Functional Outcomes of Fragility Fracture Integrated Rehabilitation Management in Sarcopenic Patients after Hip Fracture Surgery and Predictors of Independent Ambulation

Impact of sarcopenia on gait independence in older orthopaedic patients: a comparison of 2 diagnostic algorithms

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the impact of sarcopenia on gait recovery using the Sarcopenia Special Interest Group of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISarcoPRM) and the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS2019) algorithms in older orthopaedic patients.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

PATIENTS

A total of 153 orthopaedic patients (78.4% women; average age 79.3 ± 6.7 years) were included during hospitalization.

METHODS

Sarcopenia was defined using the ISarcoPRM and AWGS2019 algorithms on admission. Functional ambulation categories assessed gait independence before admission and on discharge. The impact of sarcopenia on worsened gait independence on discharge was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Sarcopenia based on the ISarcoPRM algorithm (prevalence=56.2%) was significantly associated with worsened gait independence (odds ratio: 3.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-10.25, p = 0.005), unlike sarcopenia based on AWGS2019 (prevalence=36.6%).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia assessed using the ISarcoPRM algorithm was associated with worsened gait independence on discharge in older orthopaedic patients.

Efficacy of Fragility Fracture Integrated Rehabilitation Management in Older Adults With Hip Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 1-Year Follow-Up

OBJECTIVES

Comprehensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation has been proven to benefit patients recovering from hip fracture surgery, enhancing postoperative outcomes. However, challenges persist in delivering such rehabilitation due to health care system limitations and inadequate policies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of Fragility Fracture Integrated Rehabilitation Management (FIRM) in comparison to a conventional rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery.

DESIGN

A parallel-group, single-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Three in-hospital rehabilitation settings; 203 hip fracture surgery patients aged 65 years and older were randomized and followed up for 1 year.

METHODS

The main outcome assessed ambulatory function, using the Koval and Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) scales. Functional outcomes were evaluated upon rehabilitation admission, discharge, and during follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. The prevalence of independent ambulation and recovery to prefracture ambulatory status at each follow-up time point were analyzed.

RESULTS

The FIRM group demonstrated superior improvements in Koval and FAC scores, along with most secondary outcomes during the 1-year follow-up. Significant changes from baseline to 12 months were observed in Koval scores [mean difference, -4.13 (95% CI, -4.56 to -3.70) vs -3.22 (95% CI, -3.86 to -2.61), P = .016] and FAC scores [mean difference, 3.37 (95% CI, 3.01 to 3.72) vs 2.56 (95% CI, 2.10 to 3.02), P = .006]. At the 12-month follow-up point, this group also showed higher rates of independent ambulation [53 (76.8%) vs 28 (56.0%), P = .016] and recovery to prefracture ambulatory status [56 (81.2%) vs 31 (62.0%), P = .020] than the conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The FIRM demonstrated superior effectiveness compared with conventional rehabilitation in improving ambulation and other functional outcomes in older adults with hip fracture. This finding provides valuable insights for managing comprehensive multidisciplinary postoperative care for hip fractures in South Korea and beyond.

Definitions and adverse outcomes of sarcopenia in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care: A scoping review on current evidence

PURPOSE

Sarcopenia, defined as the loss of muscle mass and strength, can hinder postoperative recovery and raise mortality rates. However, the current evidence on the harmful effects of sarcopenia in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care is unclear. This scoping review investigates different definitions that were used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care and what adverse consequences have been examined.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and Embase, following the PRISMA guidelines. We included original studies that examined clinical outcomes (such as length of hospital stay, rate of non-home discharge, rate of subsequent falls, rate of refractures, mortality, and functional outcome/quality of life) in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care (aged 65 years and above) with diagnosed sarcopenia (S) compared to a group without sarcopenia (NS).

