Protein profiling analysis of Gossypium hirsutum (Malvales: Malvaceae) leaves infested by cotton whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae)

Comparative proteomic analysis of resistant and susceptible cotton genotypes in response to leaf hopper infestation

The cotton leaf hopper is a major pest in cotton, causing a hopper burn in leaves. In this study, a comparative proteomic analysis of NDLH2010 (Resistant) and LRA5166 (Susceptible), infected with leaf hopper, was employed using a nano LC-MS/MS approach. A total of 1402 proteins varied significantly between leaf hopper-infected and control plants. The resistant and susceptible genotypes had differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) of 743 and 659, respectively. Functional annotation of DEPs revealed that the DEPs were primarily associated with stress response, hormone synthesis, photosynthesis, cell wall, and secondary metabolites. Notably, DEPs such as polyphenol oxidase, carboxypeptidase, heat shock proteins, protein BTR1-like isoform X2, chaperone protein ClpB1, and β glucosidase factors associated with environmental stress response were also detected. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis confirmed a positive correlation between protein abundances and transcripts for all genes. Collectively, this study provides the molecular mechanisms associated with cotton defense responses against leaf hopper. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Cotton, a natural fiber, assumes a pivotal role as a raw material for textile industries, thereby bearing significant importance in the global economy. The cotton production sector is considerably affected by both biotic and abiotic stresses. The cotton leaf hopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)) stands as a polyphagous insect, emerging as a dominant sap-feeding pest of the cotton crop. The continuous onslaught of sap-feeding insects on cotton plants has a detrimental impact, with leaf hoppers potentially causing yield reductions of up to 50%. Therefore, comprehending the molecular interplay between cotton and leaf hopper, elucidated at the proteome level, holds promise for more effective pest management strategies. This approach holds the potential to offer insights that contribute to the development of leaf hopper-resistant cotton varieties.

Integrative transcriptomics reveals association of abscisic acid and lignin pathways with cassava whitefly resistance

BACKGROUND

Whiteflies are a global threat to crop yields, including the African subsistence crop cassava (Manihot esculenta). Outbreaks of superabundant whitefly populations throughout Eastern and Central Africa in recent years have dramatically increased the pressures of whitefly feeding and virus transmission on cassava. Whitefly-transmitted viral diseases threaten the food security of hundreds of millions of African farmers, highlighting the need for developing and deploying whitefly-resistant cassava. However, plant resistance to whiteflies remains largely poorly characterized at the genetic and molecular levels. Knowledge of cassava-defense programs also remains incomplete, limiting characterization of whitefly-resistance mechanisms. To better understand the genetic basis of whitefly resistance in cassava, we define the defense hormone- and Aleurotrachelus socialis (whitefly)-responsive transcriptome of whitefly-susceptible (COL2246) and whitefly-resistant (ECU72) cassava using RNA-seq. For broader comparison, hormone-responsive transcriptomes of Arabidopsis thaliana were also generated.

RESULTS

Whitefly infestation, salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), and abscisic acid (ABA) transcriptome responses of ECU72 and COL2246 were defined and analyzed. Strikingly, SA responses were largely reciprocal between the two cassava genotypes and we suggest candidate regulators. While susceptibility was associated with SA in COL2246, resistance to whitefly in ECU72 was associated with ABA, with SA-ABA antagonism observed. This was evidenced by expression of genes within the SA and ABA pathways and hormone levels during A. socialis infestation. Gene-enrichment analyses of whitefly- and hormone-responsive genes suggest the importance of fast-acting cell wall defenses (e.g., elicitor recognition, lignin biosynthesis) during early infestation stages in whitefly-resistant ECU72. A surge of ineffective immune and SA responses characterized the whitefly-susceptible COL2246's response to late-stage nymphs. Lastly, in comparison with the model plant Arabidopsis, cassava's hormone-responsive genes showed striking divergence in expression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first characterization of cassava's global transcriptome responses to whitefly infestation and defense hormone treatment. Our analyses of ECU72 and COL2246 uncovered possible whitefly resistance/susceptibility mechanisms in cassava. Comparative analysis of cassava and Arabidopsis demonstrated that defense programs in Arabidopsis may not always mirror those in crop species. More broadly, our hormone-responsive transcriptomes will also provide a baseline for the cassava community to better understand global responses to other yield-limiting pests/pathogens.

Proteomic analysis by iTRAQ-PRM provides integrated insight into mechanisms of resistance in pepper to Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)

BACKGROUND

The Bemisia tabaci is a major leaf feeding insect pest to pepper (Capsicum annuum), causing serious damage to pepper growth and yield. It is particularly important to study the mechanism of pepper resistance to B. tabaci, and to breed and promote the varieties of pepper resistant to B. tabaci. However, very limited molecular mechanism is available about how plants perceive and defend themselves from the destructive pest. Proteome technologies have provided an idea method for studying plant physiological processes in response to B. tabaci.

RESULTS

Here, a highly resistant genotype and a highly susceptible genotype were exposed to B. tabaci feeding for 48 h to explore the defense mechanisms of pepper resistance to B. tabaci. The proteomic differences between both genotypes were compared using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ). The quantitative data were validated by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM). The results showed that 37 differential abundance proteins (DAPs) were identified in the RG (resistant genotype), while 17 DAPs were identified in the SG (susceptible genotype) at 48 h after B. tabaci feeding. 77 DAPs were identified when comparing RG with SG without feeding. The DAP functions were determined for the classification of the pathways, mainly involved in redox regulation, stress response, protein metabolism, lipid metabolism and carbon metabolism. Some candidate DAPs are closely related to B. tabaci resistance such as annexin D4-like (ANN4), calreticulin-3 (CRT3), heme-binding protein 2-like (HBP1), acidic endochitinase pcht28-like (PR3) and lipoxygenase 2 (LOX2).

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, this study indicates complex resistance-related events in B. tabaci interaction, provides novel insights into the molecular mechanism underlying the response of plant to B. tabaci, and identifies some candidate proteins against B. tabaci attack.