Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a case series

Navigating Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Surgeon's Conundrum With Rectal Carcinoma in a Young Adult

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a rare, chronic, and benign disorder. It can be observed as ulcers in the rectal mucosa, solitary or multiple lesions. It can often be misdiagnosed with other intestinal morbidities, due to its clinical similarities. It can be diagnosed by clinical symptoms, radiological tools, and histopathological examination. Management is carried out by conservative methods such as lifestyle and dietary modifications with medical and surgical therapy. This is a case of a 37-year-old female with a major complaint of per-rectal bleeding. Proctoscopy revealed an irregular-ulcerated mass in the rectum, which was managed conservatively. The patient showed improved symptoms after a colonoscopy, at a six-month follow-up.

Rare Cause of Hematochezia in Children: Solitary Rectal Ulcer, Single Center Experience

Background/Aims

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) can be overlooked, diagnosed late, or misdiagnosed, particularly in childhood. This study reviewed the 13-year experience of the authors' institution to increase clinicians' awareness of SRUS in the presence of symptoms. This paper reports the endoscopic and histopathological findings in children presenting with hematochezia.

Methods

The clinical and laboratory findings of 22 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven SRUS in the authors' clinic between 2007 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively.

Results

The mean age at diagnosis was 12.5±2.6 years, and 59.1% of the patients were male. The median time of diagnosis was 24 months. A single ulcer lesion was found by colonoscopy in 18 patients (81.8%), two ulcers in two patients (9%), and more than two ulcers in two patients (9%). The pathology reports of all biopsies taken from the lesions were consistent with a solitary rectal ulcer. In the first stage, the treatment was started with toilet training, a high-fiber diet, and laxatives. In 11 patients (50%) who did not respond to the initial treatment, a 5-ASA enema was added. A glucocorticoid enema was added to treatment in five patients (22%) whose complaints did not regress despite this treatment. Clinical remission was achieved in five of the patients (18.1%). The time to diagnosis was significantly shorter in those in remission than those not in remission (p=0.04).

Conclusions

This study is the first large series on Turkish children. An increased awareness of SRUS in children will increase the rate of early diagnosis and treatment, allowing remission in more patients.

Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Patients Presenting With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign rectal condition associated with defecation disorder that has multifactor pathologies and variable findings on presentation, endoscopy, and histopathology. A diagnostic dilemma with an overlap of differentials and step-wise management that starts with conservative therapies and goes up to repeated surgeries in case of failure of the conservative approach.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to observe clinical, endoscopic, and histological features of SRUS in patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted at the Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Teaching Institute, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar from October 2018 to April 2020. After written informed consent, 257 patients (149 males and 108 females) from ages 15 to 70 who presented with lower GI bleeding were included via non-probability convenient sampling. Sociodemographic details were recorded in a pre-designed proforma. A colonoscopy was performed with the Colonoscope CF200 Z, Olympus Tokyo, Japan, and findings were noted. Suspected lesions were magnified, dyed with 0.2% indigo carmine, biopsied from the middle and edges of the ulcer, and sent for histopathology. All data were recorded and analyzed in SPSS-20. The mean with SD was calculated for quantitative variables, and frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables. The chi-square test was used to check the significance, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

SRUS was found in 17 (6.6%) patients with lower GI bleeding, with a male predominance of 57% (n=11). Perirectal bleeding, constipation, mucous discharge, abdominal pain, and anemia were common clinical findings. Solitary lesions, ulceration, and anterior rectum location were the most common endoscopy findings. Obliterated lamina propria with collagen, ulceration, crypt distortion, and inflammatory infiltrates were common histopathological findings.

CONCLUSION

SRUS is a benign defecation disorder commonly presenting with lower GI bleeding, constipation, straining, and abdominal pain. It needs a stepwise approach with conservative management, medical management, biofeedback, and surgeries as a last resort.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in a young adult - A surgeon's dilemma with rectal carcinoma

The presentation of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is very similar to a wide variety of conditions including inflammatory bowel diseases, ischemic colitis and rectal carcinoma. Histopathological examination comes as an important tool for its diagnosis. Hence, high index of suspicion is required for early diagnosis of this rare condition.

Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children: A Report of 140 Cases

OBJECTIVES

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is said to be rare in children (largest series so far; 55 in children, 116 in adults). We analyzed our experience to look at its clinical presentations, endoscopic appearance, and treatment outcome in a large cohort of children.

METHODS

Clinical and endoscopic data were collected between 2000 and 2018. Children (18 years or younger) diagnosed to have SRUS on colonoscopy and confirmed by histopathology were included. All children with SRUS were treated with behavioral modification, bulk laxative. Most with ulcer received steroid enema and some sulfasalazine or sucralfate enema.