RESULTS

Our search identified 2,748 publications. Out of these, 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Most publications were from Asia (n = 13). A total of 6174 patients were examined, with a prevalence of sarcopenia in 14-92%. 11 articles focused on patients with hip joint pathologies. Most studies diagnosed sarcopenia according to the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia (AWGSOP1 or AWGSOP2) definitions (n = 10). Length of hospital stay was investigated in 13 studies. Seven studies assessed rates of non-home discharge rates. Subsequent falls were not investigated in any of the studies. 1 study reported the overall refracture rate (S: 10.4%; NS: 5.8%). Mortality was assessed in 11 studies (S: 1-60.5%; NS: 0-39.5%). The functional outcome/quality of life was investigated by 17 studies (Barthel Index decline S: -4.5 to -15.3 points; NS: -11.7 to -54.7 points).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia has been increasingly studied in older patients in orthopedic and trauma care but there is a lack of consistent definition criteria. This scoping review suggests that sarcopenia may be associated with prolonged length of stay, higher rates of non-home discharge, and increased mortality among older patients in orthopedic and trauma care. However, prospective studies are necessary to establish the relationship between sarcopenia and refractures, falls, and functional outcome/quality of life among older patients in orthopedic and trauma care.

Functional Status of Patients over 65 Years Old Intervened on for a Hip Fracture One Year after the Operation

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the functional status one year after a hip fracture surgery and the influence of sarcopenia and other clinical factors at the time of admission.

METHOD

Prospective observational study with 135 patients over 65 years of age. Functional status of basic (modified Katz) and instrumental activities (Lawton and Brody) and walking ability (Functional Ambulation Classification, FAC) was measured on admission, at discharge, and telephonically one year later. The risk or positive screening of sarcopenia (SARC-F) and cognitive status (Pfeiffer), as well as clinical variables, were evaluated.

RESULTS

72% of patients are women; 36% have a risk of sarcopenia (Sarc-F ≥ 4), and 43% have moderate-severe cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer ≥ 5). Walking capacity at one year was closer to the values at admission more often in women than in men (0.2 ± 1.3 points vs. 0.9 ± 1.6; p = 0.001), as well as in patients without risk of sarcopenia versus sarcopenic patients (0.3 ± 1.2 points vs. 0.7 ± 1.7; p = 0.001), although their evolution did not show significant differences (p = 0.183). Instrumental activities after one year have not been recovered (1.7 ± 2.5 points; p = 0.032), and patients at risk of sarcopenia showed worse values (1.7 ± 1.9 points vs. 3.7 ± 2.7; p < 0.001) and worse evolution (p = 0.012). The evolution of basic activities varied according to the risk of sarcopenia (0.6 ± 1.4 points vs. 1.4 ± 2.1; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional status at one year is related to the functional status at admission, the positive screening of sarcopenia, sex, and cognitive impairment of the patient. Knowing at the time of admission an estimate of the functional status at one year will help to reinforce the individual treatment of patients with a worse prognosis.

Malnutrition diagnosed by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria as a predictor of gait ability in patients with hip fracture

AIM

Malnutrition is common in patients with hip fractures and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria are widely used to diagnose malnutrition. However, the criteria regarding the prediction of gait ability in patients with hip fractures during the acute phase remain unclear. We aimed to determine whether GLIM or ESPEN criteria were more appropriate for predicting gait ability at discharge from an acute hospital.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included hip fracture patients aged ≥ 65 years. Patients were classified as malnourished or non-malnourished according to the GLIM and ESPEN criteria at admission. The primary outcome was gait ability, which was evaluated using functional ambulation categories (FAC) at discharge. We categorized into those with (FAC score ≥ 3 points) and without (< 3 points) improved gait ability. Logistic regression analysis for FAC was performed to determine whether GLIM or ESPEN was predictive of gait ability at discharge.

