Splenic flexure mobilization in rectal cancer surgery: do we always need it?

Splenic flexure mobilization: does body topography matter?

BACKGROUND

Splenic flexure mobilization can be technically challenging, and its oncological benefits remain uncertain. This study aims to explore the relationship between patient and clinical characteristics and splenic flexure mobilization time as well as the implications of prolonged splenic flexure mobilization duration.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study includes 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal colorectal cancer surgery between 2013 and 2018. The study analyzed patient characteristics, duration of surgical steps, and postoperative outcomes. Splenic flexure mobilization time was assessed using operation videos, and the impact of patient-related factors on splenic flexure mobilization complexity was examined.

RESULTS

The study identified significant correlations of higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.0086), weight (p = 0.002), and height (p = 0.043) with longer splenic flexure mobilization time. Gender did not significantly influence splenic flexure mobilization duration. Splenic flexure mobilization time was correlated with the durations of other individual surgical steps (Step 1: medial-to-lateral dissection [p = 0.0013], Step 2: pelvic dissection [p = 0.067], Step 3: dissection of white line and mobilization of descending colon [p = 0.0088], Step 5: stapling, resection, extraction of the specimen, and anastomosis [p = 0.04]) and the overall operation time (p < 0.0001). A 10-min cutoff point predicts the total operation time more efficiently than other potential thresholds.

CONCLUSION

This research suggests that patient characteristics including BMI, weight, and height may serve as indicators for prolonged splenic flexure mobilization time in laparoscopic distal colorectal cancer surgery. Longer splenic flexure mobilization durations were correlated with extended durations of other surgical steps. A BMI-based approach to anticipate SFM duration may enhance preoperative planning, potentially aiding in surgical decision-making.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

E-10840098-772.02-61604 2.2.2019.

It is possible to avoid routine splenic flexure mobilization during left hemicolectomy and anterior rectal resection? A single center experience compared to the surgical reality

BACKGROUND

Routine splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) during left hemicolectomy and high anterior rectal resection guarantees a well perfused and tension-free anastomosis, respecting current oncological criteria. According to the recent literature, only 70% of laparoscopic colorectal surgeons considered routine SFM mandatory. Because of its difficulty, SFM increases morbidity including surrounding organs injuries. The goal of the study is to report our experience in avoiding routine SFM during colorectal resection compared to the current surgical state of art.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively on elective left hemicolectomy without routine SFM performed in our unit between January 2015 to April 2020. Patients were recruited according to diagnosis, histopathology, operative time, ASA score, post-operative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy-five oncological patients, underwent to surgery without SFM. The other 13 patients underwent to SFM due to technical issues. The mean operative time was 160.2±44.7 mins, significantly shorter than in patients whose SFM occurred (210.3 min). The morbidity rate was 1%, reintervention occurred in one patient. Eighteen-month median follow-up morbidity was 11% while mortality was 3%. Recurrence rate was of about 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

As results from study data analysis, left colectomy can be conducted safely in both laparoscopic and laparotomic approach without SFM in selected cases. As reported in a recent meta-analysis, benefits of avoiding SFM concern reduced operative time without compromising postoperative outcome and respecting oncological criteria, as emerged by our results. Colorectal resection without SFM when is feasible, improves surgical approach reducing technical difficulties and avoiding splenic injuries.

Splenic flexure mobilization in left-sided colonic and rectal resections: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of factors associated with anastomotic leak and complications

AIM

Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is commonly performed during left-sided colon and rectal resections. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the outcomes of SFM in left-sided colon and rectal resections and the risk factors for complications and anastomotic leak (AL).

METHOD

This study was a PRISMA-compliant systematic review. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies that assessed the outcomes of sigmoid and rectal resections with or without SFM. The primary outcomes were AL and total complications, and the secondary outcomes were individual complications, operating time, conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS) and pathological and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies including data on 81 116 patients (49.1% male) were reviewed. SFM was undertaken in 40.7% of patients. SFM was associated with a longer operating time (weighted mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 14.47-34.52, p < 0.0001) and higher odds of AL (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33, p = 0.002). Both groups had similar odds of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, (LOS), local recurrence, and overall survival. A secondary analysis of rectal cancer cases only showed similar outcomes for SFM and the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

SFM was associated with a longer operating time and higher odds of AL, yet a similar likelihood of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, LOS, local recurrence, and overall survival. These conclusions must be cautiously interpreted considering the numerous study limitations. SFM may have only been selectively undertaken in cases in which anastomotic tension was suspected. Therefore, the suboptimal anastomoses may have been the reason for SFM rather than the SFM being causative of the anastomotic insufficiencies.

