Adrenalectomy: indications and options for treatment

Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) predicts postoperative complications after adrenalectomy

The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score, initially developed for gastrointestinal surgery, is a validated system used to predict postoperative complications by evaluating preoperative and intraoperative factors. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the E-PASS score in predicting postoperative complications following adrenalectomy. In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed data from 202 patients who underwent adrenalectomy by a single surgeon between January 2017 and March 2024. 182 patients with complete data and who met the study criteria were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed, including preoperative complaints, ASA classification, ECOG performance status, presence of systemic diseases, type of surgery, and intraoperative details, such as blood loss and complications. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo Classification. The mean age of the patients was 48.7 ± 13.6 years. The mean BMI was 24.1 kg/m2. Postoperative complications were observed in 26.4% of patients, categorized as Grade 1 (54.1%), Grade 2 (25%), Grade 3 (16.7%), and Grade 4 (4.2%). Multivariate logistic regression identified higher BMI (OR = 1.394) and an E-PASS CRS score > - 0.0677 (OR = 6.17) as independent risk factors for complications. ROC curve analysis determined this CRS score cut-off with an AUC of 0.866 (CI 0.808-0.923; p < 0.001). The E-PASS scoring system effectively predicts postoperative complications in adrenalectomy. Its integration into clinical practice can enhance the identification of high-risk patients, optimize perioperative management, and potentially reduce adverse outcomes.

Posterior Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: An Anatomical Essay and Surgical Update

Posterior retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (PRLA) has emerged as a revolutionary, minimally invasive technique for adrenal gland surgery, offering significant advantages over traditional open approaches. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive update on PRLA, focusing on its anatomical foundations, surgical technique, and clinical implications. We conducted an extensive review of the current literature and surgical practices to elucidate the key aspects of PRLA. The procedure leverages a unique "backdoor" approach, accessing the adrenal glands through the retroperitoneum, which necessitates a thorough understanding of the posterior abdominal wall and retroperitoneal anatomy. Proper patient selection, meticulous surgical planning, and adherence to key technical principles are paramount for successful outcomes. In this paper, the surgical technique is described step by step, emphasizing critical aspects such as patient positioning, trocar placement, and adrenal dissection. PRLA demonstrates reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times compared to open surgery, while maintaining comparable oncological outcomes for appropriately selected cases. However, the technique presents unique challenges, including a confined working space and the need for surgeons to adapt to a posterior anatomical perspective. We conclude that PRLA, in the right clinical setting, offers a safe and effective alternative to traditional adrenalectomy approaches. Future research should focus on expanding indications and refining techniques to further improve patient outcomes.

Laparoscopic Adrenal Gland Surgery in Times of COVID - Is a Safety-Interval Before Surgery After COVID-Infection Still Mandatory?

BACKGROUND

Due to a multicenter study early in the coronavirus disease (COVID)-pandemic that revealed an increased risk for postoperative mortality, thromboembolic and pulmonary complications in case of surgery shortly after a COVID infection, current recommendations for planning elective surgeries suggest postponing surgery for at least 7 weeks after COVID infection. However, virus variants have evolved throughout the pandemic, leading to less severe symptoms. Besides, laparoscopic adrenal gland surgery itself is a safe procedure with low morbidity rates. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the perioperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy shortly after a COVID-19 infection with those who had not had a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2022.

PATIENTS, MATERIAL, AND METHODS

All patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy at the Department for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Ludwig-Maximilian University between January and December 2022 were included.

RESULTS

There was no event of thromboembolic or pulmonary complications in the study population. Duration of surgery did not differ between the two groups; neither did the need for postoperative ICU-admittance nor the duration of ICU-stay. Intraoperative FiO2 did not differ, nor did the SpO2 or the number of different catecholamines. There was a slight trend towards higher noradrenaline dosage among patients after COVID-19 infection. Previous COVID infection did not lead to prolonged hospital stays.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that in case of well-standardized surgical procedures, with a limited surgical trauma and the possibility for patients to be mobilized early, surgery shortly after a mild COVID infection seems safe and reasonable.

