1
|
Celotto F, Ramacciotti N, Mangano A, Danieli G, Pinto F, Lopez P, Ducas A, Cassiani J, Morelli L, Spolverato G, Bianco FM. Da Vinci single-port robotic system current application and future perspective in general surgery: A scoping review. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4814-4830. [PMID: 39110221 PMCID: PMC11362253 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11126-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The da Vinci Single-Port Robot System (DVSP) allows three robotic instruments and an articulated scope to be inserted through a single small incision. It received FDA approval in 2014 and was first introduced in 2018. The aim of this new system was to overcome the limitations of single-incision laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Since then, it has been approved for use only for urologic and transoral surgeries in some countries. It has been used as part of experimental protocols in general surgery. OBJECTIVE By obtaining the CE mark at the end of January 2024, DVSP will soon enter the European market. This review aims to comprehensively describe the applications of DVSP in general surgery. DESIGN A search of PubMed, Embase, and Ebsco databases up to March 2024 was conducted, with registration in PROSPERO (CRD42024536430), following the preferred reporting items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses for scoping review (PRISMA-Scr) guidelines. All the studies about the use of DVSP in general surgery were included. RESULTS Fifty-six studies were included. The following surgical areas of use were identified: transabdominal and transanal colorectal, cholecystectomy, abdominal wall repair, upper gastroesophageal tract, liver, pancreas, breast, and thyroid surgery. The reported surgical and short-term outcomes are promising; a wide range of procedures have been performed safely. Some groups have found advantages, such as faster discharge, shorter operative time, and less postoperative pain compared to multiport robotic surgery. CONCLUSION Five years after its initial clinical applications, the use of the DVSP in general surgery procedures has demonstrated feasibility and safety. Hernia repair, cholecystectomy, and colorectal surgery emerge as the most frequently conducted interventions with this robotic system. Nevertheless, there is anticipation for further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods to provide more comprehensive insights and data on the long-term outcomes, including the incidence of incisional hernia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Celotto
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
| | - Niccolò Ramacciotti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Mangano
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Giacomo Danieli
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health (UBEP), Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Pinto
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Paula Lopez
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alvaro Ducas
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jessica Cassiani
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Luca Morelli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Maria Bianco
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park J, Kim K. Current and Future of Robotic Surgery in Thyroid Cancer Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2470. [PMID: 39001532 PMCID: PMC11240454 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Thyroid cancer is among the most common endocrine malignancies, necessitating effective surgical interventions. Traditional open cervicotomy has long been the standard approach for thyroidectomy. However, the advent of robotic surgery has introduced new possibilities for minimally invasive procedures with benefits in terms of cosmetic outcomes, enhanced precision, comparable complication rates, and reduced recovery time. This study mainly reviewed the most widely used and well-known robotic thyroidectomy approaches: the transaxillary approach, the bilateral axillo-breast approach, and the transoral approach. This review examines the current status and future potential of robotic surgery in thyroid cancer treatment, comparing its efficacy, safety, and outcomes with those of conventional open cervicotomy. Challenges such as a longer operative time and higher costs exist. Future directions include technological advancements, tele-surgery, single-port surgery, and the integration of artificial intelligence. Robotic surgery holds promise in optimizing patient outcomes in thyroid cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonseon Park
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwangsoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
An S, Park J, Kim K, Bae JS, Kim JS. Safety and surgical outcomes of single-port trans-axillary robot-assisted thyroidectomy: Experience from a consecutive series of 300 patients. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:13. [PMID: 38214763 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01810-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Since the introduction of the single-port (SP) robotic system, SP trans-axillary robot-assisted thyroidectomy (SP-TART) has been performed. We aimed to evaluate the safety and surgical outcomes of SP-TART in a consecutive series of 300 cases. We analyzed 300 patients with thyroid disease who underwent SP-TART from October 2021 to May 2023 in St. Mary's Hospital in Seoul, Korea. We analyzed the patients' clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes according to surgical extent. Of the 300 cases analyzed, 250 patients underwent less than total thyroidectomy (LTT), 31 patients underwent total thyroidectomy (TT), and 19 patients underwent TT with modified radical neck dissection (TT c mRND). The mean operative times for LTT, TT, and for TT c mRND were 69.8 ± 23.6, 104.2 ± 30.7, and 223.7 ± 72.4 min, respectively. Complications, including postoperative bleeding, transient hypoparathyroidism, and vocal cord palsy, were observed in nine, six, and six LTT, TT, and TT c mRND cases. The SP-TART method is a safe and feasible surgical option with a short operative time, good surgical outcome, and excellent cosmetic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solji An
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, 06591, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joonseon Park
