Giant frontal mucocele complicated by subdural empyema: treatment of a rare association

Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Intracranial Complications of Paranasal Sinus Disease: A Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Intracranial extension of frontal or ethmoid sinusitis carries a high morbidity and mortality if not treated aggressively. With the emergence of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), we questioned whether these approaches have supplanted traditional transcranial procedures for intracranial extension of sinus disease, and whether ESS approaches had a difference in patient outcomes.

METHODS

Studies reporting surgical management and outcomes of frontal sinus disease with intracranial extension were queried using the United States National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health PubMed database. We also queried common internet search engines. We included studies regarding sinogenic intracranial suppurative infections treated surgically with ESS and neurosurgical approaches. Studies with insufficient data regarding specific treatment methods and studies that included populations of medically treated infections were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 108 cases were identified in which patients with intracranial sinogenic disease were treated via ESS alone (morbidity: 43.5%, mortality: 0.9%), 47 cases via transcranial intervention alone (morbidity: 33.2%, mortality: 7.8%), and 43 cases via simultaneous neurosurgical and ESS approaches (morbidity: 16.3%, mortality: 6.4%). Complex sinus disease with posterior table compromise in the absence of intracranial extension treated via ESS alone was reported in 164 cases with a morbidity and mortality of 3.8% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined ESS and transcranial approaches achieve definitive control of sinogenic and intracranial disease, whereas either modality alone carries a potential risk for higher morbidity and mortality. The use of ESS alone may have use in the treatment of sinusitis with posterior table erosion prior to intracranial extension.

Never say never again: A bone graft infection due to a hornet sting, thirty-nine years after cranioplasty

Background:

Cranioplasty (CP) is a widespread surgical procedure aimed to restore skull integrity and physiological cerebral hemodynamics, to improve neurological functions and to protect the underlying brain after a life-saving decompressive craniectomy (DC). Nevertheless, CP is still burdened by surgical complications, among which early or late graft infections are the most common outcome-threatening ones.

Case Description:

We report the case of 48-year-old man admitted to our neurosurgical unit because of a painful right frontal swelling and 1-week purulent discharge from a cutaneous fistula. He had been undergone frontal CP because of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) when he was 9-year-old. Since then, his medical history has been being unremarkable without any surgical or infective complication of the graft for 39 years, until he was accidentally stung by a hornet in the frontal region. After the CT scan and laboratory findings had evidenced a probable infection of the graft, the patient was treated by vancomycin and cefepime before he underwent surgical revision of its former CP, with the removal of the graft and the debridement of the surgical field. Subsequent bacteriological tests revealed Staphylococcus aureus as causal agent of that infection.

Conclusion:

This case illustrates an anecdotal example of very late CP infection, due to an unpredictable accident. Due to lack of consensus on risk factors and on conservative or surgical strategy in case of graft infection, we aimed to share our surgical experience.

Considerations in the management of giant frontal mucoceles with significant intracranial extension: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Giant frontal mucoceles, characterized by significant intracranial and/or intraorbital extension, can present with significant neurologic symptoms. Although typical mucoceles are managed endoscopically, giant mucoceles are often treated with an open or combined approach due to various concerns, including frontal lobe displacement, size, and rapid decompression of the intracranial component. The impact of significant intracranial extension on outcomes is not well described.

OBJECTIVE

This review studied key neurologic considerations in the management of giant frontal sinus mucoceles and analyzed outcomes of different management strategies.

METHODS

Systematic literature review by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles, which represented 85 cases, met inclusion criteria. Neurologic symptoms on presentation ranged from headache (24.7%) and vision loss (12.9%) to extremity weakness (1.2%), frontal lobe syndrome (2.4%), and seizures (4.7%). Twenty-eight patients were treated endoscopically (34.1%), and 54 (65.9%) were treated with an external approach. Twenty-five of the open procedures included a craniotomy. Indications for the open approach included subdural empyema, enucleation, or large anterior table defects. Perioperative antibiotics were not consistently used. No perioperative seizures were reported with any approach. There were six cerebrospinal fluid leaks, all in the patients who underwent open procedures. The overall recurrence rate was 3.5%, with no recurrences reported in patients treated with an open approach. Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Giant frontal mucoceles often present with various neurologic symptoms. Both open and endoscopic techniques offer excellent results. Endoscopic management is effective and preferred, except in special circumstances. An interdisciplinary team approach should be used to optimize surgical planning.

Decompressive craniectomy in acute brain injury

Decompressive surgery to reduce pressure under the skull varies from a burrhole, bone flap to removal of a large skull segment. Decompressive craniectomy is the removal of a large enough segment of skull to reduce refractory intracranial pressure and to maintain cerebral compliance for the purpose of preventing neurologic deterioration. Decompressive hemicraniectomy and bifrontal craniectomy are the most commonly performed procedures. Bifrontal craniectomy is most often utilized with generalized cerebral edema in the absence of a focal mass lesion and when there are bilateral frontal contusions. Decompressive hemicraniectomy is most commonly considered for malignant middle cerebral artery infarcts. The ethical predicament of deciding to go ahead with a major neurosurgical procedure with the purpose of avoiding brain death from displacement, but resulting in prolonged severe disability in many, are addressed. This chapter describes indications, surgical techniques, and complications. It reviews results of recent clinical trials and provides a reasonable assessment for practice.

Frontal mucocele with intracranial extension causing frontal lobe syndrome

PURPOSE

Mucoceles are mucus-containing cysts that form in paranasal sinuses; although mucoceles themselves are benign, this case report highlights the extensive damage they can cause as their expansion may lead to bony erosion and extension of the mucocele into the orbit and cranium; it also presents a rarely reported instance of frontal sinus mucocele leading to frontal lobe syndrome. A thorough discussion and review of mucoceles is included.

CASE REPORT

A 68-year-old white man presented with intermittent diplopia and a pressure sensation in the right eye. He had a history of chronic sinusitis and had had endoscopic sinus surgery 5 years prior. A maxillofacial computed tomography scan revealed a large right frontal sinus mucocele, which had caused erosion along the medial wall of the right orbit and the outer and inner tables of the right frontal sinus. The mucocele had protruded both into the right orbit and intracranially, causing mass effect on the frontal lobe, which led to frontal lobe syndrome. The patient was successfully treated with endoscopic right ethmoidectomy, radial frontal sinusotomy, marsupialization of the mucocele, and transcutaneous irrigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Paranasal sinus mucoceles may expand and lead to bony erosion and can become very invasive in surrounding structures such as the orbit and cranium. This case not only exhibits a very rare presentation of frontal sinus mucocele with intracranial extension and frontal lobe mass effect causing a frontal lobe syndrome but also demonstrates many of the ocular and visual complications commonly associated with paranasal sinus mucoceles. Early identification and surgical intervention is vital for preventing and reducing morbidity associated with invasive mucoceles, and the patient must be followed regularly to monitor for recurrence.