Treating Primary Aldosteronism-Induced Hypertension: Novel Approaches and Future Outlooks

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared with blood pressure-matched cases of primary hypertension. Current limitations in patient care stem from delayed recognition of the condition, limited access to key diagnostic procedures, and lack of a definitive therapy option for nonsurgical candidates. However, several recent advances have the potential to address these barriers to optimal care. From a diagnostic perspective, machine-learning algorithms have shown promise in the prediction of PA subtypes, while the development of noninvasive alternatives to adrenal vein sampling (including molecular positron emission tomography imaging) has made accurate localization of functioning adrenal nodules possible. In parallel, more selective approaches to targeting the causative aldosterone-producing adrenal adenoma/nodule (APA/APN) have emerged with the advent of partial adrenalectomy or precision ablation. Additionally, the development of novel pharmacological agents may help to mitigate off-target effects of aldosterone and improve clinical efficacy and outcomes. Here, we consider how each of these innovations might change our approach to the patient with PA, to allow more tailored investigation and treatment plans, with corresponding improvement in clinical outcomes and resource utilization, for this highly prevalent disorder.

Clinical predictors and significance of adherent periadrenal fat in laparoscopic adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

Adrenalectomy requires the anatomic preparation of the adrenal gland in the fat-rich retroperitoneal space. In the literature, it was shown that the retroperitoneal fat area affects surgical outcomes in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). Besides the quantity of retroperitoneal fat, its qualitative properties play hypothetically a significant role in the safety profile and perioperative parameters of LA. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the factors associated with adherent periadrenal fat.

METHODS

The prospectively obtained demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of 44 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy in our clinic were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as adherent periadrenal fat (APAF) and non-APAF group. Periadrenal fat tissue was defined as adherent or non-adherent by the attending surgeon according to the difficulty in dissection of the adrenal gland from the surrounding fat tissue during the operation.

RESULTS

The rate of female gender and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was higher in the APAF group (respectively, p = 0.038 and p = 0.001). A ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off point was - 97 HU for APAF. On multivariable analysis using a stepwise regression model, we identified the presence of DM (OR = 5.073; 95% Cl = 2.192-12.387; p = 0.006) and ARFD > -97 HU (OR = 3.727; 95% Cl = 1.898-11.454; p = 0.008) as an independent predictor of APAF.

CONCLUSION

APAF seems to affect the perioperative outcomes of LA in terms of operation duration but not perioperative complications.

Computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of adrenal tumors

Background. Modern methods of topical diagnostics have high accuracy and can determine the morphological structure of the adrenal tumor with high probability before surgery, but none of them has 100% sensitivity and specificity. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is most commonly used by clinicians. The criteria for the malignancy of an adrenal tumor determined by this method continue to be discussed.

The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the preoperative diagnosis of adrenal tumors and to analyze errors.

Materials and methods. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was performed in 69 patients with adrenal tumors. After morphological examination of the removed tumors, the effectiveness of preoperative diagnostics was evaluated with the determination of sensitivity and specificity of the method. If the pre- and postoperative diagnosis did not match, the causes of errors were analyzed.

Results. The attenuation on unenhanced CT in adenomas ranged from 5 to 36 HU, in adrenocortical cancer — from 26 to 80 HU, in pheochromocytomas — from 25 to 99 HU. The attenuation of adenomas on unenhanced CT was significantly less than with pheochromocytomas (p=0.005) and adrenocortical cancer (p=0.012). In the venous phase, no significant differences were found, and in the delayed phase, the attenuation of adenomas was also significantly less than in malignant tumors (p=0.008, p=0.008). The median of absolute percent contrast washout in adenomas was 85%, in pheochromocytes — 59%, in adrenocortical cancer — 57%. When comparing the diagnosis before and after surgery, its non-coincidence was found in 8 cases (10.39%). Two patients (2.59%) with small tumors (diameter of 15 mm) were diagnosed with adenoma in ­combination with pheochromocytoma and adenoma before surgery. After morphological examination, the diagnosis was changed to adrenocortical cancer in combination with adenoma and «mute» pheochromocytoma.