RESULTS

The median age of 140 children was 12 (interquartile range [IQR]: 10-14) years, 79% were boys. The median symptom duration was 21 (IQR: 9-36) months. Rectal bleeding was the presenting feature in 131 (93.6%); constipation in 38 (27%); and small, frequent stools in 79 (56%). Most children had features of dyssynergic defecation such as prolonged sitting in the toilet (131, 93.6%), excessive straining (138, 98.6%), a feeling of incomplete evacuation (130, 92.8%), and rectal digitation (71, 50.7%). Rectal prolapse was noted in 24 (17%) cases. Colonoscopy documented rectal ulcer in 101 (72%) [Single: 84]. Over a median follow-up of 6 (IQR: 4-18) months, 27 patients were lost to follow-up and of the remaining 113 cases, 71 (62.8%) showed clinical improvement (healing of ulcer documented in 36/82, 44%).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of cases of SRUS presented in second decade with rectal bleeding and features of dyssynergic defecation. Ulcer was noted in three fourths of cases. The outcome of medical treatment with behavioral modification and local therapy was modest.

A Clinical Entity Often Missed-Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children

Background: Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) was a relatively uncommon and easily misdiagnosed clinical entity in children. The diagnosis of this condition was often delayed due to lack of clinical suspicion. Only case series were available and no definitive treatment was postulated. Here, we share our experience of SRUS in our institute and reviewed the literature published so far. Aim: To study the clinical profile and treatment response of Solitary Rectal ulcer Syndrome in Children (SRUS). Materials: The clinical profile and 1 year follow up response of the diagnosed cases of SRUS over a period of 5 years was retrospectively collected from medical record department. Results: The median age of presentation among 24 children was 8 years with majority (75%) above 5 years. All children presented with intermittent rectal bleeding with median duration of 5.5 months. The other presenting symptoms documented were hard stool (79%), mucorrhea (70%), and abdominal pain (58%). One child presented with rectal prolapse. On colonoscopy, 46% had single ulcer while another 46% had multiple ulcers and 8% had polypoidal lesion. All lesions were within distal rectum and had characteristic histological pattern. All children were treated with conventional treatment like dietary fibers and laxatives along with toilet training. About 75% children attained remission and 25% had relapse but responded with corticosteroid enema. None required surgery. Conclusion: Conventional treatments itself induce and maintain remission in most of SRUS patients if treatment is instituted at the earliest. Thus, early suspicion and diagnosis is needed to achieve remission.

Fecal evacuation disorders in anal fissure, hemorrhoids, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

The causative factors for hemorrhoids, anal fissure, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) are poorly understood. The study was done to identify the prevalence of fecal evacuation disorders in patients with anal fissure, hemorrhoids, and SRUS using anorectal manometry (ARM). Retrospective analysis of ARM data from three centers across India was done. Baseline demographic details and symptoms pertaining to bowel movements were noted. Limited colonoscopy details pertaining to hemorrhoids, fissure-in-ano, and SRUS were noted. The patients were divided into two groups-group I (those with fissure, hemorrhoids, or solitary rectal ulcer) and group II (normal study). ARM parameters of resting anal pressure, squeeze pressure, dyssynergic defecation, and abnormal balloon expulsion were compared between the two groups. Sub-analysis was done for ARM metric differences between those with hemorrhoids, chronic fissure, and SRUS. Appropriate statistical tests were used. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. There were more men in group I (87%; p-value 0.01) with a higher resting anal pressure (80 vs. 69 mmHg, p-value 0.03). Functional evacuation disorders (p < 0.0001), dyssynergic defecation (77.2% vs. 46.8%, p < 0.0001) and abnormal balloon expulsion (66.7% vs. 20.3%, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in group I. These were significantly more common in patients with anal fissure and SRUS compared to those with hemorrhoids (p-value 0.028). Functional evacuation disorders are frequently noted in patients with hemorrhoids, anal fissure, and SRUS.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

BACKGROUND/AIM

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign, poorly understood disorder that is difficult to manage. Medical interventions such as sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, and a high fibre diet are reported as the first line of treatment. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for SRUS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies that evaluated medical treatments for SRUS. Two authors independently performed selection of eligible studies based on eligiblity criteria. Data extraction from potentially eligible studies was carried out according to predefined data collection methods. Medical treatments, including sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, a high fibre diet, and psyllium powder as a single or combination therapy were compared to placebo alone or combined with other treatments. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ulcer remission; this was presented as pooled prevalence (PP) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The I² value and Q statistic test were used to test for heterogeneity. In the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies with 216 patients (males = 118, females = 98) diagnosed with SRUS were analysed in the final meta-analysis. The pooled effect estimate of treatment efficacy revealed that, of the patients receiving medical treatment, 57% had resolution of their ulcers (PP 0.57; 95% CI; 0.41 to 0.73). Statistically significant heterogeneity was observed (I² = 63%; τ2 = 0.64, P= <0.01). The scarcity of RCTs comparing medical treatments with other interventions was a major limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients receiving medical treatment for the management of SRUS experience resolution of their ulcers.

