Comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the assessment of cardiac sarcoidosis: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the assessment of myocardial viability: meta-analysis and systematic review

AIM

Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (Ce-CMR) and Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are frequently utilized in clinical practice to assess myocardial viability. However, studies evaluating direct comparison between Ce-CMR and FDG-PET have a smaller sample size, and no clear distinction between the two imaging modalities has been defined. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing Ce-CMR and FDG-PET for the assessment of myocardial viability.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from their inception to 4/20/2022 with search terms "viability" AND "heart diseases" AND "cardiac magnetic resonance imaging" AND "positron-emission tomography." We extracted patient characteristics, segment level viability assessment according to Ce-CMR and FDG-PET, and change in regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) at follow-up.

RESULTS

We included four studies in the meta-analysis which provided viability assessment with Ce-CMR and FDG-PET in all patients and change in RWMA at follow-up. There were 82 patients among the four included studies, and 585 segments were compared for viability assessment. There were 59 (72%) males, and mean age was 65 years. The sensitivity (95% confidence interval-CI) and specificity (CI) of Ce-CMR for predicting myocardial recovery were 0.88 (0.66-0.96) and 0.64 (0.49-0.77), respectively. The sensitivity (CI) and specificity (CI) of FDG-PET for predicting myocardial recovery were 0.91 (0.63-0.99) and 0.67 (0.49-0.81), respectively.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET and Ce-CMR have comparable diagnostic parameters in myocardial viability assessment and are consistent with prior research.

Advanced Imaging Integration for Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Imaging plays a crucial role in the therapy of ventricular tachycardia (VT). We offer an overview of the different methods and provide information on their use in a clinical setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of imaging in VT has progressed recently. Intracardiac echography facilitates catheter navigation and the targeting of moving intracardiac structures. Integration of pre-procedural CT or MRI allows for targeting the VT substrate, with major expected impact on VT ablation efficacy and efficiency. Advances in computational modeling may further enhance the performance of imaging, giving access to pre-operative simulation of VT. These advances in non-invasive diagnosis are increasingly being coupled with non-invasive approaches for therapy delivery. This review highlights the latest research on the use of imaging in VT procedures. Image-based strategies are progressively shifting from using images as an adjunct tool to electrophysiological techniques, to an integration of imaging as a central element of the treatment strategy.