Conclusion. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of adenomas was 95.61% and 94.82%, pheochromocytomas — 95% and 95.08%, adrenocortical cancer — 92.31 and 98.48%. Diagnostic errors of «mute» pheochromocytoma and adrenocortical cancer occurred with small sizes (15 mm) of adrenal tumors.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic in adrenalectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) and laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) Guidelines. Five databases, including Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science, were systematically searched. The search timeframe was set from the creation of the database to December 2021.

RESULTS

There were 26 studies including 2985 patients. Our study found that the robotic technique was superior to conventional laparoscopy for estimated blood loss (WMD = -18.25, 95% CI [-27.85, -8.65], P < 0.01), length of stay (WMD = -0.45, 95% CI [-0.57, -0.33], P < 0.01), and conversion to open (OR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.12, 0.78], P = 0.01), while complications and readmissions were comparable. Interestingly, there was no difference in operative time between the two surgical modalities, but subgroup analysis found that the retroperitoneal route robotic technique took longer (WMD = 14.64, 95% CI [0.04, 29.24], P < 0.05), whereas the study of the mixed surgical modality (RA versus LA with mixed transabdominal and retroperitoneal surgical routes) found that the robot required less time (WMD = -12.29, 95% CI [-22.86, -1.72], P < 0.05). For pheochromocytoma, RA was superior to LA in terms of length of stay (WMD = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.83, -0.15], P < 0.01), with no difference in other indicators.

CONCLUSION

robotic-assisted adrenalectomy is a superior technique to conventional laparoscopy in managing adrenal tumors, even in the case of a specific adrenal tumor - pheochromocytoma.

Robot assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Should this be the new standard?

Introduction:

Minimal invasive surgeries (MIS) for large size adrenal tumors are still debatable. The objective is to evaluate the contemporary peri- and post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing (open = OA, laparoscopic = LA, and robotic = RA) adrenalectomies in three institutions.

Materials and methods:

Retrospectively gathered peri- and post-operative data of 235 patients, underwent adrenalectomy at three Institutions over a 7-year period (2013–2020) were analyzed. All patients underwent thorough radiological and endocrine workup.

Results:

Two hundred and thirty five patients who underwent adrenalectomy (OA ( n = 29), LA ( n = 146), and RA ( n = 60)) were assessed. OA ( n = 29) versus Minimally invasive surgery ( n = 206) showed significant differences (median, p value) in larger tumour size, cm (9.4 vs 5, ( p = 0.0001)), longer operative time, mins (240 vs 100, ( p = 0.0001)), longer hospital stay, days (8 vs 3,( p = .0001)), Higher readmission rates (14% vs 1.9%), higher blood loss, ml (400 vs 100, ( p = 0.0001)) requiring blood transfusion (14% vs 4.3%) ( p = 0.03), higher intraoperative complication (21% vs 6%) ( p = 0.0004), and post op complications (17% vs 5.3%) ( p = 0.01). Amongst the MIS (RA vs LA), RA appeared be have better outcomes in terms of shorter operative time, less blood loss and less intra operative complications with a p value <0.05. These results were consistent for the assessment of patients who had ⩾6 cm tumor size. The postoperative complication rates were lowest with RA (3.3%) compared to OA (17%) and LA (6.1%).

Conclusions:

Contemporary practice of adrenalectomy shows that robotic adrenalectomy is safe and effective irrespective of the tumor size.

Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain and recovery after laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Background

To investigate the role of transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TMQLB) for postoperative pain control, patient satisfaction and recovery in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Methods

Seventy-two patients aged between 18 and 70 years with an ASA I-II and scheduled for laparoscopic adrenalectomy were randomized to receive a single-shot TMQLB with 0.4 ml/kg 0.5 % ropivacaine or 0.4 ml/kg 0.9 % saline as placebo. The primary endpoint was pain on movement at 12 h after surgery evaluated by the numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10). P-values < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The secondary outcomes included pain at rest and pain on movement evaluated by the NRS, and postoperative recovery related parameters.

Results

NRS on movement at 12 h after surgery was lower in the TMQLB group compared with the control (median 2 vs. 3, p = 0.024). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was lower in the TMQLB group (247.08 ± 63.54 vs. 285.44 ± 74.70, p = 0.022). The rate of using postoperative rescue tramadol was also lower in the TMQLB group (5.6 vs. 27.8 %, p = 0.027). Similar incidences of nausea and vomiting were observed (11.1 vs. 25 %, p = 0.220). Patient satisfaction of pain service was better in the TMQLB group (83.3 vs. 25 %, p < 0.001) with shorter time to ambulation (16.5 vs. 21 h, p = 0.004) and flatus (18.5 vs. 23.5 h, p = 0.006).

Conclusions

TMQLB showed better control of postoperative pain on movement for laparoscopic adrenalectomy with improved patients’ satisfaction of anesthesia, shorter time to ambulation and flatus.

Trial registration

This study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03942237; registration date: 08/05/2019; enrollment date: 10/05/2019).

Volume Matters: Longitudinal Retrospective Cohort Study of Outcomes Following Consultation and Standardization of Adrenal Surgery

PURPOSE

Subspecialization of adrenal surgery through regionalization has not been adequately evaluated. We assessed implementation of subspecialization and the association of regionalization with adrenalectomy outcomes in a community-based setting.

METHODS

In this longitudinal retrospective cohort study, we used an interrupted time series analysis on consecutive adrenal surgeries at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2010-2019. The intervention was regionalization of surgery in 2016. Main outcomes include surgical volumes, operative time, length of stay, 30-day return-to-care, and 30-day complications obtained from the electronic medical record. t-Tests and multivariable models were used to analyze time trends in outcomes after accounting for changes in patient and disease characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 850 adrenal surgery cases were eligible. Between 2010 and 2019, the annual incidence of surgery (per 100,000 persons) increased from 2.4 (95% CI 1.9-3.1) to 4.1 (95% CI 3.5-4.8). Average annual surgeon volume increased from 2.4 (95% CI 1.6-3.1) to 9.9 (95% CI 4.9-14.9), while hospital volume increased from 3.5 (95% CI 2.3-4.6) to 15.4 (95% CI 6.9-24.0). Operative time was 34 (23-45) min faster in 2018-2019 compared with 2010-2011. After regionalization, same-day discharges increased to 64% in 2019 (p < 0.0001). The frequency of return-to-care (p = 0.69) and the overall complication rate (p = 0.31) did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Regionalizing adrenal surgery through surgical subspecialization and standardized care pathways was feasible and decreased operative time, and hospital stay, while increasing the frequency of same-day discharges without increasing return-to-care or complications.

Thermal ablation in adrenal disorders: a discussion of the technology, the clinical evidence and the future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarise the emerging role of thermal ablation as a therapeutic modality in the management of functioning adrenal tumours and metastases to the adrenal gland.

RECENT FINDINGS

Observational evidence has demonstrated the benefit of thermal ablation in (i) resolving adrenal endocrinopathy arising from benign adenomas, (ii) treating solitary metastases to the adrenal and (iii) controlling metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma and phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma.

SUMMARY

Microwave thermal ablation offers a promising, minimally invasive therapeutic modality for the management of functioning adrenocortical adenomas and adrenal metastases. Appropriate technological design, treatment planning and choice of imaging modality are necessary to overcome technical challenges associated with this emerging therapeutic approach.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a large international multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to describe the surgical outcomes of a retrospective series of consecutive patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic approach for adrenal masses in two tertiary referral centers.

