1
|
Kanji FF, Marselian A, Burch M, Jain M, Cohen TN. Challenges With Robot-Assisted Surgery Setup for Complex Minimally Invasive Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery. Am Surg 2024:31348241248696. [PMID: 38642023 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilization of robot-assisted approaches to surgery has increased significantly over the last two decades. This has introduced novel complexities into the operating room environment, requiring management of new challenges and workflow adaptation. This study aimed to analyze challenges in the surgical setup for complex upper gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery (UGI-RAS) and identify opportunities for solutions. METHODS Direct observations of surgical setup processes for UGI-RAS were performed by a trained Human Factors researcher at a non-profit academic medical center in Southern California. Setup tasks were subdivided into five phases: (1) before wheels-in; (2) patient transfer and anesthesia induction; (3) patient preparation; (4) surgery preparation; and (5) robot docking. Start/end times for each phase/task were documented along with workflow disruption (FD) narratives and timestamps. Setup tasks and FDs were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Twenty UGI-RAS setup procedures were observed between May-November 2023: sleeve gastrectomy +/- hiatal hernia repair (n = 9, 45.00%); para-esophageal hernia repair +/- fundoplication (n = 8, 40.00%); revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 2, 10.00%); and gastric band removal (n = 1, 5.00%). Frequent FDs included planning breakdowns (n = 20, 29.85%), equipment/supply management (n = 17, 25.37%), patient care coordination (n = 8, 11.94%), and equipment challenges (n = 8, 11.94%). Eleven of 20 observations were first-start cases, of which 10 experienced delayed starts. DISCUSSION Interventions aimed at improving workflows during UGI-RAS setup include performing pre-operative team huddles and conducting trainings aimed at team coordination and equipment challenges. These solutions could result in improved teamwork, efficiency, and communication while reducing case start delays and turnover time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falisha F Kanji
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aleeque Marselian
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Miguel Burch
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monica Jain
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tara N Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marcellinaro R, Spoletini D, Grieco M, Avella P, Cappuccio M, Troiano R, Lisi G, Garbarino GM, Carlini M. Colorectal Cancer: Current Updates and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med 2023; 13:40. [PMID: 38202047 PMCID: PMC10780254 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a frequent neoplasm in western countries, mainly due to dietary and behavioral factors. Its incidence is growing in developing countries for the westernization of foods and lifestyles. An increased incidence rate is observed in patients under 45 years of age. In recent years, the mortality for CRC is decreased, but this trend is slowing. The mortality rate is reducing in those countries where prevention and treatments have been implemented. The survival is increased to over 65%. This trend reflects earlier detection of CRC through routine clinical examinations and screening, more accurate staging through advances in imaging, improvements in surgical techniques, and advances in chemotherapy and radiation. The most important predictor of survival is the stage at diagnosis. The screening programs are able to reduce incidence and mortality rates of CRC. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of incidence, mortality, and survival rate for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Marcellinaro
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Domenico Spoletini
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Michele Grieco
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (P.A.); (M.C.)
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, 81030 Caserta, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (P.A.); (M.C.)
| | - Raffaele Troiano
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Giorgio Lisi
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Giovanni M. Garbarino
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| | - Massimo Carlini
- Department of General Surgery, S. Eugenio Hospital, 00144 Rome, Italy; (D.S.); (M.G.); (R.T.); (G.L.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He LB, Liu MY, He Y, Guo AL. Nutritional status efficacy of early nutritional support in gastrointestinal care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:953-964. [PMID: 37342843 PMCID: PMC10277940 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal surgery is a complicated process used to treat many gastrointestinal diseases, and it is associated with a large trauma: Most patients often have different degrees of malnutrition and immune dysfunction before surgery and are prone to various infectious complications during postoperative recovery, thus affecting the efficacy of surgical treatment. Therefore, early postoperative nutritional support can provide essential nutritional supply, restore the intestinal barrier and reduce complication occurrence. However, different studies have shown different conclusions.
AIM To assess whether early postoperative nutritional support can improve the nutritional status of patients based on literature search and meta-analysis.
METHODS Articles comparing the effect of early nutritional support and delayed nutritional support were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Springer Link, Ovid, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine databases. Notably, only randomized controlled trial articles were retrieved from the databases (from establishment date to October 2022). The risk of bias of the included articles was determined using Cochrane Risk of Bias V2.0. The outcome indicators, such as albumin, prealbumin, and total protein, after statistical intervention were combined.