Indian consensus on chronic constipation in adults: A joint position statement of the Indian Motility and Functional Diseases Association and the Indian Society of Gastroenterology

The Indian Motility and Functional Diseases Association and the Indian Society of Gastroenterology developed this evidence-based practice guideline for management of chronic constipation. A modified Delphi process was used to develop this consensus containing 29 statements, which were generated by electronic voting iteration as well as face to face meeting and review of the supporting literature primarily from India. These statements include 9 on epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic criteria; 8 on pathophysiology; and the remaining 12 on investigations and treatment. When the proportion of those who voted either to accept completely or with minor reservation was 80% or higher, the statement was regarded as accepted. The members of the consensus team believe that this would be useful for teaching, clinical practice, and research on chronic constipation in India and in other countries with similar spectrum of the disorders.

Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Paediatric Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon benign rectal disease. Mostly young adults are affected, and it is rare in paediatric populations.

CLINICAL CASE

We present a 12-year-old girl with a 6-month history of tenesmus, frequent defaecation, and bloody stools with mucus. There was no previous history of constipation or other symptoms. At the first visit, physical examination and routine laboratory test results were normal. A stool examination for bacteria and parasites was negative. Colonoscopy revealed a single ulcer in the distal rectum 6 cm from the anal margin. SRUS was confirmed by biopsy. Despite conservative measures, the symptoms persisted. A defaecation proctography showed a small rectocele with no rectal mucosal prolapse. Because of its proximity to the anal sphincter, no surgical intervention was performed.

CONCLUSION

The present case illustrates how difficult the management of SRUS is. Multicentre studies are needed to establish treatment protocols for children.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: A single-center case series

BACKGROUND/AIM

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign, chronic defecation disorder with varied presentations. The aim of this study is to summarize the clinical features, endoscopic findings, histological appearance, and treatment strategies associated with SRUS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all patients diagnosed with SRUS at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh from January 2003 to December 2013. Cases were identified using the Department of Pathology database. Data were obtained from medical records that included clinical manifestation, endoscopic findings, and histopathological features.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified. The mean age was 42.5 years (±18.5) and 55% were females. Most of the patients presented with bleeding per rectum (85%), constipation (75%), and straining (50%), with a mean symptom duration of 26.7 months. The most common associated factors identified were constipation (75%), history of rectal surgery (25%), digital rectal manipulation (20%), and rectal prolapse (20%). Endoscopic findings included a single ulcer (50%) and multiple ulcers (30%); 55% had a polypoidal appearance. On histopathology, there was surface ulceration (95%), fibrosis of the lamina propria (60%), distorted architecture (55%), and muscle hypertrophy with increased mucin production (50%). Patients were treated conservatively and none required surgery.

CONCLUSION

SRUS is a rare disorder with variable clinical presentations. Stool softeners, a high fiber diet in addition to topical mesalamine, and biofeedback proved to be effective in this patient population.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: Is it really a rare condition in children?

AIM: To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of the children with solitary rectal ulcer.

METHODS: Fifty-five children with a confirmed diagnosis of solitary rectal ulcer were studied in a period of 11 years from March 2003 to March 2014. All data were collected from the patients, their parents and medical records in the hospital.

RESULTS: From 55 studied patients, 41 were male (74.5%) and 14 female (25.5%). The mean age of the patients was 10.4 ± 3.7 years and the average time period from the beginning of symptoms to diagnosis of solitary rectal ulcer was 15.5 ± 11.2 mo. The most common clinical symptoms in our patients were rectal bleeding (n = 54, 98.2%) and straining during defecation or forceful defecation (n = 50, 90.9%). Other symptoms were as follows respectively: Sense of incomplete evacuation (n = 34, 61.8%), mucorrhea (n = 29, 52.7%), constipation (n = 14, 25.4%), tenesmus and cramping (n = 10, 18.2%), diarrhea (n = 9, 16.4%), and rectal pain (n = 5, 9.1%). The colonoscopic examination revealed 67.3% ulcer, 12.7% polypoid lesions, 10.9% erythema, 7.3% both polypoid lesions and ulcer, and 1.8% normal. Most of the lesions were in the rectosigmoid area at a distance of 4-6 cm from the anal margin. Finally, 69.8% of the patients recovered successfully with conservative, medical and surgical management.