METHODS

We retrospectively gathered data of 477 patients submitted to adrenalectomy performed at two Institutions from March 2008 to February 2018 by six highly experienced surgeons. We excluded from the analysis 43 patients that had an open approach for tumors or for anesthetic contraindications to minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Patients were selected for surgery after a radiologic and an endocrinology work up. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 477 patients were included in the study. The robotic and the laparoscopic group included 110 and 367 patients, respectively. The preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups except for ASA score with a median (IQR) of 3 and 2 in the robotic and in the laparoscopic group, respectively (p = 0.03). Tumor size of adrenal tumors treated robotically (4, IQR 2.6-6 cm) was significantly larger than those treated laparoscopically (3, IQR 2.3-4.1 cm) (p = 0.01). The intraoperative complication rates were similar between robotic and laparoscopic groups (6.3% and 6%, respectively). The postoperative complication rate was 5.4% for robotic group and similarly 3.5% for laparoscopic adrenalectomy strategy. We analyzed the tumor ≥ 6 cm, with 29 patients in the robotic group and 43 in the laparoscopic one, with an overall complication rate of 19.5%. At multivariable analyses tumor size (OR 1.287; CI 1.128-1.468; p < 0.001) was the only independent predictor of overall complication.

CONCLUSION

Adrenal tumors can be safely treated either by robotic or laparoscopic strategy. MIS seems to be feasible also in larger adrenal masses (≥ 6 cm). Tumor size represents the only predictive factors for overall complication.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for giant adrenal tumours: Technical considerations and surgical outcome

BACKGROUND

Giant adrenal tumours are tumours with size ≥6 cm. These are rare cancer associated with malignancy in 25% of cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients admitted to our high-volume centre of Careggi University Hospital with a giant adrenal tumour and submitted to adrenalectomy between January 2008 and December 2018. The group of patients who underwent to laparoscopic adrenalectomy was compared with a group of patients that was submitted to open adrenalectomy.

RESULTS

In the past 10 years, we performed about 245 adrenalectomies for benign and malignant adrenal tumours. Fifty (20.4%) of these were giant tumours. The medium size was 9.9 cm (7-22 cm). The mean age was 57 years (21-81 years). Thirty-four (68%) of these cancers were laparoscopically removed and 16 (32%) with an open approach. The surgical outcomes in these patients were optimal if compared to the group of patients submitted to open approach in terms of good pain control, hospital stay, mean operative time and bloodless. No difference was observed about post-operative complications in the two groups. The follow-up after 30 months for malignant tumours did not show local recurrences.

CONCLUSION

Our results pinpoint the advantages of performing a laparoscopic adrenalectomy for giant adrenal tumours. The tumour size is only a predictive parameter of possible malignancy, and the laparoscopic approach is a safe and feasible method in terms of surgical and oncological, only if performed by expert surgeons and in high-volume centres.

Comparison of robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma: a single-centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RARLA) for large pheochromocytomas (PHEOs; size≥6 cm) compared with retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA).

METHODS

Fifty-one patients who underwent adrenalectomy for large PHEOs between March 2016 and January 2019 were enrolled and divided into two groups, including 32 RLA cases and 19 RARLA cases. We compared the perioperative efficacy and long-term follow-up results between the two groups.

RESULTS

Preoperative data, including demographics, comorbidities and tumour characteristics, were similar between the groups. Intraoperatively, the RARLA group had a lower incidence of haemodynamic instability (26.3% vs. 56.2%, P = 0.038) and less intraoperative blood loss (100 ml vs. Two hundred milliliter, P = 0.042) than the RLA group. The groups showed no significant differences in operative time or transfusion rates. Postoperatively, the time to diet resumption, time to ambulation, time to drainage removal and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the RARLA group than in the RLA group (1 d vs. 2 d, P = 0.027; 1 d vs. 2 d, P = 0.034; 3 d vs. 5 d, P = 0.002; 5 d vs. 6 d, P = 0.02, respectively). The groups exhibited no significant differences in the duration of anaesthetic use, complications, or long-term follow-up results for the blood pressure (BP) improvement rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with RLA, RARLA is a safe, feasible and even optimized procedure for large PHEOs.

