High-Intensity Multimodal Resistance Training Improves Muscle Function, Symmetry during a Sit-to-Stand Task, and Physical Function Following Hip Fracture

Pilot study of a high-intensity interval training program in older adults: Safety, feasibility, functional fitness and cognitive effects

Exercise can boost physical and cognitive health in older adults. However, there are a lack of accessible exercise programs that foster adherence among older adults. In this study, we aimed to establish the safety and feasibility of APEX, a new exercise program designed to optimize fitness and cognitive gains for older adults, in addition to evaluating its acute physiological effects, and assessing its possible effects on functional fitness and cognition among healthy older adults. APEX utilizes a multimodal progressive high-intensity interval training (HIIT) design, with high-intensity intervals focused on enhancing cardiovascular fitness and muscle strength, and recovery intervals that incorporate balance and mobility exercises. The APEX training was tested in healthy older adults (n=4) over the course of four weeks. Ultimately, APEX was found to be safe and feasible, with no adverse events and high adherence. Participants met heart rate targets for all of the high-intensity exercises, and all intervals had a significant difference in heart rates between high-intensity and recovery periods in linear effects models (p<0.001). Improvements in functional fitness were observed in aerobic endurance, lower body strength, and balance. The intervention was also associated with positive trends in the cognitive domains of information processing, working memory, executive control, and attention. APEX offers a promising alternative to traditional cardiovascular exercise modalities for older adults with additional benefits for functional fitness and cognition. These results encourage further testing of the APEX program in older adults and different clinical populations.

Potential Benefits of a Minimal Dose Eccentric Resistance Training Paradigm to Combat Sarcopenia and Age-Related Muscle and Physical Function Deficits in Older Adults

The ability of older adults to perform activities of daily living is often limited by the ability to generate high mechanical outputs. Therefore, assessing and developing maximal neuromuscular capacity is essential for determining age-related risk for functional decline as well as the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. Interventions designed to enhance neuromuscular capacities underpinning maximal mechanical outputs could positively impact functional performance in daily life. Unfortunately, < 10% of older adults meet the current resistance training guidelines. It has recently been proposed that a more “minimal dose” RT model may help engage a greater proportion of older adults, so that they may realize the benefits of RT. Eccentric exercise offers some promising qualities for such an approach due to its efficiency in overloading contractions that can induce substantial neuromuscular adaptations. When used in a minimal dose RT paradigm, eccentric-based RT may be a particularly promising approach for older adults that can efficiently improve muscle mass, strength, and functional performance. One approach that may lead to improved neuromuscular function capacities and overall health is through heightened exercise tolerance which would favor greater exercise participation in older adult populations. Therefore, our perspective article will discuss the implications of using a minimal dose, submaximal (i.e., low intensity) multi-joint eccentric resistance training paradigm as a potentially effective, and yet currently underutilized, means to efficiently improve neuromuscular capacities and function for older adults.

Loss of skeletal muscle mass can be predicted by sarcopenia and reflects poor functional recovery at one year after surgery for geriatric hip fractures

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures in the elderly impact negatively on functional dependence, and carry great social costs and morbidity. We assessed the decline in muscle mass and functional outcomes following hip fracture surgery .

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty patients with a hip fracture (mean age: 80.8 years) were assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and reassessed for changes in body composition 1 year after hip surgery. Baseline demographic data, sarcopenia, and bone mineral density were recorded. Body mass index (BMI), handgrip strength, appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), total body fat percentage, and responses to questionnaires measuring quality of life and activities of daily living (ADL) before injury and 1 year after hip surgery were analyzed to identify changes. Associations with changes in ADL or quality of life were analyzed with time-variant independent variables.

RESULTS

Significant losses in ADL were identified at the 1-year follow-up, at which time only 43% of patients had regained their preinjury ADL status. Additionally, the participants had lost an average of 4.63% of ASM. ASM loss was significantly higher in patients with baseline sarcopenia than in those without (mean loss: 9.18% and 1.15%, respectively). When confounders were controlled for, a greater loss of ASM and handgrip strength and larger increase in BMI were associated with greater decrease in ADL 1 year after hip surgery.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric hip fracture patients may experience a significant loss of muscle mass, associated with impaired functional recovery 1 year after hip surgery, highlighting a potential treatment target of maintaining muscle mass to improve prognosis in these patients.

