Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure: is it safe and feasible?

A proactive technique for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: lifting the rectal stump to the abdominal wall

BACKGROUND

Reversing Hartmann's procedure is complicated owing to dense adhesions resulting from inflammation in the pelvic region. These adhesions pose challenges in identifying the rectum and increase the risk of pelvic organ injuries.

METHODS

We propose a technique to lift and fix the rectal stump to the abdominal wall to diminish adhesions to the rectum and facilitate identification of the rectal stump.

RESULTS

The patient underwent Hartmann's procedure for generalized peritonitis resulting from perforation of the sigmoid colon. The abdominal cavity was significantly contaminated with fecal ascites, and postoperative pelvic adhesions were anticipated. Therefore, the rectal stump was lifted. The outcomes demonstrated that despite the presence of dense adhesions in the abdominal cavity, the rectal segment was promptly identified during the reversal of Hartmann's procedure. The procedure proceeded smoothly and was deemed satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique of lifting and fixing the rectal stump to the abdominal wall is useful in cases where dense pelvic adhesions are anticipated during the subsequent reversal of Hartmann's procedure.

Single-port laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure through the colostomy site: technical aspects and early postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Single-port laparoscopic surgical approaches offer improved cosmetic outcomes and enhance recovery following surgery. The purpose of the study was to assess the reliability and efficacy of a single-port laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal(SPL-HR) through the colostomy site.

METHODS

Prospective data from consecutive patients who underwent SPL-HR between 2020 and 2024 was analysed. Once the colostomy was detached from abdominal wall, a single-port device was introduced through the colostomy site. After mobilizing the rectal stump and afferent colon, colorectal anastomosis was carried out using a circular stapler transanally under laparoscopic vision. Postoperative care and discharge decisions were made following the ERAS protocol. Patient demographics, details of Hartmann's procedure, intraoperative outcomes, and early postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

SPL-HR was successfully performed in 23 of 27 patients (85.1%), with a median operation time of 92 (50-172) min and a median blood loss of 100 (10-360) mL. Five patients (21.7%) experienced a postoperative complication. Two of them experienced grade 3a complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification: one with an intraabdominal abscess and one with a hematoma at the colostomy site, both requiring drainage under local anaesthesia. Anastomotic leak or mortality wasn't observed in patients. Functional recovery measures such as first flatus time and time to resuming a soft diet were favourable, with a median length of hospital stay of 4 (2-9) days.

CONCLUSION

The SPL-HR technique is a reliable and efficient method that is easy to perform. It has acceptable complication rates while improving postoperative recovery and reducing the length of hospital stay.

Safety of early Hartmann reversal during adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: a pilot study

Introduction

Most patients undergoing the Hartmann procedure for complicated colorectal cancer require chemotherapy because of their advanced status. Stoma created during the procedure is typically closed after the completion of postoperative chemotherapy. However, stomas can induce medical or surgical complications and disturb quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of Hartmann's reversal during postoperative chemotherapy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records. Between 2017 and 2021, 96 patients underwent Hartmann reversal for after colorectal cancer surgery. Among them, the number of patients who underwent Hartmann procedure with radical resection of complicated colorectal cancer and Hartmann reversal during adjuvant chemotherapy was 13. The clinical, surgical, and pathological characteristics of the patients were evaluated.

Results

Eight and five patients had obstructions and perforations, respectively. Two patients with synchronous liver metastases underwent simultaneous liver resection and reversal simultaneously. Five and eight patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine and FOLFOX, respectively. The median interval between the Hartmann procedure and reversal was 3.31 months (2.69-5.59). The median operative time for Hartmann's reversal was 190 min (100-335). The median hospital stay was 10 days (7-21). Four patients (30.8%) developed postoperative complications, and the rate of 3 or higher grade according to the Clavien-Dindo classification within 90 days postoperatively was 0%. Except for 1 patient who refused continuation of chemotherapy, 12 patients completed the planned chemotherapy. Median total duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 6.78 months (5.98-8.48). There was no mortality.

Conclusion

Early Hartmann reversal during adjuvant chemotherapy is tolerable and safe in carefully selected patients. In particular, it can be used as a therapeutic option for patients with complicated colorectal cancer with synchronous resectable metastases.

Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients

BACKGROUND

Hartmann's procedure (HP) is used in surgical emergencies such as colonic perforation and colonic obstruction. "Temporary" colostomy performed during HP is not always reversed in part due to potential morbidity and mortality associated with reversal. There are several contributing factors for patients requiring a permanent colostomy following HP. Therefore, there is still some discussion about which technique to use. The aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative variables of patients undergoing Hartmann's reversal using a laparoscopic and open approach.

METHODS

The multicenter retrospective cohort study was done between January 2009 and December 2019 at 14 institutions globally. Patients who underwent Hartmann's reversal laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) approaches were evaluated and compared. Sociodemographic, preoperative, intraoperative variables, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. The main outcomes evaluated were 30-day mortality, length of stay, complications, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Five hundred and two patients (264 in the LS and 238 in the OS group) were included. The most prevalent sex was male in 53.7%, the most common indication was complicated diverticular disease in 69.9%, and 85% were American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) II-III. Intraoperative complications were noted in 5.3% and 3.4% in the LS and OS groups, respectively. Small bowel injuries were the most common intraoperative injury in 8.3%, with a higher incidence in the OS group compared with the LS group (12.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.5). Inadvertent injuries were more common in the small bowel (3%) in the LS group. A total of 17.2% in the OS versus 13.3% in the LS group required intensive care unit (ICU) admission (p = 0.2). The most frequent postoperative complication was ileus (12.6% in OS vs. 9.8% in LS group, p = 0.4)). Reintervention was required mainly in the OS group (15.5% vs. 5.3% in LS group, p < 0.5); mortality rate was 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal is safe and feasible, associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with open surgery.

[Results of reconstructive surgery with formation of low colorectal anastomoses after previous Hartmann's procedure]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of original access to short rectal stump compared to traditional direct one.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective-prospective cohort comparative study was conducted between 2012 and 2018. Inclusion criterion was previous Hartmann's procedure with formation of a short rectal stump. Short stump was determined by its length from anal-skin line to the cupola <7 cm. There were 93 patients who were divided into 2 groups: the main group - new approach (n=38), the control group - traditional direct approach (n=55). We analyzed surgery time, blood loss, intraoperative, early and late postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

Surgery time and blood loss were similar in both groups (299.9 vs. 288.3 min, p=0.82; 204.5 vs. 112.4 ml, p=0.94, respectively). Intraoperative complications occurred in 7 patients of the control group (0 vs. 12.7% (7/55), p=0.02). Incidence of early postoperative complications was similar (28.9% (11/38) vs. 25.5% (14/55), p=0.71). Adverse events Clavien-Dindo grade I and IIIa were more common in the main group, grade IIIb and IVa - in the control group. Incidence of delayed postoperative complications were similar (10.5% (4/38) vs. 7.3% (4/55), p=0.58). Colorectal anastomosis stricture prevailed in the control group, ureteral stricture - in the main group. Neurophysiological and complex urodynamic examinations revealed no between-group differences.

CONCLUSION

The new method ensures access to the rectal stump and formation of colorectal anastomosis under direct visual control. Postoperative outcomes demonstrated safety and effectiveness of this technique.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs. Open Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure: A Single Centre Experience

Introduction

Hartmann’s procedure is widely performed to fix colonic obstruction and perforation. It should ideally be followed by a reversal to restore bowel continuity. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure was traditionally performed using an open technique. However, in recent days, the use of a laparoscopic approach has become increasingly popular. In our retrospective observational study, we aim to investigate the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure in a UK tertiary centre.

Methods

All patients who underwent reversal of their Hartmann’s procedure between January 2017 and December 2019 were included in the study. Data including demographics, days between primary operation and reversal, laparoscopic or open reversal, length of hospital stay following reversal procedure, 30-day readmission, mortality, and complication rate were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test and chi-squared test.

Results

Forty-nine patients underwent reversal of Hartmann’s procedure from January 2017 to December 2019. The mean age of our cohort was 59.6 ± 13.2 years. There was no significant difference in baseline demographics of both groups, apart from the number of days between the primary operation and reversal procedure. There was also no statistical difference in length of stay, 30-day readmission, and mortality between laparoscopic and open reversal techniques. However, there was a higher incidence of wound complications in patients who underwent open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure.

Conclusion

The reversal of Hartmann’s procedure is a challenging operation. We found no significant difference between both open and laparoscopic approaches, but our study might be confounded by various factors including small sample size and selection bias. A larger, randomised study with greater statistical power is needed to confirm our findings.