Factors associated with prolonged hospital stay after laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Laparoscopy is the standard technique for resecting adrenal tumors, but short-term outcomes such as length of stay (LOS) vary widely between centers. We aimed to identify factors associated with LOS after lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LTLA). We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing unilateral LTLA between April 2003 and April 2020. Prolonged LOS was defined as a stay longer than the 75th percentile of the overall cohort. To identify potential factors associated with prolonged LOS, we compared collected data from patients with LOS ≤ 2 days versus LOS > 2 days and elaborated multivariate logistic regression models. We included 150 patients (73 men and 77 women, median age 54 years), with benign (n = 128) and malignant tumors (n = 22). The median LOS after LTLA was 2 days; 64 (42.7%) patients had prolonged hospitalization. Variables significantly associated with prolonged LOS in the univariate analysis included ASA III + IV (p = 0.016), pheochromocytoma (p < 0.001), learning curve (p = 0.032), surgery on Thursday or Friday (p < 0.001), 2D laparoscopy (p = 0.003), operative time (p < 0.001), estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), drainage (p < 0.001), specimen size (p = 0.011), conversions (p = 0.002), complications (p = 0.019), and hospital stay (p < 0.001). After adjustment for patient, surgical, and tumor characteristics, risk factors associated with prolonged LOS in the multivariate analysis were specimen size > 9 cm (OR:13.03, p = 0.005), surgery on Thursday or Friday (OR:6.92, p = 0.001), estimated blood loss ≥ 60 ml (OR:6.22, p = 0.021), and drainage (OR:5.29, p = 0.005). Prolonged length of stay after LTLA was associated with specimen size > 9 cm, operating on Thursday or Friday, estimated blood loss ≥ 60 mL, and drainage.

Three-dimensional (3D) system versus two-dimensional (2D) system for laparoscopic resection of adrenal tumors: a case-control study

PURPOSE

Laparoscopy is the standard technique for resecting adrenal tumors worldwide. The main drawbacks of conventional 2D laparoscopy are limited depth perception and tactile feedback. Currently available high-quality 3D laparoscopy systems might improve surgical outcomes for adrenalectomy. We compare the safety and efficacy of 3D versus 2D laparoscopy in the treatment of adrenal tumors.

METHODS

This case-control study analyzed prospectively collected data from patients with benign or malignant adrenal tumors treated laparoscopically at a single academic medical center between April 2003 and March 2020. We collected demographic, diagnostic, preoperative, and operative variables, and used multiple linear and logistic regression to analyze differences in various short-term outcomes between the two approaches while adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

We included 150 patients: 128 with benign tumors and 22 with malignant tumors; 95 treated with 3D laparoscopy (case group); and 55 with 2D laparoscopy (control group). After adjustment for patient, surgical, and tumor characteristics, a 2D vision was associated with a longer operative time (β = 0.26, p = 0.002) and greater blood loss (β = 0.20, p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in rates of conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47 (95% CI 0.90-22.31); p = 0.549) or complications (3.6% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.624).

CONCLUSIONS

With experienced surgeons, laparoscopic adrenalectomy was safer and more feasible with the 3D system than with the 2D system, resulting in less operative blood loss and shorter operative time with no differences in rates of conversion to open surgery or postoperative complications. For adrenal tumors, 3D laparoscopy offers advantages over 2D laparoscopy.

