Pharmacologic Treatment of Obesity in Reproductive Aged Women

Obesity: assessment and treatment across the care continuum

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a chronic condition of dysregulated energy balance that is caused by a confluence of nutritional, neurological, hormonal and metabolic factors. Clinically, obesity is associated with myriad consequences to overall health. Treatment should be based on a shared decision-making process between the patient and their professional team that considers the stage of the disease, wellness goals and desired lifestyle and can include a combination of behavioural and lifestyle interventions, pharmacological therapies and surgery. The chronic nature of obesity necessitates adjustments in treatment plans to match the evolving needs and goals of the patient over time, establishing a 'care continuum.'

METHODS

We conducted a broad, narrative literature search using PubMed for articles published on the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of adults with obesity.

RESULTS

In this narrative literature review, we outline evidence-based best practices for the diagnosis and assessment of obesity along with the various available treatment modalities. We also present considerations for treating patients with obesity with a focus on the selection of obesity medications based on severity, concurrent conditions, mechanisms of action and treatment goals. Finally, we discuss lifestyle management, the shift from weight loss to weight maintenance, and the implications of these changes in the care continuum.

CONCLUSION

Continued, individualized treatment of patients with obesity from diagnosis to weight maintenance is imperative for sustained weight reductions, and strategies should be tailored to the changing needs of patients over time.

Smoking, Obesity, and Post-Cessation Weight Gain: Neurobiological Intersection and Treatment Recommendations

In the US, 28.8 million adults currently smoke cigarettes, and approximately 1.25 billion people use tobacco globally. Unfortunately, post-cessation weight gain is a substantial barrier to smoking cessation and sustained abstinence. Among people who smoke, 36% meet the body mass index (BMI) criteria for obesity and over 50% meet the waist circumference criteria for central obesity. Despite this, primary care providers currently have limited guidance on how to best treat their patients who want to quit smoking without post-cessation weight gain. There are common neurobiologic and endocrine dysregulations in nicotine dependence and weight gain. For example, nicotine dependence and obesity are both associated with dysregulation in hypothalamic neuropeptide systems and dopaminergic pathways. Medications for nicotine dependence act on dopaminergic pathways and hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) cells. Similarly, medications for obesity may increase dopamine and norepinephrine signaling and stimulate POMC activity. A unique medication, the fixed-dose extended-release combination of naltrexone and bupropion, supports both smoking cessation and weight loss by increasing dopamine and norepinephrine signaling and stimulating POMC-producing cells. This narrative review outlines neurobiologic mechanisms common to smoking and obesity and compares the effects of available pharmacotherapies on dopaminergic system and neuroendocrine dysregulation. Finally, this review outlines factors that primary care professionals should consider when treating people who want to stop smoking but are at risk of post-cessation weight gain.

Teratogenic risks of treated and untreated maternal obesity

Untreated obesity in pregnancy is associated with adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes that influence the long-term offspring health trajectory, propagating obesity and cardiometabolic disease from one generation to the next. The current efforts to reduce the risk of these negative outcomes through preconception weight loss remain largely ineffective. Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are an understudied option for this indication, likely due to the potential for teratogenicity with accidental exposure during pregnancy. However, the current recommendation to discontinue all AOMs prior to conception fails to frame obesity within the chronic disease paradigm typically used for preconception counseling. Evolving evidence suggests that glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), the newest and most effective AOM class, may be safe in early pregnancy. Although further research is needed, counseling about GLP-1 RAs during pregnancy should include the potential for both risk and benefit. This review summarizes the known risks that obesity in pregnancy poses to the offspring and discusses the benefits and limitations of current treatment strategies. While there remain several barriers to optimal preconception and prenatal care for people with obesity, this review aims to arm providers with the knowledge needed for patient-centered counseling prior to and during pregnancy.

The use of GLP-1: receptor agonist medications for benign gynecology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes research on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) medications and their relevance in the treatment of benign gynecologic conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

GLP-1 RA use is increasing in popularity in the USA, with expanding applications for gynecology. GLP-1 RA may improve weight loss, metabolic dysfunction, and menstrual regularity in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Side effects of these medications, including delayed gastric emptying, impact perioperative management, and the efficacy of oral contraception for patients on tirzepatide. Research is ongoing for their use in infertility and endometrial hyperplasia treatment. Recent studies showed a higher spontaneous conception rate and pregnancy rate with combined GLP-1 RA and metformin therapy when taken before IVF. Further studies are needed to establish recommendations for GLP-1 RA medication use in treating gynecologic conditions.

