Effectiveness of Therapeutic Patient Education Interventions for Older Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review

Effectiveness of a community-based multicomponent lifestyle intervention (the ADA programme) to improve the quality of life of French breast cancer survivors: protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised trial and embedded qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer survivors (BCSs) are often faced with multiple mental and physical sequelae and are at increased risk of emotional distress, degraded health-related quality of life (HRQoL), chronic pain and fatigue.Physical activity is strongly associated with improved HRQoL and survival rates; however, adherence rates to recommendations for a healthy lifestyle are seldom satisfactory among BCSs. Also, few studies have examined the effectiveness of multicomponent and personalised interventions that integrate physical activity and motivational techniques to improve the HRQoL of BCS.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

"Activité physique adaptée Doublée d'un Accompagnement d'après cancer" (ADA) is an integrated programme of physical activity enriched with a dietary and supportive care approach targeting BCS in the early post-treatment phase. The effectiveness of the ADA intervention will be evaluated using a cluster randomised controlled trial design with two arms (ADA programme vs usual care; 1:1 ratio).The ADA intervention aims to recruit 160 participants and will be implemented by Siel Bleu, a non-profit association specialised in health prevention via adapted physical activity. Measurements will be performed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after the start of the intervention. The primary outcome will be participants' HRQoL, at 12 months measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue global score. Secondary outcome will include participants' physical, social, emotional and functional well-being. The effect of the intervention on physical activity level, motivation for physical activity, relation to food and self-efficacy will also be evaluated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the 'CPP Paris XI' Institutional Review Board on 5 May 2022 (Ref no.: 21.04512.000048-22004). The study's findings will be shared through various channels, including academic publications, simplified reports for wider audiences and active engagement with medical and institutional organisations as well as patients' associations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05658341.

Effectiveness of Therapeutic Education in Patients with Cancer Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Objective: To review the existing evidence on pain education in patients with pain derived from an oncological process. (2) Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the databases Pubmed, Web of Science, PEDro, and Scopus. The selected studies had to incorporate instruction about the neurophysiology of pain into their educational program. The target population was cancer patients who had suffered pain for at least one month. The methodological quality of the articles collected was assessed using the PEDro scale. (3) Results: Some 698 studies were initially identified, of which 12 were included in this review. Four different models of pain education programs were found in the studies' interventions. Pain intensity, pain experience, quality of life, pain tolerance, and catastrophism were the variables that appeared most frequently. (4) Conclusions: This review demonstrates that pain education in patients with cancer pain may produce effects such as decreased pain intensity and catastrophism. Knowledge about pain also seems to increase. However, no benefit was reported for patients' overall quality of life. Therefore, more research is needed to clarify the effects of these interventions on the oncology population.

Oral health related quality of life of oral cancer patients treated with radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy in a tertiary referral centre in Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND

Oral cancer is the number one cancer among males in Sri Lanka. Radiotherapy is a common treatment modality for oral cancer, but this can affect oral health related quality of life (OHRQOL). This study assessed the OHRQOL and its changes from baseline to the last week of radiotherapy and three months post radiotherapy among oral cancer patients who received this treatment alone or with chemotherapy.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among 90 oral cancer patients awaiting for radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy. The modified Sinhala version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Oral Health Module (EORTC QLQ-OH15) was used to gather data related to OHRQOL before radiotherapy. Socio-demographic and clinical data were also recorded. The same cohort of patients were followed up and assessed their OHRQOL during the last week of radiotherapy and three months post radiotherapy. The Modified EORTC QLQ-OH15 assesses the OHRQOL under three domains namely 'Eating problem', 'Gum and speech problem' and 'Soreness', and one item named as 'Teeth'.

RESULTS

The majority of the sample (88%) was males. The anterior two-thirds of the tongue (40%) and buccal mucosa (22%) were the most common sites. The median scores of 'Eating problem' domain at baseline, last week of radiotherapy and three months post radiotherapy were 20 (IQR = 6.7-33.3), 100 (IQR = 86.9-100.0) and 66.7 (IQR = 46.7-93.3) respectively. 'Gum and speech problem' was higher during last week of radiotherapy (median, 50.0, IQR, 25.0-58.3) than three months post radiotherapy (median, 8.3, IQR, 0.0-33.3). The changes of OHRQOL between the time frames were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Baseline OHRQOL in relation to 'Gum and speech problem' domain and 'Teeth' item was identified as an influential factor for OHRQOL during last week of radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The OHRQOL of oral cancer patients who received radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy had deteriorated from the baseline level to the last week of radiotherapy but then improved at three months post radiotherapy. The OHRQOL however did not return to the baseline level three months post radiotherapy. OHRQOL during the last week of radiotherapy was influenced by the OHRQOL at baseline, civil status and sites of metastasis.

A Systematic Review of Patient Education Strategies for Oncology Patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

INTRODUCTION

Patient education can facilitate early cancer diagnosis, enhance treatment adherence, and improve outcomes. While there is increasing cancer burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is little research to inform successful patient education in these regions. This systematic review summarizes the existing literature on oncology education and evaluation strategies in LMICs, identifies best practices, and highlights areas which require further investigation.

METHODS

The review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines and an a priori protocol. Four databases (Ovid Medline, Cochrane Libraries, Embase, and Cabi) were searched in December 2021. Two independent reviewers evaluated studies for inclusion. Using a coded data extraction form, information was collected about the study site, intervention characteristics, and evaluation methods.