A comprehensive evaluation of 80 consecutive robotic low anterior resections: impact of not mobilizing the splenic flexure alongside low-tie vascular ligation as a standardized technique

Rectal cancer surgery represents challenges due to its location. To overcome them and minimize the risk of anastomosis-related complications, some technical maneuvers or even a diverting ileostomy may be required. One of these technical steps is the mobilization of the splenic flexure (SFM), especially in medium/low rectal cancer. High-tie vascular ligation may be another one. However, the need of these maneuvers may be controversial, as especially SFM may be time-consuming and increase the risk of iatrogenic. The objective is to present the short- and long-term outcomes of a low-tie ligation combined with no SFM in robotic low anterior resection (LAR) for mid- and low rectal cancer as a standardized technique. A retrospective observational single-cohort study was carried out at Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain. 221 robotic rectal resections between Jul-18th-2018 and Jan-12th-2023 were initially considered. After case selection, 80 consecutive robotic LAR performed by a single surgeon were included. STROBE checklist assessed the methodological quality. Histopathological, morbidity and oncological outcomes were assessed. Anastomotic stricture occurrence and distance to anal verge were evaluated after LAR by rectosigmoidoscopy. Variables related to the ileostomy closure such as time to closure, post-operative complications or hospital stay were also considered. The majority of patients (81.2%) presented a mid-rectal cancer and the rest, lower location (18.8%). All patients had adequate perfusion of the anastomotic stump assessed by indocyanine green. Complete total mesorectal excision was performed in 98.8% of the patients with a lymph node ratio < 0.2 in 91.3%. The anastomotic leakage rate was 5%. One patient (1.5%) presented local recurrence. Anastomosis stricture occurred in 7.5% of the patients. The limitations were small cohort and retrospective design. The non-mobilization of the splenic flexure with a low-tie ligation in robotic LAR is a feasible and safe procedure that does not affect oncological outcomes.

Influence of splenic flexure mobilization on postoperative and oncological outcomes following anterior resection

BACKGROUND

Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) during anterior resection is often debated given its increased operative complexity and lack of clear data suggesting oncological benefit. This study aimed to compare postoperative complications and 3-year oncological outcomes in patients undergoing anterior resection with and without SFM.

METHODS

A retrospective single center observational study was performed. Notes review was performed for all patients undergoing anterior resection over a one-year period at a high-volume institution for sigmoid and rectal cancers. Anterior resections performed for benign disease or non-colorectal cancers were excluded.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen patients were included and 49 (41.9%) underwent SFM. 75 (64.1%) cases were completed laparoscopically and 48 (41%) resulted in stoma formation. SFM significantly increased the risk of minor Clavien Dindo Grade 1 postoperative complications (18.4% vs. 5.9%, P=0.03), however, it had no impact on more major postoperative complications, including anastomotic leaks (4.2% vs. 7.1%, P=0.52). There were no significant differences in median total lymph node yield (21.0% vs. 21.1, P=0.57) or R0 resection margin (93.9% vs. 94.1%, P=0.96). There was a non-significant trend towards lower overall recurrence rates in the SFM group (10.2% vs. 19.1%, P=0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing anterior resection for colorectal cancer, SFM provides no clear oncological benefit, but does increase the likelihood of minor postoperative complications. Whilst a trend towards lower overall recurrence rates was observed in the SFM group, this was not statistically significant. Therefore, SFM should be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis.

Predictors for selective flexure mobilization during robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) may be indicated during anterior resection to provide a tension-free anastomosis. However, to date, no score allows identifying patients who may benefit from SFM.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer were identified from a prospective register. Demographic and cancer-related variables were extracted, and predictors of SFM were identified using regression models. Thereafter, 20 patients with SFM and 20 patients without SFM were randomly selected and their pre-operative CTscan were reviewed. The radiological index was defined as 1/(sigmoid length/pelvis depth). The optimal cut-off value for predicting SFM was identified using ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

Five hundred and twenty-four patients were included. SFM was performed in 121 patients (27.8%) and increased operative time by 21.8 min (95% CI: 11.3 to 32.4, p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between patient with or without SFM. Realization of an anastomosis was the main predictor for SFM (OR: 42.4, 95% CI: 5.8 to 308.5, p < 0.001). In patients with colorectal anastomosis, both sigmoid length (15 ± 5.1 cm versus 24.2 ± 80.9 cm, p < 0.001) and radiological index (1 ± 0.3 versus 0.6 ± 0.2, p < 0.001) differed between patients who had SFM and patients who did not. ROC curve analysis of the radiological index indicated an optimal cut-off value of 0.8 (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 90%).

