Digital rectal examination-A reliable screening tool for dyssynergic defecation

A simple four symptom-based BEDS score to predict dyssynergic defecation in patients with chronic constipation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dyssynergic defecation (DD) is a disorder of anorectal function characterized by impaired relaxation or inappropriate contraction of pelvic floor muscles on attempted defecation. Based on previous Indian studies, we devised a symptom score (bleeding per rectum, excessive straining for stools, digitation, sense of incomplete evacuation/blockage-BEDS) and tried to determine if it can identify which patients with chronic constipation are more likely to have DD.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational cohort study in which consecutive adult patients (> 18 years) with chronic constipation who were referred to our centre for anorectal manometry (ARM) between 2019 and 2023 were included. Prior to tests, patients were asked in detail regarding their symptoms and scoring was done. ARM was done by a single observer. Diagnosis of DD was based on standard criteria. Statistical tests used were median, range and percentages, Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U-test. The data was analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Agreement of symptom-based scoring and DD diagnosis as per criteria was calculated using Cohen's κ coefficient. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

As many as 244 patients (males 140, median age 42 years) formed the study cohort. Of these, 104 (42.6%) have DD. Sense of incomplete evacuation/sense of blockage (72.1% vs. 40%, p < 0.0001), excessive straining (73.1% vs. 22.1%, p < 0.0001) and digitation (28.8% vs. 13.5%, p 0.003) were more commonly reported in patients with DD. Taking a cut-off score of > / = 2, sensitivity of 69.2%, specificity 81.4% and positive likelihood ratio of 3.73 were noted. Similarly, if the score of > / = 3 was considered, the likelihood ratio increased to 4.71 with an increase in specificity (94.29%) and fall in sensitivity (26.92%).

CONCLUSION

Symptom-based BEDS score of > / = 2 is useful in identifying patients with DD.

Digital Rectal Exams Are Infrequently Performed Prior to Anorectal Manometry

BACKGROUND

Digital rectal examination should be performed prior to anorectal manometry; however, real-world data is lacking.

AIMS

Characterize real world rates of digital rectal and their sensitivity for detecting dyssynergia compared to anorectal manometry and balloon expulsion test.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was conducted to examine all patients who underwent anorectal manometry for chronic constipation between 2021 and 2022 at one tertiary center with motility expertise. Primary outcomes consisted of the rate of digital rectal exam prior to anorectal manometry; and secondary outcomes included the sensitivity of digital rectal exam for dyssynergic defecation.

RESULTS

Only 42.3% of 142 patients had digital rectal examinations prior to anorectal manometry. Overall sensitivity for detecting dyssynergic defecation was 46.4%, but significantly higher for gastroenterology providers (p = .004), and highest for gastroenterology attendings (82.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Digital rectal examination is infrequently performed when indicated for chronic constipation. Sensitivity for detecting dyssynergic defecation may be impacted by discipline and level of training.

Digital Rectal Examination Is a Valuable Bedside Tool for Detecting Dyssynergic Defecation: A Diagnostic Study and a Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate dyssynergic defecation (DD) diagnosis depends on anorectal physiological tests that are not widely available.

AIM

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of digital rectal examination (DRE) compared with anorectal physiological tests in diagnosing DD in patients with constipation.

METHODS

A total of 218 chronic constipation patients who fulfilled the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for functional constipation (FC) and underwent a standardized DRE and high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) test were enrolled in this study. The diagnostic accuracy of DRE compared with HRAM was evaluated, and the agreement between DRE and HRAM was calculated. Furthermore, a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase database was conducted to further elucidate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of DRE in DD patients.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients (46.33%) had a DD pattern using HRAM, while 117 patients (53.67%) were diagnosed without DD. The sensitivity of DRE in diagnosing dyssynergia was 71.3%, and the specificity was 76.1%. There was a moderate agreement between DRE and HRAM for diagnosing DD (κ-coefficient = 0.474, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, six studies (including our study) comprising 964 constipated patients were included in our meta-analysis. The outcomes demonstrated that the AUC was 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.88) with 77% summary sensitivity (95% CI 65-86) and 80% summary specificity (95% CI 71-86) to diagnose DD.

