Effect of Milliamperage Reduction on Pre-surgical Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography by Surgeons of Varying Experience

Accuracy of linear measurements for implant planning based on low-dose cone beam CT protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to verify the accuracy of linear measurements performed on low-dose CBCT protocols for implant planning, in comparison with those performed on standard and high-resolution CBCT protocols.

METHODS

The literature search included four databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus). Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts according to eligibility criteria, extracted the data, and examined the methodological quality. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was used for pooling measurement error data.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 4684 titles. In total, 13 studies were included in the systematic review, representing a total of 81 samples, while 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias ranged from medium to low. The main results across the studies indicate a strong consistency in linear measurements performed on low-dose images in relation to the reference methods. The overall pooled planning measurement error from low-dose CBCT protocols was -0.24 mm (95% CI, -0.52 to 0.04) with a high level of heterogeneity, showing a tendency for underestimation of real values. Various studies found no significant differences in measurements across different protocols (eg, voxel sizes, mA settings, or dose levels), regions (incisor, premolar, molar) and types (height vs. width). Some studies, however, noted exceptions in measurements performed on the posterior mandible.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose CBCT protocols offer adequate precision and accuracy of linear measurements for implant planning. Nevertheless, diagnostic image quality needs must be taken into consideration when choosing a low-dose CBCT protocol.

Low-dose CBCT protocols in implant dentistry: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the state-of-the-art evidence for applying low-dose CBCT protocols in 3 stages of implant therapy (planning, insertion, and follow-up examination of peri-implantitis) and assess the overall body of evidence presented in the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

The search was conducted in the MEDLINE/Pubmed and Scopus databases. Studies comparing low-dose CBCT protocols to a relevant reference standard in relation to any stage of implant therapy were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed for all included studies.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included. Low-dose protocols were reported to result from reduction of the exposure parameters of kV, mA, resolution (through increased voxel size), exposure time, and scanning trajectory. The current literature suggests that low-dose CBCT protocols perform similarly in the 3 stages of implant therapy compared to higher resolution protocols regarding objective measurements, with adverse impacts mostly on subjective assessment of image quality. The results also suggest that CBCT-based bone measurements are similar to direct measurements, independent of the imaging protocol. Reduction in all parameters except kV seems feasible as the basis of low-dose CBCT protocols for implant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of low-dose CBCT protocols does not impact objective image quality assessment in any stage of implant therapy. Clinical studies are needed to indicate if the reported results can be extrapolated to improve patient care in relation to the responsible use of ionizing radiation.

The crucial role of imaging in digital dentistry

One of the recent trends in dentistry - and this in every field from the restorative to the orthodontic one- is the introduction of simplified completely digital workflows. Digital dentistry is supposed to allow dentists to work more efficiently, and this at higher precision, and with the possibility of all-in-one sessions using in-house computerized techniques. In this workflow, one of the major tools for simulating and transferring dental treatments is imaging. Both 3D low dose radiographic as well as optical imaging are playing crucial roles and have been overwhelming the market. Novel design platforms, compact and extremely fast milling and printing units are now also plentiful and rapidly being adopted in practice. Nevertheless, many of the steps in this digital dentistry process, no matter how simplified, present risks that can contribute to reduced precision and clinical difficulties. It is therefore the purpose of the article to briefly describe the role of imaging in this digital workflow, and where the pitfalls can be found that may lead to errors and imprecision.

Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities

OBJECTIVES

A narrative review on the potential use of low-dose protocols for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was conducted to identify indications and their relevance for various dental disciplines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Google Scholar was searched using the words "low-dose CBCT". Reviews, consensus papers, clinical studies, and experimental studies were eligible for the initial screening process, but for data extraction only original articles were selected. Similar search procedures were then performed with the additional search words "pedo," "ortho," "endo," "implant," "perio," and "oral surgery." Furthermore, references of included articles were examined to identify further relevant articles.

RESULTS

After screening, 27 publications remained for the data extraction process. Low-dose protocols have been reported for specialties such as pediatric dentistry (evaluating orofacial clefts, periapical lesions, impacted teeth, and autotransplantation), orthodontics (cephalometric analysis and interim assessment of treatment results), endodontics (detecting root fractures, resorptions and periapical bone loss), implant dentistry (planning implant insertion, evaluating peri-implant fenestration and dehiscence), periodontology (assessing periodontal structures), and oral and maxillofacial surgery (assessing mandibular third molars and TMJs). Nevertheless, most of the literature available is related to non-clinical studies. Furthermore, there is a lack of position statements or guidelines from authoritative bodies regarding the use of low-dose protocols in dental medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose protocols for CBCT imaging seem to have potential in various disciplines in dental medicine ranging from pediatric dentistry to oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dose reduction is usually achieved by mAs reduction, use of partial rotations, reduced number of projections, and larger voxel sizes, but seldom by kV reduction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Albeit low-dose protocols have potential to result in a reduction of dose exposure for 3D imaging due to dental indications, there is a need to more clearly specify indications and limitations to avoid indiscriminate use of standard and high-dose CBCT scans in the future on the lines of ALARA/ALADA principles.