CONCLUSION

SFM was performed in 27.8% of patients who underwent robotic anterior resection, and increased operative time by 21.8 min. For optimal surgical planning, patients requiring SFM can be identified based on pre-operative CT using the index 1/(sigmoid length/pelvis depth) with a cut-off value set at 0.8.

Is routine splenic flexure mobilization always necessary in laparotomic or laparoscopic anterior rectal resection? A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis

Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is one of the most difficult steps in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and its role is harshly debated. Some surgeons considered it routinely necessary to obtain a safe anastomosis and to respect oncologic criteria; for others SFM is frequently unnecessary, not ensuring the aspects mentioned above and increasing the risk of morbidity (splenic, bowel and vessels injury, lengthened procedure). We performed a systematic review and a comprehensive meta-analysis, without any language restriction, about the peri-operative and post-operative outcomes (anastomotic leakage, intra-operative complication, conversion rate, operative time, post-operative bleeding, intra-abdominal collection, prolonged ileus, wound infection, anastomotic stricture, overall complications, hospital stay, re-operation, post-operative mortality, R0 margin resection, local recurrence) in patients undergoing elective anterior rectal resection (ARR) with or without SFM, both in laparotomic (LT) and laparoscopic (LS) approach. Fourteen studies were meta-analyzed with a total amount of 42,221 patients. The comprehensive meta-analysis shows that the mobilization or the preservation (SFP) of the splenic flexure does not statistically influence the incidence of colorectal anastomotic leakage, conversion rate, post-operative bleeding, intra-abdominal collection, prolonged ileus, wound infection, anastomotic stricture, overall complications, hospital stay, re-operation, R0 margin resection, and local recurrence results. The operative time is significantly longer in every group of patients undergoing SFM. The incidence of intra-operative complication is statistically increased in overall patients and also in the LS subgroup of patients undergoing SFM, in which also higher incidence of wound infection and re-operation is shown. The meta-analysis shows that SFM may be considered not necessary to ensure better peri-operative and post-operative outcomes in both LT and LS ARR.

[Splenic flexure mobilization in surgery for rectal cancer]

Nowadays, the issue of splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) in anterior and low anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer is still debatable. This stage is important because dissection results tension-free anastomosis and excision of specimen of enough length with adequate number of harvested lymph nodes. However, literature review confirmed the absence of agreement regarding reduced incidence of colorectal anastomotic leakage and improved long-term oncologic outcomes after SFM. Opinion about selective approach to this procedure is becoming more common. Therefore, randomized trials are necessary to determine a need for routine SFM or indications for selective approach to SFM in anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer.

Effect of splenic flexure mobilization performed via medial-to-lateral and superior-to-inferior approach on early clinical outcomes in elective laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer

Introduction

Whether complete splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is required remains a controversial issue and there are numerous approaches regarding the performance of this procedure.

Aim

To investigate the effect of SFM performed with a medial-to-lateral and superior-to-inferior approach on early clinical outcomes in laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer.

Material and methods

The SFM procedure was initiated by the ligation of the inferior mesenteric vein followed by dissection extending from the upper border of the pancreas to the splenic hilum through the gastrocolic space. The mesocolon was dissected in a superior-to-inferior and medial-to-lateral fashion and the presacral space was entered by dividing the inferior mesenteric artery. The procedure was completed by dividing all the splenocolic, phrenicocolic, gastrocolic, and pancreaticomesocolic ligaments.

Results

A total of 43 patients were included in the study, comprising 26 (60.5%) men and 17 (39.5%) women with a mean age of 58.2 ±13.9 (range: 30–87) years. Of the 43 patients, 21 (48.8%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a diversion stoma was performed in 37 (86%) patients. No adjacent organ injury occurred intraoperatively. Mean operative time was 271 ±50 min and mean blood loss was 144 ±83 ml. One (2.3%) patient might have developed anastomotic leakage secondary to bevacizumab therapy postoperatively and developed no anastomotic stenosis in the follow-up period. Mean length of hospital stay was 9.3 ±4.3 days and no mortality occurred in any patient.

Conclusions

Splenic flexure mobilization performed via the superior-to-inferior and medial-to-lateral approach appears to be a safe and feasible procedure.