Biomarker Response to Mindfulness Intervention in Veterans Diagnosed with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

The use of biomarkers as measures of PTSD treatment efficacy and predictors of treatment outcomes: A systematic review

The efficacy of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments might be hampered by individual differences. In order to maximize treatment efficacy in existing and newly developed interventions, controlling for individual variables is essential in treatment research. Given the marked physiological correlates of PTSD, biomarkers represent a promising solution. Throughout the PTSD literature, biomarkers have been used to assess treatment effects and predict treatment outcomes. However, the wide variety of biomarkers studied, along with several conflicting results, hinder researchers' abilities to comprehensively interpret the results reported. This systematic review of the literature aimed to identify and classify all biomarkers used to assess the efficacy of PTSD interventions and identify pre-treatment biomarkers able to predict treatment outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 70 studies that assessed biomarkers sensitivity to treatment effects and 25 that used biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes. Well-established treatments and newly developed protocols were included. The results were classified and interpreted by biomarker type. Indicators of neuroanatomical structures and functions were the most commonly studied biomarkers, followed by markers of cardiac activation and glucocorticoid analytes. Cardiac activation markers, and concretely heart rate reactivity to trauma cues, showed the most consistent findings, serving as a valuable method to assess treatment effects across different populations and treatment modalities. Other biomarkers showed promising trends both as predictors of treatment outcomes and measures of treatment efficacy, although essential methodological differences significantly impacted the comparison across studies.

Serotonin Transporter (SLC6A4) and FK506-Binding Protein 5 (FKBP5) Genotype and Methylation Relationships with Response to Meditation in Veterans with PTSD

Meditation-based interventions are novel and effective non-pharmacologic treatments for veterans with PTSD. We examined relationships between treatment response, early life trauma exposure, DNA polymorphisms, and methylation in the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and FK506-binding protein 5 (FKBP5) genes. DNA samples and clinical outcomes were examined in 72 veterans with PTSD who received meditation-based therapy in two separate studies of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and Transcendental Meditation (TM). The PTSD Checklist was administered to assess symptoms at baseline and after 9 weeks of meditation intervention. We examined the SLC6A4 promoter (5HTTLPR_L/S insertion/deletion + rs25531_A/G) polymorphisms according to previously defined gene expression groups, and the FKBP5 variant rs1360780 previously associated with PTSD disease risk. Methylation for CpG sites of SLC6A4 (28 sites) and FKBP5 (45 sites) genes was quantified in DNA samples collected before and after treatment. The 5HTTLPR LALA high expression genotype was associated with greater symptom improvement in participants exposed to early life trauma (p = 0.015). Separately, pre to post-treatment change of DNA methylation in a group of nine FKBP5 CpG sites was associated with greater symptom improvement (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.1, p = 0.027). These findings build on a wealth of existing knowledge regarding epigenetic and genetic relationships with PTSD disease risk to highlight the potential importance of SLC6A4 and FKBP5 for treatment mechanisms and as biomarkers of symptom improvement.

Efficacy of natural duct specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Rectal cancer has a high incidence and its onset age is getting younger. Currently, conventional laparoscopic surgery can no longer meet the clinical requirements for surgical incisions. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is less invasive, but there have been few studies on the effectiveness of this procedure for rectal cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the efficacy of NOSES and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we collected clinical data of 150 rectal cancer patients. Patients who received NOSES were included in a NOSES group and those underwent routine laparoscopic surgery were in a control group. Then, the observation group was matched with the control group at a ratio of 1:1 by using the propensity score matching method. We compared the surgical indicators, postoperative recovery indicators, physical indicators, pain, surgical stress-related indicators, inflammation indicators, immune indicators, quality of life, and postoperative complications between the two groups.

RESULTS

We found that compared with the control group, the NOSES group had a shorter exhaust start time, getting out-of-bed activity time, length of hospital stay, bowel sound recovery time, and gastrointestinal peristalsis time. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scores decreased in both groups after surgery, with the NOSES group showing a more significant reduction. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores decreased in both groups, and the NOSES group had lower VAS scores. Additionally, the NOSES group exhibited a significant interaction effect with time (intergroup effect: F = 497.800; time effect: F = 163.100; interaction effect: F = 5.307). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels decreased and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels increased in both groups postoperatively; however, the NOSES group had higher SOD levels and lower MDA levels. All the above comparisons were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total complication rates between the NOSES group and the control group (Z = -0.768, P = 0.442; χ2 = 2.333, P = 0.127).

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, NOSES results in less pain and injury, a more stable mood, faster recovery, and comparable safety.

The effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on depression, PTSD, and mindfulness among military veterans: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Thirteen studies were included in the current systematic review and meta-analysis with 1131 participants. Both within- and between-group comparisons demonstrated reductions in depressive and PTSD symptoms with medium effect sizes post MBSR intervention. Additionally, MBSR demonstrated small effects in improving mindfulness in veterans at post-intervention. Maintenance of treatment effects were observed at follow-up for the three outcomes during within-group comparisons. Treatment effects were maintained at follow-up between-groups for depression and mindfulness, but not for PTSD symptoms. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between MBSR and cognitive behavioural therapy/person-centred group therapy intervention groups in the three outcomes.