CONCLUSIONS

DRE could be a valuable tool for screening DD. Our study revealed acceptable sensitivity and specificity of DRE in detecting dyssynergia compared with the physiological tests. Meanwhile, our study highlights that DRE remains an important tool in clinical practice.

Diagnostic value of the balloon expulsion test compared with anorectal manometry in Indian patients with dyssynergic defecation

INTRODUCTION

Digital rectal examination (DRE) and balloon expulsion test (BET) are simple tests to diagnose dyssynergic defecation (DD).

AIM

To determine differences in symptoms and manometry findings in patients with abnormal BET and normal BET. The secondary objective was to ascertain the sensitivity and specificity of BET and DRE + BET for the diagnosis of DD in an Indian setting using ARM findings as the gold standard.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with chronic constipation referred for anorectal manometry (ARM) between December 2012 and March 2019. DD was diagnosed using ARM. Findings on BET and, in a subset of cases, on DRE + BET were compared with ARM findings. The data were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Agreement of BET and DRE + BET with ARM was calculated using Cohen's κ coefficient. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 1006 cases (734 males, 73%) formed the study cohort. Patients with abnormal BET more frequently reported digitation, bleeding per rectum, and straining (p < 0.00001). Moreover, they had a significantly higher median basal pressure compared to those with normal BET (80 vs. 67, p = 0.03). DD was significantly more common in those with abnormal BET. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of BET in detecting DD were 28.29%, 97.15%, 81.13%, and 75.78%, respectively. The percentage of agreement was 76.34%, and there was fair degree of correlation between the two tests. In a smaller subset of cases (166), DRE and BET findings were both available for analysis. We noted that the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of combined DRE + BET were 57.63%, 88.79%, 73.91%, and 79.17%, respectively. The Cohen's κ correlation coefficient was 0.49, suggesting moderate agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with abnormal BET more frequently report digitation, straining, and bleeding per rectum, and have higher resting anal pressure. BET is a good screening test for DD in an Indian setting.

Indian consensus on chronic constipation in adults: A joint position statement of the Indian Motility and Functional Diseases Association and the Indian Society of Gastroenterology

The Indian Motility and Functional Diseases Association and the Indian Society of Gastroenterology developed this evidence-based practice guideline for management of chronic constipation. A modified Delphi process was used to develop this consensus containing 29 statements, which were generated by electronic voting iteration as well as face to face meeting and review of the supporting literature primarily from India. These statements include 9 on epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic criteria; 8 on pathophysiology; and the remaining 12 on investigations and treatment. When the proportion of those who voted either to accept completely or with minor reservation was 80% or higher, the statement was regarded as accepted. The members of the consensus team believe that this would be useful for teaching, clinical practice, and research on chronic constipation in India and in other countries with similar spectrum of the disorders.

Clinical predictors and gender-wise variations in dyssynergic defecation disorders

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient data from India regarding clinical predictors of dyssynergic defecation.

AIM

To identify demography, symptom, and colonoscopic parameters that can predict dyssynergic defecation (DD) among patients with chronic constipation (CC) and to compare the profile among male and female patients with DD.

METHODS

Data collected from three centers during June 2014 to May 2017 included age, gender, symptom duration, form and consistency of stools, digital examination, colonoscopy, and anorectal manometry (ARM). Patients were grouped based on ARM diagnosis: group I (normal study) and group II (DD). The two groups were compared for demography, symptom profile, and colonoscopy findings. Gender-wise subset analysis was done for those with the normal and abnormal ARM using chi-square and unpaired t tests.

RESULTS

Of 236 patients with CC evaluated, 130 (55%) had normal ARM and 106 (45%) had DD. Male sex, straining during defecation, bleeding per rectum, and abnormal colonoscopic diagnosis were significantly more common in group II. While bleeding per rectum and absence of urge to defecate were more common in males (p < 0.02), straining, digital evacuation, and hard stools were commoner in females with DD.

CONCLUSION

Straining during defecation, bleeding per rectum, and abnormal colonoscopy findings were more common in patients with DD. Symptoms of bleeding per rectum and absence of urge to defecate in men and straining during defecation in female patients were significantly associated with DD. Symptoms differ in males and females with DD.