RESULTS

Of the 2047 articles generated in the search, 77 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four countries were represented; only 6 studies (8%) were in low-income countries. The most common education methods included technology-based interventions (31, 40%) and visual pamphlets or posters (20, 26%). More than one education method was used in 57 (74%) studies. Nurses were the most frequent educators (25, 33%). An evaluation was included in 74 (96%) studies, though only 41 (55%) studies used a validated tool. Patient knowledge was the most common measured outcome in 35 (47%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited empiric research on oncology patient education in LMICs. The available data show heterogeneity in education approaches and gaps in evaluation. Further research to determine successful patient education and evaluation strategies is urgently needed to improve treatment cancer outcomes in LMICs.

An investigation of the use of app technology to support clinical management of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)

Introduction

The availability of healthcare apps to support patient self-management of various medical conditions, including cancer, has increased considerably in the past decade. However, there are limited published data on the role of apps in the management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). The primary aim of this study was to investigate the current and future role of apps as a means of supporting patients with CML.

Methods

A 31-item questionnaire was developed and distributed to patients via three on-line CML support groups.

Results

Responses were received from 286 patients. There was an approximate 2:1 female: male split and the majority (54%, n = 155) resided in the United Kingdom. 91% (n = 260) of respondents were currently receiving drug treatment for their CML. 23.4% (n = 67) of respondents were aware that apps were available to support their CML management and 11.5% (n = 33) had experience of using such an app. 94.1% (n = 238) of those who had not used a patient support app in the past stated that they would consider using an app in the future to help manage their disease. App awareness was significantly higher amongst male patients (30.3% vs. 19.9%). Likelihood of being a current or previous app user was higher amongst younger patients (16.3% for <55 years old vs. 5.6% for ≥55 years old) whilst younger patients and those with a more recent diagnosis of CML were both more likely to be interested in using an app in the future. When asked about potential app functionality, a drug interaction checker was the feature of greatest interest to respondents.

Conclusions

We have identified both a lack of awareness of and a low uptake of patient support apps amongst CML patients. Importantly, we have demonstrated a clear interest in CML-specific apps amongst this population. Based on the functionality that study participants were most interested in, we will work with health care professionals, app developers and patients to develop a new app to deliver holistic support to CML patients.

Exploring the Dilemma of Ethical Issues Using the Lens of Seedhouse Can Help Oncology Nurses to Gain a Different Perspective on Caring for Older Adults with Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore ethical issues associated with older adults with cancer and the people who matter to them.

DATA SOURCES

A scoping review of the literature was conducted to inform the article using CINAHL, Medline, and Google Scholar databases using broad terms, older adults, geriatrics, cancer, and ethics.

CONCLUSION

Older adults with cancer experience ageism, which stems from a range of uncertainties on best practice in care and treatment. By employing an ethical lens, decision-making by oncology nurses can be aided by creating and promoting autonomy through impeccable communication. Best interests for individual older adults with cancer can also be served by oncology nurses working in a way that serves needs first and acts in the best interests of the person and their family.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The article is of relevance to practicing oncology globally nurses because the framework can be easily used in clinical practice.

Patients’ awareness about their own breast cancer characteristics

BACKGROUND

Patients’ knowledge about the characteristics of their own cancer could be an important factor for understanding treatment regimens and adhering to therapies. However, to date nothing is known about the awareness among Chinese breast cancer patients about the characteristics of their own tumors.

AIM

To investigate how much knowledge that Chinese breast cancer patients have about their tumor characteristics and the impact of health and education literacy on the acquisition of such information.

METHODS

The survey was administered to patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer from 2017 to 2019 in three hospitals in China, and who came in for regular follow-up on an outpatient basis. We collected responses from 226 respondents who were asked about their cancer characteristics (stage, grade, and estrogen receptor status and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status of the cancer), and evaluated the correctness by comparing with their medical records. Logistic regression was used to assess the probability of knowing and of correctly answering questions. We also analyzed the association between our findings and the level of the patient’s education and their health literacy.

RESULTS

Overall, 20.80% to 57.96% of the patients reported knowing about the characteristics of breast cancer; of these, 10.18% to 46.46% reported these characteristics correctly. Education, age, and health literacy were all significantly associated with awareness rate, and with the level to which this information was accurate.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer patients in China know little about their disease, and better education aimed at improving their knowledge about cancer characteristics is urgently needed. The low level of awareness could represent a deficiency of communication between surgeons and patients, which may be one of the reasons why medical disputes occur in China.

Informational support for depression and quality of life improvements in older patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To assess and summarize the effects of informational support on depression and quality of life of older patients with cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched to identify articles written in English and published until March 2021. Studies within 10 years period (2010-2021) were included. Randomized controlled trials were included if they evaluated the impact of informational support on depression and quality of life. All analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with a total of 2374 participants met the inclusion criteria. Our primary outcomes included depression and quality of life. (1) Depression: results indicated no statistically significant difference and low heterogeneity [SMD = 0.28, 95% CI (- 0.24,0.80), p = 0.45; I² = 0%], (2) Quality of life: in the subgroup analyses of EORTC QLQ-C30, results indicated a significant effect of informational support on quality of life [SMD = 2.84, 95% CI (0.63, 5.05), p = 0.03; I² = 79%]; in the subgroup analyses of FACT and SF-36, there were no significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Informational support could reduce depression and did improve the quality of life in older cancer patients with statistical significance. The findings suggested that informational support was an effective approach to improve depression and quality of life in older patients with cancer.