Intradermal Micro-Dosing of AbobotulinumtoxinA for Face-Lifting: How Long Does It Last?

Immunogenicity of Botulinum Toxin A: Insights

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is widely used in treating dystonia and spasticity to managing chronic migraine and cosmetic applications. However, its immunogenic potential presents challenges, such as the development of neutralizing antibodies that lead to diminished therapeutic efficacy over time, known as secondary nonresponse.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to bridge the knowledge gap regarding the immunogenic mechanisms of BoNT-A and to explore effective management strategies to mitigate these immune responses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic search in databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, using keywords related to BoNT-A's immunogenicity. The selection process refined 157 initial articles down to 23 relevant studies, which underwent analysis to investigate the underlying mechanisms of immunogenicity and the factors influencing it.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that both the neurotoxin component and the neurotoxin-associated proteins could elicit an immune response. However, only antibodies against the core toxin influence therapeutic outcomes. Various patient-specific factors such as genetic predispositions and prior immune experiences, along with treatment-related factors such as dosage and frequency, play crucial roles in shaping these responses.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the specific immunogenic triggers and responses to BoNT-A is critical for optimizing treatment protocols and improving patient outcomes.

Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A on Skin Quality and Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Botulinum toxin A (BTxA) has gained popularity as a nonsurgical aesthetic treatment for skin rejuvenation. However, previous studies on intradermal BTxA have shown inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intradermal BTxA for facial rejuvenation.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in various databases from January 2008 to March 2023. Outcome measures included sebum production, pore size, skin hydration, skin texture, erythema index, facial wrinkles, and facelift. Eligible studies included human-based clinical trials and prospective cohort studies published in English, focusing on healthy populations requiring facial rejuvenation. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review to determine study eligibility. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two authors using predefined criteria.

Results

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, including five randomized controlled trials and five prospective cohort studies with 153 participants. Studies revealed positive effects of intradermal BTxA on various outcome measures related to facial rejuvenation. These effects included improvements in sebum production, pore size, erythema index, facial wrinkles, skin texture and elasticity, and overall facelift but not skin hydration. All failed to reach the required information size in the trial sequential analysis.

Conclusions

Findings suggest positive outcomes in multiple attributes of skin quality and facial rejuvenation. However, more high-quality research is needed to establish definitive conclusions. These findings contribute to the evidence base for nonsurgical aesthetic treatments, emphasizing the importance of ongoing research in this field.

Cutaneous Layer and SMAS Suspension (CaSS) Lift as a Minimally Invasive Lateral Midface Lift

BACKGROUND

In our prior study, the authors determined that pulling on the superficial adipose layer is more effective in lifting the skin than pulling on the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS). Applying this concept of using the superficial adipose layer to transmit the lifting force to the skin, this study examined improvements in patients who underwent lateral midface lifting using our minimally invasive multilayer lifting technique and measured the duration of those improvements.

METHODS

Along the hairline in front of the sideburns, a W-shaped zigzag incision of 3 to 8 mm in width and 3 to 4 cm in length was made. On the temporal scalp, 3 to 4 cm away from the first incision, a second incision was made more lateral/posterior to the first incision, and an elliptical excision of 3 to 5 mm in width and 3 to 4 cm in length was made. From the medial cut margin of the anterior first incision, the superficial temporal fascia/SMAS (the deep layer), and the superficial adipose layer (the superficial layer) were purchased with 3-0 polyester sutures, tunneled under the soft tissue, and fixed to the deep temporal fascia of the second posterior temporal incision. Prior to the excised temporal scalp closure, the dermis in the medial cut margin of the second incision was pulled to the rear as much as possible and fixed to the deep temporal fascia.

RESULTS

The effects of surgery were monitored for 6 to 42 months after surgery. The nasolabial folds were improved. Skin elasticity also showed significant improvements, which lasted throughout the follow-up period (up to 42 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike traditional wide dissection SMAS facelift, our method requires minimal incisions and does not require skin undermining. Therefore, the operating time is shorter, and postoperative swelling is minimized. In our technique, the superficial adipose layer, the superficial temporal fascia/SMAS, and the dermis were pulled individually to lift all layers of the lateral midface soft tissues. This results in a significant and long-lasting lateral midface rejuvenation.

