Revision of knee prostheses with components malrotation: treatment algorithm using a computed tomographic analysis

Femur rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Delphi consensus statements from European knee society (EKS)

Proper rotational alignment of the femur components represents one of the key factors for the functional outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recent 3-D imaging data have shown a wide variability of the distal femur bony anatomy in the axial plane. The identification and intraoperative correction of these bony torsional deformities remain controversial. During the last decades various bony landmarks and surgical techniques have been proposed for proper femur rotational alignment but there is no consensus or evidence which method will be the best.This study employs a Delphi consensus methodology among European Knee Society (EKS) experts to address key questions regarding femur rotational alignment in TKA. Through a systematic literature review and expert discussions, a strong consensus was achieved on three main points: (1) Proper femoral rotational alignment must establish a balanced flexion gap and ensure proper patella tracking through the 3-D positioning of the trochlear groove. There is no consensus or evidence indicating whether the transepicondylar or trans-cylindric axis is the best compromise for the TKA flexion/extension axis. (2) For the three main techniques (measured resection, balanced flexion gap and combined/hybrid) and the new personalized alignment philosophies, no agreement on the best femoral rotational alignment exist. (3) Computer-Assisted Surgery (CAS) techniques using 3-D imaging preoperatively can help to identify the key rotational bony landmarks. Until now CAS has not delivered conclusive data to link these pre- and intraoperative findings to the clinical outcome to allow any recommendation for proper rotational alignment of the femur.This Delphi consensus statement summarizes the controversies, current practices, and evidence on the three key questions regarding proper femoral rotational alignment. There is a need for further high-level studies to identify the correct individual femoral rotational alignment to achieve better TKA outcomes.

Clinical Efficacy of Preoperative CT-Assisted Planning for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

This study aims to determine the mean posterior condylar angle (PCA) in the included population and its relation to coronal alignment; and to know the clinical importance of the use of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We randomized 50 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis into 2 groups. We used CT scan axial images to measure the PCA. In the first group we followed the CT scan plan (group 1), but in the second we did not follow the plan and adjusted rotation to the standard three degrees (group 2). The mean age of the included patients was 63 years. The radiological data of the included patients showed 5 patients with valgus deformity and 45 patients with varus deformity with the mean coronal alignment of 7.5 degrees. CT scan showed the mean PCA of 3.7 degrees (1.3 degrees). The axial knee postoperative X-ray showed the mean patellar tilt angle of 2.1 degrees (0.5 degrees) and 1.9 degrees (0.5 degrees) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The congruence angle was 4 degrees (2.6 degrees) in group 1 and 5.5 degrees (3.2 degrees) in group 2. The median Knee Society functional score in group 1 was 85 (12), while it was 84 (7.5) in group 2. The median postoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score in group 1 was 84 (18.6) whereas 80.2 (13.6) in group 2. The median postoperative Bartlett score in group 1 was 30 (5), while it was 30 (6) in group 2. The use of preoperative CT scan did not improve the patient functional scores after TKA.

Revision for coronal malalignment will improve functional outcome up to 5 years postoperatively

PURPOSE

Revision of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for the diagnosis of malalignment is widely performed. However, very little is known about the functional outcome in revision TKA surgery for malalignment. The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome and to identify factors influencing the functional outcome of patients who have had a revision of a TKA for the diagnosis of malalignment at 5 years follow-up.

METHODS

All patients with a revision of a TKA for malalignment as the primary reason were selected from a prospective database. The diagnosis of symptomatic malalignment was made by the surgeon and quantified by radiologic examination. Functional outcome was scored by the functional score of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System (fKSS) at 0, 12, 24 and 60 months. Multiple imputation for missing data and multivariable analysis were performed to identify factors influencing functional outcome.

RESULTS

After selection, 105 patients (age: 65.1 ± 9.1 years, gender M:F 30:75) were eligible for outcome analysis. Functional outcome significantly improved from the preoperative (fKSS: 44.1 ± 22.0) to 5 years postoperative (64.7 ± 24.0, p < 0.001) time frames. Higher degree of coronal deviation, younger age and lower preoperative KSS were found to be strongest positive influencing factors for the change in fKSS.

