The management of esophageal achalasia: from diagnosis to surgical treatment. Updates Surg. 2014;66:23-29. [PMID: 23817763 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-013-0224-1]

Association of individual surgeon volume and postoperative outcome in esophagomyotomy for achalasia

BACKGROUND

Many surgical disciplines have demonstrated superior outcomes when procedures are performed at "high-volume". Esophagomyotomy is commonly performed for achalasia, however it's unclear what constitutes "high-volume" for this procedure, and if individual procedure volume and outcome are related. We identified physicians performing esophagomyotomy, stratified them by individual case volume, and examined their outcomes with the hypothesis that high-volume surgeons will be associated with improved outcomes as compared to low-volume surgeons.

METHODS

The 2015-2019 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) inpatient dataset was queried for esophagomyotomy. Surgeons who performed ≥ 10 procedures during the study period were placed into the high-volume cohort, and those performing < 10 into the low-volume cohort. Groups were compared by length of stay, discharge disposition, and postoperative complications. Patient demographics were evaluated using student's t test and chi square test, p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Six hundred and sixty-two procedures performed by 135 surgeons were identified. The mean number of esophagomyotomies per surgeon was 4.9 (Range 1-147). The high-volume group (n = 12) performed 362 of the 662 procedures (55%), while the low-volume group (n = 123) performed the remaining 300 (45%). Patients of high-volume physicians had decreased length of stay (1.4 ± 0.8 days vs 4.9 ± 6.7 days, p = 0.01) and were more likely to be discharged to home following surgery (92.8% vs 86.0, p = 0.04). High volume physicians also had statistically significant differences in rates of urinary tract infection (1.4% vs 4.0%, p = 0.034), postoperative malnutrition (5.8% vs 11.0%, p = 0.015), and postoperative fluid and electrolyte disorders (5.5% vs 13.3%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Surgeons who perform higher volumes of esophagomyotomies are associated with decreased length of stay, higher likelihood of patient discharge to home, and decreased rates of some postoperative complications. This research should prompt further inquiry into defining what constitutes a high-volume center in foregut surgery and their role in improving patient outcomes.

The patient with megaesophagus due to long-term achalasia combined with squamous cell carcinoma: A case report

Introduction

Achalasia is a rare disease of the esophagus accompanied by progressive development of symptoms such as dysphagia, vomiting, and chest pain, which in case of ineffective treatment leads to the formation of megaesophagus and requires radical surgical treatment. The relationship between the lengthy course of esophageal achalasia and the chance of developing esophageal cancer has been evidenced in the international literature.

Presentation of case

This paper presents a case of a patient with long-term (30 years) achalasia, grade 4 dysphagia, and severe concomitant cardiovascular pathology who was diagnosed with megaesophagus and carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus after receiving solely symptomatic treatment. The patient underwent a video-assisted thoracoscopic K.C. McKeown esophagectomy, two-field lymphadenectomy, and esophageal gastroplasty. The postoperative period proceeded without complications. Ten months post-surgery there were no signs of recurrence or progression of the disease. The patient also noted a decrease in cardiac symptoms.

Discussion

Clinical manifestations of achalasia are characterized by progressive dysphagia, predominant nocturnal regurgitation, aspiration of undigested food, and weight loss. The role of cancer surveillance in achalasia remains controversial. Medical therapy and minimally invasive interventions can be used for both early and late stages of the disease. The use of minimally invasive techniques for the megaesophagus is recognized as ineffective and increases the risk of post-manipulation complications.

Conclusion

Since minimally invasive techniques are ineffective, radical surgical treatment, or esophagectomy, appears to be the best choice in case of the development of megaesophagus and the detection of esophageal cancer.

•

The treatment regimen for achalasia highly depends on the severity of the symptoms.

•

Long-term achalasia significantly increases the risk of esophageal cancer.

•

Minimally invasive techniques in advanced stages of achalasia are ineffective.

•

Megaesophagus combined with early esophageal cancer can be solved by esophagectomy.