Effectiveness of a Community-Based Muscle Strengthening Exercise Program to Increase Muscle Strength Among Pre-frail Older Persons in Malaysia: A Pilot Study

Deterioration in muscle mass and muscle strength is common among the frail older persons, cause functional dependence and decrease in the quality of life. Therefore, the identification of cost-effective interventions to prevent or ameliorate frailty is crucially needed. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a Community-based Muscle Strengthening Exercise (COME) program to increase muscle strength among pre-frail older persons. This study was a quasi-experimental study. A total of 32 older persons aged 60 years and older with pre-frail symptoms were recruited from the community center. The COME was developed based on the Growing Stronger program and the Otago Home Exercise Program. COME was designed to strengthen all of the major muscle groups in the upper and lower extremities. The exercise program was conducted for 12 weeks and divided into 3 parts; (1) to strengthen the body slowly and gently, using only body weight, (2) to introduce dumbbells and ankle weights to increase strength and (3) to add various new ways to boost strength even more. Functional tests were measured before and after the intervention. The results revealed non-significant p-value for pre- and post-intervention comparison for all study outcomes. Observing the values of mean difference, the study intervention was shown to have slightly improved the time up and go (Mean difference = -0.25), and sit-to-stand duration (Mean difference = -0.41) as well as the handgrip strength (Mean difference = 0.68) among the participants. On the assessment of Cohen ES, all three improvements exhibited small effect sizes. Sit-to-stand duration was shown to have most benefited from the intervention with highest ES among the outcome variables (ES = 0.20). COME intervention program among pre-frail older persons showed favorable trend toward improvement of upper and lower extremities muscle strength. This study should be further tested in randomized control trial to confirm its effectiveness.

Balance training can enhance hip fracture patients' independence in activities of daily living: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

We conducted this meta-analysis to analyze the effectiveness of balance training in improving postoperative rehabilitation outcomes in hip fracture surgery patients.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed electronic databases were searched from their inception to December 2018. We selected prospective clinical control analyses and high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following the inclusion standards. We used Stata 12.0 to perform the meta-analysis. Where possible, the standard mean difference (SMD) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 955 hips (balance training = 487, control = 468) published between 2002 and 2019 were assessed for eligibility of inclusion in the meta-analysis. Balance training was shown to remarkably improve the aspects of quality of life associated with physical health (standard mean difference [SMD], 2.20; 95% CI, 1.63-2.78, P = .000), a fast gait speed (SMD, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.25-1.77, P = .009), and balance (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI: [0.12, 0.41], P = .000). Moreover, the balance training group showed increases in independence in activities of daily living (ADLs), performance task scores, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores compared with the control group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

According to the present meta-analysis, balance training improves one's independence in activities of daily living, performance tasks, lower limb strength, gait, and total physical function compared with no balance training. More high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes are required for the identification of the best balance training program after hip fracture.

Community rehabilitation interventions after hip fracture: Pragmatic evidence-based practice recommendations

Practice development enables practitioners to develop their knowledge and allows the application of evidence-based care for their patients. It happens within the practitioner's own clinical practice area and enhances personal and professional growth whilst focusing on patients' specific needs. This is important when working with patients in the rehabilitation phase following fragility hip fracture whose care should be provided by practitioners knowledgeable about the best way to approach their needs. This article, which followed the methods for a scoping review, aims to provide the practitioner with an overview of rehabilitation interventions for patients following hip fracture discussed in the literature. There is an introduction to the nature of rehabilitation and the issues raised for the patient with a hip fracture, a discussion of the existing literature, and recommendations for practice based on both that evidence and a pragmatic approach to care. Scoping reviews provide overviews of broad topic areas (Peterson et al., 2017). This gives the reader the opportunity to consider how other factors, besides research evidence, can contribute to best practice and to reflect on how their own practice needs to develop. At the end of the discussion, an overview of pragmatic recommendations for practice is provided based on the findings of the literature considered. Some points for individual reflection are also provided to help the practitioner to consider how the contents of the paper might impact on their own practice.

Efficacy of balance training for hip fracture patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

To investigate whether the clinical effects of balance training were improved in hip fracture patients.

Methods

Electronic databases which included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2018 were searched. High-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective clinical controlled studies were selected based on inclusion criteria. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis. Standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the effects.

Results

Finally, 9 studies with 872 patients (balance training = 445, control = 427) were included in our meta-analysis (published between 1997 and 2018). Compared with the control group, balance training group showed a significant increase in overall function (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI [0.25, 0.93], P = 0.001), gait speed (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI [0.19, 1.07], P = 0.005), lower limb strength (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI [0.50, 0.95], P = 0.000), activities of daily living (ADLs) (SMD = 0.97, 95% CI [0.61, 1.34], P = 0.000), performance task scores (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI [0.21, 0.61], P = 0.000), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.16, 0.47], P = 0.000).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis revealed that the balance training group has improved overall physical functioning, gait, lower limb strength, performance task, and activity of daily living than the control group. More high-quality and large-scale RCTs are needed to identify the optimal regimen of balance training after hip fracture.