Serial changes of coronary endothelial function and arterial healing after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation

Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology)

Recent clinical trials have raised concerns about the safety and efficacy of ABSORB™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). The difference in the vascular healing process between SYNERGY™ bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) and BVS remains unclear. The aim of the ENHANCE study was to compare vascular healing on BP-EES versus BVS by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS) at 4- and 12-month follow-ups. This is a prospective, non-randomized, single center clinical trial. Thirteen eligible patients with multivessel disease were enrolled. BP-EES and BVS were simultaneously implanted in the same patients, but in different coronary vessels. Imaging follow-up with both OCT and CAS was completed in 11 patients at 12 months. Neointimal coverage rates were similar between the two groups based on OCT measurements. The neointimal thickness of BP-EES was significantly thicker at the 12th month than at the 4th month, whereas the neointimal thickness of BVS did not change between the measurements taken at the 4th and 12th month. Existence of intra-stent thrombus was significantly higher in the BVS group, compared to the BP-EES group. On the other hand, CAS revealed that red-thrombi and yellow-plaque were more frequently observed in BVS at 4 months and up to 12-month follow-ups than in BP-EES. These findings suggested that the evidence of instability remained up to 12 months in the vascular healing with BVS, compared to that with BP-EES. Vascular healing of the stented wall was recognized at the very early phase after BP-EES implantation. However, vascular healing with BVS was still incomplete after 12 months.

Five-year clinical efficacy and safety of contemporary thin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials

Very long-term data of the biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) in comparison with the contemporary durable polymer DES (DP-DES) are still to be investigated. We aimed to investigate the very long-term clinical performance of contemporary BP-DES against the DP-DES. We performed a systematic review to evaluate very long-term clinical outcomes of BP-DES versus DP-DES. Inclusion criteria were randomized design comparing BP-DES against DP-DES and follow-up duration ≥ 36 months. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL without restricting language or publication status were searched up to December 2018. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF; a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), respectively. Primary analysis was done for the contemporary thin-strut BP- and DP-DES (strut thickness < 100 µm). A total of 9 trials comprising 10,699 patients (BP-DES, n = 6241 versus DP-DES, n = 4458) were analyzed. The mean follow-up duration was 63 months. No significant difference was found in TLF [Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.04 (0.89-1.21)] and definite/probable ST (odds ratio (95% CI) 0.78 (0.59-1.01)] between the BP- and DP-DESs. The present meta-analysis suggested that the contemporary thin-strut BP- and DP-DES have similar efficacy and safety profile at 5-year follow-up.Clinical trial registration PROSPERO; CRD42018101983 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=101983.

Effects of Catheterization on Artery Function and Health: When Should Patients Start Exercising Following Their Coronary Intervention?

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death worldwide, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; angioplasty) are commonly used to diagnose and/or treat the obstructed coronaries. Exercise-based rehabilitation is recommended for all CAD patients; however, most guidelines do not specify when exercise training should commence following PTCA and/or PCI. Catheterization can result in arterial dysfunction and acute injury, and given the fact that exercise, particularly at higher intensities, is associated with elevated inflammatory and oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction and a pro-thrombotic milieu, performing exercise post-PTCA/PCI may transiently elevate the risk of cardiac events. This review aims to summarize extant literature relating to the impacts of coronary interventions on arterial function, including the time-course of recovery and the potential deleterious and/or beneficial impacts of acute versus long-term exercise. The current literature suggests that arterial dysfunction induced by catheterization recovers 4-12 weeks following catheterization. This review proposes that a period of relative arterial vulnerability may exist and exercise during this period may contribute to elevated event susceptibility. We therefore suggest that CAD patients start an exercise training programme between 2 and 4 weeks post-PCI, recognizing that the literature suggest there is a 'grey area' for functional recovery between 2 and 12 weeks post-catheterization. The timing of exercise onset should take into consideration the individual characteristics of patients (age, severity of disease, comorbidities) and the intensity, frequency and duration of the exercise prescription.

Interleukin-1β is associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with mTOR-inhibitor-eluting stent implantation

Implantation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-inhibitor drug-eluting stents (DESs) impairs coronary endothelial function. There are no known non-invasive biomarkers of coronary endothelial dysfunction. We aimed to assess the association between serum interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) and coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with mTOR-inhibitor DES implantation and to investigate the association between the mTOR pathway and IL-1β. We enrolled 35 patients who had implanted DESs for coronary artery disease. At a 10-month follow-up, peripheral venous blood samples were collected to measure IL-1β levels. Coronary endothelial dysfunction was evaluated by intracoronary infusion of incremental doses of acetylcholine. Serum IL-1β levels were significantly associated with the magnitude of vasoconstriction to acetylcholine at the segment distal (P < 0.05) but not proximal to the stent. Serum IL-1β levels were positively correlated with stent length (P < 0.05). To examine the direct effects of mTOR inhibition on IL-1β release, sirolimus was incubated in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) or coronary artery smooth muscle cells (CASMCs). Sirolimus directly increased IL-1β mRNA expression (P < 0.01) and enhanced IL-1β release into the culture media (P < 0.01) in CASMCs, but not in HUVECs. Inhibition of mTOR triggers IL-1β release through transcriptional activation in CASMCs. Serum IL-1β levels are a potential biomarker for mTOR-inhibitor DES-associated coronary endothelial dysfunction.