Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion I: Myocardial partial volume correction

Assessment of resting myocardial blood flow in regions of known transmural scar to confirm accuracy and precision of 3D cardiac positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND

Composite invasive and non-invasive data consistently demonstrate that resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) in regions of known transmural myocardial scar (TMS) converge on a value of ~ 0.30 mL/min/g or lower. This value has been confirmed using the 3 most common myocardial perfusion agents (13N, 15O-H2O and 82Rb) incorporating various kinetic models on older 2D positron emission tomography (PET) systems. Thus, rMBF in regions of TMS can serve as a reference "truth" to evaluate low-end accuracy of various PET systems and software packages (SWPs). Using 82Rb on a contemporary 3D-PET-CT system, we sought to determine whether currently available SWP can accurately and precisely measure rMBF in regions of known TMS.

RESULTS

Median rMBF (in mL/min/g) and COV in regions of TMS were 0.71 [IQR 0.52-1.02] and 0.16 with 4DM; 0.41 [0.34-0.54] and 0.10 with 4DM-FVD; 0.66 [0.51-0.85] and 0.11 with Cedars; 0.51 [0.43-0.61] and 0.08 with Emory-Votaw; 0.37 [0.30-0.42], 0.07 with Emory-Ottawa, and 0.26 [0.23-0.32], COV 0.07 with HeartSee.

CONCLUSIONS

SWPs varied widely in low end accuracy based on measurement of rMBF in regions of known TMS. 3D PET using 82Rb and HeartSee software accurately (0.26 mL/min/g, consistent with established values) and precisely (COV = 0.07) quantified rMBF in regions of TMS. The Emory-Ottawa software yielded the next-best accuracy (0.37 mL/min/g), though rMBF was higher than established gold-standard values in ~ 5% of the resting scans. 4DM, 4DM-FDV, Cedars and Emory-Votaw SWP consistently resulted values higher than the established gold standard (0.71, 0.41, 0.66, 0.51 mL/min/g, respectively), with higher interscan variability (0.16, 0.11, 0.11, and 0.09, respectively).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05286593, Registered December 28, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05286593 .

Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance

Although the year 2020 was different from other years in many respects, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology published excellent articles pertaining to imaging in patients with cardiovascular disease due to the dedication of the investigators in our field all over the world. In this review, we will summarize a selection of these articles to provide a concise review of the main advancements that have recently occurred in the field and provide the reader with an opportunity to review a wide selection of articles. We will focus on publications dealing with positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance and hope that you will find this review helpful.

Decay Correction for Quantitative Myocardial PET Perfusion in Established PET Scanners: A Potentially Overlooked Source of Errors

Quantitative myocardial PET perfusion requires decay correction (DC) of the dynamic datasets to ensure that measured activity reflects true physiology and not radiotracer decay or frame duration. DC is typically performed by the PET camera system, and the exact algorithm is buried within the settings and assumed to be correct for quantitative perfusion data. For quantitative myocardial perfusion, sequential dynamic images should be decay-corrected to the activity at the midpoint of the first scan in the sequence. However, there are different DC algorithms that can be implemented depending on the needs and expertise of the laboratory. As such, before quantitative myocardial perfusion is performed, the DC technique of a camera system should be tested.

3D printing 18F radioactive phantoms for PET imaging

Purpose

Phantoms are routinely used in molecular imaging to assess scanner performance. However, traditional phantoms with fillable shapes do not replicate human anatomy. 3D-printed phantoms have overcome this by creating phantoms which replicate human anatomy which can be filled with radioactive material. The problem with these is that small objects suffer to a greater extent than larger objects from the effects of inactive walls, and therefore, phantoms without these are desirable. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of creating resin-based 3D-printed phantoms using ¹⁸F.

Methods

Radioactive resin was created using an emulsion of printer resin and ¹⁸F-FDG. A series of test objects were printed including twenty identical cylinders, ten spheres with increasing diameters (2 to 20 mm), and a double helix. Radioactive concentration uniformity, printing accuracy and the amount of leaching were assessed.