RESULTS

Overall 157 patients were included; the median age was 84 years, and 75.3% were female. The prevalence of malnutrition was 73.9% and 25.5% according to the GLIM and ESPEN criteria, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that malnutrition evaluated using the GLIM criteria were predictive of lower FAC at discharge (odds ratio, 0.394; 95% CI, 0.164-0.946), while ESPEN criteria did not show statistically significant differences (odds ratio, 0.625; 95% CI, 0.292-1.335).

CONCLUSION

GLIM criteria are useful for predicting gait ability at discharge during acute hospitalization in patients with hip fractures.

Nutrition and Exercise Treatment of Sarcopenia in Hip Fracture Patients: Systematic Review

Background

This study aimed to investigate nutritional or rehabilitation intervention protocols for hip fracture patients with sarcopenia and to analyze the effect of these protocols through a systematic review of studies that reported clinical results.

Methods

Studies were selected based on the following criteria: (1) study design: randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies; (2) study population: patients with hip fracture; (3) intervention: nutritional or rehabilitation; and (4) reporting the clinical outcomes and definition of sarcopenia.

Results

Of the 247 references initially identified from the selected databases, 5 randomized controlled studies and 2 comparative studies were selected for further investigation. The total number of patients was 497. We found 2 specific rehabilitation interventions, one medication intervention using erythropoietin, and 4 nutritional interventions using amino-acid or protein. Among the studies included in this systematic review, 2 studies did not find a clear statistical difference in assessment tools compared to controls after intervention. On the other hand, the rest of the studies positively interpreted the results for intervention. The most frequently used assessment tool for intervention was handgrip strength.

Conclusions

Although mainstream methods of intervention for sarcopenia include nutritional, exercise, and drug interventions, the validity of these interventions in elderly hip fractures has not been clearly proven. In addition, as most studies only reported short-term results, there is no consensus on the optimal long-term treatment.

The effect of sarcopenia on outcomes following orthopaedic surgery : a systematic review

AIMS

Sarcopenia is characterized by a generalized progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and physical performance. This systematic review primarily evaluated the effects of sarcopenia on postoperative functional recovery and mortality in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, and secondarily assessed the methods used to diagnose and define sarcopenia in the orthopaedic literature.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies involving sarcopenic patients who underwent defined orthopaedic surgery and recorded postoperative outcomes were included. The quality of the criteria by which a diagnosis of sarcopenia was made was evaluated. The quality of the publication was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 365 studies were identified and screened, 26 full-texts were reviewed, and 19 studies were included in the review. A total of 3,009 patients were included, of whom 2,146 (71%) were female and 863 (29%) were male. The mean age of the patients was 75.1 years (SD 7.1). Five studies included patients who underwent spinal surgery, 13 included hip or knee surgery, and one involved patients who underwent fixation of a distal radial fixation. The mean follow-up was 1.9 years (SD 1.9; 5 days to 5.6 years). There was wide heterogeneity in the measurement tools which were used and the parameters for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in the studies. Sarcopenia was associated with at least one deleterious effect on surgical outcomes in all 19 studies. The postoperative rate of mortality was reported in 11 studies (57.9%) and sarcopenia was associated with poorer survival in 73% (8/11) of these. The outcome was most commonly assessed using the Barthel Index (4/19), and sarcopenic patients recorded lower scores in 75% (3/4) of these. Sarcopenia was defined using the gold-standard three parameters (muscle strength, muscle quantity or quality, and muscle function) in four studies (21%), using two parameters in another four (21%) and one in the remaining 11 (58%). The methodological quality of the studies was moderate to high.

CONCLUSION

There is much heterogeneity in the reporting of the parameters which are used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia, and evaluating the outcome of orthopaedic surgery in sarcopenic patients. However, what data exist suggest that sarcopenia impairs recovery and increases postoperative mortality, especially in patients undergoing emergency surgery. Further research is required to develop processes that allow the accurate diagnosis of sarcopenia in orthopaedics, which may facilitate targeted pre- and postoperative interventions that would improve outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(3):321-330.