CONCLUSION

Revision of TKA for malalignment appears to be an effective treatment to improve functional outcome up to 5 years postoperatively. Higher degree of coronal deviation, younger age and lower preoperative KSS are the strongest contributing factors for functional improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Therapeutic prospective cohort study.

Metal Artifact Reduction Dual-Energy CT as an Accurate and Reliable Method for Measuring Total Knee Arthroplasty Femoral Component Rotation Compared to Conventional CT

This article determines the accuracy and reliability of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) with metal artifact reduction (MAR) in the evaluation of femoral component rotation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), in comparison with conventional CT images. A total of 49 patients (mean age, 69 years; 42 women) who underwent TKA between January 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Femoral component rotation, including the anatomic and surgical transepicondylar axes, was evaluated with preoperative conventional CT and postoperative conventional CT and DECT with MAR. Surgical femoral component rotation was also assessed as a reference standard. Accuracy was assessed using paired t-test, and inter- and intraobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on postoperative conventional CT and DECT with MAR. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society objective and functional scores. Accuracy of femoral component rotation was not significantly different from that of surgical rotation with both conventional CT and DECT with MAR. However, inter- and intraobserver reliability were better for DECT with MAR (ICC: 0.953-0.966) than for conventional CT (ICC: 0.641-0.749). The Knee Society objective and functional scores improved 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION:  DECT with MAR showed accurate and more reliable results than did conventional CT in the evaluation of femoral component rotation after TKA.

How to assess femoral and tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty with computed tomography: a systematic review

PURPOSE

One of the most important factors leading to revision of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) is malrotation of femoral and/or tibial component. Rotation measurements performed on radiographs are limited and less reliable compared to 2D computed tomography (CT). Nowadays, 2D-CT and 3D-CT can be distinguished in measuring rotation of the TKA components. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the most reliable CT techniques in measuring rotation of the TKA components and to investigate possible cut-off points that can be used in the clinician's decision for a possible revision of the TKA.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science was performed up to April 2015. Final selections of 12 articles were used in this systematic review.

RESULTS

3D-CT, compared to 2D-CT, is more reliable and shows a high level of intra- and interobserver reliability. Femoral component rotation is measured using the component's posterior condylar line or inner pegs in relation to the epicondylar axis. Five different techniques were used to measure tibial component rotation. The posterior border of the tibial component in relationship to the geometric centre and tibial tubercle was most frequently used.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows a strong preference for 3D-CT to determine the component's rotation following a TKA. The literature shows consensus on the reference points of the femoral component. In measurements of the tibial component, various techniques are used with similar results. No clear cut-off point for revision of malrotated TKA components can be stated because of limited evidence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effect of rotational alignment on outcome of total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Poor outcomes have been linked to errors in rotational alignment of total knee arthroplasty components. The aims of this study were to determine the correlation between rotational alignment and outcome, to review the success of revision for malrotated total knee arthroplasty, and to determine whether evidence-based guidelines for malrotated total knee arthroplasty can be proposed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review including all studies reporting on both rotational alignment and functional outcome. Comparable studies were used in a correlation analysis and results of revision were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

846 studies were identified, 25 of which met the inclusion criteria. From this selection, 11 studies could be included in the correlation analysis. A medium positive correlation (ρ = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27-0.59) and a large positive correlation (ρ = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.64-0.73) were found between external rotation of the tibial component and the femoral component, respectively, and the Knee Society score. Revision for malrotation gave positive results in all 6 studies in this field.

INTERPRETATION

Medium and large positive correlations were found between tibial and femoral component rotational alignment on the one hand and better functional outcome on the other. Revision of malrotated total knee arthroplasty may be successful. However, a clear cutoff point for revision for malrotated total knee arthroplasty components could not be identified.