Neonatal Fc Receptor-Targeted Therapies in Neurology

Strategic Inhibition of CHRM Autoantibodies: Molecular Insights and Therapeutic Potentials in Long COVID

In addition to the conventional symptoms reported for COVID-19, it is becoming increasingly clear that patients with long COVID are exhibiting new symptoms due to the emergence of autoantibodies against G-protein-coupled receptors, among which human muscarinic cholinergic receptors (CHRMs) have been prominently reported. With a chronic condition such as long COVID, additional symptoms caused by anti-CHRM autoantibodies (AAbs) have proven to be an added burden on these patients. The origins of these AAbs, their interactions with, and effects on the function of neural and non-neural cells within the nervous system have remained unknown. Furthermore, the specific symptom complex to which they contribute has not been clearly understood. In this context, we address these issues here and suggest methods to combat the autoantibodies that contribute to neurological symptoms in long COVID.

Safety and efficacy of nipocalimab in adults with generalised myasthenia gravis (Vivacity-MG3): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Given burdensome side-effects and long latency for efficacy with conventional agents, there is a continued need for generalised myasthenia gravis treatments that are safe and provide consistently sustained, long-term disease control. Nipocalimab, a neonatal Fc receptor blocker, was associated with dose-dependent reductions in total IgG and anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies and clinically meaningful improvements in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scale in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis in a phase 2 study. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of nipocalimab in a phase 3 study.

METHODS

Vivacity-MG3 was a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study conducted at 81 outpatient centres with expertise in myasthenia gravis in 17 countries in Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with generalised myasthenia gravis inadequately controlled with standard-of-care therapy (MG-ADL score ≥6) were randomly assigned (1:1) to either nipocalimab (30 mg/kg loading dose then 15 mg/kg every 2 weeks for maintenance dosing) or placebo infusions every 2 weeks, added to standard-of-care therapy in both groups, for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by antibody status, day 1 MG-ADL total score, and region. The sponsor, investigators, clinical raters, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the difference between nipocalimab and placebo based on least-squares mean change from baseline in MG-ADL total score averaged over weeks 22, 23, and 24 in the intention-to-treat population of patients who were antibody-positive (for AChR, anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase [MuSK], or anti-low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 [LRP4]). Adverse events were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04951622; the double-blind phase is completed and an open-label extension phase is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between July 15, 2021, and Nov 17, 2023, 199 patients were enrolled, and 196 patients received study drug (98 in the nipocalimab group and 98 in the placebo group); of these, 153 (77 in the nipocalimab group and 76 in the placebo group) were antibody-positive. The least-squares mean change in MG-ADL score from baseline to weeks 22, 23, and 24 was -4·70 (SE 0·329) in the nipocalimab group versus -3·25 (0·335) in the placebo group (difference -1·45 [95% CI -2·38 to -0·52]; p=0·0024). The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups (82 [84%] of 98 in both the nipocalimab and placebo groups), including infections (42 [43%] of 98 in the nipocalimab group and placebo group) and headache (14 [14%] of 98 in the nipocalimab group and 17 [17%] of 98 in the placebo group). Serious adverse events were reported for nine (9%) of 98 patients in the nipocalimab group and 14 (14%) of 98 patients in the placebo group, three of which had a fatal outcome (nipocalimab: myasthenic crisis; placebo: cardiac arrest and myocardial infarction).

INTERPRETATION

Results from the completed double-blind phase of Vivacity-MG3 support the role of nipocalimab, added to standard-of-care therapies, as a safe treatment for sustained disease control over 6 months for a broad population of patients with generalised myasthenia gravis who are antibody-positive. The ongoing open-label extension phase should provide longer term sustained safety and efficacy data with nipocalimab.

FUNDING

Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company.

Targeting Brain Drug Delivery with Macromolecules Through Receptor-Mediated Transcytosis

Brain diseases pose significant treatment challenges due to the restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Recent advances in targeting macromolecules offer promising avenues for overcoming these obstacles through receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT). We summarize the current progress in targeting brain drug delivery with macromolecules for brain diseases. This exploration details the transport mechanisms across the BBB, focusing on RMT and its use of natural ligands for drug delivery. Furthermore, the review examines macromolecular ligands such as antibodies, peptides, and aptamers that leverage RMT for effective BBB traversal. Advancements in macromolecules-based delivery systems for brain diseases are summarized, emphasizing their therapeutic potential and limitations. Finally, emerging RMT strategies, including viral vectors, exosomes, and boron neutron capture therapy, are discussed for their precision in brain-targeted treatments. This comprehensive overview underscores the potential of RMT-based approaches to revolutionize brain disease therapy.