Reversal of left-sided colostomy utilizing single-port laparoscopy a multicenter European audit and overview of the literature

Background

Stoma reversal surgery can result in considerable morbidity and even mortality. Feasibility of utilizing single-port laparoscopy through the stoma fenestration have been shown before. Aim of the present observational study is to evaluate multicenter experiences of single-port reversal of left-sided colostomy (SPRLC) throughout Europe and to provide an overview of available literature on this topic.

Methods

All patients undergoing SPRLC in four different teaching hospitals throughout Europe are included. Primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes were postoperative length of stay (LOS), single-port success rate and conversion rates. Appraisal of the available literature in PubMed was performed.

Results

Of 156 SPRLC procedures, 98.7% of them were technically successful and 71.8% were without postoperative complications. No postoperative mortality was encountered. Superficial site infection occurred in 14.7%, anastomotic leakage in 3.9% and major complications in 8.3%. Median LOS was 4.0 days (1–69), single-port success rate was 64.7%, 12.8% and 21.2% (33/154) were converted to an open and multiport laparoscopic procedure, respectively. Literature shows equally favorable results in 131 patients divided over 5 cohorts with morbidity ranging from 0 to 30.4% and mortality from 0 to 2.2% and median LOS of 4–8 days.

Conclusion

This study confirms the safety, feasibility and favorable results of the use of single-port approach in the reversal of left-sided colostomy in different centers in Europe with laparoscopic experienced colorectal surgeons. The available literature on this topic support and show equally favorable results using single-port laparoscopy for left-sided colostomy reversal surgery.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08657-x.

Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal: Experiences From a Developing Country

Purpose

Laparoscopic surgery is considered a promising approach for Hartmann reversal but is also a complicated major surgical procedure. We conducted a retrospective analysis at a city hospital in Vietnam to evaluate the treatment technique and outcomes of laparoscopic Hartmann reversal (LHR).

Methods

A colorectal surgery database in 5 years between 2015 and 2019 (1,175 cases in total) was retrieved to collect 35 consecutive patients undergoing LHR.

Results

The patients had a median age of 61 years old. The median operative time was 185 minutes. All the procedures were first attempted laparoscopically with a conversion rate of 20.0% (7 of 35 cases). There was no intraoperative complication. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0 and 11.4% (2 medical, 1 deep surgical site infection, and 1 anastomotic leak required reoperation) respectively. The median time to first bowel activity was 2.8 days and median length of hospital stay was 8 days.

Conclusion

When performed by skilled surgeons, LHR is a feasible and safe operation with acceptable morbidity rate.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann Reversal: A Case-Control Study

Background

Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure (LHR) offers reduced morbidity compared with open Hartmann's reversal (OHR). The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-four patients who underwent Hartmann reversal between January 2017 and July 2019 were evaluated. Patients underwent either LHR (n = 17) or OHR (n = 17). Variables such as numbers of patients, patient's age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score, indication for previous open sigmoid resection, mean operation time, rate of conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay, mortality, and morbidity were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

The two groups of patients were homogeneous for gender, age, body mass index, cause of primary surgery, time to reversal, and comorbidities. In 97% of the cases, HP was done by open surgery. Our data revealed no difference in mean operation time (LHR: 180.5 ± 35.1 vs. OHR: 225.2 ± 48.4) and morbidity rate, although, in OHR group, there were more severe complications. Less intraoperative blood loss (LHR: 100 ± 40 mL vs. OHR: 450 ± 125 mL; p value <0.001), shorter time to flatus (LHR: 2.4 days vs. OHR: 3.6 days; p value <0.021), and shorter hospitalization (LHR: 4.4 vs. OHR: 11.2 days; p value <0.001) were observed in the LHR group. Mortality rate was null in both groups. Discussion. LHR is feasible and safe even for patients who received a primary open Hartmann's procedure. We suggest careful patient's selection allowing LHR procedures to highly skilled laparoscopy surgeons.

Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure: Evaluating Outcomes of Single-Port Laparoscopic Approach Versus Conventional Approach

Bowel restoration following Hartmann's procedure (HP) remains a topic of discussion and innovation. This article seeks to highlight and analyze the outcomes of conventional reversal approaches such as open surgery (OS) and conventional laparoscopic (CL) to single-port laparoscopic reversal (SPLR) approach to evaluate whether SPLR is a feasible alternative to the OS or CL approach. A PubMed search using keywords yielded 5,750 articles. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 40 articles of relevance were reviewed, and endpoints considered. These included 13 systematic reviews and 27 observational reviews, three of which identified themselves as retrospective or comparative studies. The analysis showed overwhelming support for CL over OS as a choice for HP reversal. Studies comparing SPLR to CL showed SPLR to be a safe and feasible alternative, given its significantly shorter operating times, hospitalization times, and complication rates.