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, 06591, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwangsoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, 06591, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ja Seong Bae
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, 06591, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, 06591, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Materazzi G, Papini P, Fregoli L, Morganti R, De Palma A, Ambrosini CE, Rossi L. The learning curve on robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy performed by a single endocrine surgeon in a third-level institution in Europe: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1653-1660. [PMID: 37531041 PMCID: PMC10435399 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01619-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy is widely performed in Asian countries, although it is still under discussion in the Western World. However, there have been few studies reporting on the learning curve of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy. We used the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis to assess the learning curve of gasless robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy at a third-level institution in Europe. We included all consecutive patients operated by a single surgeon without previous experience of robotic surgery from February 2012 to January 2023. The primary endpoint of the study was the learning curve extracted from the median operative time using the CUSUM method for the quantitative assessment. Overall, 583 patients were enrolled. The median operative time for thyroid lobectomy and total thyroidectomy was 70 and 90 min, respectively. The CUSUM analysis showed that the learning curve for thyroid lobectomy and total thyroidectomy is 66 and 56 cases, respectively. Moreover, the presence of thyroiditis resulted associated with shorter operative time for total thyroidectomy (p = 0.044), whereas no factors resulted associated with surgical complications. The learning curve for performing robotic transaxillary thyroid lobectomy for a surgeon without previous robotic experience is 66 cases. After that, 56 cases must be performed to acquire proficiency in robotic transaxillary total thyroidectomy. Training programs may reduce the slope of the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Materazzi
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Piermarco Papini
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fregoli
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Andrea De Palma
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlo Enrico Ambrosini
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Leonardo Rossi
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Area, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marchegiani F, Siragusa L, Zadoroznyj A, Laterza V, Mangana O, Schena CA, Ammendola M, Memeo R, Bianchi PP, Spinoglio G, Gavriilidis P, de’Angelis N. New Robotic Platforms in General Surgery: What's the Current Clinical Scenario? MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1264. [PMID: 37512075 PMCID: PMC10386395 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Robotic surgery has been widely adopted in general surgery worldwide but access to this technology is still limited to a few hospitals. With the recent introduction of new robotic platforms, several studies reported the feasibility of different surgical procedures. The aim of this systematic review is to highlight the current clinical practice with the new robotic platforms in general surgery. Materials and Methods: A grey literature search was performed on the Internet to identify the available robotic systems. A PRISMA compliant systematic review was conducted for all English articles up to 10 February 2023 searching the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Clinical outcomes, training process, operating surgeon background, cost-analysis, and specific registries were evaluated. Results: A total of 103 studies were included for qualitative synthesis after the full-text screening. Of the fifteen robotic platforms identified, only seven were adopted in a clinical environment. Out of 4053 patients, 2819 were operated on with a new robotic device. Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery specialty performed the majority of procedures, and the most performed procedure was cholecystectomy. Globally, 109 emergency surgeries were reported. Concerning the training process, only 45 papers reported the background of the operating surgeon, and only 28 papers described the training process on the surgical platform. Only one cost-analysis compared a new robot to the existing reference. Two manufacturers promoted a specific registry to collect clinical outcomes. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the feasibility of most surgical procedures in general surgery using the new robotic platforms. Adoption of these new devices in general surgery is constantly growing with the extension of regulatory approvals. Standardization of the training process and the assessment of skills' transferability is still lacking. Further studies are required to better understand the real clinical and economical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Marchegiani
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France; (F.M.)
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Alizée Zadoroznyj
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France; (F.M.)
| | - Vito Laterza
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France; (F.M.)
| | - Orsalia Mangana
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France; (F.M.)
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France; (F.M.)
| | - Michele Ammendola
- Science of Health Department, Digestive Surgery Unit, University “Magna Graecia” Medical School, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, General Regional Hospital “F. Miulli”, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spinoglio
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Paschalis Gavriilidis
- Department of Surgery, Saint Helena General Hospital, Jamestown, Saint Helena STHL 1ZZ, South Atlantic Ocean, UK
| | - Nicola de’Angelis
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, 92110 Paris, France; (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|