RESULTS Fourteen literatures with 2145 adult patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery (1138 patients (53.1%) receiving early postoperative nutritional support and 1007 patients (46.9%) receiving traditional nutritional support or delayed nutritional support) were included in this study. Seven of the 14 studies assessed early enteral nutrition while the other seven studies assessed early oral feeding. Furthermore, six literatures had "some risk of bias," and eight literatures had "low risk". The overall quality of the included studies was good. Meta-analysis showed that patients receiving early nutritional support had slightly higher serum albumin levels, than patients receiving delayed nutritional support [MD (mean difference) = 3.51, 95%CI: -0.05 to 7.07, Z = 1.93, P = 0.05]. Also, patients receiving early nutritional support had shorter hospital stay (MD = -2.29, 95%CI: -2.89 to -1.69), Z = -7.46, P < 0.0001) shorter first defecation time (MD = -1.00, 95%CI: -1.37 to -0.64), Z = -5.42, P < 0.0001), and fewer complications (Odd ratio = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.50 to 0.76, Z = -4.52, P < 0.0001) than patients receiving delayed nutritional support.
CONCLUSION Early enteral nutritional support can slightly shorten the defecation time and overall hospital stay, reduce complication incidence, and accelerate the rehabilitation process of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Bin He
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgery, Xiang'an Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen 361100, Fujian Province, China
| | - Ming-Yuan Liu
- Department of Endocrine, Xiang'an Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361100, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yue He
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ai-Lin Guo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361100, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Rezende BB, Assumpção LR, Haddad R, Terra RM, Marques RG. Characteristics of the learning curve in robotic thoracic surgery in an emerging country. J Robot Surg 2023:10.1007/s11701-023-01590-2. [PMID: 37083992 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01590-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
It is not established which factors impact the learning curve (LC) in robotic thoracic surgery (RTS), especially in emerging countries. The aim of this study is to analyze LC in RTS in Brazil and identify factors that can accelerate LC. We selected the first cases of two Brazilian surgeons who started their LC. We used CUSUM and the Lowess technique to measure LC for each surgeon and Poisson regression to assess factors associated with shorter console time (CT). 58 patients were operated by each surgeon and included in the analysis. Surgeries performed were different: Surgeon I (SI) performed 54 lobectomies (93.11%), whereas Surgeon II (SII) had a varied mix of cases. SI was proctored in his first 10 cases (17.24%), while SII in his first 41 cases (70.68%). The mean interval between surgeries was 8 days for SI and 16 days for SII. There were differences in the LC phases of the two surgeons, mainly regarding complications and conversions. There was shorter CT by 30% in the presence of a proctor, and by 20% with the Da Vinci Xi. Mix of cases did not seem to contribute to faster LC. Higher frequency between surgeries seems to be associated with a faster curve. Presence of proctor and use of bolder technologies reduced console time. We wonder if in phase 3 it is necessary to keep a proctor on complex cases to avoid serious complications. More studies are necessary to understand which factors impact the LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna Brandão de Rezende
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Pós Graduação em Fisiopatologia e Ciências Cirúrgicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Lia Roque Assumpção
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Pós Graduação em Fisiopatologia e Ciências Cirúrgicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Rui Haddad
- Departamento de Cirurgia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica - PUC-RIO, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Mingarini Terra
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ruy Garcia Marques
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Pós Graduação em Fisiopatologia e Ciências Cirúrgicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alterio RE, Nagaraj MB, Scott DJ, Tellez J, Radi I, Baker HB, Zeh HJ, Polanco PM. Developing a Robotic Surgery Curriculum: Selection of Virtual Reality Drills for Content Alignment. J Surg Res 2023; 283:726-732. [PMID: 36463811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the importance of simulation-based training for robotic surgery, there is no consensus about its training curricula. Recently, a virtual reality (VR) platform (SimNow, Intuitive, Inc) was introduced with 33 VR drills but without evidence of their validity. As part of our creating a new robotic VR curriculum, we assessed the drills' validity through content mapping and the alignment between learning goals and drill content. METHODS Three robotically trained surgeons content-mapped all 33 drills for how well the drills incorporated 15 surgery skills and also rated the drills' difficulty, usefulness, relevance, and uniqueness. Drills were added to the new curriculum based on consensus about ratings and historic learner data. The drills were grouped according to similar skill sets and arranged in order of complexity. RESULTS The 33 drills were judged to have 12/15 surgery skills as primary goals and 13/15 as secondary goals. Twenty of the 33 drills were selected for inclusion in the new curriculum; these had 11/15 skills as primary goals and 11/15 as secondary goals. However, skills regarding energy sources, atraumatic handling, blunt dissection, fine dissection, and running suturing were poorly represented in the drills. Three previously validated inanimate drills were added to the curriculum to address lacking skill domains. CONCLUSIONS We identified 20 of the 33 SimNow drills as a foundation for a robotic surgery curriculum based on content-oriented evidence. We added 3 other drills to address identified gaps in drill content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo E Alterio
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Madhuri B Nagaraj
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Daniel J Scott