SUMMARY

With obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease on the rise in the USA, the use of GLP-1 RA medication is also increasing. GLP-1 RAs are currently indicated for the treatment of diabetes with cardiovascular disease to improve glycemic control, in addition to weight loss management. Gynecologists must consider the implications of GLP-1 RA medication in treating metabolic disorders, such as PCOS, contraceptive management, perioperative care, and potential impacts on infertility and endometrial hyperplasia.

Semaglutide as a GLP-1 Agonist: A Breakthrough in Obesity Treatment

This review addresses the role of semaglutide (SMG), a GLP-1 receptor agonist, in the treatment of obesity and its related comorbidities. Originally developed for type 2 diabetes (DM2), SMG has shown significant efficacy in weight reduction, with superior results compared to other treatments in the same class. Its effects include appetite suppression, increased satiety, and improvements in cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic parameters. Studies such as SUSTAIN, PIONEER, and STEP highlight its superiority compared to other GLP-1 receptor agonists and anti-obesity drugs. The oral formulation showed promising initial results, with higher doses (50 mg) showing weight losses comparable to those of subcutaneous administration. Despite its benefits, there are challenges, such as weight regain after cessation of treatment, gastrointestinal adverse effects, and variability of response. Future studies should explore strategies to mitigate these effects, identify predictive factors of efficacy, and expand therapeutic indications to other conditions related to obesity and insulin resistance. The constant innovation in this class of drugs reinforces the potential of SMG to transform treatment protocols for chronic weight-related diseases.

Pathophysiology of Maternal Obesity and Hypertension in Pregnancy

Obesity is one of the biggest health problems in the 21st century and the leading health disorder amongst women of fertile age. Maternal obesity is associated with several adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. In this group of women, the risk for the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), such as gestational hypertension (GH) and pre-eclampsia (PE), is increased. In fact, there is a linear association between an increase in pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and PE. Excessive weight gain during pregnancy is also related to the development of PE and GH. The role of obesity in the pathophysiology of HDP is complex and is most likely due to an interaction between several factors that cause a state of poor maternal cardiometabolic health. Adipokines seem to have a central role in HDP development, especially for PE. Hypoadiponectinemia, hyperleptinemia, insulin resistance (IR), and a proinflammatory state are metabolic disturbances related to PE pathogenesis, contributing to its development by inducing a state of maternal endothelial dysfunction. Hypertriglyceridemia is suggested to also be a part of the disease mechanisms of HDP. Therefore, this review seeks to explore the scientific literature to assess the complications of maternal obesity and its association with the development of HDP.

What is the evidence regarding the safety of new obesity pharmacotherapies

The use of gut-hormone receptors agonists as new therapeutic options for obesity and some of its related comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes, has resulted in an unprecedented efficacy in the medical management of people living with obesity (PLWO). Appraisal of the safety of these drugs is of utmost importance considering the large number of PLWO, and the potentially long exposure to these pharmacotherapies. In this narrative review we summarize the evidence on the safety of liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide as derived from randomized clinical trials conducted in adults living with obesity. Additionally, the safety of these drugs is put into perspective with that of other drugs currently approved for the treatment of PLWO. Overall, the available data support a favorable efficacy versus safety balance for gut-hormone hormone receptor analogues in the treatment of these subjects. Nonetheless, it should be acknowledged that in the context of a chronic disease that has reached epidemic proportions, data from randomized clinical trials aimed primarily at proving the efficacy of these drugs may have been insufficient to unveil all the safety issues. Thus, continuous surveillance on the adverse effects of liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide is required as we use these drugs in a broader population than that represented in currently available clinical trials.

