Radiosurgery for brainstem metastases with and without whole brain radiotherapy: clinical series and literature review

The potential of ferroptosis combined with radiotherapy in cancer treatment

Ferroptosis is a new form of regulatory cell death that is closely related to the balance of redox reactions and the occurrence and development of cancer. There is increasing evidence that inducing ferroptosis in cells has great potential in the treatment of cancer. Especially when combined with traditional therapy, it can improve the sensitivity of cancer cells to traditional therapy and overcome the drug resistance of cancer cells. This paper reviews the signaling pathways regulating ferroptosis and the great potential of ferroptosis and radiotherapy (RT) in cancer treatment and emphasizes the unique therapeutic effects of ferroptosis combined with RT on cancer cells, such as synergy, sensitization and reversal of drug resistance, providing a new direction for cancer treatment. Finally, the challenges and research directions for this joint strategy are discussed.

Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brainstem Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Owing to the proximity to critical neurologic structures, treatment options for brainstem metastases (BSM) are limited, and BSM growth can cause acute morbidity or death. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the only local therapy for BSM, but efficacy and safety of this approach are incompletely understood because patients with BSM are excluded from most clinical trials.

Objective

To perform a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of SRS studies for BSM in the context of prospective trials of SRS or molecular therapy for nonbrainstem brain metastases (BM).

Data Sources

A comprehensive search of Pubmed/MEDLINE and Embase was performed on December 6, 2019.

Study Selection

English-language studies of SRS for BSM with at least 10 patients and reporting 1 or more outcomes of interest were included. Duplicate studies or studies with overlapping data sets were excluded. Studies were independently evaluated by 2 reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. A total of 32 retrospective studies published between 1999 and 2019 were included in the analysis.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify studies. Study quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. Fixed and random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed for the outcomes of interest.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary study outcomes included 1-year and 2-year local control and overall survival, objective response rate, symptom response rate, neurological death rate, and rate of grade 3 to 5 toxic effects as described in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

Results

The 32 retrospective studies included in the analysis comprised 1446 patients with 1590 BSM that were treated with SRS (median [range] dose, 16 [11-39] Gy; median [range] fractions, 1 [1-13]). Local control at 1 year was 86% (95% CI, 83%-88%; I2 = 38%) in 1410 patients across 31 studies, objective response rate was 59% (95% CI, 47%-71%; I2 = 88%) in 642 patients across 17 studies, and symptom improvement was 55% (95% CI, 47%-63%; I2 = 41%) in 323 patients across 13 studies. Deaths from BSM progression after SRS were rare (19 of 703 [2.7%] deaths across 19 studies), and the neurologic death rate in patients with BSM (24%; 95% CI, 19%-31%; I2 = 62%) was equivalent to the neurologic death rate in patients with BM who were treated on prospective trials. The rate of treatment-related grade 3 to 5 toxic effects was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.5%-3.7%; I2 = 33%) in 1421 patients across 31 studies. These results compared favorably to trials of targeted or immunotherapy for BM, which had a wide objective response rate range from 17% to 56%.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that SRS for BSM was associated with effectiveness and safety and was comparable to SRS for nonbrainstem BM, suggesting that patients with BSM should be eligible for clinical trials of SRS. In this analysis, patients treated with SRS for BSM rarely died from BSM progression and often experienced symptomatic improvement. Given the apparent safety and efficacy of SRS for BSM in the context of acute morbidity or death from BSM growth, consideration of SRS at the time of enrollment on emerging trials of targeted therapy for BM should be considered.