Safety Concerns in Neurological Clinical Trials: A Challenge That the FDA Must Resolve

Background: Monoclonal antibodies approved by the FDA, lecanemab, donanemab, and aducanumab, are failing to meet the expected efficacy to treat early Alzheimer's disease, and aducanumab has been recalled. Methods: Recently, it was reported that the clinical trials of these antibodies may have violated patient's rights and subjected them to high, likely lethal risk. The challenge with developing antibodies to treat neurological disorders is their poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration if the antibody must enter the brain, resulting in almost negligible brain bioavailability, requiring high dosing that can be toxic. Results: The reported efficacy of these drugs should also be reviewed, considering the placebo effects, since all antibodies have shown severe side effects that are not prevented by the placebo responses. In this critical and urgent advice to the FDA, I am suggesting a guideline amendment to all clinical trials requiring proof of sufficient brain bioavailability at the site of action, where it is known. Conclusions: For antibodies to cross the blood-brain barrier, there are proven options such as conjugating with transferrin protein, making clinical trials in its absence more questionable.

Clinical efficacy of efgartigimod combined with intravenous methylprednisolone in the acute phase of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD) comprise a group of autoimmune-mediated, inflammatory, demyelinating central nervous system diseases caused by aquaporin-4 (AQP4) IgG autoantibodies. Efgartigimod is a human IgG Fc fragment that reduces antibody titers by targeting the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). This study documents the efficacy of efgartigimod combined with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in the acute phase of NMOSD.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the medical records of NMOSD patients with acute attack who received efgartigimod plus IVMP or IVMP were reviewed. Treatment efficacy was assessed by the Expanded Disability Scale Score (EDSS) before and one month after treatment. Any side effects that occurred during the treatment period were recorded.

RESULTS

This study was performed on 11 patients (efgartigimod plus IVMP group [n = 4] and IVMP group [n = 7]). Efgartigimod plus IVMP was effective and had a satisfactory safety profile. EDSS was reduced by 0.5 ± 0.32 compared with the IVMP group (0.27 ± 0.02). Immunoglobulin was decreased in three patients, and the immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels gradually increased approximately 8 weeks after the last administration. Hyperlipidemia and elevated white blood cell count were common side effects. No infections or deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Efgartigimod plus IVMP treatment is safe and well-tolerated in patients with acute-phase NMOSD.

Initiation response, maximized therapeutic efficacy, and post-treatment effects of biological targeted therapies in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

As targeted drug development in myasthenia gravis (MG) continues to advance, it is important to compare the efficacy of these drugs for better clinical decision-making. However, due to the varied regimens and dosages used in clinical trials for different drugs, a standardized comparison between them is necessary.

Methods

This study enrolled participants in phase II and III trials of innovative targeted drugs for MG. The primary outcome was the change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (MG-QMG) from baseline. The efficacy of all drugs at four time points was separately analyzed at four time points: initiation 1 week, initiation 4 weeks, maximized response, and post last dose 4 weeks. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the results of the different drugs.

Results

A total of 9 drugs, including Efgartigimod, Rozanolixizumab, Batoclimab, Eculizumab, Belimumab, Zilucoplan, Ravulizumab, Nipocalimab, Rituximab, derived from 12 studies were analyzed. At the initiation 1-week time point, three drugs exhibited significant improvement compared to the placebo effect: Efgartigimod, Zilucoplan, Rozanolixizumab. At the initiation 4-week time point, four drugs showed significant improvement compared to the placebo effect: Efgartigimod, Rozanolixizumab, Batoclimab, Zilucoplan. At the maximized response time point, six drugs achieved significant improvement compared to the placebo effect: Efgartigimod, Rozanolixizumab, Batoclimab, Eculizumab, Zilucoplan, Ravulizumab. At the post last dose 4-week point, all drugs statistically showed no significant difference from the placebo.