Nutrient-Stimulating Hormone-Based Therapies for Obesity

Obesity is a chronic disease with an increasing worldwide prevalence. Improving obesity is of paramount importance given its association with conditions such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer among others. In the last decade, a new class of highly efficacious medications called nutrient-stimulating hormone (NuSH) therapies has emerged. This article highlights the effectiveness of the FDA-approved NuSH-based therapies-liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide-in long-term weight management. Ongoing trials are exploring novel mechanisms of action to simultaneously target multiple receptors involved in appetite and energy regulation, promising further advancements and additional treatment options in the field of obesity management.

Role of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in People With Infertility and Pregnancy

Obesity is a chronic condition that causes significant morbidity and mortality in people in the United States and around the world. Traditional means of weight loss include diet, exercise, behavioral modifications, and surgery. New weight loss medications, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, are revolutionizing the management of weight loss but have implications for fertility and pregnancy. Obesity is associated with infertility and may affect response to ovulation induction medications. In pregnancy, obesity increases the risks of spontaneous abortion, birth defects, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, and stillbirth. Lifestyle changes alone for weight loss have not improved outcomes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and new medications targeting gut hormones can help people achieve their weight loss goals but are contraindicated in pregnancy. Obstetrician-gynecologists should work with patients to manage these medications before they become pregnant, between pregnancies, and after delivery.

Medical therapy to treat obesity and optimize fertility in women of reproductive age: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Overweight and obesity-chronic illnesses in which an increase in body fat promotes adipose tissue dysfunction and abnormal fat mass resulting in adverse metabolic, biomechanical, and psychosocial health consequences-negatively impact female fertility. Adverse conception outcomes are multifactorial, ranging from poor oocyte quality and implantation issues to miscarriages and fetal health issues. However, with the advent of novel pharmacologic agents, significant weight loss can be achieved, improving the chances of healthy pregnancies, and their use should be considered during periconceptual counseling. There are currently 6 FDA-approved medications for weight loss: 2 GLP1-receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) liraglutide and semaglutide, 1 dual GLP-1 and gastric inhibitory peptide agonist (GLP1-GIP) tirzepatide, Contrave (naltrexone/bupropion), Qsymia (phentermine/Topamax), and Xenical (orlistat). GLP1-RAs reduce food cravings, appetite, and "food noise" and improve insulin sensitivity and satiety, all of which lead to significant weight loss, ranging from 6 to 30% of starting total body weight or greater, depending on the specific agent used. Their efficacy and relative safety should make them first-line options for women seeking to lose weight in the year before trying to conceive. Contrave, the combination of naltrexone and bupropion, seems to work most significantly for weight loss by inhibiting the rewarding and reinforcing effects of food consumption. Clinical trials report ~ 6% loss of starting total body weight with use of Contrave, as well as improvement in metabolic health factors. It may also improve a woman's ability to conceive by mitigating the effects of PCOS and endometriosis and reducing the drive for alcohol and smoking. Qsymia, the combination of phentermine and topiramate, results in more weight loss than Contrave but cannot be used in the acute preconception period, as its topiramate component is a known teratogen. Orlistat is another FDA-approved medication for weight loss; however, it is currently used much less often than other anti-obesity drugs because of its relatively lower efficacy and significant side effects. Bariatric surgery, which can lead to significant weight loss (25-50%), was previously regarded as the most durable method for weight loss, before the advent of GLP1-RAs. Given the inherent risks of surgery, the development of vitamin (i.e. B12, folate, vitamin D) and mineral (i.e. iron, copper, zinc) deficiencies, that may impact the health of the mother and fetus, as well as the recommended delay of 1-2 years prior to attempting pregnancy, bariatric surgery should not be considered first-line therapy for obesity management in women of reproductive age, especially for women who are hoping to conceive quickly or are nearing advanced maternal age.

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant and meaningful weight loss is achievable with pharmacotherapy to help enhance fertility in women of reproductive age who are overweight or obese. Current research supports the use of weight loss medications for enhancing spontaneous conception and response to ovulation induction. Further research on the effects upon live birth rates are warranted. For meaningful weight loss, GLP1-RAs can be considered for use in the preconception period, as long as they are stopped at least 2 months before conception. Contrave can be considered as well, though resulting in less weight loss. Phentermine and Qsymia are teratogenic but can be used with contraception for weight loss before trying to get pregnant.