New insights into the pathophysiology of achalasia and implications for future treatment

Idiopathic achalasia is an archetype esophageal motor disorder, causing significant impairment of eating ability and reducing quality of life. The pathophysiological underpinnings of this condition are loss of esophageal peristalsis and insufficient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The clinical manifestations include dysphagia for both solids and liquids, regurgitation of esophageal contents, retrosternal chest pain, cough, aspiration, weight loss and heartburn. Even though idiopathic achalasia was first described more than 300 years ago, researchers are only now beginning to unravel its complex etiology and molecular pathology. The most recent findings indicate an autoimmune component, as suggested by the presence of circulating anti-myenteric plexus autoantibodies, and a genetic predisposition, as suggested by observed correlations with other well-defined genetic syndromes such as Allgrove syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 B syndrome. Viral agents (herpes, varicella zoster) have also been proposed as causative and promoting factors. Unfortunately, the therapeutic approaches available today do not resolve the causes of the disease, and only target the consequential changes to the involved tissues, such as destruction of the LES, rather than restoring or modifying the underlying pathology. New therapies should aim to stop the disease at early stages, thereby preventing the consequential changes from developing and inhibiting permanent damage. This review focuses on the known characteristics of idiopathic achalasia that will help promote understanding its pathogenesis and improve therapeutic management to positively impact the patient’s quality of life.

Imaging in the Evaluation of Endoscopic or Surgical Treatment for Achalasia

Purpose. Aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the endoscopic (pneumatic dilation) versus surgical (Heller myotomy) treatment in patients affected by esophageal achalasia using barium X-ray examination of the digestive tract performed before and after the treatment. Materials and Methods. 19 patients (10 males and 9 females) were enrolled in this study; each patient underwent a barium X-ray examination to evaluate the esophageal diameter and the height of the barium column before and after endoscopic or surgical treatment. Results. The mean variation of oesophageal diameter before and after treatment is −2.1 mm for surgery and 1.74 mm for pneumatic dilation (OR 0.167, CI 95% 0.02–1.419, and P: 0.10). The variations of all variables, with the exception of the oesophageal diameter variation, are strongly related to the treatment performed. Conclusions. The barium X-ray study of the digestive tract, performed before and after different treatment approaches, demonstrates that the surgical treatment has to be considered as the treatment of choice of achalasia, reserving endoscopic treatment to patients with high operative risk and refusing surgery.

Clinical Effect of Endoscopic Pneumatic Dilation for Achalasia

Although pneumatic dilation is an accepted method for the treatment of achalasia, this therapy has high recurrence and complication rates, and prolonged follow-up studies on the parameters associated with various outcomes are rare. In this prospective 10-year follow-up study, a satisfactory therapeutic effect was achieved without serious complications. We report the therapeutic experience with pneumatic dilation, having aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical safety and efficacy of pneumatic dilation. In total, 35 consecutive patients with idiopathic achalasia who underwent pneumatic dilation were followed up at regular intervals in person or by a phone interview over a 10-year period. The mean duration of the follow-up was 43.03 ± 26.34 months (range 6-120 months). Remission was assessed by the dysphagia classification and symptom scores. Patients' clinical symptom scores were calculated before and at 6 to 36  months, 37 to 60  months, and >60  months after therapy. The influence of the patients' age, gender, and disease duration on the therapeutic effect was analyzed. The success rate of the operation was 97.2% (35/36), without massive hemorrhaging, perforation or other serious complications. Dysphagia after the therapy was significantly eased (P < 0.01). In total, 35 patients have been followed up for 6 to 36  months after therapy, 21 cases for 37 to 60  months, and 5 cases for >60  months, and the patients' symptom scores separately decreased significantly compared with the pretherapy scores (P < 0.01). For these patients, the 6 to 36  months remission rate was 85.7% (30/35), the 37 to 60  months rate was 61.9% (13/21), and the >60  months rate was 40% (2/5). The dilation effect had no relationship to the patient's age, gender, and disease duration (P > 0.05). The patients in 30 cases (85.7%) were successfully treated with a single dilation, in 4 cases (11.4%) with 2 dilations, and in 1 case (2.9%) with 3 dilations. These results suggest that endoscopic pneumatic dilation is an achalasia therapy with a good response; it is a simple and safe procedure with long-term clinical effectiveness. It is a preferred method in the treatment of achalasia.

Zenker's diverticulum complicating achalasia: a 'cup-and-spill' oesophagus

A 72-year-old woman presented with long-standing gastro-oesophageal reflux, regurgitation of swallowed food and worsening cervical dysphagia. Fluoroscopic barium oesophagography revealed a posterolateral pharyngeal pouch (Zenker's diverticulum (ZD)) complicating a 'cup and spill' oesophageal deformity with a smoothly tapered segment at the gastro-oesophageal junction. CT and high-resolution manometry confirmed that the underlying abnormality was a massively dilated oesophagus with aperistalsis and pan-oesophageal pressurisation, consistent with a diagnosis of oesophageal achalasia (type II). She underwent endoscopic stapled diverticulotomy, with good symptomatic relief. We discuss the aetiology of ZD, its management and the association here with oesophageal achalasia.