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas; Simulation Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Juan Tellez
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Imad Radi
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Hayley B Baker
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Karadza E, Haney CM, Limen EF, Müller PC, Kowalewski KF, Sandini M, Wennberg E, Schmidt MW, Felinska EA, Lang F, Salg G, Kenngott HG, Rangelova E, Mieog S, Vissers F, Korrel M, Zwart M, Sauvanet A, Loos M, Mehrabi A, de Santibanes M, Shrikhande SV, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG, Müller-Stich BP, Hackert T, Nickel F. Development of biotissue training models for anastomotic suturing in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00041-2. [PMID: 36828741 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic suturing is the Achilles heel of pancreatic surgery. Especially in laparoscopic and robotically assisted surgery, the pancreatic anastomosis should first be trained outside the operating room. Realistic training models are therefore needed. METHODS Models of the pancreas, small bowel, stomach, bile duct, and a realistic training torso were developed for training of anastomoses in pancreatic surgery. Pancreas models with soft and hard textures, small and large ducts were incrementally developed and evaluated. Experienced pancreatic surgeons (n = 44) evaluated haptic realism, rigidity, fragility of tissues, and realism of suturing and knot tying. RESULTS In the iterative development process the pancreas models showed high haptic realism and highest realism in suturing (4.6 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 0.5 on 1-5 Likert scale, soft pancreas). The small bowel model showed highest haptic realism (4.8 ± 0.4) and optimal wall thickness (0.1 ± 0.4 on -2 to +2 Likert scale) and suturing behavior (0.1 ± 0.4). The bile duct models showed optimal wall thickness (0.3 ± 0.8 and 0.4 ± 0.8 on -2 to +2 Likert scale) and optimal tissue fragility (0 ± 0.9 and 0.3 ± 0.7). CONCLUSION The biotissue training models showed high haptic realism and realistic suturing behavior. They are suitable for realistic training of anastomoses in pancreatic surgery which may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emir Karadza
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caelan M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eldridge F Limen
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urooncological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marta Sandini
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Erica Wennberg
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mona W Schmidt
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Eleni A Felinska
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Franziska Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Salg
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hannes G Kenngott
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena Rangelova
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery at Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sven Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frederique Vissers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maurice Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of HPB Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy-Paris, France
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin de Santibanes
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vanella S, Bottazzi EC, Farese G, Murano R, Noviello A, Palma T, Godas M, Crafa F. Minimally invasive colorectal surgery learning curve. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:731-736. [PMID: 36438877 PMCID: PMC9693684 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The learning curve in minimally invasive colorectal surgery is a constant subject of discussion in the literature. Discordant data likely reflects the varying degrees of each surgeon’s experience in colorectal, laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Several factors are necessary for a successful minimally invasive colorectal surgery training program, including: Compliance with oncological outcomes; dissection along the embryological planes; constant presence of an expert tutor; periodic discussion of the morbidity and mortality rate; and creation of a dedicated, expert team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serafino Vanella
- Department of General and Oncology Surgery, A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Enrico Coppola Bottazzi
- Department of General and Oncology Surgery, A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Farese
- Department of General and Oncology Surgery, A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Rosa Murano
- Department of General and Oncology Surgery, A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Adele Noviello
- Department of General and Oncology Surgery, A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Tommaso Palma
- Department of General and Oncology Surgery, A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Maria Godas
- Department of General and Oncology Surgery, A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino 83100, Italy
| | - Francesco Crafa
- Department of General and Oncology Surgery, A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati, Avellino 83100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu JB, Tam V, Zenati MS, Schwartz D, Ali A, Low CA, Smith LJ, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Hogg ME. Association of robotic approach with patient-reported outcomes after pancreatectomy: a prospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1659-1667. [PMID: 35568654 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted pancreatectomy continues to proliferate despite limited evidence supporting its benefits from the patient's perspective. We compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients undergoing robotic and open pancreatectomies. METHODS PROs, measured with the FACT-Hep, FACT-G, and HCS, were assessed in the immediate postoperative (i.e., preoperative to discharge) and recovery (i.e., discharge to three months postoperative) periods. Linear mixed models estimated the association of operative approach on PROs. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were also considered. RESULTS Among 139 patients, 105 (75.5%) underwent robotic pancreatectomies. Compared to those who underwent open operations, those who underwent robotic operations experienced worse FACT-Hep scores that were both statistically and clinically significant (mean difference [MD] 8.6 points, 95% CI 1.0-16.3). Declines in FACT-G (MD 4.3, 95% CI -1.0 to 9.6) and HCS (MD 4.3, 95% CI 0.8-7.9) scores appeared to contribute equally in both operative approaches to the decline in total FACT-Hep score. Patients who underwent robotic versus open operations both statistically and clinically significantly improved due to improvements in HCS (MD 6.1, 95% CI 2.3-9.9) but not in FACT-G (MD 1.2, 95% CI - 5.1-7.4). CONCLUSION The robotic approach to pancreas surgery might offer, from the patient's perspective, greater improvement in symptoms over the open approach by three months postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason B Liu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Vernissia Tam
