1
|
Woo S, Araji A, El Amine MA, Gangai N, Acquafredda E, Price AP, Trippett TM, Hricak H, Vargas HA, Behr GG. Emergency room imaging in pediatric patients with cancer: analysis of the spectrum and frequency of imaging modalities and findings in a tertiary cancer center and their relationship with survival. Cancer Imaging 2021; 21:51. [PMID: 34454626 PMCID: PMC8400759 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-021-00421-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the spectrum and frequency of modalities used for emergency room (ER) imaging and their findings in pediatric cancer patients and assess their relationship with survival. METHODS Consecutive pediatric cancer patients that underwent imaging during an ER visit at our tertiary cancer center over a 5-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Imaging findings were considered positive when they were relevant to the ER presenting complaint. Imaging positivity was correlated with inpatient admission. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and uni- and multi-variate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify significant factors associated with OS. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-one patients (135 males and 126 females; median age 11 years [interquartile range 5-16 years] with 348 visits and a total of 406 imaging studies were included. Common chief complaints were related to the chest (100 [28.7 %]) and fever (99 [28.4 %]). ER imaging was positive in 207 visits (59.5 %), commonly revealing increased metastases (50 [14.4 %]), pneumonia (47 [13.5 %]), and other lung problems (12 [2.9 %]). Positive ER imaging was associated with inpatient admission (69.3 % [133/192] vs. 40.4 % [63/156], p < 0.01). Multivariate survival analysis showed that positive ER imaging (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.35 [95% CI 1.44-3.83, p < 0.01), admission (HR = 1.86 [95% CI 1.17-3.00], p < 0.01), number of ER visits (HR = 3.08 [95% CI 1.62-5.83], p < 0.01 for ≥ 3 visits) were associated with poorer survival. CONCLUSIONS Imaging was able to delineate the cause for ER visits in children with cancer in over half of the cases. Positive ER imaging was associated with admission and worse survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Abdallah Araji
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mohammad Ali El Amine
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalie Gangai
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Acquafredda
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anita P Price
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tanya M Trippett
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gerald G Behr
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Emergency room imaging in patients with genitourinary cancers: analysis of the spectrum of CT findings and their relation to patient outcomes. Emerg Radiol 2020; 27:413-421. [PMID: 32249352 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-020-01774-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the spectrum of computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with genitourinary cancers visiting the emergency room (ER) and evaluate the relationship between CT findings and overall survival (OS). METHODS Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with genitourinary cancers undergoing CT during an ER visit at a tertiary cancer center during a 20-month period. CTs were considered positive if there were findings relevant to the presenting complaint(s). Demographic/clinical variables were recorded. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression (HR) was used to evaluate OS predictors. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-seven patients (243 visits) were included. The most common primary tumors were prostate (121 [49.8%]), bladder/urothelial (78 [32.1%]), and renal (69 [28.4%]). Common presenting complaints were abdominal pain (67 [27.6%]), respiratory symptoms (49 [20.2%]), neurological signs (37 [15.2%]), and fever (34 [14.0%]). CT findings were positive in 172 patients (70.8%) and included new/increased metastases (21.4% [52/243]), fluid collections (7.4% [18/243]), urinary tract infection/inflammation (6.2% [15/243]), enteritis/colitis (5.3% [13/243]), and pneumonia (4.9% [12/243]). A positive ER CT was associated with patient admission (p = 0.01). At multivariate analysis, independently predictive factors of shorter survival were positive ER CT (HR = 2.09 [95% CI 1.16-3.76, p = 0.01), hospital admission (HR = 2.17 [95% CI 1.38-3.41], p < 0.01), and recent systemic treatment (HR = 2.10 [95% CI 1.32-3.35], p < 0.01). CONCLUSION When CT was performed, it was able to identify a structural cause for the presenting complaint in the majority of patients with genitourinary cancers attending the ER. A positive ER CT was associated with hospital admission and poorer overall survival.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ierardi AM, Jannone ML, Brambillasca PM, Zannoni S, Damiani G, Rossi UG, Granata AM, Petrillo M, Carrafiello G. Bleeding after prostatectomy: endovascular management. Gland Surg 2019; 8:108-114. [PMID: 31183320 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.02.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Background To evaluate role of interventional radiology (IR) in post-surgical haemorrhagic complications of prostatectomy. Methods A retrospective study was performed. From April 2015 to January 2018, 10 patients referred to IR Department for haemorrhagic complications post radical prostatectomy (RP). All patients (mean age: 68.5 years; range, 58-85 years) were successfully treated with superselective trans-arterial embolization. We evaluated technical and clinical success and post procedural complications. Results Technical and clinical success was 100% (10/10) and no major complications were identified. No complications related to the endovascular procedures occurred. No recurrences during follow-up (8-20 months) were observed. Among minor complications, only 20% (2/10) developed mild post embolization syndrome. Conclusions The endovascular management of significant haemorrhage after prostatectomy is safe and long-term effective, with no major ischaemic events associated to embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Ierardi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Jannone
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Maria Brambillasca
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Zannoni
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Umberto G Rossi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Interventional Radiology Unit, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Mario Petrillo
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|