1
|
Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging, Eldaya RW, Parsons MS, Hutchins TA, Avery R, Burns J, Griffith B, Hassankhani A, Khan MA, Ng H, Raizman NM, Reitman C, Shah VN, Sliker C, Soliman H, Timpone VM, Tomaszewski CA, Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi N, Policeni B. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cervical Pain or Cervical Radiculopathy: 2024 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2025; 22:S136-S162. [PMID: 40409873 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2025] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 05/25/2025]
Abstract
Cervical spine pain is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care as it ranks in the top 5 causes of global years lost to disability. The economic burden of cervical pain is also significant. Imaging is at the center of diagnosis of cervical pain and its causes. However, different symptoms and potential causes of cervical pain require different initial imaging to maximize the benefit of diagnostic usefulness of imaging. In this document we address different cervical pain variants with detailed assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of different modalities for addressing each specific variant. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rami W Eldaya
- Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
| | - Matthew S Parsons
- Panel Chair, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Troy A Hutchins
- Panel Vice-Chair, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Ryan Avery
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | | | | | | - Majid A Khan
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Henry Ng
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of the Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; American College of Physicians
| | - Noah M Raizman
- The Centers for Advanced Orthopaedics, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, and Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
| | - Charles Reitman
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; North American Spine Society
| | - Vinil N Shah
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Clint Sliker
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Committee on Emergency Radiology, Commission on General, Small, Rural and Emergency Radiology
| | - Hesham Soliman
- Northwell/Hofstra University Zucker School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York; American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons
| | | | | | | | - Bruno Policeni
- Specialty Chair, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duan H, Iagaru A. Neuroendocrine Tumor Diagnosis: PET/MR Imaging. PET Clin 2023; 18:259-266. [PMID: 36707370 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The initial workup of the primary tumor, including its characterization, local and distant staging, defines subsequent treatment decisions. Functional imaging using hybrid systems, such as PET combined with computed tomography, has become the gold standard. As NETs majorly arise from the gastrointestinal system and metastasize primarily to the liver, simultaneous PET and MR imaging with its high soft tissue contrast might be a valuable clinical one-stop-shop whole-body imaging tool. This review presents the current status and challenges of PET/MR imaging for diagnosis of NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heying Duan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, H2200, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, H2200, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
PET/MR imaging is in routine clinical use and is at least as effective as PET/CT for oncologic and neurologic studies with advantages with certain PET radiopharmaceuticals and applications. In addition, whole body PET/MR imaging substantially reduces radiation dosages compared with PET/CT which is particularly relevant to pediatric and young adult population. For cancer imaging, assessment of hepatic, pelvic, and soft-tissue malignancies may benefit from PET/MR imaging. For neurologic imaging, volumetric brain MR imaging can detect regional volume loss relevant to cognitive impairment and epilepsy. In addition, the single-bed position acquisition enables dynamic brain PET imaging without extending the total study length which has the potential to enhance the diagnostic information from PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshad Moradi
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, H2200, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, H2200, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jonathan McConathy
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 619 19th Street South, JT 773, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galgano S, Viets Z, Fowler K, Gore L, Thomas JV, McNamara M, McConathy J. Practical Considerations for Clinical PET/MR Imaging. PET Clin 2018; 13:97-112. [PMID: 29157390 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2017.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Clinical PET/MR imaging is currently performed at a number of centers around the world as part of routine standard of care. This article focuses on issues and considerations for a clinical PET/MR imaging program, focusing on routine standard-of-care studies. Although local factors influence how clinical PET/MR imaging is implemented, the approaches and considerations described here intend to apply to most clinical programs. PET/MR imaging provides many more options than PET/computed tomography with diagnostic advantages for certain clinical applications but with added complexity. A recurring theme is matching the PET/MR imaging protocol to the clinical application to balance diagnostic accuracy with efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Zachary Viets
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Kathryn Fowler
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Lael Gore
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - John V Thomas
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Michelle McNamara
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Jonathan McConathy
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 619 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hwang D, Kim KY, Kang SK, Seo S, Paeng JC, Lee DS, Lee JS. Improving the Accuracy of Simultaneously Reconstructed Activity and Attenuation Maps Using Deep Learning. J Nucl Med 2018; 59:1624-1629. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.202317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
6
|
Galgano S, Viets Z, Fowler K, Gore L, Thomas JV, McNamara M, McConathy J. Practical Considerations for Clinical PET/MR Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2017; 25:281-296. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2016.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
|