Conclusion

Although the MG subtypes were not consistent across trials, within the regimen design of each trial, neonatal Fc receptor inhibitors-represented by Efgartigimod, Rozanolixizumab, and Batoclimab-exhibited the most effective response rates when compared to complement and B-cell inhibitor drugs.

Case report: Rapid symptom relief in autoimmune encephalitis with efgartigimod: a three-patient case series

Introduction

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a group of inflammatory brain disorders mediated by autoimmune responses. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis, and anti-γ-aminobutyric acid-B receptor (GABABR) encephalitis are the most prevalent forms, characterized by the presence of antibodies against neuronal cell-surface antigens. Efgartigimod, an antagonist of the neonatal Fc receptor, has proven efficacy in myasthenia gravis treatment. This clinical case report describes the clinical progression and functional outcomes of AE in three patients who received efgartigimod treatment.

Case presentations

Case 1 was a 60-year-old man exhibiting memory impairment and psychiatric disturbances over 11 days. Case 2 was a 38-year-old man with a 1-month history of rapid cognitive decline and seizures. Case 3 was a 68-year-old woman with mental behavioral changes and seizures for 4 months. Anti-GABABR, anti-LGI1, and anti-NMDAR antibodies were confirmed in the respective patients' cerebrospinal fluid or serum. All three patients experienced marked and swift symptomatic relief after four cycles of efgartigimod treatment, with no complication.

Conclusion

Current first-line and second-line treatments for AE have limitations, and efgartigimod has demonstrated potential in the rapid and efficacious treatment of AE, emerging as a promising option for the management of this disease.

Efgartigimod in refractory autoimmune myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc-receptor inhibitor, has recently been approved as treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to systematically assess short- and long-term effectiveness of efgartigimod in patients with refractory MG.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with refractory autoimmune acetylcholine receptor MG were treated with efgartigimod. Data were collected from January 2021 to March 2023 on Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Composite score (MGC) and the 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life questionnaire (MG-QoL15r).

RESULTS

A favorable outcome was seen in 56% of patients at the last measurement. Out of 16 patients, 50% were an MG-ADL responder after the first treatment cycle. After 4 weeks, a clinically meaningful improvement compared to baseline was seen on the MG-ADL, QMG, and MGC. There was a statistically significant improvement on the MGQoL15r from baseline to week 4. The improvement was maintained until the last measurement for the MGC and the MGQoL15r. At the last visit, all patients had discontinued 4-weekly dosages, shifting to administration frequencies of 1, 2, or 3 weeks. Drug doses could be decreased for prednisolone (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2), and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 9). Frequency of plasma exchange was decreased in nine patients.

DISCUSSION

In patients with refractory MG, efgartigimod was effective for at least half of all patients. Patients required more frequent dosing compared to the ADAPT phase 3 trial. In 80% of the patients concurrent medication could be reduced or discontinued.

Beyond conventional therapies: IVIG in treating severe fingolimod-rebound in a postpartum patient with MS

This case report details a female patient with multiple sclerosis in her 30s, who experienced a significant fingolimod rebound syndrome post partum, characterised by worsening neurological symptoms and severe demyelinating lesions. Traditional treatments, including steroids and plasmapheresis, were ineffective. However, the introduction of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) led to remarkable improvement in her symptoms and disability status. This case highlights the complex immunological changes associated with fingolimod cessation and underscores IVIG's potential as a valuable treatment in managing such rebounds.

Identification of disease phenotypes in acetylcholine receptor-antibody myasthenia gravis using proteomics-based consensus clustering

BACKGROUND

The clinical heterogeneity of myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disease defined by antibodies (Ab) directed against the postsynaptic membrane, constitutes a challenge for patient stratification and treatment decision making. Novel strategies are needed to classify patients based on their biological phenotypes aiming to improve patient selection and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

For this purpose, we assessed the serum proteome of a cohort of 140 patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor-Ab-positive MG and utilised consensus clustering as an unsupervised tool to assign patients to biological profiles. For in-depth analysis, we used immunogenomic sequencing to study the B cell repertoire of a subgroup of patients and an in vitro assay using primary human muscle cells to interrogate serum-induced complement formation.

