Virus-Induced Cancers of the Skin and Mucosa: Are We Dealing with "Smoking Guns" or "Smoke and Mirrors" in the Operating Theatre?

Virus-associated neuroendocrine cancers: Pathogenesis and current therapeutics

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise malignancies involving neuroendocrine cells that often lead to fatal pathological conditions. Despite escalating global incidences, NENs still have poor prognoses. Interestingly, research indicates an intricate association of tumor viruses with NENs. However, there is a dearth of comprehension of the complete scenario of NEN pathophysiology and its precise connections with the tumor viruses. Interestingly, several cutting-edge experiments became helpful for further screening of NET for the presence of polyomavirus, Human papillomavirus (HPV), Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), etc. Current research on the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) pathogenesis provides new information concerning their molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Of note, scientists observed that metastatic neuroendocrine tumors still have a poor prognosis with a palliative situation. Different oncolytic vector has already demonstrated excellent efficacies in clinical studies. Therefore, oncolytic virotherapy or virus-based immunotherapy could be an emerging and novel therapeutic intervention. In-depth understanding of all such various aspects will aid in managing, developing early detection assays, and establishing targeted therapeutic interventions for NENs concerning tumor viruses. Hence, this review takes a novel approach to discuss the dual role of tumor viruses in association with NENs' pathophysiology as well as its potential therapeutic interventions.

Comparison of surgical smoke between two approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy and open thyroidectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical smoke has been recognized as a potential health risk by an increasing number of researchers. Moreover, the counts of surgical smoke produced during different surgical approaches are different. This study aimed to measure and compare the particulate matter (PM) of surgical smoke generated during open thyroidectomy and two endoscopic approaches for thyroidectomy to provide guidance for safe clinical practices.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with thyroid cancer admitted to our hospital from June 2020 to December 2021 and treated with different surgical approaches were enrolled in this study. The total and peak counts of PM, dynamic changes, and other characteristics of surgical smoke produced during surgery were recorded. PM was classified as PM2.5 (size ≤ 2.5 μm) and PM10 (size ≤ 10 μm).

RESULTS

In a single cut, both the peak and total counts of PM2.5 and PM10 of surgical smoke in the open thyroidectomy group (n = 15) were significantly higher than those in the breast approach endoscopic thyroidectomy with CO2 insufflation group (n = 15) and the gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy group (n = 18) (p < 0.001). Moreover, the latter two groups showed no significant differences in the peak and total counts of PM2.5 and PM10 (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In thyroid surgery, more surgical smoke is produced during open thyroidectomy than during endoscopic thyroidectomy, while different endoscopic approaches showed no significant difference in surgical smoke production. Thus, endoscopic approaches outperform the open thyroidectomy approach with regard to surgical smoke production.

In vivo and in vitro study of the potential hazards of surgical smoke during cervical cancer treatment with an ultrasonic scalpel

OBJECTIVE

To explore the composition and potential hazards of cervical cancer surgical smoke generated by ultrasonic scalpels.

METHODS

Surgical smoke was collected during the cutting and coagulation of cervical cancer xenograft tumors using an ultrasonic scalpel. Surgical smoke-filtered cells were cultured and subcutaneously injected into nude mice. Cell morphology and viability were assessed by HE, Pap and trypan blue staining. HPV DNA in surgical smoke samples was identified by PCR. HPV transmission was determined by culturing HPV-negative C33A cells in HPV-positive surgical smoke-filtered medium. The cytotoxicity of surgical smoke to small airway epithelial cells (SAECs) and THP-1 cells was determined by CCK-8, MTS and LDH release assays. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are present in cervical cancer surgical smoke samples obtained by laparoscopic hysterectomy, were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

RESULTS

Cellular debris and epithelioid cells were found in surgical smoke, but no malignant cells were observed. HPV DNA was identified in all smoke samples, and HPV genotypes were matched to those in cervical cancer cells. Coculture with HPV-positive surgical smoke-filtered medium induced an 83% (15 of 18) HPV positivity rate in C33A cells. Subculture in normal medium decreased this rate to 50% (9 of 18). The proliferation of SAECs and THP-1 cells was inhibited by smoke-filtered medium in a time-dependent manner. The concentration of total VOCs, especially benzene, toluene and xylene, in surgical smoke exceeded the standard for good indoor air quality.

CONCLUSION

Cervical cancer surgical smoke contains HPV and VOCs and exhibits cytotoxicity and infectivity in vitro. Surgical smoke is an occupational hazard to health care workers.