Microneedling combined with botulinum toxin-A versus microneedling combined with platelet-rich plasma in treatment of atrophic acne scars: a comparative split face study

BACKGROUND

Atrophic post-acne scarring constitutes a troublesome cosmetic concern for both patients and dermatologists. Old and new therapies as well as combinations are being introduced to achieve a satisfactory response. Microneedling has been used either alone or under different combinations for its treatment. The aim was to compare its combination with topical platelet-rich plasma versus its combination with topical Botulinum Toxin-A.

METHODS

30 subjects with different types and grades of atrophic post-acne scars completed the study. Right side of the face was treated with microneedling and platelet-rich plasma while the left side was treated microneedling and Botox. Response was assessed using two different scales. Patient satisfaction and pain were also assessed.

RESULTS

Regarding response to therapy and according to the quartile grading scale, there was no statistically significant difference between the two sides where (23.4% & 13.3%) of the right and left sides, respectively, had an excellent response. Regarding the difference in the qualitative global scarring grading system before and after treatment, there was a highly statistically significant improvement on both sides with higher improvement on the right side than left side but in a non-statistically significant way.

CONCLUSIONS

Both combinations present efficacious options for treating acne scars with comparable efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered and approved prospectively by the ethical review board of the faculty of medicine, Zagazig University.

Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Scalp Sebum Secretion Regulation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Prospective Study in Chinese Subjects

BACKGROUND

Although botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection has been proved to reduce topical sebum secretion, the impact of intradermal BTX-A injection on scalp sebum production has never been reported.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of intradermal BTX-A treatment vs intradermal normal saline (NS) injection for scalp sebum secretion regulation.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, prospective study recruited patients complaining of oily scalp and/or hair. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either 1 session of intradermal BTX-A or NS injection. The baseline and posttreatment scalp sebum secretion at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours postshampooing was measured with a Sebumeter SM815 (Cutometer Dual MPA 580, Courage & Khazaka, Cologne, Germany) at 1, 3, 4, and 6 months after treatment. The patients' comments, satisfaction, and adverse events were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

In total, 25 patients in the BTX-A group and 24 patients in the NS group completed the follow-up. For the treated region, compared with NS, intradermal BTX-A treatment (50-65 U) significantly reduced scalp sebum secretion at 24, 48, and 72 hours postshampooing at the 1- and 3-month follow-up visits (P < 0.05). No significant difference between the 2 groups was observed at 4 and 6 months after the treatment. The patients' satisfaction ratings were significantly higher for the BTX-A treatment (P = 0.000). No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with NS, 1 session of intradermal BTX-A injection (50-65 U) effectively and safely reduced scalp sebum secretion and greasiness perception in the treated region at 24 and 48 hours postshampooing for 3 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Use of Micro Botulinum Toxin for a Face-lifting Effect: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Micro-Botox (Micro-btx) was described in 2000 for the paralysis of superficial muscle fibers to address facial rhytides. Increasingly, there are reports of its off-label use for a face-lifting effect.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature for such results.

METHODS AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA; only Level ≥ III evidence from 2000 to 2020 were included. Data extracted include patient demographics, type of botulinum toxin, dilution, dosage, injection sites and spacing, needle size and syringe, follow-up, patient and physician assessment, and complications.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-two patients (average 35.2 years) underwent different botulinum toxin injections (average 39 units/hemiface) of varying dilutions with 30- to 32-G needles, typically with 1-mL syringes, by forming 0.2- to 0.5-cm wheals 1 cm apart. Follow-up averaged 10.5 weeks with both subjective and objective assessments. Facial asymmetry and minor bruising were common. Subjective assessment of face-lifting effects between patients and physicians was highly discordant and injection sites reported were highly variable.