Adrenal-sparing surgery: current concepts on a theme from the past

Adrenal insufficiency represents a debilitating condition which mandates lifelong steroid replacement and which is associated with significant long-term morbidity, due to either inadequate or excessive replacement. The concept of preserving healthy cortical tissue by means of partial adrenalectomy has evolved as a means of avoiding the detrimental consequences of adrenal insufficiency. The advent of advanced technology in adrenal surgery has greatly facilitated the performance of partial adrenalectomy, enabling utilization of this method in an increasing number of endocrine diseases. Hereditary pheochromocytoma, Conn's syndrome, Cushing's syndrome, and non-functional adrenal masses represent the current indications for partial adrenalectomy, although the specific circumstances under which adrenal-sparing surgery should be proposed are still debatable. Partial adrenalectomy can be achieved by all types of minimally invasive surgery. In the absence of randomized, prospective, controlled studies designed to compare laparoscopic, retroperitoneoscopic, and robot-assisted partial adrenalectomy, none of these techniques has as yet been proven to be the gold standard for adrenal-sparing surgery. Apart from indications for surgery, results of surgery, and different types of partial adrenalectomy, controversial topics addressed in this review article include technical aspects such as the volume of residual adrenal tissue needed, ligation of adrenal vein, and means of tumor identification. Discussion of these controversial topics represents an attempt to define the role of partial adrenalectomy in modern adrenal surgery.

Surgical Indications and Techniques for Adrenalectomy

Indications for adrenalectomy are malignancy suspicion or malignant tumors, non-functional tumors with the risk of malignancy and functional adrenal tumors. Regardless of the size of functional tumors, they have surgical indications. The hormone-secreting adrenal tumors in which adrenalectomy is indicated are as follows: Cushing’s syndrome, arises from hypersecretion of glucocorticoids produced in fasciculata adrenal cortex, Conn’s syndrome, arises from an hypersecretion of aldosterone produced by glomerulosa adrenal cortex, and Pheochromocytomas that arise from adrenal medulla and produce catecholamines. Sometimes, bilateral adrenalectomy may be required in Cushing’s disease due to pituitary or ectopic ACTH secretion. Adenomas arise from the reticularis layer of the adrenal cortex, which rarely releases too much adrenal androgen and estrogen, may also develop and have an indication for adrenalectomy. Adrenal surgery can be performed by laparoscopic or open technique. Today, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard treatment in selected patients. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed transperitoneally or retroperitoneoscopically. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. In the selection of the surgery type, the experience and habits of the surgeon are also important, along with the patient’s characteristics. The most common type of surgery performed in the world is laparoscopic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy, which most surgeons are more familiar with. The laparoscopic anterior transperitoneal approach is the least preferred laparoscopic method in adrenalectomy. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed with a posterior or lateral approach. In addition to conventional laparoscopy, laparoscopic surgery is robot-assisted, which can be administered by transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. In addition, conventional or robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be performed transabdominally or retroperitoneally using the single-port method. Today, partial adrenalectomy can be performed using laparoscopic techniques in bilateral adrenal masses, hereditary diseases with the risk of developing multiple adrenal tumors, and solitary masses of the adrenal gland. Open surgery is indicated in the case of malignancy or suspected malignancy and large tumors when laparoscopic surgery is contraindicated. The risk of conversion to open surgery is low (approximately 5%). The open transperitoneal anterior approach is the most common open intervention, especially in large tumors with malignancy or suspected malignancy. This procedure can be performed using a midline incision, bilateral or unilateral subcostal incision, Makuuchi or modified Makuuchi incision. Thoracoabdominal incision may be required, especially in the removal of large malignant lesions as a block. The open retroperitoneal approach can be applied posteriorly or laterally.

Laparoscopic Approach to the Adrenal Masses: Single-Center Experience of Five Years

Objectives:

Currently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard technique for suitable patients with adrenal masses. In this study, we aimed to assess the postoperative results of patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Methods:

Between January 2014 and October 2019, 76 cases were operated and retrospectively evaluated. Laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy was applied to the patients. Demographic profiles, preoperative indications, intraoperative and postoperative complications, mortality and length of hospital stay were evaluated.