Recruitment and retention of participants with obesity into a longitudinal birth cohort: the Breastfeeding and Early Child Health (BEACH) study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to evaluate how maternal pre-pregnant body mass index (BMI) impacts participant recruitment and retention.

METHODS

Participants were enrolled in a longitudinal study between 30 and 36 weeks of pregnancy as having normal weight (pre-pregnant BMI ≥ 18.5 and <25 kg/m2) or obesity (pre-pregnant BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2). Recruitment channels included Facebook, email, newspaper, phone calls, radio advertisements, flyers, and word-of-mouth. The stages of recruitment included eligibility, consent, and completion. Pearson's chi-square tests were used to evaluate the relationship between BMI and enrollment outcomes.

RESULTS

Recruitment yielded 2770 total prospective participants. After screening, 141 individuals were eligible, 83 consented, and 60 completed the study. Facebook was the most successful method for identifying eligible pregnant patients with obesity, while a higher percentage of participants recruited through word-of-mouth and flyers consented to the study. Pre-pregnant BMI was significantly associated with the stage of recruitment completed by the participant (p = 0.04), whereby individuals eligible for the study with obesity were less likely to consent and complete study visits.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that maternal obesity was significantly associated with enrollment outcomes in a longitudinal birth cohort study. This study showed that pre-pregnancy BMI influenced study participation. Therefore, tailored recruitment strategies to enhance the recruitment and enrollment of individuals with obesity in maternal-infant health research may be necessary.

What is known about the use of weight loss medication in women with overweight/obesity on fertility and reproductive health outcomes? A scoping review

Pregnancy during or soon after treatment with weight loss medication, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), is contraindicated due to potential teratogenicity. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate what is known about the use of weight loss medication in women of childbearing age in relation to reproductive health outcomes, focusing on the three medications licenced in the United Kingdom at the time of the search. A systematic search of studies that assessed reproductive health outcomes in women taking either orlistat, liraglutide or semaglutide was undertaken in July 2023 and updated in January 2024 across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, PROSPERO, Epistemonikos and OpenGrey. Studies focused on polycystic ovarian syndrome, diabetes or animals were excluded. Titles and abstracts were screened, and data from included articles were extracted. After removal of duplicates, 341 titles remained, of which 318 were excluded. Of the final 18 articles included, there were five interventional trials, one retrospective case-control study, six narrative reviews, two systematic reviews, three systematic review protocols and one registry protocol yet to start recruitment. All five interventional trials involved orlistat given preconceptionally, showing no improvement in live birth rate, despite improvement in reproductive hormone levels. There were no studies with primary data about GLP-1 RAs. There were no qualitative studies. There is an absence of primary data about the role of GLP-1 RAs on the reproductive health of women of childbearing age without polycystic ovarian syndrome. Future research should explore short- and long-term effects on reproductive health, pregnancy outcomes and experiences.

Position statement of Italian Society of Obesity (SIO): Gestational Obesity

PURPOSE

Gestational obesity (GO) presents a multifaceted challenge to maternal and fetal health, with an escalating prevalence and far-reaching consequences extending beyond pregnancy. This perspective statement by the Italian Society of Obesity (SIO) provides current insights into the diagnosis, maternal and fetal impacts, and treatment strategies for managing this pressing condition.

METHODS

This article provides a comprehensive review of the maternal and fetal effects of GO and provides suggestions on strategies for management. Comprehensive review was carried out using the MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of GO primarily relies on pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), although standardized criteria remain contentious. Anthropometric measures and body composition assessments offer valuable insights into the metabolic implications of GO. Women with GO are predisposed to several health complications, which are attributed to mechanisms such as inflammation and insulin resistance. Offspring of women with GO face heightened risks of perinatal complications and long-term metabolic disorders, indicating intergenerational transmission of obesity-related effects. While nutritional interventions are a cornerstone of management, their efficacy in mitigating complications warrants further investigation. Additionally, while pharmacological interventions have been explored in other contexts, evidence on their safety and efficacy specifically for GO remains lacking, necessitating further investigation.