Transmission Possibility of COVID-19 via Surgical Smoke Generated by the Use of Laparoscopic Approaches: A Subject of Debate During the Pandemic

Background: The smoke created by energy-based devices during surgery may have the potential to transmit viral components to operating room staff. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed staff safety regulations. However, it is not clearly understood whether it can be transmitted via surgical smoke. Laparoscopic approaches have become the standard surgical procedure in many cases, but some of previous investigations have advised to pretermit these approaches due to high risk of COVID-19 transmission. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the English literature that were indexed in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases by using key words including Virus, viral transmission, surgical smoke, surgical plum, laparoscopy, and COVID-19 both solely and in two-word combination. A total of 87 articles were found relevant, and after reviewing the abstract, 33 articles were shortlisted and summarized. Results: Previous studies have focused on different surgical instruments that generate smoke, methods to collect and analyze the smoke and to understand the implications of its exposure after an analysis. A total of 9 out of 11 studies on the potential transmission of human papilloma virus through surgical smoke found evidence in favor of transmission. There were studies on the possible transmission of HIV, hepatitis B virus, and Sabin poliomyelitis vaccine virus 2. Conclusion: We do not believe that laparoscopic procedures may have extra risk for COVID-19 transmission compared with the open procedures, but it is always advised that the operating room staff adhere to the safety instructions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Airborne human papillomavirus (HPV) transmission risk during ablation procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with development of oropharyngeal cancer. Aim of this review was to assess airborne transmission risk of infectious particles from HPV lesions to airway mucosa of medical staff during established ablation procedures.

METHODS

A systematic review of human and animal studies, published before 09/2020, relevant to airborne HPV transmission. Controlled studies reporting prevalence of HPV-associated upper airway (nasal/oral/pharyngeal) disease in staff performing ablation procedures (laser, loop electrosurgical excision [LEEP], cryosurgery) on HPV lesions were included in meta-analysis. Additionally, we aimed for a comprehensive systematic overview of studies regarding occupational risk of airborne HPV transmission and safety measures during ablation procedures.

RESULTS

A total of n = 30 original studies report outcomes related to HPV transmission risk in medical staff conducting ablation procedures. HPV DNA detection in ablation smoke (n = 7), matching HPV genotypes on ablated HPV lesions and face/airways of medical staff after ablation (n = 2), and evidence for infectivity of papillomavirus in ablation smoke (n = 3, animal models only) were reported. Three case reports describe occupational HPV disease of upper airway mucosa. Three controlled studies assessed warts (in CO₂ laser-users only); when pooling all controls (general population, non-laser users), nasal/oral/pharyngeal lesion sites were more common amongst laser-users (OR = 5.75; 95%CI[1.55, 21.38]; p < .001).

DISCUSSION

Airborne HPV dispersal with matching "high-risk" HPV-genotypes in airways of medical staff after ablations (LEEP and CO₂-laser) and cases of HPV-associated upper airways neoplasms based on exposure to laser and LEEP smoke are documented. Upper airway mucosa is a more common anatomical site for warts in CO₂ laser users compared to controls. Simple safety measures greatly reduce HPV contamination and transmission risk.

Safe management of surgical smoke in the age of COVID-19

Background

The COVID-19 global pandemic has resulted in a plethora of guidance and opinion from surgical societies. A controversial area concerns the safety of surgically created smoke and the perceived potential higher risk in laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

The limited published evidence was analysed in combination with expert opinion. A review was undertaken of the novel coronavirus with regards to its hazards within surgical smoke and the procedures that could mitigate the potential risks to healthcare staff.

Results

Using existing knowledge of surgical smoke, a theoretical risk of virus transmission exists. Best practice should consider the operating room set-up, patient movement and operating theatre equipment when producing a COVID-19 operating protocol. The choice of energy device can affect the smoke produced, and surgeons should manage the pneumoperitoneum meticulously during laparoscopic surgery. Devices to remove surgical smoke, including extractors, filters and non-filter devices, are discussed in detail.

Conclusion

There is not enough evidence to quantify the risks of COVID-19 transmission in surgical smoke. However, steps can be undertaken to manage the potential hazards. The advantages of minimally invasive surgery may not need to be sacrificed in the current crisis.

Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists

Surgical smoke is the gaseous by-product produced by heat generating devices in various surgical operations including laser conization and loop electrosurgical procedures that often are performed by gynecologists. Surgical smoke contains chemicals, blood and tissue particles, bacteria, and viruses, which has been shown to exhibit potential risks for surgeons, nurses, anesthesiologists, and technicians in the operation room due to long term exposure of smoke. In this review, we describe the detailed information of the components of surgical smoke. Moreover, we highlight the effects of surgical smoke on carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, and infection in gynecologists. Furthermore, we discussed how to prevent the surgical smoke via using high-filtration masks and smoke evacuation systems as well as legal guidelines for protection measures among the gynecologists.