Endoscopic Endonasal Transclival Resection of a Pontine Metastasis: Case Report and Operative Video

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Brainstem lesions are challenging to manage, and surgical options have been controversial. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been used for local control, but life-threatening toxicities from 0% to 9.5% have been reported. Several microsurgical approaches involving safe entry zones have been developed to optimize the exposure and minimize complications in different portions of the brainstem, but require extensive drilling and manipulation of neurovascular structures. With recent advancements, the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) can provide direct visualization of ventral brainstem. No case has been reported of EEA to remove a brainstem metastasis.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

We present an illustrative case of a 68-yr-old female with metastatic colon cancer who presented with 2.8 × 2.7 × 2.1 cm (7.9 cm3) heterogeneously enhancing, right ventral pontine lesion with extensive edema. She underwent endoscopic endonasal transclival approach, and gross total resection of the lesion was achieved.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic approach may offer certain advantages for removal of ventral brainstem lesions, as it can provide direct visualization of important neurovascular structures, especially, if the lesion displaces the tracts and comes superficial to the pial surface.

Inorganic Nanomaterial-Mediated Gene Therapy in Combination with Other Antitumor Treatment Modalities

Cancer is a genetic disease originating from the accumulation of gene mutations in a cellular subpopulation. Although many therapeutic approaches have been developed to treat cancer, recent studies have revealed an irrefutable challenge that tumors evolve defenses against some therapies. Gene therapy may prove to be the ultimate panacea for cancer by correcting the fundamental genetic errors in tumors. The engineering of nanoscale inorganic carriers of cancer therapeutics has shown promising results in the efficacious and safe delivery of nucleic acids to treat oncological diseases in small-animal models. When these nanocarriers are used for co-delivery of gene therapeutics along with auxiliary treatments, the synergistic combination of therapies often leads to an amplified health benefit. In this review, an overview of the inorganic nanomaterials developed for combinatorial therapies of gene and other treatment modalities is presented. First, the main principles of using nucleic acids as therapeutics, inorganic nanocarriers for medical applications and delivery of gene/drug payloads are introduced. Next, the utility of recently developed inorganic nanomaterials in different combinations of gene therapy with each of chemo, immune, hyperthermal, and radio therapy is examined. Finally, current challenges in the clinical translation of inorganic nanomaterial-mediated therapies are presented and outlooks for the field are provided.

Tumor Control Probability of Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

As part of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, tumor control probability (TCP) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) for brain metastases was modeled based on pooled dosimetric and clinical data from published English-language literature.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed-indexed studies published between January 1995 and September 2017 were used to evaluate dosimetric and clinical predictors of TCP after SRS or fSRS for brain metastases. Eligible studies had ≥10 patients and included detailed dose-fractionation data with corresponding ≥1-year local control (LC) data, typically evaluated as a >20% increase in diameter of the targeted lesion using the pre-SRS diameter as a reference.

RESULTS

Of 2951 potentially eligible manuscripts, 56 included sufficient dose-volume data for analyses. Accepting that necrosis and pseudoprogression can complicate the assessment of LC, for tumors ≤20 mm, single-fraction doses of 18 and 24 Gy corresponded with >85% and 95% 1-year LC rates, respectively. For tumors 21 to 30 mm, an 18 Gy single-fraction dose was associated with 75% LC. For tumors 31 to 40 mm, a 15 Gy single-fraction dose yielded ∼69% LC. For 3- to 5-fraction fSRS using doses in the range of 27 to 35 Gy, 80% 1-year LC has been achieved for tumors of 21 to 40 mm in diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

TCP for SRS and fSRS are presented. For small lesions ≤20 mm, single doses of ≈18 Gy appear generally associated with excellent rates of LC; for melanoma, higher doses seem warranted. For larger lesions >20 mm, local control rates appear to be ≈ 70% to 75% with usual doses of 15 to 18 Gy, and in this setting, fSRS regimens should be considered. Greater consistency in reporting of dosimetric and LC data is needed to facilitate future pooled analyses. As systemic and biologic therapies evolve, updated analyses will be needed to further assess the necessity, efficacy, and toxicity of SRS and fSRS.

Clinical and radiographic adverse events after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brainstem lesions: A dosimetric analysis

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the association between dosvolume relationships and adverse events in brainstem lesions treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS).