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Danielle Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Areej Ali
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carissa A Low
- Departments of Medicine and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lillian J Smith
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang P, Li S, Li P, Jia B. The Learning Curve of Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 76 Cases at a Single Center. Front Surg 2022; 9:897103. [PMID: 35846959 PMCID: PMC9276975 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.897103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) has many benefits in treating colon cancer, but it is a new technology that needs to be evaluated. This study aims to assess the learning curve (LC) of RARH procedures with the complete mesoscopic exception and D3 lymph node dissection for colon carcinoma. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of 76 patients who underwent RARH from July 2014 to March 2018. The operation time was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to analyze the LC. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the LC: Phase I and Phase II. Statistical methods were used to compare clinicopathological data on intraoperative and perioperative outcomes at different stages of the study. Results The peak point of the LC was observed in the 27th case. Using the CUSUM method, we divide the LC into two stages. Stage 1 (initial learning stage): Cases 1–27 and Stage 2 (proficiency phase): Cases 28–76. There were no obvious distinctions between the two patients’ essential characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, clinical stage, and ASA score). The mean operation time of each group is 187.37 ± 45.56 min and 161.1 ± 37.74 min (P = 0.009), respectively. The intraoperative blood loss of each group is 170.4 ± 217.2 ml and 95.7 ± 72.8 ml (P = 0.031), respectively. Conclusion Based on the LC with CUSUM analysis, the data suggest that the learning phase of RARH was achieved after 27 cases. The operation time and the intraoperative blood loss decrease with more cases performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pu Huang
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Sen Li
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Baoqing Jia
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Correspondence: Baoqing Jia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zizzo M, Zanelli M, Sanguedolce F, Torricelli F, Morini A, Tumiati D, Mereu F, Zuliani AL, Palicelli A, Ascani S, Giunta A. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58060834. [PMID: 35744096 PMCID: PMC9231199 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58060834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical treatment with curative intent for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Over the last three decades, surgeons have been increasingly adopting laparoscopic surgery for GC, due to its better short-term outcomes. In particular, laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has been routinely used for early gastric cancer (EGC) treatment. However, LG suffers from technical limitations and drawbacks, such as a two-dimensional surgical field of view, limited movement of laparoscopic tools, unavoidable physiological tremors and discomfort for operating surgeon. Therefore, robotic surgery has been developed to address such limitations. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines in order to investigate the benefits and harms of robotic gastrectomy (RG) compared to the LG. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Re-views, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL) and Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index) databases were used to search all related literature. Results: The 7 included meta-analyses covered an approximately 20 years-study period (2000-2020). Almost all studies included in the meta-analyses were retrospective ones and originated from Asian countries (China and Korea, in particular). Examined overall population ranged from 3176 to 17,712 patients. If compared to LG, RG showed both operative advantages (operative time, estimated blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes) and perioperative ones (time to first flatus, time to restart oral intake, length of hospitalization, overall complications, Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ III complications, pancreatic complications), in the absence of clear differences of oncological outcomes. However, costs of robotic approach appear significant. Conclusions: It is impossible to make strong recommendations, due to the statistical weakness of the included studies. Further randomized, possibly multicenter trials are strongly recommended, if we want to have our results confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Zizzo
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0522-296372; Fax: +39-0522-295779
| | - Magda Zanelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Francesca Sanguedolce
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Federica Torricelli
- Laboratory of Translational Research, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | - Andrea Morini
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| | - David Tumiati
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| | - Federica Mereu
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| | - Antonia Lavinia Zuliani
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| | - Andrea Palicelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.Z.); (A.P.)