FINDINGS

This strategy identified four distinct patient phenotypes based on their proteomic patterns in their serum. Notably, one patient phenotype, here named PS3, was characterised by high disease severity and complement activation as defining features. Assessing a subgroup of patients, hyperexpanded antibody clones were present in the B cell repertoire of the PS3 group and effectively activated complement as compared to other patients. In line with their disease phenotype, PS3 patients were more likely to benefit from complement-inhibiting therapies. These findings were validated in a prospective cohort of 18 patients using a cell-based assay.

INTERPRETATION

Collectively, this study suggests proteomics-based clustering as a gateway to assign patients to a biological signature likely to benefit from complement inhibition and provides a stratification strategy for clinical practice.

FUNDING

CN and CBS were supported by the Forschungskommission of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf. CN was supported by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (EKEA.38). CBS was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-German Research Foundation) with a Walter Benjamin fellowship (project 539363086). The project was supported by the Ministry of Culture and Science of North Rhine-Westphalia (MODS, "Profilbildung 2020" [grant no. PROFILNRW-2020-107-A]).

Myasthenia gravis: the future is here

Myasthenia gravis (MG) stands as a prototypical antibody-mediated autoimmune disease: it is dependent on T cells and characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting proteins located on the postsynaptic surface of skeletal muscle, known as the neuromuscular junction. Patients with MG exhibit a spectrum of weakness, ranging from limited ocular muscle involvement to life-threatening respiratory failure. Recent decades have witnessed substantial progress in understanding the underlying pathophysiology, leading to the delineation of distinct subcategories within MG, including MG linked to AChR or MuSK antibodies as well as age-based distinction, thymoma-associated, and immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced MG. This heightened understanding has paved the way for the development of more precise and targeted therapeutic interventions. Notably, the FDA has recently approved therapeutic inhibitors of complement and the IgG receptor FcRn, a testament to our improved comprehension of autoantibody effector mechanisms in MG. In this Review, we delve into the various subgroups of MG, stratified by age, autoantibody type, and histology of the thymus with neoplasms. Furthermore, we explore both current and potential emerging therapeutic strategies, shedding light on the evolving landscape of MG treatment.

Suspected autoimmune encephalitis: A retrospective study of patients referred for therapeutic plasma exchange

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a heterogeneous group of autoantibody-mediated disorders targeting the brain parenchyma. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), one of several first-line therapies for AE, is often initiated when AE is suspected, albeit prior to an established diagnosis. We sought to characterize the role of TPE in the treatment of suspected AE.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective analysis was performed of adults (≥18 years) who underwent at least one TPE procedure for "suspected AE." The following parameters were extracted and evaluated descriptively: clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment course, TPE-related adverse events, outcomes (e.g., modified Rankin scale [mRS]), and diagnosis once investigation was complete.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (median age 56 years, range 28-77 years, 62.2% male) were evaluated. Autoimmune antibody testing was positive in serum for 43.2% (n = 16) and cerebrospinal fluid for 29.7% (n = 11). Patients underwent a median of five TPE procedures (range 3-16), with 97.3% (n = 36) via a central line and 21.6% (n = 8) requiring at least one unit of plasma as replacement fluid. Fifteen patients (40.5%) experienced at least one TPE-related adverse event. Compared with mRS at admission, the mRS at discharge was improved in 21.6% (n = 8), unchanged in 59.5% (n = 22), or worse in 18.9% (n = 7). Final diagnosis of AE was determined to be definite in 48.6% (n = 18), probable in 8.1% (n = 3) and possible in 27.0% (n = 10). Six (16.2%) patients were ultimately determined to have an alternate etiology.

CONCLUSION

Empiric TPE for suspected AE is generally well-tolerated. However, its efficacy remains uncertain in the absence of controlled trials, particularly in the setting of seronegative disease.

