Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Substrate-Based Imaging Agents for the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen

Advances in structure-based drug design targeting membrane protein markers in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the leading cancers in men and the lack of suitable biomarkers or their modulators results in poor prognosis. Membrane proteins (MPs) have a crucial role in the development and progression of PCa and can be attractive therapeutic targets. However, experimental limitations in targeting MPs hinder effective biomarker and inhibitor discovery. To overcome this barrier, computational methods can yield structural insights and screen large libraries of compounds, accelerating lead identification and optimization. In this review, we examine current breakthroughs in computer-aided drug design (CADD), with emphasis on structure-based approaches targeting the most relevant membrane-bound PCa biomarkers.

Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Specific Antigen Doubling Time Predict Findings on 18F-DCFPyL Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate specific membrane antigen targeted ¹⁸F-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography may offer superior image quality and sensitivity for the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. We examined the association of Gleason sum, serum prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen doubling time with any detectable and pelvic confined disease in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 108 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy who underwent prostate specific membrane antigen targeted ¹⁸F-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computerized tomography were analyzed. Data were collected on positive positron emission tomography findings as well as pelvic confined disease. Associations between Gleason sum, prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen doubling time were retrospectively explored.

RESULTS

Serum prostate specific antigen was associated with positive prostate specific membrane antigen targeted imaging as continuous (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.60-7.95, p=0.005) and categorical values (ie prostate specific antigen greater than 2.0 to 5.0 vs 0.5 ng/ml or less, OR 16.92, 95% CI 3.13-315.81, p=0.008). No relationship between Gleason sum or prostate specific antigen doubling time with overall positive imaging was observed. Patients with a prostate specific antigen greater than 2.0 to 5.0 ng/ml were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with pelvic confined disease compared with the 0.5 ng/ml or less subgroup (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.69, p=0.013). A prostate specific antigen doubling time of 9 months or more (OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.57-11.89, p=0.005) or prostate specific antigen doubling time of 12 months or more (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.12-8.76, p=0.033) was significantly associated with pelvic confined disease. No relationship between Gleason sum and pelvic confined disease was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute prostate specific antigen was positively associated with the presence of findings on prostate specific membrane antigen targeted imaging and negatively associated with pelvic confined disease. Prostate specific antigen doubling time did not predict for overall disease detection, but long prostate specific antigen doubling times were associated with pelvic confined prostate cancer.