METHODS

Treatment plans were generated on BrainLab Elements and GammaPlan software. Dosimetric data were analyzed as continuous variables for patients who received GKRS to brain metastases or arteriovenous malformations (AVM) within or abutting the brainstem. Adverse events were classified as clinical and/or radiographic. Logistic and cox regression were used to assess the relationship between dosimetric variables and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients who underwent single fraction GKRS for brain metastases or AVM were retrospectively analyzed. Median age was 62 years (range: 12-92 years) and the median prescription dose was 18 Gy (range: 13-25 Gy). Median follow-up was 6months. Clinical and radiographic complications were seen in ten (16.4%) and 17 (27.9%) patients, respectively. On logistic regression, increasing D_05% was found to be associated with an increased probability of developing a clinical complication post-GKRS (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.01-1.39; p = 0.04). Furthermore, mean brainstem dose (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.05-1.94; p < 0.02), D_05% (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.18; p = 0.03), and D_95% (HR: 2.37; 95% CI: 0.99-5.67; p = 0.05) were associated with an increased hazard of experiencing post-GKRS complications over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing D_05% to the brainstem is associated with an increased risk of developing clinical complications. Clinicians may consider this parameter in addition to fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy when well-established dose constraints are not met in this patient population. Additional data are needed to further validate these findings.

Toxicity of Radiosurgery for Brainstem Metastases

BACKGROUND

Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective modality in the treatment of brainstem metastases (BSM), radiation-induced toxicity remains a critical concern. To better understand how severe or life-threatening toxicity is affected by the location of lesions treated in the brainstem, a review of all available studies reporting SRS treatment for BSM was performed.

METHODS

Twenty-nine retrospective studies investigating SRS for BSM were reviewed.

RESULTS

The rates of grade 3 or greater toxicity, based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, varied from 0 to 9.5% (mean 3.4 ± 2.9%). Overall, the median time to toxicity after SRS was 3 months, with 90% of toxicities occurring before 9 months. A total of 1243 cases had toxicity and location data available. Toxicity rates for lesions located in the medulla were 0.8% (1/131), compared with midbrain and pons, respectively, 2.8% (8/288) and 3.0% (24/811).

CONCLUSIONS

Current data suggest that brainstem substructure location does not predict for toxicity and lesion volume within this cohort with median tumor volumes 0.04-2.8 cc does not predict for toxicity.

Brainstem metastases treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery: the Indiana University Health experience

Brainstem metastases offer a unique challenge in cancer treatment, yet stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven to be an effective modality in treating these tumors. This report discusses the clinical outcomes of patients with brainstem metastases treated at Indiana University with Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery from 2008 to 2016. 19 brainstem metastases from 14 patients who had follow-up brain imaging were identified. Median tumor volume was 0.04 cc (range: 0.01–2.0 cc). Median prescribed dose was 17.5 Gy to the 50% isodose line (range: 14–22 Gy). Median survival after GK SRS treatment to brainstem lesion was 17.2 months (range: 2.8–45.6 months). The experience at Indiana University confirms the safety and efficacy of range of GK SRS prescription doses (14–22 Gy) to brainstem metastases.

Cancer Radiosensitizers

Radiotherapy (RT) is a mainstay treatment for many types of cancer, although it is still a large challenge to enhance radiation damage to tumor tissue and reduce side effects to healthy tissue. Radiosensitizers are promising agents that enhance injury to tumor tissue by accelerating DNA damage and producing free radicals. Several strategies have been exploited to develop highly effective and low-toxicity radiosensitizers. In this review, we highlight recent progress on radiosensitizers, including small molecules, macromolecules, and nanomaterials. First, small molecules are reviewed based on free radicals, pseudosubstrates, and other mechanisms. Second, nanomaterials, such as nanometallic materials, especially gold-based materials that have flexible surface engineering and favorable kinetic properties, have emerged as promising radiosensitizers. Finally, emerging macromolecules have shown significant advantages in RT because these molecules can be combined with biological therapy as well as drug delivery. Further research on the mechanisms of radioresistance and multidisciplinary approaches will accelerate the development of radiosensitizers.