Knee Extension Strength Measures Indicating Probable Sarcopenia Is Associated with Health-Related Outcomes and a Strong Predictor of 1-Year Mortality in Patients Following Hip Fracture Surgery

To examine if knee-extension strength (KES) measures indicating probable sarcopenia are associated with health-related outcomes and if KES and hand grip strength (HGS) measures are associated with 1-year mortality after hip fracture. Two groups of older patients with hip fracture had either HGS (n = 32) or KES (n = 150) assessed during their acute hospital stay. Cut-points for HGS (<27 kg for men and <16 kg for women), and cut-points for maximal isometric KES (non-fractured limb), being the lowest sex-specific quintile (<23.64 kg for men and <15.24 kg for women), were used to examine association with health-related outcomes and 1-year mortality. Overall, 1-year mortality was 12.6% in the two strength groups, of which 47% (HGS) and 46% (KES) respectively, were classified as probable sarcopenia. Probable sarcopenia patients (KES) had lower prefracture function, performed poorly in mobility measures and expressed a greater concern of falling compared to their stronger counterparts. Hazard ratio for 1-year mortality was 2.7 (95%CI = 0.49–14.7, p = 0.3) for HGS and 9.8 (95%CI = 2.2–43.0, p = 0.002) for KES for probable sarcopenia patients compared to those not. Sex-specific KES measures indicating sarcopenia is associated with health-related outcomes and a strong predictor of 1-year mortality after hip fracture.

Intelligent rehabilitation assistant system to promote the early functional recovery of the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture after hemiarthroplasty (HA): A protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fracture is a common type of hip fracture, which has a high morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment is the first choice. However, the functional rehabilitation after operation has not been paid enough attention. In addition, the quality of exercise is difficult to quantify, and the rehabilitation is lack of standards. Therefore, the intelligent rehabilitation assistant system which could record exercise details, might be used to evaluate the quality and adherence to the prescribed exercise to this fragile group of patients has great relevance, so as to provide new ideas for postoperative rehabilitation of hip fracture.

METHODS

This is an opening, prospective, double-dummy RCT. Fifty femoral neck fractures patients, older than 65 years and are about to hospitalize for HA, will be invited to study. The sample will be divided into monitoring group and control group randomly at a 1:1 ratio. The prescribed exercises need to be done continuously for 2 weeks. The monitoring group needs additional use intelligent rehabilitation assistant system. Each subject will receive a total of 4 follow-up visits at the designated time (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks). The following factors will be talked as dependent variables:Each subject will receive a total of 4 follow-up visits at the designated time, and the findings will be analyzed statistically considering a 5% significance level (P < .05).

DISCUSSION

Exercise under monitor may improve patients compliance and exercise quality, and accelerate the rehabilitation process. This protocol reported in accordance with the CONSORT 2010 checklist and SPIRIT 2013 Checklist.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2000033213, May 24, 2020).

Rehabilitation Strategies for Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures in Sarcopenia: A Narrative Review

Sarcopenia is defined as a syndrome characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength. It has been identified as one of the most common comorbidities associated with femoral neck fracture (FNF). The aim of this review was to evaluate the impact of physical therapy on FNF patients' function and rehabilitation. The selected articles were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in the last 10 years. Seven full texts were eligible for this review: three examined the impact of conventional rehabilitation and nutritional supplementation, three evaluated the effects of rehabilitation protocols compared to new methods and a study explored the intervention with erythropoietin (EPO) in sarcopenic patients with FNF and its potential effects on postoperative rehabilitation. Physical activity and dietary supplementation are the basic tools of prevention and rehabilitation of sarcopenia in elderly patients after hip surgery. The most effective physical therapy seems to be exercise of progressive resistance. Occupational therapy should be included in sarcopenic patients for its importance in cognitive rehabilitation. Erythropoietin and bisphosphonates could represent medical therapy resources.