CONCLUSION

GO significantly impacts maternal and fetal health, contributing to both immediate and long-term complications. Effective management requires a multifaceted approach, including precise diagnostic criteria, personalized nutritional interventions, and potential pharmacological treatments. These findings underscore the need for individualized care strategies and further research to optimize outcomes for mothers and their offspring are needed. Enhanced understanding and management of GO can help mitigate its intergenerational effects, improving public health outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V narrative review.

Treating obesity and fertility in the era of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists

The objective of this narrative review is to advocate for improved comprehensive care of patients with obesity and infertility. Persons with an increased body mass index have less successful reproductive outcomes, and recently, new medications to treat neuroendocrine hormone imbalances are producing meaningful weight loss akin to surgical interventions. For the first time, obesity is publicly being recognized as a disease. These medications contain the newest generation of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and deserve our attention for several reasons: regardless of body mass index, many patients will be using them; it is necessary to understand the mode of action, side effects, and implications for anesthetic procedures and pregnancy; and it is important to evaluate when they could be used to improve health outcomes and/or access to fertility care.

Effectiveness of preconception weight loss interventions on fertility in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Weight loss before conception is recommended for women with overweight or obesity to improve fertility outcomes, but evidence supporting this recommendation is mixed.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of weight loss interventions using lifestyle modification and/or medication in women with overweight or obesity on pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage.

DATA SOURCES

An electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature was conducted through July 6, 2022, via Wiley.

STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS

Randomized controlled trials examining weight loss interventions through lifestyle and/or medication in women with overweight or obesity planning pregnancy were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, reporting the risk ratio (RR) for each outcome. Subgroup analyses were conducted by intervention type, type of control group, fertility treatment, intervention length, and body mass index (BMI).

MAIN OUTCOME(S)

Clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage events.

RESULT(S)

A narrative review and meta-analysis were possible for 16 studies for pregnancy (n = 3,588), 13 for live birth (n = 3,329), and 11 for miscarriage (n = 3,248). Women randomized and exposed to a weight loss intervention were more likely to become pregnant (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.07-1.44; I2 = 59%) but not to have live birth (RR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.97-1.45; I2 = 69%) or miscarriage (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.79-1.74; I2 = 31%) compared with women in control groups. Subgroup analyses revealed women randomized to weight loss interventions lasting 12 weeks or fewer (n = 9, RR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.13-1.83) and women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (n = 7, RR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.18-2.02) were more likely to become pregnant compared with women in the control groups. Miscarriage was higher in intervention groups who underwent fertility treatment (n = 8, RR 1.45; 95% CI 1.07-1.96).

CONCLUSION(S)

Pregnancy rates were higher in women undergoing preconception weight loss interventions with no impact on live birth or miscarriage rates. Findings do not support one-size-fits-all recommendation for weight loss through lifestyle modification and/or medication in women with overweight or obesity immediately before conception to improve live birth or miscarriage outcomes.

Updates in Medical and Surgical Weight Loss

The number of individuals with obesity is at an all-time high, and the rate of obesity continues to climb each year. Obesity is a chronic disease with widespread effects throughout the body. Midwives and perinatal care providers need an understanding of the etiology, pathophysiology, and interventions for obesity. A review of evidence-based diet and lifestyle modifications, medications, and surgical procedures is presented.

Insulin-sensitizing agents for infertility treatment in woman with polycystic ovary syndrome: a narrative review of current clinical practice

PURPOSE

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine, metabolic, and reproductive disorder which, according to the Rotterdam criteria, affects up to 24% of women of childbearing age. Although the prevalence of infertility in this subpopulation of women is high, the optimal treatment has not been fully established yet. Insulin resistance is considered to be an important mechanism involved in the development of PCOS; hence, the aim of this narrative review is to present an overview of the current pharmacological insulin-sensitizing treatment modalities for infertile women with PCOS.

METHODS

A MEDLINE and PubMed search for the years 1990-2023 was performed using a combination of keywords. Clinical trials with insulin sensitizers used for infertility treatment as well as analyses of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were evaluated. When deemed necessary, additional articles referenced in the retrieved papers were included in this narrative review.

RESULTS

Several insulin-sensitizing compounds and various therapeutical protocols are available for infertility treatment of women with PCOS. Metformin is the most common adjuvant medication to induce ovulation in infertile women with PCOS and is more frequently administered in combination with clomiphene citrate than on its own. Recently, inositol and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have emerged as possible options for infertility treatment in PCOS.

