Varied presentations and outcomes of Charcot neuroarthropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus

Controversies in the management of active Charcot neuroarthropathy

Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) was first described over 150 years ago. Despite this there remains uncertanity around the factors that contribute to its development, and progression. This article will discuss the current controversies around the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, assessment and management of the condition. The exact pathogenesis of CN is not fully understood, and it is likely to be multifactorial, with perhaps currently unknown mechanisms contributing to its development. Further studies are needed to examine opportunities to help screen for and diagnose CN. As a result of many of these factors, the true prevalence of CN is still largely unknown. Almost all of the recommendations for the assessment and treatment of CN are based on low-quality level III and IV evidence. Despite recommendations to offer people with CN nonremovable devices, currently only 40-50% people are treated with this type of device. Evidence is also lacking about the optimal duration of treatment; reported outcomes range from 3 months to more than a year. The reason for this variation is not entirely clear. A lack of standardised definitions for diagnosis, remission and relapse, heterogeneity of populations, different management approaches, monitoring techniques with unknown diagnostic precision and variation in follow-up times prevent meaningful comparison of outcome data. If people can be better supported to manage the emotional and physical consequences of CN, then this could improve people's quality of life and well-being. Finally, we highlight the need for an internationally coordinated approach to research in CN.

Ankle Charcot Mimics: Tubercular Rheumatism to Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Charcot Foot is often misdiagnosed because of its varied presentation that mimics other common disorders including tubercular rheumatism, complex regional pain syndrome or gout. We present a case of ankle swelling and discuss the differential diagnosis, radiological findings, and management. We also discuss the approach to diagnosis and provide differences in clinical presentations, magnetic resonance imaging,and bone scan findings for various differentials considered for Charcot foot.

Long-term foot outcomes following differential abatement of inflammation and osteoclastogenesis for active Charcot neuroarthropathy in diabetes mellitus

AIMS

Inflammatory osteolysis is sine-qua-non of active Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) causing decreased foot bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures. We aimed to explore the effect of anti-inflammatory or anti-resorptive agents for effect on foot bone mineral content (BMC) and consequent long-term outcomes of foot deformities, fractures and amputation.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with active CN (temperature difference >2°C from normal foot) were evaluated. Patients were off-loaded with total contact cast and randomized to receive either methylprednisolone (1gm) (group A), zoledronate (5mg) (group B) or placebo (100ml normal saline) (group C) once monthly infusion for three consecutive months. Change in foot BMC was assessed at 6 months or at remission and followed subsequently up to 4 years for the incidence of new-onset fracture, deformities, or CN recurrence.

RESULTS

Thirty-six participants (24 male, 12 female) were randomized (11 in group A, 12 group B, 13 group C). The mean age was 57.7± 9.9 years, duration of diabetes 12.3± 5.8 years and symptom duration 6.5± 2.8 weeks. BMC increased by 36% with zoledronate (p = 0.02) but reduced by 13% with methylprednisolone (p = 0.03) and 9% (p = 0.09) with placebo at remission. There were no incident foot fractures, however, two patients sustained ulcers, and 3 had new-onset or worsening deformities and none required amputation during 3.36 ± 0.89 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonate for active CN is associated with an increase in foot bone mineral content as compared to decrease with steroids or total contact cast but long-term outcomes of foot deformities, ulceration and amputation are similar.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03289338.

Efficacy of medical treatment for Charcot neuroarthropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

No pharmacotherapeutic agents are yet recommended for active CN though many anti-resorptive agents have been studied. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the time to remission of active CN with anti-resorptive or antiinflammatory drugs. RCTs published in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Cochrane Library from January 1994 to December 2019 were accessed. We reviewed studies and extracted information on study design, participants' characteristics, time to remission, bone turnover markers, bone mineral content (BMC) and temperature difference between feet. Five RCTs out of 588 total identified records were included. Standardized mean differences (SMD) between groups with 95% CI are summarized. Pharmacotherapy nonsignificantly increased time to remission [SMD 0.52 weeks (- 0.71, 1.75), p = 0.402; I2 = 88.6%] as compared to TCC alone. The pooled median time to remission with the intervention was 18.5 weeks (11.2, 28.1) compared to 16.8 weeks (8.7, 27.7) with TCC. A nonsignificant increase in BMC [SMD 3.39% (- 0.78, 7.56), p = 0.109; I2 = 96.7%], a decrease in foot temperature [SMD - 0.42 °C (- 0.78, - 0.07), p = 0.020; I2 = 0%] and alkaline phosphatase [SMD = -2.51% (- 3.24, - 1.77), p < 0.001; I2 = 0%] was observed with intervention. Limited evidence from available studies does not support the role of anti-resorptive or anti-inflammatory drugs for earlier remission when added to offloading with total contact cast for active CN of the foot.

An overview of Charcot's neuroarthropathy

Charcot's neuroarthropathy is a destructive complication of the joints, which is often found in people with diabetes with peripheral neuropathy. Despite the fact that its description was published almost 130 years ago, its pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment remain areas that need to be described. Thanks to the use of bone remodelling, new therapeutic classes have emerged, we hope that this review will shed light on the pathology from its discovery through to the current state of knowledge on its classification, diagnosis and treatment methods.

Mortality in Asian Indians with Charcot's neuroarthropathy: a nested cohort prospective study

AIMS

We studied mortality in individuals of diabetes with or without Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN).

METHODS

People attending diabetic foot care facility with CN of foot (Cohort 1) were prospectively evaluated. Details pertaining to the duration of diabetes, microvascular and macrovascular complications, foot ulcer, amputation and mortality outcomes were recorded and compared with those without foot complications (Cohort 2) by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Data for 260 individuals of diabetes with CN and 520 individuals without CN were analysed. Mean age at presentation with CN was 55.8 ± 9.1 years, and duration of diabetes was 12.9 ± 7.8 years. 39.8% individuals with CN had foot ulcer, and 15.3% had amputation. People with CN were younger (55 ± 9.1 vs. 59.9 ± 8.1 years, p < 0.001) and had higher prevalence of microvascular complications. A total of 39 (15%) individuals with CN and 50 (9.8%) (p = 0.03) individuals without CN died during median follow-up of 40(24-51) months. People with CN had 2.7 times (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.4-5.2, p = 0.003) increased mortality risk when matched for potential confounders. Prevalent CAD and low eGFR predicted higher mortality in people with CN.

CONCLUSIONS

People with Charcot neuroarthropathy have almost three times increased risk of mortality despite being younger at presentation.