Distraction Osteogenesis for Management of Severe OSA in Pierre Robin Sequence: An Approach to Elude Tracheostomy in Infants

The Impact of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis on Cephalometric Measurements in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence

BACKGROUND

The obstruction of the upper airway (UAO) in infants diagnosed with Robin Sequence (RS) is caused by micrognathia, and in severe cases, it can result in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is a secure and efficient remedy for significant UAO. However, there is insufficient data on the related cephalometric changes. Therefore, this study meticulously analyzes the mandibular cephalometric changes in infants with RS who have undergone MDO using internal devices. The aim is to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the short- and long-term impacts of distraction on the mandible.

METHODS

The study examined 73 consecutive cases of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) performed by a single surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative lateral cephalograms, as well as CT scans of the mandible, were utilized to assess population averages for both time points. A two-sample T-Test with equal variance was used for this analysis.

RESULTS

After the MDO procedure, 19 out of 21 cephalometric parameters exhibited significant morphological changes. On average, there were notable improvements of 20.3 mm (60.7%) in length, 9.8 mm (49.7%) in height, 12.6 mm (36.1%) in width, and 211% in airway parameters. However, most parameters showed only mild regression at the time of device removal and 6 to 12 months post-MDO. Nonetheless, the cephalometric parameters remained significantly improved compared to the preoperative measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cephalometric measurement is a potent approach that provides a clear and measurable understanding of how MDO influences both immediate and long-term growth of the mandible. This quantitative assessment of the effects of mandibular distraction allows for the refinement of surgical techniques and the optimization of outcomes. Therefore, incorporating cephalometric measurements in the evaluation of patients undergoing MDO can lead to better surgical planning and more favorable results.

Pierre Robin and breathing: What to do and when?

Robin sequence is characterized by mandibular retrognathia, airway obstruction, and glossoptosis; 80%-90% also have a cleft palate. Various treatment approaches exist, and although controlled studies are rare, objective assessment of treatment outcomes that address the leading clinical issues, namely obstructive sleep apnea and failure to thrive, are essential. Sleep-disordered breathing may be detected using cardiorespiratory polygraphy or polysomnography. Pulse oximetry alone may miss infants with frequent obstructive apneas, yet no intermittent hypoxia. Among conservative treatment options, the Tubingen Palatal Plate with a velar extension shifting the tongue base forward is the only approach that corrects the underlying anatomy and that has undergone appropriate evaluation. Of the surgical treatment options, which are not necessarily the first line of therapy, mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) is effective and has been most extensively adopted. Notwithstanding, it is puzzling that MDO is frequently used in some countries, yet hardly ever in others, despite similar tracheostomy rates. Thus, prospective multicenter studies with side-by-side comparisons aimed at identifying an optimal treatment paradigm for this potentially life-threatening condition are urgently needed.

Device Malfunction Associated With Mandibular Distraction for Infants With Robin Sequence

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) effectively treats upper airway obstruction (UAO) in young patients with Robin sequence (RS). The most commonly used MDO devices have internal and external components that require manual activation. Although complications associated with MDO in infants with RS have been well documented, hardware/device malfunction has not been precisely described. The present study reports the authors' recent experiences with such problems, in an effort to shed light on these complications and identify potential steps to mitigate future related issues.

DESIGN

The authors reviewed a prospectively gathered database to identify all young children under the age of 3 years who underwent MDO using buried internal devices for UAO associated with grade 3 RS from March 2007 to September 2019. We specifically focused on complications attributable to the hardware itself.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with 40 devices met inclusion criteria. The median age at MDO was 2.3 months (interquartile range 1.4-6.3 months). Intraoperative activation of all devices under direct vision resulted in satisfactory distraction. Four devices (10.5%) developed postoperative complications directly related to the device, including break down of component parts (N = 3) and failure to maintain distraction distance (N = 1). Two patients required surgical replacement of one device each, whereas the remaining complications occurred during the consolidation phase and did not require intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This report documents a series of device/hardware malfunction in infants and young children undergoing MDO for severe UAO associated with RS. Despite rigorous testing and development, these devices may fail, resulting in patient morbidity.

The effect of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on airway obstruction and polysomnographic parameters in children with Robin sequence

INTRODUCTION

The optimal surgical technique for the management of patients with Robin Sequence (RS) has not been established. One of the most commonly used surgical techniques, mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), is still controversial because of its potential risks and the lack of clear evidence of its efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess variations in airway patency, clinical symptoms, and polysomnographic parameters in children with RS who underwent MDO.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 38 patients with RS were evaluated before and after MDO. Symptom severity was classified using a grading scale for RS clinical manifestations. Patients underwent flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy, and the images were classified by a blinded examiner using two validated grading scales for airway obstruction. Patients not requiring ventilatory support underwent a polysomnography.

RESULTS

Patients' symptoms significantly improved after MDO, as shown by a decreased score in the grading scale for RS clinical manifestations (preoperative score of 2.20 vs. postoperative score of 0.81; P < 0.001). The two endoscopic grading scales also showed a statistically significant postoperative improvement in airway obstruction (first scale: preoperative score of 1.56 vs. postoperative score of 0.92; second scale: preoperative score of 2.19 vs. postoperative score of 1.16; P < 0.001 for both). Moreover, there was a statistically significant variation in the following polysomnographic parameters evaluated pre- and postoperatively: apnea-hypopnea index, total sleep time, oxygen desaturation nadir, and oxygen desaturation index (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MDO seems to be an effective surgical option for children, as shown by postoperative improvements in clinical symptoms, endoscopic grading scales, and polysomnographic parameters.

Temporomandibular joint arthritis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis, now what?

BACKGROUND

Arthritis involving the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) complicates 40 - 96% of cases of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), potentially leading to devastating changes to form and function. Optimal evaluation and management of this joint remains a matter of ongoing discussion.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search for all articles with keywords "temporomandibular" and "arthritis", covering the dates 2002 through February 28, 2018. A separate PubMed search was performed for all articles with keywords "temporomandibular joint", "arthritis", and "treatment" covering the same dates.

FINDINGS

The TMJ is a particularly challenging joint to assess, both clinically and with imaging studies. Clinical assessment of the TMJ is hampered by the low sensitivity of joint pain as well as the absence of physical exam findings early in the disease process. As with all joints, plain radiography and computed tomography only detect arthritic sequelae. Additionally, there is mixed data on the sensitivity of ultrasound, leaving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the optimal diagnostic modality. However, several recent studies have shown that non-arthritic children can have subtle findings on MRI consistent with TMJ arthritis, such as joint effusion and contrast enhancement. Consequently, there has been an intense effort to identify features that can be used to differentiate mild TMJ arthritis from normal TMJs, such as the ratio of the enhancement within the TMJ itself compared to the enhancement in surrounding musculature. With respect to treatment of TMJ arthritis, there is minimal prospective data on medical therapy of this complicated joint. Retrospective studies have suggested that the response to medical therapy of the TMJ may lag behind that of other joints, prompting use of intraarticular (IA) therapy. Although most studies have shown short-term effectiveness of corticosteroids, the long-term safety of this therapy on local growth as well as on the development of IA heterotopic bone have prompted recommendations to limit use of IA corticosteroids. Severe TMJ disease from JIA can also be managed non-operatively with splints in a growing child, as well as with surgery.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we summarize literature on the diagnosis and management of TMJ arthritis in JIA and suggest a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for children with refractory TMJ arthritis.