FcRn Inhibitor Therapies in Neurologic Diseases

In the last decade, the landscape of treating autoimmune diseases has evolved with the emergence and approval of novel targeted therapies. Several new biological agents offer selective and target-specific immunotherapy and therefore fewer side effects, such as neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-targeting therapy. Neonatal Fc receptor-targeted therapies are engineered to selectively target FcRn through various methods, such as Fc fragments or monoclonal anti-FcRn antibodies. These approaches enhance the breakdown of autoantibodies by blocking the immunoglobulin G recycling pathway. This mechanism reduces overall plasma immunoglobulin levels, including the levels of pathogenic autoantibodies, without affecting the other immunoglobulin class immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin E, immunoglobulin M, and immunoglobulin D levels. Drugs that inhibit FcRn include efgartigimod, rozanolixizumab, batoclimab, and nipocalimab. These medications can be administered either intravenously or subcutaneously. Numerous clinical trials are currently underway to investigate their effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in various neurological conditions, including myasthenia gravis and other neurological disorders such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, myositis, neuromyelitis optica, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease. Positive results from clinical trials of efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab led to their approval for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis. Additional clinical trials are still ongoing. Neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor agents seem to be well tolerated. Reported adverse events include headache (most commonly observed with efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab), upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, pyrexia, and nausea. Additionally, some of these agents may cause transient hypoalbuminemia and hypercholesterolemia notably reported with batoclimab and nipocalimab. In this review, we discuss the available clinical data for FcRN inhibitor agents in treating different neurological autoimmune diseases.

Recombinant Acetylcholine Receptor Immunization Induces a Robust Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis in Mice

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototypical autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). The study of the underlying pathophysiology has provided novel insights into the interplay of autoantibodies and complement-mediated tissue damage. Experimental autoimmune myasthenia gravis (EAMG) emerged as a valuable animal model, designed to gain further insight and to test novel therapeutic approaches for MG. However, the availability of native acetylcholine receptor (AChR) protein is limited favouring the use of recombinant proteins. To provide a simplified platform for the study of MG, we established a model of EAMG using a recombinant protein containing the immunogenic sequence of AChR in mice. This model recapitulates key features of EAMG, including fatigable muscle weakness, the presence of anti-AChR-antibodies, and engagement of the NMJ by complement and a reduced NMJ density. Further characterization of this model demonstrated a prominent B cell immunopathology supported by T follicular helper cells. Taken together, the herein-presented EAMG model may be a valuable tool for the study of MG pathophysiology and the pre-clinical testing of therapeutic applications.

Batoclimab as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with myasthenia gravis: rationale and study design of a phase 3 clinical trial

Introduction

Batoclimab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the neonatal fragment crystallisable receptor, has shown promising phase 2 clinical trial results in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG).

Methods and analysis

In this phase 3, randomised, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled study, adults with gMG will be randomised 1:1:1 to induction therapy with batoclimab 680 mg, batoclimab 340 mg, or placebo, administered once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks as a subcutaneous injection. The primary endpoint is the change from baseline to week 12 on the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score. Batoclimab-treated patients achieving a ≥2-point improvement from baseline on MG-ADL at week 10 or week 12 will be re-randomised to maintenance treatment with batoclimab 340 mg QW, batoclimab 340 mg every other week (Q2W), or placebo for 12 weeks; batoclimab-treated patients with a <2-point improvement at week 10 and week 12 will be switched to placebo for the maintenance period and discontinued thereafter. Placebo-treated patients from the induction period will be re-randomised to batoclimab 340 mg QW or Q2W in the maintenance period. All patients who complete the maintenance period and achieve a ≥2-point improvement from baseline in MG-ADL during ≥1 of the final 2 visits of the induction and/or maintenance periods will continue their current batoclimab dose (or switch to batoclimab 340 mg QW for those on placebo) for a 52-week long-term extension (LTE-1). Patients who complete LTE-1 may enter a second, optional 52-week LTE (LTE-2).

Ethics and dissemination

This trial is being conducted in accordance with the International Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, the Declaration of Helsinki, and each site's Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee. All patients must provide written informed consent. Results from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and global conferences.