Outcomes of Hartmann's procedure and subsequent intestinal restoration. Which patients are most likely to undergo reversal?

BACKGROUND

Aim of the study was to describe characteristics and outcomes of Hartmann's procedure (HP) and subsequent intestinal restoration.

METHODS

Retrospective study including all patients who underwent HP over a period of 16 consecutive years. We propose a classification and regression tree for a more accurate view of the relationship between the variables related to intestinal restoration and their weighting in the decision to reverse HP.

RESULTS

533 patients were included. Overall morbidity rate of HP was 53.5% and mortality 21.0%. Overall morbidity of the intestinal continuity reconstruction was 47.3% and mortality 0.9%. Patients with a benign disease, aged under 69 years and with low comorbidity, had an 84.4% probability of undergoing intestinal reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

HP is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Restoration of intestinal continuity involves minor, but frequent, morbidity and a low mortality rate. Age and comorbidities can decrease, and even override, the decision to reverse HP.

Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a single-centre experience of 533 consecutive cases

AIM

Hartmann's procedure (HP) is common. However, restoration of intestinal continuity is not so frequent. The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors which might influence outcomes following the reversal of HP.

METHOD

All consecutive patients who underwent elective and emergency HP in a single institution between January 1999 and December 2014 were included. Data concerning patient, disease and treatment features were collected. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to determine prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 533 consecutive patients underwent HP over the 16-year period. Factors that were associated with a higher probability of reversal were age (< 69 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (I or II), indication for HP (likelihood of anastomotic leakage) and length of rectal stump reaching or exceeding the sacral promontory. A reduced probability of intestinal reconstruction was associated with anal incontinence, Stage IV cancer, postoperative transfusion or elective surgery.

CONCLUSION

Age, ASA grade, the indication for HP, the length of rectal stump, anal incontinence, tumour stage, postoperative transfusion and elective surgery determine the probability of reversal.

Emergency Hartmann's Procedure and Its Reversal: A Totally Laparoscopic 2-Step Surgery for the Treatment of Hinchey III and IV Diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

Hartmann's procedure (HP) followed by reversal restoration is the first choice for treatment of diffuse diverticular peritonitis. There is no unanimous consensus regarding the use of laparoscopy to treat the same condition.

METHODS

Data from 60 patients with diverticular diffuse peritonitis who underwent urgent HP followed by laparoscopic reversal were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the open or laparoscopic HP (OHP, 24 patients; LHP, 36 patients). Outcomes were measured in terms of functional recovery, morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

HPs showed no differences among the groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, and length of intensive care unit stay. Overall morbidity was significantly lower in LHP than in OHP, corresponding to 33.3% and 66.7% respectively ( P = .018). The incidence of both surgical and medical complications was higher in OHP than in LHP (41.7% vs 22.2% [ P = .044] and 45.8% vs 24.3% [ P = .023], respectively). Mortality was 16.6% for each group. LHP showed a faster return to bowel movements and a shorter hospital stay than OHP. The secondary intestinal reversal was possible in 92% of cases, successfully completed laparoscopically in 91.3%. No patients of LHP group required a conversion to open intestinal reversal.

CONCLUSION

LHP for treatment of diverticular diffuse peritonitis showed significantly lower morbidity, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, and higher rates of successful laparoscopic reversal when compared with OHP.

Stoma prolapse handmade repair under local anesthesia with variation of Altemeier method in severe patients: a case report and review of the literature

Stoma prolapse represents one of the most common late complications, occurring in 1–16%. Final rate depends on systematic follow up of the patient and the primary technique. A 49-year-old male patient presented in the Emergency Department, complaining about stoma prolapse, pain and stoma care difficulties. On admission, his colostomy protruded ~20 cm from the skin. The symptoms were local pain and psychological stress. The prolapse was repaired successfully with a simple revision procedure under local anesthesia, by resecting the prolapsed part of the bowel and reconstruction of stoma. Prolapsed part of the colon is removed and the remaining end of the colon is fixated to the abdominal wall. Colorectal surgeons must familiarize with management of stoma complications. Stoma revision under local anesthesia is an alternative and safe method.