CONCLUSION

The future of medical treatment of PCOS women with infertility lies in a personalized pharmacological approach, which involves various compounds with different mechanisms of action that could modify ovarian function and endometrial receptivity, ultimately leading to better overall reproductive outcomes in these women.

Infertility Improvement after Medical Weight Loss in Women and Men: A Review of the Literature

Infertility is a modern health problem. Obesity is another expanding health issue associated with chronic diseases among which infertility is also included. This review will focus on the effects of weight loss by medical therapy on fertility regarding reproductive hormonal profile, ovulation rates, time to pregnancy, implantation rates, pregnancy rates, normal embryo development, and live birth rates. We comprised medicine already used for weight loss, such as orlistat and metformin, and emerging medical treatments, such as Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). Their use is not recommended during a planned pregnancy, and they should be discontinued in such cases. The main outcomes of this literature review are the following: modest weight loss after medication and the duration of the treatment are important factors for fertility improvement. The fecundity outcomes upon which medical-induced weight loss provides significant results are the female reproductive hormonal profile, menstrual cyclicity, ovulation and conception rates, and pregnancy rates. Regarding the male reproductive system, the fertility outcomes that feature significant alterations after medically induced weight loss are as follows: the male reproductive hormonal profile, sperm motility, movement and morphology, weight of reproductive organs, and sexual function. The newer promising GLP-1 RAs show expectations regarding fertility improvement, as they have evidenced encouraging effects on improving ovulation rates and regulating the menstrual cycle. However, more human studies are needed to confirm this. Future research should aim to provide answers about whether medical weight loss therapies affect fertility indirectly through weight loss or by a possible direct action on the reproductive system.

Metabolic hormones are integral regulators of female reproductive health and function

The female reproductive system is strongly influenced by nutrition and energy balance. It is well known that food restriction or energy depletion can induce suppression of reproductive processes, while overnutrition is associated with reproductive dysfunction. However, the intricate mechanisms through which nutritional inputs and metabolic health are integrated into the coordination of reproduction are still being defined. In this review, we describe evidence for essential contributions by hormones that are responsive to food intake or fuel stores. Key metabolic hormones-including insulin, the incretins (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1), growth hormone, ghrelin, leptin, and adiponectin-signal throughout the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis to support or suppress reproduction. We synthesize current knowledge on how these multifaceted hormones interact with the brain, pituitary, and ovaries to regulate functioning of the female reproductive system, incorporating in vitro and in vivo data from animal models and humans. Metabolic hormones are involved in orchestrating reproductive processes in healthy states, but some also play a significant role in the pathophysiology or treatment strategies of female reproductive disorders. Further understanding of the complex interrelationships between metabolic health and female reproductive function has important implications for improving women's health overall.

High pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain among women belonging to upper SES from Delhi, India

Background and objective

With increase in prevalence of obesity and an increasing trend in the birth of macrosomic infants, Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines pertaining to optimal gestational weight gain (GWG) required for positive pregnancy outcome were revised in 1990 and 2009. Since, in the Indian scenario, no recommendations exist for optimum GWG for obese (OB) and overweight (OW) women, we assessed the pattern of GWG w.r.t Institute of Medicine (IOM), 2009 among the subjects with different body mass index (BMI).

Study design

Present data were a part of a longitudinal observational study wherein, 312 pregnant women (≤12th week of gestation) attending private antenatal clinics were followed till term and their weight was monitored regularly at pre-determined intervals i.e., 12th-14th, 18th-20th, 24th-26th, 30th-32nd, 36th + week of gestation and compared w.r.t IOM guidelines 2009.

Results

66.37 %, 57.89 % and 11.69 % of OB, OW and normal weight (NW) subjects respectively had weight gain exceeding their GWG limits. About 5 %,10.53 %, 33.77 % of OB, OW and NW subjects respectively had gained weight less than GWG limits (p = 0.000***).

Conclusion

An increase in GWG inadequacy with increase in BMI and pronounced variations in GWG among OB and OW subjects underscore the necessity to monitor GWG especially among the subjects with high BMI.