Results:

Seventy-six patients (30 male, 46 female) with a mean age of 47.2±11.7 (range 22-71) years underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Thirty-nine of the patients had right; 33 of the patients had left adrenal masses. Three patients had bilateral adrenal cortical hyperplasia. One patient was operated for paraganglioma. Conversion to open adrenalectomy was observed in four patients (5.26%). Nine patients (11.8%) experienced intraoperative and postoperative complications. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were bleeding from spleen (2 cases) and upper pole of kidney (1 case), renal artery injury (1 case), bleeding from liver parenchyma (2 cases), ischemia of spleen and pancreas (1 case), small intestinal injury (1 case) and incisional hernia (1 case). The complication rate is acceptable and comparable with other studies in the literature.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy can be safely applied in suitable patients with acceptable complications and low conversion rates.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis were designed and conducted, in order to provide an up-to-date comparison of the robotic (RA) and laparoscopic (LA) adrenalectomy in terms of perioperative efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The present meta-analysis was completed in accordance with the guidelines provided by the PRISMA study group and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The electronic scholar databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) were screened. For the reduction of type I errors, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 studies and 2997 patients were included in this study. RA was associated with a significantly lower open conversion rate (OR: 1.79; 95%CI: 1.10, 2.92) and length of hospitalization (LOS WMD: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.2, 0.84). Marginal results regarding blood loss were recorded (WMD: 2.02; 95%CI: 0.0, 4.03). TSA could not validate the superiority of RA in open conversion rate and blood loss. LA and RA were similar in terms of operative duration (P = 0.18) and positive margin (P = 0.81), complications (P = 0.94) and mortality rate (P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though RA and LA were equivalent regarding perioperative safety, RA was associated with a favorable LOS.

Volume-outcome relationship in adrenal surgery: A review of existing literature

The relationship between operative volume and perioperative outcomes after several oncologic operations is well documented. Recent studies on adrenalectomy reveal a robust association between higher surgeon volume and improved patient outcomes. Statistical analyses have demonstrated that outcomes are improved when surgeons perform at least six adrenalectomies annually; based on this threshold definition of a 'high-volume' surgeon, more than 80% of adrenalectomies in the United States are performed by 'low-volume' surgeons. When compared to low-volume surgeons, high-volume surgeons on average achieve lower rates of postoperative complications and mortality, as well as a shorter length of hospital stay, and lower cost of hospitalization. There does not appear to be a similar association between hospital adrenalectomy volume and improved patient outcomes; however, there is evidence of benefit for the subset of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma. Despite limitations of existing literature, evidence is sufficient to recommend the referral of patients with adrenal tumors to high-volume surgeons.

Challenges of training in adrenal surgery

While adrenal tumors are common, adrenalectomy is rather uncommon. This is one reason for the many challenges regarding the training of adrenal surgery. Here we focus on issues that are most pertinent regarding training of the young surgeons performing adrenalectomy. Due to the very limited literature, what is presented is mainly based on personal experience and/or from the literature published for other surgical operations and subspecialties. The discussed challenges include indications for surgery, surgical approaches and extent, and intraoperative complications. With advances in adrenal surgery, we expect some old challenges to be resolved, and some new challenges to arise. These challenges will be faced in order to continue to help our younger trainee acquire the knowledge and skills to best care for our patients with adrenal diseases.

[Preferable surgery for benign tumors of the adrenal glands]

AIM

To determine optimal surgical approach in patients with adrenal tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Overall experience of treatment of patients with adrenal tumors comprises over 300 procedures including 152 minimally invasive surgeries.

RESULTS

We have presented the advantages and relative disadvantages of various technologies which are useful to be considered to determine the most optimal surgery in these patients.

CONCLUSION

There are no serious contradictions to use existing surgical methods in patients with adrenal tumors. Minimally invasive procedures along with conventional (open) interventions significantly enlarged rational choice in surgery for adrenal neoplasms and optimized personified approach.