Implication of soluble transferrin receptor and ferritin ratio in gestational diabetes

The diagnostic indicators of gestational diabetes mellitus from second trimester to birth: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is glucose intolerance first recognised during pregnancy. Both modalities and thresholds of the GDM diagnostic test, the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), have varied widely over time and among countries. Additionally, OGTT limitations include inconsistency, poor patient tolerability, and questionable diagnostic reliability. Many biological parameters have been reported to be modified by GDM and could potentially be used as diagnostic indicators. This study aimed to 1) systematically explore biomarkers reported in the literature as differentiating GDM from healthy pregnancies 2) screen those indicators assessed against OGTT to propose OGTT alternatives.

MAIN BODY

A systematic review of GDM diagnostic indicators was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42020145499). Inclusion criteria were full-text, comprehensible English-language articles published January 2009-January 2021, where a biomarker (from blood, ultrasound, amniotic fluid, placenta) was compared between GDM and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) women from the second trimester onward to immediately postpartum. GDM diagnostic method had to be clearly specified, and the number of patients per study higher than 30 in total or 15 per group. Results were synthesised by biomarkers.

RESULTS

Of 13,133 studies identified in initial screening, 174 studies (135,801 participants) were included. One hundred and twenty-nine studies described blood analytes, one amniotic fluid analytes, 27 ultrasound features, 17 post-natal features. Among the biomarkers evaluated in exploratory studies, Adiponectin, AFABP, Betatrophin, CRP, Cystatin-C, Delta-Neutrophil Index, GGT, TNF-A were those demonstrating statistically and clinically significant differences in substantial cohorts of patients (> 500). Regarding biomarkers assessed versus OGTT (i.e. potential OGTT alternatives) most promising were Leptin > 48.5 ng/ml, Ficolin3/adiponectin ratio ≥ 1.06, Chemerin/FABP > 0.71, and Ultrasound Gestational Diabetes Score > 4. These all demonstrated sensitivity and specificity > 80% in adequate sample sizes (> / = 100).

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous biomarkers may differentiate GDM from normoglycaemic pregnancy. Given the limitations of the OGTT and the lack of a gold standard for GDM diagnosis, advanced phase studies are needed to triangulate the most promising biomarkers. Further studies are also recommended to assess the sensitivity and specificity of promising biomarkers not yet assessed against OGTT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42020145499.

Role of C-reactive Protein(CRP) or high-sensitivity CRP in predicting gestational diabetes Mellitus:Systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is the most common disorder during pregnancy in 8-18% of pregnancies. Due to maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, early diagnosis and appropriate treatment have always been of interest to researchers. One of the recent cases for early diagnosis of GDM is the size of the C-reactive protein (CRP). The purpose of this review study was to investigate the role of CRP or its high sensitivity type in predicting GDM.

METHODS

Systematic searching of MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ProQuest databases between 2009 and 2019 using keywords 'Gestational Diabetes Mellitus','Screening', 'C-reactive protein',' High sensitivity CRP'was performed. The quality of articles was also assessed using the STROBE checklist.

RESULTS

After a thorough search of the mentioned databases, 31 articles with the desired quality were finally selected. Most of studies showed significant relationship between CRP or high-sensitivity CRP(hs-CRP) level with GDMbutthe relationship was not significant in fewstudies.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood levels of CRP or hs-CRP could be used as a potential indicator for GDM, but more studies are needed.