Trial registration number

NCT05403541.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Versus FcRn Inhibition in Autoimmune Disease

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE or PLEX) is used in a broad range of autoimmune diseases, with the goal of removing autoantibodies from the circulation. A newer approach for the selective removal of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies is the use of therapeutic molecules targeting the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). FcRn regulates IgG recycling, and its inhibition results in a marked decrease in circulating autoantibodies of the IgG subtype. The difference between FcRn inhibition and PLEX is often questioned. With anti-FcRn monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and fragments only recently entering this space, limited data are available regarding long-term efficacy and safety. However, the biology of FcRn is well understood, and mounting evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and potential differences among compounds in development is available, allowing us to compare against nonselective plasma protein depletion methods such as PLEX. FcRn inhibitors may have distinct advantages and disadvantages over PLEX in certain scenarios. Use of PLEX is preferred over FcRn inhibition where removal of antibodies other than IgG or when concomitant repletion of missing plasma proteins is needed for therapeutic benefit. Also, FcRn targeting has not yet been studied for use in acute flares or crisis states of IgG-mediated diseases. Compared with PLEX, FcRn inhibition is associated with less invasive access requirements, more specific removal of IgG versus other immunoglobulins without a broad impact on circulating proteins, and any impacts on other therapeutic drug levels are restricted to other mAbs. In addition, the degree of IgG reduction is similar with FcRn inhibitors compared with that afforded by PLEX. Here we describe the scientific literature regarding the use of PLEX and FcRn inhibitors in autoimmune diseases and provide an expert discussion around the potential benefits of these options in varying clinical conditions and scenarios.

Stiff Person Spectrum Disorders-An Update and Outlook on Clinical, Pathophysiological and Treatment Perspectives

Stiff person spectrum disorders (SPSD) are paradigm autoimmune movement disorders characterized by stiffness, spasms and hyperekplexia. Though rare, SPSD represent a not-to-miss diagnosis because of the associated disease burden and treatment implications. After decades as an enigmatic orphan disease, major advances in our understanding of the evolving spectrum of diseases have been made along with the identification of multiple associated autoantibodies. However, the most important recent developments relate to the recognition of a wider affection, beyond the classic core motor symptoms, and to further insights into immunomodulatory and symptomatic therapies. In this review, we summarize the recent literature on the clinical and paraclinical spectrum, current pathophysiological understanding, as well as current and possibly future therapeutic strategies.

Synthetic Cell-Based Immunotherapies for Neurologic Diseases

The therapeutic success and widespread approval of genetically engineered T cells for a variety of hematologic malignancies spurred the development of synthetic cell-based immunotherapies for CNS lymphoma, primary brain tumors, and a growing spectrum of nononcologic disease conditions of the nervous system. Chimeric antigen receptor effector T cells bear the potential to deplete target cells with higher efficacy, better tissue penetration, and greater depth than antibody-based cell depletion therapies. In multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders, engineered T-cell therapies are being designed and currently tested in clinical trials for their safety and efficacy to eliminate pathogenic B-lineage cells. Chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells expressing a disease-relevant autoantigen as cell surface domains are designed to selectively deplete autoreactive B cells. Alternative to cell depletion, synthetic antigen-specific regulatory T cells can be engineered to locally restrain inflammation, support immune tolerance, or efficiently deliver neuroprotective factors in brain diseases in which current therapeutic options are very limited. In this article, we illustrate prospects and bottlenecks for the clinical development and implementation of engineered cellular immunotherapies in neurologic diseases.

Immune Mechanisms in Epileptogenesis: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Epilepsy Syndromes

Seizures and epilepsy can result from various aetiologies, yet the underlying cause of several epileptic syndromes remains unclear. In that regard, autoimmune-mediated pathophysiological mechanisms have been gaining attention in the past years and were included as one of the six aetiologies of seizures in the most recent classification of the International League Against Epilepsy. The increasing number of anti-neuronal antibodies identified in patients with encephalitic disorders has contributed to the establishment of an immune-mediated pathophysiology in many cases of unclear aetiology of epileptic syndromes. Yet only a small number of patients with autoimmune encephalitis develop epilepsy in the proper sense where the brain transforms into a state where it will acquire the enduring propensity to produce seizures if it is not hindered by interventions. Hence, the term autoimmune epilepsy is often wrongfully used in the context of autoimmune encephalitis since most of the seizures are acute encephalitis-associated and will abate as soon as the encephalitis is in remission. Given the overlapping clinical presentation of immune-mediated seizures originating from different aetiologies, a clear distinction among the aetiological entities is crucial when it comes to discussing pathophysiological mechanisms, therapeutic options, and long-term prognosis of patients. Moreover, a rapid and accurate identification of patients with immune-mediated epilepsy syndromes is required to ensure an early targeted treatment and, thereby, improve clinical outcome. In this article, we review our current understanding of pathogenesis and critically discuss current and potential novel treatment options for seizures and epilepsy syndromes of underlying or suspected immune-mediated origin. We further outline the challenges in proper terminology.

Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Chronic Autoimmune Demyelinating Neuropathies

Autoimmune diseases of the peripheral nervous system have so far been treated mainly with exogenous high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), that act through several mechanisms, including neutralization of pathogenic autoantibodies, modulation of lymphocyte activity, interference with antigen presentation, and interaction with Fc receptors, cytokines, and the complement system. Other therapeutic strategies have recently been developed, in part to address the increasing shortage of IVIg, prime among which is the use of B cell depleting monoclonal antibodies, or small molecule inhibitors targeting the B-cell specific kinases. Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 + B lymphocytes, is currently the most used, especially in anti-MAG antibody neuropathy and autoimmune neuropathies with antibodies to nodal/paranodal antigens that are unresponsive to IVIg. After several reports of its efficacy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), rituximab is currently under investigation in three Phase 2 trials in CIDP. In addition, the possible role of complement activation in the pathogenesis of chronic autoimmune neuropathies has brought into consideration drugs that can block the complement cascade, such as eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody already assessed in acute polyradiculoneuropathies, and approved for myasthenia gravis. Preliminary data on eculizumab in multifocal motor neuropathy have been published, but randomized controlled studies are pending. Moreover, the neonatal Fc receptor, that recycles IgGs by preventing their lysosome degradation, is an important and attractive pharmacological target. Antibodies against FcRn, which reduce circulating IgG (both pathogenic and non-pathogenic) have been developed. The FcRn blocker efgartigimod, a humanized IgG1-derived Fc fragment, which competitively inhibits the FcRn, has recently been approved for the treatment of myasthenia gravis and is currently under investigation in CIDP. In addition, the anti-human FcRn monoclonal antibody rozanolixizumab is currently being assessed in phase 2 trials in CIDP. However, none of the abovementioned monoclonal antibodies is currently approved for treatment of any immune-mediated neuropathies. While more specific and individualized therapies are being developed, the possibility of combined treatments targeting different pathogenic mechanisms deserves consideration as well.

IgG4 Autoantibodies in Organ-Specific Autoimmunopathies: Reviewing Class Switching, Antibody-Producing Cells, and Specific Immunotherapies

Organ-specific autoimmunity is often characterized by autoantibodies targeting proteins expressed in the affected tissue. A subgroup of autoimmunopathies has recently emerged that is characterized by predominant autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass (IgG4-autoimmune diseases; IgG4-AID). This group includes pemphigus vulgaris, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, subtypes of autoimmune encephalitis, inflammatory neuropathies, myasthenia gravis and membranous nephropathy. Although the associated autoantibodies target specific antigens in different organs and thus cause diverse syndromes and diseases, they share surprising similarities in genetic predisposition, disease mechanisms, clinical course and response to therapies. IgG4-AID appear to be distinct from another group of rare immune diseases associated with IgG4, which are the IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RLD), such as IgG4-related which have distinct clinical and serological properties and are not characterized by antigen-specific IgG4. Importantly, IgG4-AID differ significantly from diseases associated with IgG1 autoantibodies targeting the same organ. This may be due to the unique functional characteristics of IgG4 autoantibodies (e.g. anti-inflammatory and functionally monovalent) that affect how the antibodies cause disease, and the differential response to immunotherapies of the IgG4 producing B cells/plasmablasts. These clinical and pathophysiological clues give important insight in the immunopathogenesis of IgG4-AID. Understanding IgG4 immunobiology is a key step towards the development of novel, IgG4 specific treatments. In this review we therefore summarize current knowledge on IgG4 regulation, the relevance of class switching in the context of health and disease, describe the cellular mechanisms involved in IgG4 production and provide an overview of treatment responses in IgG4-AID.