven Motion Correction (DDMC) algorithm to generate corrected images that are compared with non-corrected images to identify visual differences in relative rubidium-82 perfusion images due to motion.

METHODS

300 stress and 300 rest static images were reconstructed with DDMC and without correction (NMC). The 600 DDMC/NMC image pairs were assigned Visual Difference Score (VDS). The number of non-diagnostic images were noted. A "Dwell Fraction" (DF) was derived from the data to quantify motion and predict image degradation.

RESULTS

Motion degradation (VDS = 1 or 2) was evident in 58% of stress images and 33% of rest images. Seven NMC images were non-diagnostic-these originated from six studies giving a 2% rate of non-diagnostic studies due to motion. The DF metric was able to effectively predict image degradation. The DDMC heart identification and tracking was successful in all images.

CONCLUSION

Motion degradation is present in almost half of all relative perfusion images. The DDMC algorithm is a robust tool for predicting, assessing and correcting image degradation.

Activity regimes for 82Rb cardiac PET: Effects on absolute MBF and MPI

BACKGROUND

Selection of optimal tracer activity for 82Rb PET is based on a trade-off between necessary count-statistics in the late static phase and detector saturation in the early blood-pool phase. Administered tracer activity recommended in prescribing information differs substantially from recommendations in current literature. The present study examines the effect on both absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and relative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) of reducing dose.

METHODS

Forty patients were scanned twice on a PMT-based PET/CT (GE D690): At recommended activity (1110 MBq) and at either 740 or 370 MBq. MBF, MFR, total perfusion deficit (TPD) and ejection fractions (EF) were quantified. Results were compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Linear correlation between MBF at 1110 MBq at either reduced activity had an R2 > 0.98. A small bias (± 5%-9%) was observed with opposite signs for 1110/740 and 1110/370. Limits of agreement for MBF were larger for 1110/370. MFR had a lower linear correlation (R2 = 0.96), but wide limits of agreement especially for 1110/370. TPD and EF correlated well at 1110/740 (R2 = 0.96 and 0.99, respectively), but large scatter was observed for 1110/370.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of the tracer activity to 740 MBq, significantly reduced dead-time correction factors, while still producing reliable static and gated images. However, despite large dead-time at 1110 MBq, no systematic bias on absolute MBF was observed compared to reduced activities.

Effects of two patient-specific dosing protocols on measurement of myocardial blood flow with 3D 82Rb cardiac PET

PURPOSE

Clinical measurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) has emerged as an important component of routine PET-CT assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Although multiple society guidelines recommend patient-specific dosing, there is a lack of studies evaluating the efficacy of patient-specific dosing for quantitative MBF accuracy.

METHODS

Two patient-specific dosing protocols (weight- and BMI-adjusted) were retrospectively evaluated in 435 consecutive clinical patients referred for PET myocardial perfusion assessment. MBF was estimated at rest and after regadenoson-induced hyperemia. The effect of dosing protocol on dose reduction, PET scanner saturation, relative perfusion, and image quality was compared. The effect of PET saturation on the accuracy of MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in remote myocardium was assessed with multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

BMI-adjusted dosing was associated with lower administered ⁸²Rb activities (1036.0 ± 274 vs. 1147 ± 274 MBq, p = 0.003) and lower PET scanner saturation incidence (28 vs. 38%, p = 0.006) and severity (median saturation severity index 0.219 ± 0.33 vs. 0.397 ± 0.59%, p = 0.018) compared to weight-adjusted dosing. PET saturation that occurred with either dosing protocol was moderate and resulted in modest remote MBF and MFR biases ranging from 2 to 9% after adjusting for patient age, sex, BMI, rate-pressure product, and LV ejection fraction. No adverse effects of BMI dose adjustment were observed in relative perfusion assessment or image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific dosing according to BMI is an effective method for guideline-directed dose reduction while maintaining image quality and accuracy for routine MBF and MFR quantification.