CONCLUSION: The study revealed that solitary rectal ulcer is not so uncommon despite what was seen in previous studies. As the most common symptom was rectal bleeding, clinicians and pathologists should be familiar with this disorder and common symptoms in order to prevent its complications with early diagnosis.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: Clinical features, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment strategies

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon benign disease, characterized by a combination of symptoms, clinical findings and histological abnormalities. Ulcers are only found in 40% of the patients; 20% of the patients have a solitary ulcer, and the rest of the lesions vary in shape and size, from hyperemic mucosa to broad-based polypoid. Men and women are affected equally, with a small predominance in women. SRUS has also been described in children and in the geriatric population. Clinical features include rectal bleeding, copious mucus discharge, prolonged excessive straining, perineal and abdominal pain, feeling of incomplete defecation, constipation, and rarely, rectal prolapse. This disease has well-described histopathological features such as obliteration of the lamina propria by fibrosis and smooth muscle fibers extending from a thickened muscularis mucosa to the lumen. Diffuse collage deposition in the lamina propria and abnormal smooth muscle fiber extensions are sensitive markers for differentiating SRUS from other conditions. However, the etiology remains obscure, and the condition is frequently associated with pelvic floor disorders. SRUS is difficult to treat, and various treatment strategies have been advocated, ranging from conservative management to a variety of surgical procedures. The aim of the present review is to summarize the clinical features, pathophysiology, diagnostic methods and treatment strategies associated with SRUS.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a report of six cases

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare, benign disorder in children that usually presents with rectal bleeding, constipation, mucous discharge, prolonged straining, tenesmus, lower abdominal pain, and localized pain in the perineal area. The underlying etiology is not well understood, but it is secondary to ischemic changes and trauma in the rectum associated with paradoxical contraction of the pelvic floor and the external anal sphincter muscles; rectal prolapse has also been implicated in the pathogenesis. This syndrome is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings, but SRUS often goes unrecognized or is easily confused with other diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, amoebiasis, malignancy, and other causes of rectal bleeding such as a juvenile polyps. SRUS should be suspected in patients experiencing rectal discharge of blood and mucus in addition to previous disorders of evacuation. We herein report six pediatric cases with SRUS.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a literature review

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign and chronic disorder well known in young adults and less in children. It is often related to prolonged excessive straining or abnormal defecation and clinically presents as rectal bleeding, copious mucus discharge, feeling of incomplete defecation, and rarely rectal prolapse. SRUS is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings. The current treatments are suboptimal, and despite correct diagnosis, outcomes can be unsatisfactory. Some treatment protocols for SRUS include conservative management such as family reassurance, regulation of toilet habits, avoidance of straining, encouragement of a high-fiber diet, topical treatments with salicylate, sulfasalazine, steroids and sucralfate, and surgery. In children, SRUS is relatively uncommon but troublesome and easily misdiagnosed with other common diseases, however, it is being reported more than in the past. This condition in children is benign; however, morbidity is an important problem as reflected by persistence of symptoms, especially rectal bleeding. In this review, we discuss current diagnosis and treatment for SRUS.

The clinical, endoscopic and histological spectrum of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a single-center experience of 116 cases

Background

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon although benign defecation disorder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variable endoscopic manifestations of SRUS and its association with other diseases.

Methods

All the patients diagnosed with SRUS histologically from January 1990 to February 2011 at The Aga Khan University, Karachi were included in the study. The medical records were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate the clinical spectrum of the patients along with the endoscopic and histological findings.

Results

A total of 116 patients were evaluated. The mean age was 37.4 ± 16.6 (range: 13–80) years, 61 (53%) of the patients were male. Bleeding per rectum was present in 82%, abdominal pain in 49%, constipation in 23% and diarrhea in 22%. Endoscopically, solitary and multiple lesions were present in 79 (68%) and 33 (28%) patients respectively; ulcerative lesions in 90 (78%), polypoidal in 29 (25%), erythematous patches in 3 (2.5%) and petechial spots in one patient. Associated underlying conditions were hemorrhoids in 7 (6%), hyperplastic polyps in 4 (3.5%), adenomatous polyps in 2(2%), history of ulcerative colitis in 3 (2.5%) while adenocarcinoma of colon was observed in two patients. One patient had previous surgery for colonic carcinoma.

Conclusion

SRUS may manifest on endoscopy as multiple ulcers, polypoidal growth and erythematous patches and has shown to share clinicopathological features with rectal prolapse, proctitis cystica profunda (PCP) and inflammatory cloacogenic polyp; therefore collectively grouped as mucosal prolapse syndrome. This may be associated with underlying conditions such as polyps, ulcerative colitis, hemorrhoids and malignancy. High index of suspicion is required to diagnose potentially serious disease by repeated endoscopies with biopsies to look for potentially serious underlying conditions associated with SRUS.