| | - Stefano Ascani
- Hematology Unit, CREO, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, University of Perugia, 06129 Perugia, Italy;
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria di Terni, University of Perugia, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giunta
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (A.M.); (D.T.); (F.M.); (A.L.Z.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fantola G, Moroni E, Runfola M, Lai E, Pintus S, Gallucci P, Pennestrì F, Raffaelli M. Controversial Role of Robot in Primary and Revisional Bariatric Surgery Procedures: Review of the Literature and Personal Experience. Front Surg 2022; 9:916652. [PMID: 35711697 PMCID: PMC9194091 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopy is the surgical standard of care for bariatric procedures; however, during the last two decades, the robotic approach has gained increasing interest. It is currently considered a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopy. This literature review investigates the role of the robotic approach for primary and revisional bariatric procedures, with the particular aim of comparing this technique with the standard-of-care laparoscopic approach. The feasibility of robotic dissection and suturing could have potential advantages: robotics may prevent the risk of leak and bleeding and other surgical complications, determining potential benefits in terms of operative time, length of hospital stay, and learning curve. Considering primary procedures, the literature reveals no advantages in robotic versus the laparoscopic approach for adjustable gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy. Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is associated with a longer operative time and a shorter hospital length of stay than laparoscopy. The robotic approach in revisional surgery has been proven to be safe and effective. Despite the longer operative time, the robotic platform could achieve a lower bleeding rate compared with laparoscopy. The surgeon’s selection criteria related to referrals to the robotic approach of difficult-perceived cases could represent a bias. In conclusion, robotic surgery can be considered a safe and effective approach in both primary and revisional bariatric surgery, despite the lack of evidence to support its routine use in primary bariatric surgery. However, in revisional bariatric surgery and in surgical complex procedures, the robotic approach could have potential benefits in terms of surgical complications and learning curves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Fantola
- Obesity Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
- Correspondence: Giovanni Fantola
| | - Enrico Moroni
- Obesity Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Matteo Runfola
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Emanuele Lai
- Obesity Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Stefano Pintus
- Obesity Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Gallucci
- Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pennestrì
- Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Raffaelli
- Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Robinson J, Tschuor C, McKillop IH, Baker EH, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Martinie JB. Robotic Revision of Hepaticojejunostomy for Benign Biliary Stricture. Am Surg 2022:31348221096834. [PMID: 35575212 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221096834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Surgical revision of biliary enteric anastomoses (BEA) can be a challenging undertaking and a robotic platform may provide advantages that address many of the technical obstacles. We present our technical approach and outcomes for patients undergoing robotic revision of BEA for benign strictures. A retrospective review was performed for robot-assisted benign BEA revision at our institution. Operative details, perioperative metrics, and outcomes are reported. Four patients underwent anastomotic revision following previously failed non-operative management. There were no intraoperative complications, mean length of stay was 4-days, and all patients experienced resolution of presenting clinical signs and symptoms. No patients required reoperation and there was no mortality. Postoperative outcomes were consistent with findings reported for other interventional modalities. Based on our experience we conclude robotic intervention in this context is safe and improves the technical feasibility of this complex procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Robinson
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Christoph Tschuor
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.,Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, 53146Copenhagen University Hospital, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Iain H McKillop
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Erin H Baker
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - David A Iannitti
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - John B Martinie
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, 22442Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|