Results

Creating radioactive resin was simple and effective. The radioactive concentration was uniform among identical objects; the CoV of the signal was 0.7% using a gamma counter. The printed cylinders and spheres were found to be within 4% of the model dimensions. A double helix was successfully printed as a test for the printer and appeared as expected on the PET scanner. The amount of radioactivity leached into the water was measurable (0.72%) but not visible above background on the imaging.

Conclusions

Creating an ¹⁸F radioactive resin emulsion is a simple and effective way to create accurate and complex phantoms without inactive walls. This technique could be used to print clinically realistic phantoms. However, they are single use and cannot be made hollow without an exit hole. Also, there is a small amount of leaching of the radioactivity to take into consideration.

Reliability and Reproducibility of Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow: Does It Depend on the PET/CT Technology, the Vasodilator, and/or the Software?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The COURAGE and ISCHEMIA trials showed no reduced mortality after revascularization compared to medical treatment. Is this lack of benefit due to revascularization having no benefit regardless of CAD severity or to suboptimal patient selection due to non-quantitative cardiac imaging?

RECENT FINDINGS

Comprehensive, integrated, myocardial perfusion quantified by regional pixel distribution of coronary flow capacity (CFC) is the final common expression of objective CAD severity for which revascularization reduces mortality. Current lack of revascularization benefit derives from narrow thinking focused on measuring one isolated aspect of coronary characteristics, such as angiogram stenosis, its fractional flow reserve (FFR), anatomic FFR simulations, relative stress imaging, absolute stress ml/min/g or coronary flow reserve (CFR) alone, or even more narrowly on global CFR or fixed regions of interest in assumed coronary artery distributions, or in arbitrary 17 segments on bull's-eye displays, rather than regional pixel distribution of perfusion metrics as they actually are in an individual. Comprehensive integration of all quantitative perfusion metrics per regional pixel into coronary flow capacity guides artery-specific interventions for reduced mortality in non-acute CAD but requires addressing the methodologic questions in the title.

PET Imaging of Tumor Perfusion: A Potential Cancer Biomarker?

Perfusion, as measured by imaging, is considered a standard of care biomarker for the evaluation of many tumors. Measurements of tumor perfusion may be used in a number of ways, including improving the visual detection of lesions, differentiating malignant from benign findings, assessing aggressiveness of tumors, identifying ischemia and by extension hypoxia within tumors, and assessing treatment response. While most clinical perfusion imaging is currently performed with CT or MR, a number of methods for PET imaging of tumor perfusion have been described. The inert PET radiotracer ¹⁵O-water PET represents the recognized gold standard for absolute quantification of tissue perfusion in both normal tissue and a variety of pathological conditions including cancer. Other cancer PET perfusion imaging strategies include the use of radiotracers with high first-pass uptake, analogous to those used in cardiac perfusion PET. This strategy produces more visually pleasing high-contrast images that provide relative rather than absolute perfusion quantification. Lastly, multiple timepoint imaging of PET tracers such as ¹⁸F-FDG, are not specifically optimized for perfusion, but have advantages related to availability, convenience, and reimbursement. Multiple obstacles have thus far blocked the routine use of PET imaging for tumor perfusion, including tracer production and distribution, image processing, patient body coverage, clinical validation, regulatory approval and reimbursement, and finally feasible clinical workflows. Fortunately, these obstacles are being overcome, especially within larger imaging centers, opening the door for PET imaging of tumor perfusion to become standard clinical practice. In the foreseeable future, it is possible that whole-body PET perfusion imaging with ¹⁵O-water will be able to be performed in a single imaging session concurrent with standard PET imaging techniques such as ¹⁸F-FDG-PET. This approach could establish an efficient clinical workflow. The resultant ability to measure absolute tumor blood flow in combination with glycolysis will provide important complementary information to inform prognosis and clinical decisions.