CONCLUSION

Much heterogeneity in dosage, injection sites, definition of "face-lifting," and assessment methods remain, all of which preclude accurate and objective evaluation of the current evidence for micro-btx. Future studies should address these variables, given the growing interest in such nonsurgical options for a face-lifting effect.

Emerging Trends in Botulinum Neurotoxin A Resistance: An International Multidisciplinary Review and Consensus

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection is the most widely performed aesthetic procedure and a first-line therapeutic option for various medical conditions. The potential for BoNT-A immunoresistance and secondary nonresponse related to neutralizing antibody (NAb) formation warrants attention as the range of BoNT-A aesthetic applications continues to expand.

Methods

An international multidisciplinary panel reviewed published evidence on BoNT-A immunoresistance in aesthetic and therapeutic applications and discussed best practices integrating clinical, ethical, and aesthetic considerations. Consensus statements relating to awareness, assessment, and management of the risk of NAb-related secondary nonresponse in aesthetic practice were developed.

Results

There was a consensus that, as doses used in aesthetic practice become like those in therapeutics, rates of NAb formation may be expected to increase. However, the true extent of NAb formation in aesthetics is likely underestimated due to limitations of published evidence and variability in treatment patterns of aesthetic patients. Since BoNT-A therapy is often lifelong, practitioners need to recognize immunogenicity as a potential complication that might affect future therapeutic use and strive to minimize modifiable risk factors. The selection and use of a BoNT-A product with the least immunogenic potential from the beginning may thus be advantageous, especially when treatment with high doses is planned.

Conclusions

In view of current trends in BoNT-A aesthetic use, it is essential for practitioners to conduct thorough clinical assessments, inform patients of treatment risks, and develop BoNT-A treatment plans to minimize immunogenicity. This can help preserve the option of continued or future BoNT-A treatment with satisfactory outcomes.

The Air Toxin Technique: Introduction and Analysis of Effect using a Photo Imaging System

BACKGROUND

As an alternative to other approaches to facial rejuvenation, the air toxin technique (dermal injection of air with micro-doses of botulinum toxin) is a promising method. We aimed to describe this novel technique and assess the overall safety and efficacy of the air toxin technique in facial rejuvenation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on cases treated with the air toxin technique. A total of 47 Korean patients underwent a single treatment session. Treatment efficacy was assessed objectively with serial VISIA® (Canfield Scientific, NJ, USA) skin analysis data and subjectively based on the patients' assessment scores at week 12.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in Wrinkle (p < 0.001), UV spot (p < 0.001), and Porphyrin (p = 0.005) were objectively seen at 12-weeks follow-up. Patients noted improvement in the categories Wrinkle (p < 0.01), Redness (p = 0.029), Texture (p < 0.001), Dilated pore (p < 0.001), and Lifting (p < 0.001) at week 12 compared to baseline. No major adverse event was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the Air toxin technique is efficacious in facial rejuvenation as shown by improved skin analysis parameters and patient assessment scores. Notably, there was some discrepancy between the objective and subjective parameters of improvement.

Botulinum Toxin A Injection and Perianesthesia Neuromuscular Monitoring: Case Report and Review

The popularity of looking younger has been facilitated by the availability of botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection. In 2019, over 7.7 million injections of BoNT occurred, making it the number one minimally invasive cosmetic procedure in the United States. With the ease of patients obtaining BoNT in an outpatient setting, coupled with the fact that it is considered a minimally invasive procedure, most patients do not disclose the use of BoNT during the preoperative anesthesia evaluation. This case report involves a female whose recent BoNT injections interfered with neuromuscular (NM) monitoring during anesthesia. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed using the orbicularis oculi muscle with repeated train-of-four (TOF) 0/4. It was not until completion of procedure when the arms were accessible that the adductor pollicis muscle was assessed with a TOF of 2/4. During postoperative follow up, the patient revealed she had received BoNT injections prior to surgery. A review of BoNT pharmacology, barriers to NM monitoring and use of sugammadex are discussed. This case demonstrates the importance of ascertaining BoNT injection history in any case in which access to the ulnar nerve or tibial nerve is not available.