1
|
Zanini LYK, Herbella FAM, Velanovich V, Patti MG. Modern insights into the pathophysiology and treatment of pseudoachalasia. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:65. [PMID: 38367052 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03259-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary achalasia or pseudoachalasia is a clinical presentation undistinguishable from achalasia in terms of symptoms, manometric, and radiographic findings, but associated with different and identifiable underlying causes. METHODS A literature review was conducted on the PubMed database restricting results to the English language. Key terms used were "achalasia-like" with 63 results, "secondary achalasia" with 69 results, and "pseudoachalasia" with 141 results. References of the retrieved papers were also manually reviewed. RESULTS Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS Pseudoachalasia is a rare disease. Most available evidence regarding this condition is based on case reports or small retrospective series. There are different causes but all culminating in outflow obstruction. Clinical presentation and image and functional tests overlap with primary achalasia or are inaccurate, thus the identification of secondary achalasia can be delayed. Inadequate diagnosis leads to futile therapies and could worsen prognosis, especially in neoplastic disease. Routine screening is not justifiable; good clinical judgment still remains the best tool. Therapy should be aimed at etiology. Even though Heller's myotomy brings the best results in non-malignant cases, good clinical judgment still remains the best tool as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Yuri Kasputis Zanini
- Department of Surgery, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Diogo de Faria 1087 Cj 301, São Paulo, 04037-003, Brazil
| | - Fernando A M Herbella
- Department of Surgery, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Diogo de Faria 1087 Cj 301, São Paulo, 04037-003, Brazil.
| | - Vic Velanovich
- Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | - Marco G Patti
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kunz S, Ashraf H, Klonis C, Thompson SK, Aly A, Liu DS. Surgical approaches for achalasia and obesity: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:403. [PMID: 37843694 PMCID: PMC10579133 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03143-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Synchronous and metachronous presentations of achalasia and obesity are increasingly common. There is limited data to guide the combined or staged surgical approaches to these conditions. METHODS A systematic review (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) and patient-level meta-analysis of published cases were performed to examine the most effective surgical approach for patients with synchronous or metachronous presentations of achalasia and obesity. RESULTS Thirty-three studies with 93 patients were reviewed. Eighteen patients underwent concurrent achalasia and bariatric surgery, with the most common (n = 12, 72.2%) being laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This combination achieved 68.9% excess weight loss and 100% remission of achalasia (mean follow-up: 3 years). Seven (6 RYGB, 1 biliopancreatic diversion) patients had bariatric surgery following achalasia surgery. Of these, all 6 RYGBs had satisfactory bariatric outcomes, with complete remission of their achalasia (mean follow-up: 1.8 years). Sixty-eight patients underwent myotomy following bariatric surgery; the majority (n = 55, 80.9%) were following RYGB. In this scenario, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) achieved higher treatment success than LHM (n = 33 of 35, 94.3% vs. n = 14 of 20, 70.0%, p = 0.021). Moreover, conversion to RYGB following a restrictive bariatric procedure during achalasia surgery was also associated with higher achalasia treatment success. CONCLUSION In patients with concurrent achalasia and obesity, LHM and RYGB achieved good outcomes for both pathologies. For those with weight gain post-achalasia surgery, RYGB provided satisfactory weight loss, without adversely affecting achalasia symptoms. For those with achalasia after bariatric surgery, POEM and conversion to RYGB produced greater treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Kunz
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
- General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research and Trials Group, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
| | - Hamza Ashraf
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Christopher Klonis
- Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
| | - Sarah K Thompson
- Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - Ahmad Aly
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
| | - David S Liu
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
- Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia.
- General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research and Trials Group, Department of Surgery, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia.
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herbella FAM, Patti MG. The Impact of Bariatric Procedures on Esophageal Motility. FOREGUT: THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN FOREGUT SOCIETY 2021; 1:268-276. [DOI: 10.1177/26345161211043462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
Bariatric operations may cause or cure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The comprehension of esophageal motility following different types of bariatric procedures may help understand the relationship between GERD and bariatric surgery. This review focused on the impact of bariatric procedures on esophageal motility. We found that lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure is increased after adjustable gastric banding; is unaltered or decreased after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; and is decreased after sleeve gastrectomy. Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation may be abnormal after all these procedures. Esophageal body contractility is worsened after sleeve gastrectomy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chadalavada P, Thota PN, Raja S, Sanaka MR. Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy as a Novel Treatment for Achalasia: Patient Selection and Perspectives. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2020; 13:485-495. [PMID: 33173323 PMCID: PMC7648548 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s230436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and impaired relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter. There is no cure for achalasia and all the current treatments are aimed at palliation of symptoms by reducing the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Currently, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication is considered the most effective and durable treatment option owing to its superiority over other treatments such as pneumatic dilation. Advancements in interventional endoscopy led to a novel minimally invasive endoscopic alternative to LHM, namely peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). In the last decade since its inception, POEM expanded rapidly throughout the world due to excellent safety profile and its efficacy comparable to LHM. The main drawback of POEM is gastroesophageal reflux disease since it is not combined with an anti-reflux procedure. The current review focuses on the indications, contraindications, technique, outcomes of POEM in various patient populations, and complications along with its effectiveness in comparison to LHM and pneumatic dilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Prashanthi N Thota
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Siva Raja
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Madhusudhan R Sanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|